David W. Schaal

Effects of neuropeptide Y, insulin, 2-deoxyglucose, and food deprivation on food-motivated behavior

The current study demonstrates the ability of neuropeptide Y (NPY) to increase break points under a progressive ratio 1 (PR1) reinforcement schedule. An initial response resulted in delivery of a food reinforcer (45 mg pellet) under the PR1, and an additional response was required foreach successive reinforcer. The break point, the number of responses emitted to obtain the last reinforcer, is considered a measure of reinforcing efficacy or motivational strength of the food reinforcer. NPY (0.3–10 µg) significantly increased break point to levels comparable to those produced by 36–48 h of food deprivation. Although insulin (3–8 U/kg) and 2-deoxyglucose (150–250 mg/kg) also increased food intake, neither increased break points to levels produced by NPY or food deprivation. These data suggest that NPY may change the value of food in ways that cannot be accounted for by changes in insulin, glucose levels or intracellular glucoprivation. These results emphasize that simply measuring the amount of freely available food eaten is not a fully adequate measure of the strength of the feeding behavior.

The discriminative stimulus effects of neuropeptide Y

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), an endogenous peptide which strongly induces food intake, is demonstrated to have discriminative stimulus properties when administered intracerebroventricularly. Rats rapidly learned to press the appropriate lever during training. NPY discrimination was dose-dependent. NPYs discriminative stimulus properties were compared to those of two doses of Peptide YY (PYY) and 24 and 48 h of food deprivation, conditions which also increase feeding. Both doses of PYY generalized to NPY, supporting previous findings that PYY has effects similar to NPY. Although food deprivation increases feeding in a manner similar to NPY, food deprivation did not result in NPY-appropriate responding.

Effects of methadone on free feeding in satiated rats

A variety of opioids and opiates are known to increase short-term food intake. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of methadone on free feeding in satiated rats. We assessed the effect of methadone (0, 1.5, 3.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) on food intake 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after injection for 3 consecutive days. Two hours after methadone administration, food intake was inversely related to dose, but after 6 h a direct relationship between dose and feeding was obtained. Food intake increased with repeated methadone administration. In Experiment 2, methadone (5.0 mg/kg) was injected and food was made available 0, 1, 2, or 3 h later. Maximal food intake occurred in the third and fourth hours following methadone administration. As in Experiment 1, food intake increased with repeated methadone administration. Increases in food intake following repeated methadone administration may have been due to the development of tolerance to effects of methadone that may interfere with feeding, such as sedation. In Experiment 3, methadone was administered daily or every fifth day, assuming that spacing injections would retard tolerance development. Repeated daily methadone administration was associated with increased food intake earlier in the session, whereas increases in food intake following spaced methadone administration occurred later in the session. These data indicate that methadone increases short-term feeding in satiated rats. This is in contrast to the reported decrease in food-reinforced behavior noted in operant studies. This contrast may be due to sedating or other disabling effects of methadone.

Insulin, 2-deoxy-D-glucose, and food deprivation as discriminative stimuli in rats

Using a two-lever drug discrimination procedure, two groups of four rats each were trained to discriminate the stimulus effects of 1.0 U/kg insulin or 125 mg/kg 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) from saline. A third group was trained to discriminate food deprivation produced by feeding 23 h prior to sessions from satiation produced by feeding 2 h prior to sessions. Differential responding was a direct function of dose or deprivation level in each group. Rats trained to discriminate insulin responded as if they had received insulin when they received 2-DG and vice versa. Insulin and 2-DG produced deprivation-appropriate responding in two of four rats trained to discriminate food deprivation. Low insulin and 2-DG doses produced drug-appropriate responding in rats deprived 47 h, but not in rats deprived 23 h. Blood glucose level was altered by the training doses of insulin and 2-DG, but not by 23-h deprivation. These results indicate that operations that induce feeding produce discriminable stimuli, and that these effects overlap or interact. Thus, drug discrimination procedures can be useful in the analysis of ingestive behavior.

[Leu31,Pro34]neuropeptide Y (NPY), but not NPY 20-36, produces discriminative stimulus effects similar to NPY and induces food intake.

Rats were trained to discriminate between an intracerebroventricular injection of 1.15 nmol of Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and a sham injection. Rats rapidly learned to press the appropriate lever during training. NPYs discriminative stimulus effects were compared to those of saline, and 1.15-3.45 nmol [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, a Y1 receptor agonist and NPY 20-36, Y2 receptor agonist. [Leu31,Pro34]NPY resulted in NPY-appropriate responding, whereas saline and NPY 20-36 did not. [Leu31,Pro34]NPY also increased food intake, but NPY 20-36 did not. This suggests that NPYs discriminative stimulus and orexigenic effects involve the Y1, but not the Y2, receptor.

Methadone and feeding: Sources of differences between home cage and operant chamber assessment procedures

Methadone administration is reported to increase food intake in studies examining free feeding and to decrease food reinforced operant responding. In light of this apparent paradox, the present study evaluated methadones effects on food reinforced operant responding under conditions more typical of free feeding studies than operant studies. The effect of methadone (5 mg/kg) on food intake was examined in rats maintained at 100% of their free feeding weights. Methadone did not increase food intake with food available under a fixed ratio 1 (FR 1) reinforcement schedule. Methadone did not alter response rate when each lever press produced a larger reinforcer (225 mg as opposed to 45 mg), but did increase food intake. When response requirements were changed from lever pressing to interruption of an infrared beam, increases in food intake following methadone administration were observed. Thus, the differences between methadones effects on free feeding vs. operant chamber food intake may be due to procedural factors such as magnitude of reinforcement and response requirements.

Behavioral and neurochemical mechanisms of opioid-antidepressant interactions

Twelve pigeons key-pecked under a multiple variable interval 15-s, 150-s schedule of food reinforcement. The effects of methadone were studied alone and in combination with chronic daily administration of either imipramine (IMI) or desipramine (DMI). Chronic IMI was also given following reductions in response rates by unsignaled delay-to-reinforcement (UDR). Acute administration of methadone produced dose-dependent reductions in response rates under both schedules of reinforcement. Chronic daily administration of IMI or DMI alone did not result in lasting changes in baseline responding. When administered in combination, chronic daily IMI significantly attenuated the rate-reducing effects of methadone, whereas neither a low nor a high dose of chronic daily DMI was effective. The same dose of chronic daily IMI failed to ameliorate response rate reductions under delayed reinforcement. The behavioral and neurochemical specificity of the antidepressant effect is discussed.