Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David T. Tzou is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David T. Tzou.


Journal of Endourology | 2017

A Prospective Case–Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes

Manint Usawachintachit; Dylan Isaacson; Kazumi Taguchi; David T. Tzou; Ryan S. Hsi; Benjamin A. Sherer; Marshall L. Stoller; Thomas Chi

OBJECTIVE LithoVue™ is a novel, single-use, digital flexible ureteroscope that was released to the US market in January 2016. There are scant data regarding its performance in humans. Procedural outcomes comparing LithoVue with reusable ureteroscopes are presented in patients undergoing ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract pathology. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical outcomes between two groups of patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract pathology were analyzed. The first group underwent surgery utilizing LithoVue, and the second group used reusable fiber-optic flexible ureteroscopes. Differences in procedural outcomes, operative times, and time spent in hospital were analyzed using two-tailed t-tests and chi-squared and Fishers exact tests. RESULTS One hundred fifteen cases utilizing LithoVue and 65 cases utilizing reusable ureteroscopes were included in this study. Demographics, surgical indications, stone size, location, total stone burden, composition, procedural outcomes, and complications were comparable between groups. For all cases, LithoVue procedures lasted 54.1 ± 25.7 minutes compared with 64.5 ± 37.0 minutes for reusable scope procedures (p < 0.05) and for stone removal cases, 57.3 ± 25.1 vs 70.3 ± 36.9 minutes, respectively (p < 0.05). Scope failure occurred in 4.4% of LithoVue cases and 7.7% of reusable cases (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS LithoVue represents a feasible alternative to reusable ureteroscopes with a low rate of scope failure comparable with reusable ureteroscopes. Its use shortens procedure duration, a finding that warrants further investigation.


The Journal of Urology | 2017

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound as a Radiation-Free Alternative to Fluoroscopic Nephrostogram for Evaluating Ureteral Patency

Thomas Chi; Manint Usawachintachit; Stefanie Weinstein; Maureen P. Kohi; Andrew G. Taylor; David T. Tzou; Helena C. Chang; Marshall L. Stoller; John Mongan

Purpose: We compared contrast enhanced ultrasound and fluoroscopic nephrostography in the evaluation of ureteral patency following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort, noninferiority study was performed after obtaining institutional review board approval. We enrolled eligible patients with kidney and proximal ureteral stones who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy at our center. On postoperative day 1 patients received contrast enhanced ultrasound and fluoroscopic nephrostogram within 2 hours of each other to evaluate ureteral patency, which was the primary outcome of this study. Results: A total of 92 pairs of imaging studies were performed in 82 patients during the study period. Five study pairs were excluded due to technical errors that prevented imaging interpretation. Females slightly predominated over males with a mean ± SD age of 50.5 ± 15.9 years and a mean body mass index of 29.6 ± 8.6 kg/m2. Of the remaining 87 sets of studies 69 (79.3%) demonstrated concordant findings regarding ureteral patency for the 2 imaging techniques and 18 (20.7%) were discordant. The nephrostomy tube was removed on the same day in 15 of the 17 patients who demonstrated antegrade urine flow only on contrast enhanced ultrasound and they had no subsequent adverse events. No adverse events were noted related to ultrasound contrast injection. While contrast enhanced ultrasound used no ionizing radiation, fluoroscopic nephrostograms provided a mean radiation exposure dose of 2.8 ± 3.7 mGy. Conclusions: A contrast enhanced ultrasound nephrostogram can be safely performed to evaluate for ureteral patency following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This imaging technique was mostly concordant with fluoroscopic findings. Most discordance was likely attributable to the higher sensitivity for patency of contrast enhanced ultrasound compared to fluoroscopy.


International Journal of Surgery | 2016

Animal models of urinary stone disease

David T. Tzou; Kazumi Taguchi; Thomas Chi; Marshall L. Stoller

The etiology of stone disease remains unknown despite the major technological advances in the treatment of urinary calculi. Clinically, urologists have relied on 24-h urine collections for the last 30-40 years to help direct medical therapy in hopes of reducing stone recurrence; yet little progress has been made in preventing stone disease. As such, there is an urgent need to develop reliable animal models to study the pathogenesis of stone formation and to assess novel interventions. A variety of vertebrate and invertebrate models have been used to help understand stone pathogenesis. Genetic knockout and exogenous induction models are described. Surrogates for an endpoint of stone formation have been urinary crystals on histologic examination and/or urinalyses. Other models are able to actually develop true stones. It is through these animal models that real breakthroughs in the management of urinary stone disease will become a reality.


Urology | 2017

X-ray–free Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: How to Select the Right Patient?

