David W. Altchek

Biomechanical evaluation of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow

Anatomical dissection and biomechanical testing were used to study twenty-eight cadaveric elbows in order to determine the role of the medial collateral ligament under valgus loading. The medial collateral ligament was composed of anterior, posterior, and occasionally transverse bundles. The anterior bundle was, in turn, composed of anterior and posterior bands that tightened in reciprocal fashion as the elbow was flexed and extended. Sequential cutting of the ligament was performed while rotation caused by valgus torque was measured. The anterior band of the anterior bundle was the primary restraint to valgus rotation at 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion and was a co-primary restraint at 120 degrees of flexion. The posterior band of the anterior bundle was a co-primary restraint at 120 degrees of flexion and a secondary restraint at 30 and 90 degrees of flexion. The posterior bundle was a secondary restraint at 30 degrees only. The reciprocal anterior and posterior bands have distinct biomechanical roles and theoretically may be injured separately. The anterior band was more vulnerable to valgus overload when the elbow was extended, whereas the posterior band was more vulnerable when the elbow was flexed. The posterior bundle was not vulnerable to valgus overload unless the anterior bundle was completely disrupted. The intact elbows rotated a mean of 3.6 degrees between the neutral position and the two-newton-meter valgus torque position. Cutting of the entire anterior bundle caused an additional 3.2 degrees of rotation at 90 degrees of flexion, where the effect was greatest. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Physical findings in a patient who has an injury of the anterior bundle may be subtle, and an examination should be performed with the elbow in 90 degrees of flexion for greatest sensitivity. As the anterior bundle is the major restraint to valgus rotation, reconstructive procedures should focus on anatomical reproduction of that structure. Parallel limbs of tendon graft placed from the inferior aspect of the medial epicondyle to the area of the sublimis tubercle will simulate the reciprocal bands of the anterior bundle. Temporary immobilization with the elbow in flexion may relax the critically important anterior band of the reconstruction during healing.

Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Prognostic factors affecting clinical and ultrasound outcome

The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of function and tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair that will enable the orthopaedic surgeon to determine which patients can expect a successful outcome. Between 2003 and 2005, the Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Registry was established to collect demographic, intraoperative, functional outcome, and ultrasound data prospectively on all patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. At total of 193 patients met the study criteria, and 127 (65.8%) completed the 2-year follow-up. The most significant independent factors affecting ultrasound outcome were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14; P = .006) and tear size (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.55-3.38; P < .001). After adjustment for age and tear size, the intraoperative factors found to be significantly associated with a tendon defect were concomitant biceps procedures (OR, 11.39; 95% CI, 2.90-44.69; P < .001) and acromioclavicular joint procedures (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.46-10.12; P = .006). In contrast to the ultrasound data, the functional outcome variables, such as satisfaction (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 2.00-7.68; P < .001) and strength (OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 1.61-62.77; P = .01), had a greater role in predicting an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score greater than 90. The progression from a single-tendon rotator cuff tear to a multiple-tendon tear with associated pathology increased the likelihood of tendon defect by at least 9 times, and therefore, earlier surgical intervention for isolated, single-tendon rotator cuff tears could optimize the likelihood of ultrasound healing and an excellent functional outcome.

Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Subgroup analysis

BACKGROUND The rotator cuff registry was established to evaluate prospectively the effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study is to report the preliminary data at the 1- and 2-year time point and perform subgroup analysis to identify factors that may affect outcome. METHODS A total of 193 patients underwent all-arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear and met the inclusion criteria and 127 (65.8%) completed 2-year follow-up. The outcome measurements included physical examination, manual muscle testing, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and ultrasonography. RESULTS The pre-operative ASES score was 52.37 +/- 24.09 and improved to 83.88 +/- 19.28 at 1 year (P < .0001) and 92.65 +/- 11.36 at 2 years (P < 0.0001). The percent healing for all patients was 64.10% at 3 months and 64.34% at 1 year (P = .4080). At 2 years, there was a significant increase in the percentage of healed tendon at 75.42% compared to the 3-month (P (1/4) .0001) and 1-year (P = 0.0332) time points. Patients with intact tendons had an ASES score of 93.9 +/- 10.2 compared to tendon defects with a score of 88.0 +/- 15.6 (P = .0623). Gender, tear size, and acromioclavicular joint involvement have a significant effect on ASES score. Rotator cuff characteristics such as tear size, biceps pathology, acromioclavicular joint pathology, and tissue quality have a significant effect on postoperative tendon integrity. CONCLUSION Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrates significant improvement in clinical outcomes and good rate of healing by postoperative ultrasound. Longer-term studies are necessary to determine the efficacy over time.

