David Vancraeynest

Functional Anatomy of Aortic Regurgitation Accuracy, Prediction of Surgical Repairability, and Outcome Implications of Transesophageal Echocardiography

Background— For patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic valve sparing or repair surgery is an attractive alternative to valve replacement. In this setting, accurate preoperative delineation of aortic valve pathology and potential repairability is of paramount importance. The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of preoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in defining the mechanisms of AR, as identified by surgical inspection, and in predicting repairability, by using the final surgical approach as reference. Methods and Results— One hundred and sixty-three consecutive patients (117 males, mean age: 58±14 years) undergoing AR surgery were included. Mechanisms of AR were categorized by TEE and surgical inspection as follows: type 1, aortic dilatation; type 2, cusp prolapse; and type 3, restrictive cusp motion or endocarditis. At surgery, mechanisms of AR were type 1 in 41 patients, type 2 in 62, and type 3 in 60. Agreement between TEE and surgical inspection was 93% (&kgr;=0.90). Valve sparing or repair was performed in 125 patients and valve replacement in 38 patients. TEE correctly predicted the final surgical approach in 108/125 (86%) patients undergoing repair and in 35/38 (93%) patients undergoing replacement. The gross anatomic classification of AR lesions by TEE was determinant of valve repairability and postoperative outcome (4-year freedom from > grade 2 AR, reoperation, or death, P=0.04). Conclusions— TEE provides a highly accurate anatomic assessment of all types of AR lesions. In addition, the functional anatomy of AR defined by TEE is strongly and independently predictive of valve repairability and postoperative outcome.

Prognostic Significance of LGE by CMR in Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can detect focal fibrosis in aortic stenosis (AS), suggesting that it might predict higher mortality risk. OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to evaluate whether LGE-CMR can predict post-operative survival in patients with severe AS undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS We prospectively evaluated survival (all-cause and cardiovascular disease related) according to LGE-CMR status in 154 consecutive AS patients (96 men; mean age: 74 ± 6 years) without a history of myocardial infarction undergoing surgical AVR and in 40 AS patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). RESULTS LGE was present in 29% of patients undergoing surgical AVR and in 50% undergoing TAVR. During a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 21 patients undergoing surgical AVR and 20 undergoing TAVR died. In surgical AVR, the presence of LGE predicted higher post-operative mortality (odds ratio: 10.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2 to 100.0; p = 0.02) and worse all-cause survival (73% vs. 88%; p = 0.02 by log-rank test) and cardiovascular disease related survival (85% vs. 95%; p = 0.03 by log-rank test) on 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival after surgical AVR. Multivariate Cox analysis identified the presence of LGE (hazard ratio: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.3 to 6.9; p = 0.025) and New York Heart Association functional class III/IV (hazard ratio: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.1 to 8.1; p < 0.01) as the sole independent predictors of all-cause mortality after surgical AVR. The presence of LGE also predicted higher all-cause mortality (p = 0.05) and cardiovascular disease related mortality (p = 0.03) in the subgroup of patients without angiographic coronary artery disease (n = 110) and higher cardiovascular disease related mortality in 25 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. CONCLUSIONS The presence of LGE indicating focal fibrosis or unrecognized infarct by CMR is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with AS undergoing AVR and could provide additional information in the pre-operative evaluation of risk in these patients.