Manint Usawachintachit; David T. Tzou; Weiguo Hu; Jianxing Li; Thomas Chi

OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with successful ultrasound guidance for each surgical step of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing PCNL between March 2015 and June 2016 were prospectively enrolled. An attempt was made to use ultrasound guidance in renal access, tract dilation, and nephrostomy tube placement for each patient. For steps during which ultrasound guidance was unsuccessful, fluoroscopic screening was applied. Regression analysis identified patient characteristics associated with successful use of ultrasound guidance. RESULTS A total of 96 patients composed this cohort, with a mean body mass index of 28.7 kg/m2. Mean stone size was 33.1 ± 18.9 mm, and no hydronephrosis was found in 63.5% of cases. Fluoroscopic screening was required for renal access in 27 cases (28.1%), tract dilation in 38 (39.6%), and nephrostomy tube placement in 80 (83.3%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that successful ultrasound guidance was significantly associated with the presence of hydronephrosis for renal access and the absence of staghorn calculi for tract dilation. Ultrasound-guided nephrostomy tube placement appeared linked to surgeon experience. CONCLUSION To achieve completely x-ray-free ultrasound-guided PCNL, the ideal patient should have a hydronephrotic collecting system with no staghorn stone present. For practitioners looking to adopt ultrasound guidance into their PCNL practice, these represent the most appropriate patients to safely initiate a surgical experience.


Journal of Endourology | 2018

Micro-costing analysis demonstrates comparable costs for LithoVue™ compared to reusable flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes

Kazumi Taguchi; Manint Usawachintachit; David T. Tzou; Benjamin A. Sherer; Ian Metzler; Dylan Isaacson; Marshall L. Stoller; Thomas Chi

INTRODUCTION Reusable ureteroscope durability and need for repair are significant sources of expense and inefficiency for patients and urologists. Utilization of LithoVue™, a disposable flexible digital ureteroscope, may address some of these concerns. To identify its economic impact on clinical care, we performed a micro-cost comparison between flexible reusable fiberoptic ureteroscopes (URF-P6™) and LithoVue. PATIENTS AND METHODS For this prospective, single-center micro-costing study, all consecutive ureteroscopies performed during 1 week each in July and August 2016 utilized either URF-P6 or LithoVue ureteroscopes respectively. Workflow data were collected, including intraoperative events, postoperative reprocessing cycle timing, consumables usage, and ureteroscope cost data. RESULTS Intraoperative data analysis showed mean total operating room time for URF-P6 and LithoVue cases were 93.4 ± 32.3 and 73.6 ± 17.4 minutes, respectively (p = 0.093). Mean cost of operating room usage per case was calculated at


Urology | 2017

Ultrasound Guidance Reduces Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Cost Compared to Fluoroscopy

Matthew Hudnall; Manint Usawachintachit; Ian Metzler; David T. Tzou; Brittany L. Harrison; Errol Lobo; Thomas Chi

1618.72 ± 441.39 for URF-P6 and


Urology | 2018

Increasing Body Mass Index Steepens the Learning Curve for Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

David Bayne; Manint Usawachintachit; David T. Tzou; Kazumi Taguchi; Alan W. Shindel; Thomas Chi

1348.64 ± 237.40 for LithoVue based on institutional cost rates exclusive of disposables. Postoperative data analysis revealed costs of


Urology | 2018

Management of Inverted Papilloma During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

David T. Tzou; Cathryn Cadwell; Jeffry Simko; Thomas Chi; Marshall L. Stoller

107.27 for labor and consumables during reprocessing for URF-P6 cases. The costs of ureteroscope repair and capital acquisition for each URF-P6 case were


Journal of endourology case reports | 2018

Ultrasound-Guided Morcellation During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

David T. Tzou; Ian Metzler; Marshall L. Stoller; Thomas Chi

957.71 and


The Journal of Urology | 2017

PD35-10 A PROSPECTIVE CASE COHORT STUDY DEMONSTRATES THAT LITHOVUETM, A SINGLE-USE FLEXIBLE DISPOSABLE URETEROSCOPE, REDUCES OPERATIVE TIME

Manint Usawachintachit; Dylan Isaacson; Kazumi Taguchi; David T. Tzou; Ryan S. Hsi; Benjamin A. Sherer; Marshall L. Stoller; Thomas Chi

116.02, respectively. The total ureteroscope cost per case for URF-P6 and LithoVue were

Collaboration


Dive into the David T. Tzou's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Chi

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin A. Sherer

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dylan Isaacson

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger L. Sur

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan S. Hsi

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian Duty

North Shore-LIJ Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian Metzler

University of California

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge