Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David W. Mehlman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David W. Mehlman.


The Condor | 2017

How do en route events around the Gulf of Mexico influence migratory landbird populations

Emily B. Cohen; Wylie C. Barrow; Jeffrey J. Buler; Jill L. Deppe; Andrew Farnsworth; Peter P. Marra; Scott R. McWilliams; David W. Mehlman; R. Randy Wilson; Mark S. Woodrey; Frank R. Moore

ABSTRACT Habitats around the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) provide critical resources for Nearctic–Neotropical migratory landbirds, the majority of which travel across or around the GOM every spring and fall as they migrate between temperate breeding grounds in North America and tropical wintering grounds in the Caribbean and Central and South America. At the same time, ecosystems in the GOM are changing rapidly, with unknown consequences for migratory landbird populations, many of which are experiencing population declines. In general, the extent to which events encountered en route limit migratory bird populations is not well understood. At the same time, information from weather surveillance radar, stable isotopes, tracking, eBird, and genetic datasets is increasingly available to address many of the unanswered questions about bird populations that migrate through stopover and airspace habitats in the GOM. We review the state of the science and identify key research needs to understand the impacts of en route events around the GOM region on populations of intercontinental landbird migrants that breed in North America, including: (1) distribution, timing, and habitat associations; (2) habitat characteristics and quality; (3) migratory connectivity; and (4) threats to and current conservation status of airspace and stopover habitats. Finally, we also call for the development of unified and comprehensive long-term monitoring guidelines and international partnerships to advance our understanding of the role of habitats around the GOM in supporting migratory landbird populations moving between temperate breeding grounds and wintering grounds in Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean.


PLOS ONE | 2010

Global versus Local Conservation Focus of U.S. State Agency Endangered Bird Species Lists

Jeffrey V. Wells; Bruce A. Robertson; Kenneth V. Rosenberg; David W. Mehlman

The development of species priorities for conservation at local or regional scales (for example, within a state or province) poses an interesting paradox. One the one hand, locally or regionally-derived species priorities may lead to greater interest in and resources directed to biodiversity conservation by local or regional institutions. On the other hand, locally or regionally-derived species priorities could overlook national or global priorities. We assessed U.S. state government agency endangered-threatened bird lists to determine the comparative representation of species of global versus local conservation significance on them. State lists tended to be represented primarily by species of low global risk-low global responsibility (range: 15–100%; mean 51%) and high global risk-high global responsibility (range: 0–73%; mean 35%). In 25 states, more than half of the species on the state lists were in the low global risk-low global responsibility category. Most U.S. state agency lists represent a combined strategy of highlighting species of both local and global conservation significance. Even with this combined local-global strategy, most state lists were predominated by species that represent local but not global conservation significance. Such a strategy could have profound negative consequences for many species that are not formally recognized under national endangered species protections but that are also left off of state-level endangered species lists.


Ecological Applications | 2018

Avian demographic responses to drought and fire: a community‐level perspective

James F. Saracco; Stephen M. Fettig; George L. San Miguel; David W. Mehlman; Brent E. Thompson; Steven K. Albert

Drought stress is an important consideration for wildlife in arid and semiarid regions under climate change. Drought can impact plant and animal populations directly, through effects on their physiology, as well as indirectly through effects on vegetation productivity and resource availability, and by creating conditions conducive to secondary disturbance, such as wildfire. We implemented a novel approach to understanding community-level demographic responses of birds and their habitats to these stressors in the context of climate change at 14 study sites in the Four Corners region of the southwestern United States. A large wildfire affecting three of the sites provided a natural experiment for also examining fire effects on vegetation and the bird community. We assessed (1) trends in drought and end-of-century (2071-2100) predicted average drought conditions under mid-range and high greenhouse gas concentration trajectory scenarios; (2) effects of drought and fire on habitat (vegetation greenness); and (3) effects of drought and fire on community-level avian productivity and adult apparent survival rates. Drought has increased and is expected to increase further at our study sites under climate change. Under spring drought conditions, vegetation greenness and avian productivity declined, while summer drought appeared to negatively affect adult apparent survival rates. Response to fire was mixed; in the year of the fire, avian productivity declined, but was higher than normal for several years post-fire. Our results highlight important links between environmental stressors and avian vital rates that will likely affect population trajectories in this region under climate change. We suggest that the use and continued development of community-level demographic models will provide useful tool for leveraging sparse species-level data to provide multi-species inferences and inform conservation.


