David T. Patterson
Duke University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David T. Patterson.
Archive | 1984
Nasser Sionit; David T. Patterson
SummaryThe growth and photosynethetic responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment of 4 species of C4 grasses grown at two levels of irradiance were studied. We sought to determine whether CO2 enrichment would yield proportionally greater growth enhancement in the C4 grasses when they were grown at low irradiance than when grown at high irradiance. The species studied were Echinochloa crusgalli, Digitaria sanguinalis, Eleusine indica, and Setaria faberi. Plants were grown in controlled environment chambers at 350, 675 and 1,000 μl 1-1 CO2 and 1,000 or 150 μmol m-2 s-1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). An increase in CO2 concentration and PPFD significantly affected net photosynthesis and total biomass production of all plants. Plants grown at low PPFD had significantly lower rates of photosynthesis, produced less biomass, and had reduced responses to increases in CO2. Plants grown in CO2-enriched atmosphere had lower photosynthetic capacity relative to the low CO2 grown plants when exposed to lower CO2 concentration at the time of measurement, but had greater rate of photosynthesis when exposed to increasing PPFD. The light level under which the plants were growing did not influence the CO2 compensation point for photosynthesis.
Botanical Gazette | 1977
C. David Raper; Lawrence R. Parsons; David T. Patterson; Paul J. Kramer
Experiments were conducted to determine whether the nitrogen absorption function of the roots is directly related to the photosynthate supplying function of the leaves under steady-state conditions during vegetative growth phase of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) and soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill) plants. A direct relationship between these two functions would imply a balanced interdependence and contradict the views that growth of all plant parts is dependent on carbohydrate supplied by the leaves and that nitrogen uptake is dependent only on existing root and soil characteristics. Plants were grown under both artificial light in CERs and natural light in air-conditioned greenhouses, at three thermoperiods, and with three levels of nutrient supply. The data show that RGRR and RARNP were not significantly different within thermoperiod or nutrient supply and agree with those obtained in a previous experiment with tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) The results suggest that plant growth models should be based on the balanced interdependence of the nitrogen absorption and photosynthate supplying functions
Plant and Soil | 1977
C. David Raper; David T. Patterson; Lawrence R. Parsons; Paul J. Kramer
SummaryTobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum L.) were grown from transplanting until floral expression in the phytotron units of Southeastern Plant Environment Laboratories to evaluate the relationship between relative growth rate (RGR) and relative accumulation rates (RAR) of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg. RAR is calculated to be analogous to RGR. Plants were grown in both controlled-environment rooms with artificial light and air-conditioned greenhouses with natural light at three temperature conditions and three application rates of N-P-K. RGR and RAR were calculated only for the period of grand growth which occurred within the interval from 7 to 32 days after transplanting.In general, neither RGR nor RAR were affected by temperature or nutrient level. However, both temperature and nutrient level affected dry matter accumulation of the plants apparently by an influence on the rapidity with which plants adjusted to their new environment during the initial 7-day interval after transplanting. RAR for P and K were coequal with RGR of the whole plant; thus, the concentrations of P and K within the plant tended to remain constant during growth. RAR for N, Ca, and Mg were less than RGR for the whole plant; thus, internal concentrations of these nutrients declined during growth. RAR of N, Ca, and Mg for the whole plant were equivalent to RGR of the roots. As a rationale for the association of RGR of roots and RAR of N, it is proposed that the soluble carbohydrate pool in the roots concurrently influences both N absorption, as NO3-, and growth of new roots of immature plants.
Field Crops Research | 1987
N. Sionit; David T. Patterson; R.D. Coffin; D.A. Mortenson
Abstract The relative sensitivity to water stress at different growth stages of goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertner) was investigated by measuring water status and growth of groups of plants stressed during the vegetative stage, the reproductive stage, and during both stages. Plants were grown from seed in large pots in a controlled-environment chamber at 29/23°C and 14-h photoperiod. In all treatments, decreasing leaf water-potential was correlated with decreasing osmotic and pressure potentials. Plants stressed during the flowering stage maintained greater pressure potentials at any leaf water-potential than plants stressed during vegetative growth or stressed twice. Prestressing the plants did not induce lower leaf osmotic potentials at full turgor. However, dehydration was the main cause of low osmotic potentials measured in the leaves of the plants stressed twice. Stomatal closure occurred over a relatively large range of leaf water-potentials. The sensitivity of stomata to water stress in this species was fairly similar in the two growth stages studied. Leaves of plants stressed during the flowering stage had a smaller decline in total biomass during the stress period, and a higher rate of growth after rewatering, compared to the plants that received a stress during vegetative growth and flowering or were stressed during vegetative growth.
Impact of Carbon Dioxide, Trace Gases, and Climate Change on Global Agriculture | 1990
David T. Patterson; Elizabeth P. Flint
Archive | 1984
David T. Patterson; Elizabeth P. Flint; Jan L. Beyers
Oecologia | 1984
Nasser Sionit; David T. Patterson
Crop Science | 1985
Nasser Sionit; David T. Patterson
Oecologia | 1984
Nasser Sionit; David T. Patterson
Weed science (USA) | 1986
David T. Patterson; Ann E. Russell; David A. Mortensen; Robert D. Coffin; Elizabeth P. Flint