Results of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery

Background Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery remains challenging. Purpose To analyze the authors’ experience with revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery and determine the association between stability and functional results. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods Between 1991 and 2002, 95 of 102 patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the authors’ institution met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Of those, the 63 (66%) who returned for complete clinical and radiologic evaluation (mean follow-up, 72.7 months) formed the study group. Subjective evaluation focused on return to sports, arthritic symptoms, and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee criteria. Clinical evaluation included examination, KT-1000 arthrometer and functional testing, and radiographic analysis of alignment and arthritis. Results Based on International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores and return to sports, results were rated as excellent/good in 45 patients (71%), fair in 6 (10%), and poor in 12 (19%). A grade IA or IIA Lachman and a KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference of <3 mm (32/63 patients) was associated with a good/excellent result (P < .05). The mechanical axis was midline in 78% (49/63 patients). Radiographic arthritis (16 patients, 25%) was associated with duration of instability after primary failure (P < .03). Return to sports occurred in 59% (37/63 patients). Sixteen patients (25%) required a second revision surgery. Conclusion Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery allowed approximately 60% of patients to go back to sports, most of them at lower levels than their prerevision function. Instrumented laxity of <3 mm was associated with a better result. Radiographic arthritis was associated with duration of instability symptoms after primary failure. Patients who undergo revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery should be counseled as to the expected outcome and cautioned that this procedure probably represents a salvage situation and may not allow them to return to their desired levels of function.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Prospective Evaluation With Sequential Ultrasonography

Background Recent studies have demonstrated predictable healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at a single time point, but few studies have evaluated tendon healing over time. Hypothesis Rotator cuff tears that are intact on ultrasound at 1 time point will remain intact, and clinical results will improve regardless of healing status. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods The Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Registry was established to determine the effectiveness of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with clinical outcomes using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and ultrasound at 1 and 2 years, postoperatively. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on ultrasound appearance: group 1, rotator cuff tendon intact at 1 and 2 years (n = 63); group 2, rotator cuff tendon defect at 1 and 2 years (n = 23); group 3, rotator cuff tendon defect at 1 year but no defect at 2 years (n = 7). Results The ultrasound appearance was consistent at 1 and 2 years for 86 of the 93 patients (92.5%). The patients in group 1 had a significantly lower mean age (57.8 ± 9.8 years) than the patients of group 2 (63.6 ± 8.6 years; P = .04). Group 2 had a significantly greater rotator cuff tear size (4.36 ± 1.6 cm) than group 1 (2.84 ± 1.1 cm; P = .00025). Each group had a significant improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Conclusion All intact rotator cuff tendons at 1 year remained intact at 2 years. A small group of patients with postoperative imaging did not appear healed by ultrasound at 1 year but did so at 2 years. Patients demonstrated improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder scores, range of motion, and strength, regardless of tendon healing status on ultrasound.

Graft Selection for Revision ACL Reconstruction

Although primary ACL reconstructions have been considered a successful operation, success rates have still only ranged from 75 to 97 %. Consequently, several thousand revision ACL reconstructions are performed annually. Failures include frank graft rupture and structural failure as well as functional failure with residual instability and pivoting despite the presence of an intact graft. When planning a revision ACL reconstruction, one of the most important considerations is the graft choice. Despite the prevalence of revision ACL reconstruction, there is no universally agreed upon graft choice. Generally, autografts are the preferred graft for revision ACL reconstructions due to their more rapid and complete incorporation into the host tissue, but allograft tissue is used if there are limited autograft options available or if autograft use is relatively contraindicated secondary to patellofemoral pathology. This chapter will focus on the qualities of the different graft sources available (autografts, allografts, and synthetic grafts) along with the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

Isolated closure of rotator interval defects for shoulder instability

Fifteen patients noted at surgery to have an isolated defect in the rotator interval and no other pathologic abnormality underwent closure of the defect as an isolated procedure for recurrent instability symptoms. Intraoperative assessment of each of these shoulders after the closure demonstrated adequate stability, and no other stabilization procedures were performed. The average age of the patients was 24 years, and 10 of the 15 patients were women. Examination under anesthesia revealed increased inferior translation in all patients, as illustrated by at least a 1+ sulcus sign. The rotator interval defect averaged 2.75 cm in width and 2.3 cm in height. The rotator interval defect edges were freshened and approximated (nine patients) or imbricated (six patients), depending on the anterior capsular laxity and the degree of glenohumeral joint translation possible. Followup averaged 3.3 years (range, 2.2 to 5.3), and all patients achieved either a good or excellent result using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons evaluation scale and the Rowe rating scale. Although most patients with a defect in the rotator interval require a standard stabilization procedure as a supplement to closure of the defect, approximation or imbrication of the defect as an initial step at surgery may confer adequate stability in selected patients and obviate the need for formal capsular advancement.