Prognostic value of myocardial viability by delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance in patients with coronary artery disease and low ejection fraction : impact of revascularization therapy.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of myocardial viability assessment by delayed-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) and of revascularization therapy on survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and low ejection fraction (EF). BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown that DE-CMR predicts recovery of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after revascularization. METHODS The authors prospectively evaluated survival of 144 consecutive patients (130 males, age 65 ± 11 years) with CAD and LV dysfunction (EF: 24 ± 7%) undergoing DE-CMR. Eighty-six patients underwent complete revascularization of dysfunctional myocardium (79 coronary artery bypass grafting, 7 percutaneous coronary intervention), whereas 58 patients remained under medical treatment. RESULTS Over the 3-year median follow-up, 49 patients died. Three-year survival was significantly worse in medically treated patients with dysfunctional viable than with nonviable myocardium (48% vs. 77% survival, p = 0.02). By contrast, in revascularized patients, survival was similar whether myocardium was viable or not (88% and 71% survival, respectively, p = NS). Hazard of death of viable myocardium remaining under medical treatment versus complete revascularization was 4.56 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93 to 10.8). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that interaction of revascularization and viability provided significant additional value (chi-square test = 13.1, p = 0.004) to baseline predictors of survival (New York Heart Association functional class, wall motion score, and peripheral artery disease). More importantly, in 43 pairs of propensity score-matched patients, hazard of death (hazard ratio: 2.5 [95% CI: 1.1 to 6.1], p = 0.02) remained significantly higher for medically treated patients rather than for those with fully revascularized viable myocardium. CONCLUSIONS Without revascularization, presence of dysfunctional viable myocardium by DE-CMR is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction. This observation may be useful for pre-operative selection of patients for revascularization.

Evaluation of Anatomic Valve Opening and Leaflet Morphology in Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis by Using Multidetector CT: Comparison with Transthoracic Echocardiography

PURPOSE To prospectively determine whether cardiac-gated multidetector computed tomography (CT) allows visualization of aortic valve leaflets after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR), to provide an accurate method for measuring the aortic valve opening, and to provide morphologic and functional information regarding the mechanism underlying poor function of the bioprosthetic valve. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved the study protocol; informed consent was given. Fifty-four patients (27 men; mean age, 75 years + or - 8 [standard deviation]) with bioprosthetic AVR implanted 2 years + or - 3 earlier underwent 64-section CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Two blinded observers manually planimetered the aortic valve area (AVA) by using a computer workstation on end-systolic short-axis CT images and measured opening angles (OAs) between the bioprosthesis annulus base and the free margin on long-axis images. These measurements were compared with those of the effective orifice area (EOA) of the valve at Doppler continuity-equation TTE by using regression and Bland-Altman methods. Morphology and mobility of leaflets in normally functioning (EOA indexed to body surface area [EOA(i)] > 0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) and dysfunctional (EOA(i)< 0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) AVRs were compared. RESULTS AVA at CT correlated highly to EOA at TTE (r = 0.93, P < .001) but was significantly larger (1.2 cm(2) + or - 0.4 vs 1.1 cm(2) + or - 0.3, P < .001) than EOA at TTE. In dysfunctional bioprostheses (n = 34), CT results showed a variety of morphologic abnormalities, such as leaflet thickening (n = 9), presumed thrombotic material (n = 6), and leaflet calcification (n = 1). Multidetector CT results demonstrated restriction of leaflet motion indicated by lower OA (64 degrees + or - 5 vs 79 degrees + or - 3, P < .0001) in dysfunctional AVRs than in normally functioning AVRs (n = 11). CONCLUSION Sixty-four-section CT can help accurately measure AVA in bioprosthetic AVR compared with EOA at TTE. It can also show morphologic abnormalities and reduced leaflet motion in a dysfunctional bioprosthesis, thereby potentially unraveling the mechanism of dysfunction.

Natural History of Paradoxical Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis

Background—Up to 30% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS; indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2) present with low transvalvular gradient despite a normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Presently, there is intense controversy as to the prognostic implications of such findings. Accordingly, the aim of the present work was to compare the natural history of patients with paradoxical low-gradient (PLG) or high-gradient (HG) SAS. Methods and Results—We prospectively studied 349 patients with SAS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were categorized into HG-SAS (n=144) and PLG-SAS (n=205) according to mean transvalvular gradient (mean gradient >40 or ⩽40 mm Hg). Primary end points were all-cause mortality and echocardiographic disease progression. To evaluate natural history, patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were censored at the time of surgery (n=92). During a median follow-up of 28 months, 148 patients died. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed better survival in PLG-SAS than in HG-SAS, both in the overall population (48% versus 31%; P<0.01) and in the asymptomatic subgroup (59% versus 35%; P<0.02). In asymptomatic patients, Cox analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, left atrial volume, and mean gradient as independent predictors of death. Finally, at last echocardiographic follow-up, PLG-SAS demonstrated significant increases in mean gradient (from 29±6 to 38±11 mm Hg; P<0.001). Conclusions—Our study indicates that PLG-SAS is a less malignant form of AS compared with HG-SAS, because their spontaneous outcome is better. We further demonstrated that patients with PLG-SAS are en route toward the more severe HG-SAS form, because the majority of them evolve into HG-SAS over time.

Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.

To compare the accuracy of planimetric and continuity equation measurements of aortic valve area (AVA) by cardiac MR (cMR) to each other and against transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography.

Incidence, Determinants, and Prognostic Impact of Operative Refusal or Denial in Octogenarians With Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valve disease in octogenarians. Previous studies have shown that aortic valve replacement (AVR) is frequently not performed in these patients. This study investigated the incidence, determinants, and prognostic impact of AVR refusal or denial in these patients. METHODS Between 2000 and 2007, 163 octogenarians (mean age, 84 ± 3 years) with severe AS and an indication for operation according to guidelines were prospectively included in an echocardiographic registry. Among these, 97 underwent AVR, and 66 were treated conservatively. RESULTS Logistic regression analysis identified older age, a lower transaortic pressure gradient, a larger aortic valve area, and the presence of diabetes as independent predictors of AVR refusal or denial. Patients who underwent AVR had a 30-day mortality of 9%. Overall 5-year survival was 66% in AVR patients vs 31% in those treated conservatively (log rank p < 0.001 vs AVR). After adjustment for the propensity score, patients undergoing AVR still had a better outcome than conservatively treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.91; p = 0.022). In addition to the therapeutic decision, Cox regression analysis also identified low body weight, New York Heart Association class III/IV, and the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation as independent predictors of outcome in the overall series. CONCLUSIONS About 40% of octogenarians with severe AS and a definite indication for operation either refuse or are denied AVR. AVR refusal or denial has a profound impact on long-term prognosis, resulting in a twofold excess mortality, even after adjustment for the propensity score.

Aortic Valve Area, Stroke Volume, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, Remodeling, and Fibrosis in Aortic Stenosis Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison Between High and Low Gradient and Normal and Low Flow Aortic Stenosis

Background—Recent works using echocardiography suggested that low gradient (LG), low flow (LF) aortic stenosis (AS) has more pronounced left ventricular (LV) concentric remodeling, smaller LV cavity size, and more interstitial fibrosis compared with high gradient (HG) normal flow (NF) AS. Therefore, we evaluated the accuracy of echocardiographic measurements and compared remodeling and fibrosis in different types of AS by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods and Results—A total of 128 patients (73±11 years of age; 75 men) with aortic valve area (AVA) <0.6 cm2/m2 and ejection fraction >50% by echocardiography underwent CMR to measure planimetric AVA, phase-contrast indexed stroke volume, LV mass, and focal fibrosis. Using <40 mm Hg and indexed stroke volume <35 mL/m2 by echocardiography as criteria for LG and LF, 69 (54%) patients were HG/NF, 28 (22%) HG/LF, 17 (13%) LG/NF, and 14 (11%) LG/LF AS. LV outflow tract area, indexed stroke volume, and AVA correlated well between echocardiography and CMR (r=0.7, 0.61, and 0.65, respectively; P<0.001 for all). By CMR, however, planimetric AVA was larger in LF/LG (0.54±0.08 cm2/m2) and LG/NF (0.61±0.08 cm2/m2) than in HG/LF (0.46±0.07 cm2/m2; P<0.05) AS, and indexed LV mass was lower in LG/LF (75±12 g/m2) and LG/NF (81±18 g/m2) than in HG/LF (100±27 g/m2; P<0.05) AS. All groups of AS had similar LV volumes, predominantly concentric hypertrophy remodeling, and similar amounts of focal fibrosis. Conclusions—CMR confirmed overall accuracy of echocardiographic classification of AS but demonstrated that LG/LF and LG/NF AS have larger AVA, less LV hypertrophy, and similar focal fibrosis compared with HG/LF AS. This challenges the view that LG/LF AS is a more advanced state of AS.

Accuracy of the Flow Convergence Method for Quantification of Aortic Regurgitation in Patients With Central Versus Eccentric Jets

Proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) has been proposed as a quantitative method to assess the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR). Yet the accuracy of this method in patients with eccentric AR jets is unknown. The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy of the PISA method for the quantification of AR severity in patients with central versus eccentric AR jets and to verify whether imaging from the left parasternal instead of the apical window improves the accuracy of the PISA method in patients with eccentric jets. Fifty patients with AR (21 with central jets and 29 with eccentric jets) underwent PISA and phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) measurements of AR volume. In patients with eccentric AR jets, PISA measurements obtained from the left parasternal and apical windows were compared. In patients with central AR jets, CMR- and PISA-derived AR volumes were similar (28 +/- 19 vs 30 +/- 20 ml, p = 0.34), were strongly correlated (r = 0.92, p <0.0001), and differed minimally from each other (by 2 +/- 8 ml). In patients with eccentric AR jets, PISA-derived AR volumes underestimated those measured by CMR (38 +/- 22 vs 51 +/- 27 ml, bias -13 +/- 20 ml) and were correlated only fairly (r = 0.69, p <0.001). Imaging from the left parasternal window eliminated the differences between CMR- and PISA-derived AR volumes (51 +/- 27 vs 53 +/- 26 ml, p = 0.24) and improved the correlation between the 2 measures (r = 0.95). In conclusion, in patients with eccentric AR jets imaged from the apical window, the PISA method significantly underestimated AR severity. This was no longer the case when imaging was performed from the left parasternal instead of the apical window.

A Randomized Trial on the Optimization of 18F-FDG Myocardial Uptake Suppression: Implications for Vulnerable Coronary Plaque Imaging

18F-FDG PET/CT can be used to detect arterial atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. However, avid myocardial glucose uptake may preclude its use for visualizing coronary plaques. Fatty acid loading or calcium channel blockers could decrease myocardial 18F-FDG uptake, thus assisting coronary plaque inflammation identification. The present prospective randomized trial compared the efficacies of different interventions for suppressing myocardial 18F-FDG uptake. We also investigated whether circulating free fatty acid (cFFA) levels predicted the magnitude of myocardial 18F-FDG uptake. Methods: Thirty-six volunteers ate a high-fat low-carbohydrate meal, followed by a 12-h fasting period. They were then randomized to 1 of 4 intervention groups. Group 1 received no additional preparation and served as a reference. Groups 2 and 3, respectively, received a commercial high-fat solution containing 43.8 g of lipids or 50 mL of olive oil 1 h before 18F-FDG injection to evaluate the impact of fatty acid loading on myocardial 18F-FDG uptake. Group 4 received verapamil to evaluate the effect of calcium channel blockers. Cardiac PET/CT was performed after administration of 370 MBq of 18F-FDG. Myocardial uptake suppression was assessed using a qualitative visual scale and by measuring the myocardial maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Insulin, glucose, and cFFA were serially measured. Results: The qualitative visual scale showed good myocardial 18F-FDG uptake suppression in 8 of 9, 5 of 9, 4 of 9, and 8 of 9 subjects of groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P = 0.09). SUVmax did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.17). Interestingly, cFFA levels were higher in volunteers with good suppression (0.80 ± 0.31 mmol/L) than in those with poor suppression (0.53 ± 0.15 mmol/L; P = 0.011). We found an inverse correlation between cFFA level (measured at 18F-FDG injection) and the SUVmax (R = 0.61). Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis identified 0.65 mmol/L cFFA as the best cutoff value to predict adequate 18F-FDG uptake suppression (positive predictive value, 89%). Conclusion: A high-fat low-carbohydrate meal followed by a 12-h fasting period effectively suppressed myocardial 18F-FDG uptake in most subjects. Neither complementary fatty acid loading nor verapamil administered 1 h before 18F-FDG injection conferred any additional benefit. Myocardial 18F-FDG uptake was inversely correlated with cFFA level, representing an interesting way to predict myocardial 18F-FDG uptake suppression.