Bird Conservation International | 2012

Establishing quantitative habitat targets for a ‘Critically Endangered’ Neotropical migrant (Golden-cheeked Warbler Dendroica chrysoparia ) during the non-breeding season

David I. King; Carlin C. Chandler; John H. Rappole; Richard B. Chandler; David W. Mehlman

The Golden-cheeked Warbler Dendroica chrysoparia is a federally endangered Neotropical migrant that inhabits montane pine-oak forests in Mexico and northern Central America during the non-breeding season. Although it is known that Golden-cheeked Warblers are closely associated with ‘ encino ’ oaks (evergreen or holm oak) such as Quercus sapotifolia , Q. eliptica and Q. elongata, which have shiny, narrow, elliptical, or oblong leaves, quantitative habitat targets are useful for effectively incorporating this information into conservation planning and forest management practices. We analysed data on wintering Golden-cheeked Warblers collected during the non-breeding season in Honduras from 1996 to 1998 to identify quantitative targets for habitat conditions for this species. Data on warbler abundance were collected using line transect surveys located in montane pine-oak forests in a stratified-random fashion. Habitat data were collected at five 0.04 ha plots on these same transects and the averaged values used as predictors of Golden-cheeked Warbler abundance. We found that Golden-cheeked Warblers were strongly associated with the basal area of encino oaks and density of ‘ roble ’ oaks, such as Q. segoviensis , Q. purulhana and Q. rugosa , which have large, lobed leaves. Density of Golden-cheeked Warblers peaked at ≈ 5.6 m 2 ha –1 basal area of encino and ≈7 roble oaks ha –1 . These values can be used to identify quantitative habitat targets that can be directly incorporated into forest management practices to ensure that these activities maintain habitat conditions necessary for their use by Golden-cheeked Warblers.


The Auk | 2005

CONSERVING STOPOVER SITES FOR FOREST-DWELLING MIGRATORY LANDBIRDS

David W. Mehlman; Sarah E. Mabey; David N. Ewert; Charles Duncan; Becky Abel; David A. Cimprich; Robert D. Sutter; Mark S. Woodrey


The Auk | 2003

The UK SPA network: Its Scope and Content

David W. Mehlman


Biological Conservation | 2004

A comparison of North American avian conservation priority ranking systems

David W. Mehlman; Kenneth V. Rosenberg; Jeffrey V. Wells; Bruce Robertson


Ecology Letters | 2001

Developmental stability across the breeding distribution of the scissor-tailed flycatcher (Tyrannus forficatus)

Laura I. Gonzalez-Guzman; David W. Mehlman


In: Ralph, C. John; Rich, Terrell D., editors 2005. Bird Conservation Implementation and Integration in the Americas: Proceedings of the Third International Partners in Flight Conference. 2002 March 20-24; Asilomar, California, Volume 2 Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191. Albany, CA: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: p. 1158-1161 | 2005

The nature conservancy's prairie wings project: a conservation strategy for the grassland birds of the Western Great plains

Bob McCready; David W. Mehlman; Danny Kwan; Becky Abel


Bulletin of The Ecological Society of America | 2018

Avian Demographic Responses to Drought and Fire: A Community-Level Perspective

James F. Saracco; Stephen M. Fettig; George L. San Miguel; David W. Mehlman; Brent E. Thompson; Steven K. Albert

Collaboration


Dive into the David W. Mehlman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brent E. Thompson

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Woodrey

Mississippi State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen M. Fettig

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carlin C. Chandler

University of Massachusetts Amherst

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Cimprich

University of Southern Mississippi

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David I. King

University of Massachusetts Amherst

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge