David Weintraub

Comparison and predictors of rash associated with 15 antiepileptic drugs

Objective: To determine predictors and relative incidence of antiepileptic drug (AED)–related rash in patients taking all common AEDs. Methods: We reviewed 1,890 outpatients. Eighty-one variables were tested as potential predictors of rash. We compared the rate of rash attributed to each AED (AED rash) with the average rate of rash attributed to the other AEDs in all adults (aged ≥16 years; n = 1,649) when taking carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), primidone (PRM), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), valproate (VPA), or zonisamide (ZNS). We repeated this analysis for patients with and without the identified nondrug predictors of AED rash. Results: The average rate of AED rash was 2.8%. The only nondrug predictor significant in multivariate analysis was occurrence of another AED rash (odds ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.1; p < 0.0001); the rate of rash in this subgroup was 8.8%, vs 1.7% in those without another AED rash. Higher AED rash rates were seen with PHT (5.9% overall, p = 0.0008; 25.0% in those with another AED rash, p = 0.001), LTG (4.8%, p = 0.00095; 14.4%, p = 0.025), and CBZ (3.7%, not significant; 16.5%, p = 0.01). Lower rates were seen with LEV (0.6% overall; p = 0.00042), GBP (0.3%, p = 0.00035), and VPA (0.7%, p = 0.01). Rash rates were also low (<1% overall) with FBM, PRM, TPM, and VGB (not significant). These AED differences remained similar in patients with and without other AED rashes. There were four cases of Stevens–Johnson syndrome involving four AEDs. Conclusions: The rate of an antiepileptic drug (AED) rash is approximately five times greater in patients with another AED rash (8.8%) vs those without (1.7%). Rash rates were highest with phenytoin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine and low (<1%) with several AEDs.

Predictors of Lamotrigine‐associated Rash

Summary:  Purpose: To determine the predictors of lamotrigine‐associated rash (LTG‐rash) and the incidence of serious and benign LTG‐rash to individualize risk assessment in a given patient.

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of the newer antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE Psychiatric/behavioral side effects (PSEs) are common in patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The objective of the study described here was to compare the PSE profiles of the newer AEDs. METHODS We examined the charts of 1394 adult outpatients seen at the Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center who had taken one of the newer AEDs. We compared the rate of AED-related PSEs in patients newly started on the newer AEDs both before and after controlling for non-AED predictors of PSEs. RESULTS Overall, 221 of 1394 (16%) patients experienced PSEs. The average rate of AED-related PSEs for a single AED was 8.4%, with 6.1% resulting in dosage change and 4.3% resulting in AED discontinuation. Significantly fewer PSEs were attributed to gabapentin (n=160, 0.6% incidence, P<0.001) and lamotrigine (n=547, 4.8% incidence, P<0.001), and significantly more PSEs were attributed to levetiracetam (n=521, 15.7% incidence, P<0.001; 8.8% discontinued LEV because of PSEs). Vigabatrin, felbamate, and oxcarbazepine were associated with similarly low rates of PSEs in many analyses but with fewer of patients. Tiagabine was associated with high PSE rates (similar to those for levetiracetam), but was used much less commonly at our center. Intermediate rates of PSEs were attributed to topiramate and zonisamide (both nonsignificant). Psychiatric history was the most significant nondrug predictor of AED-related PSEs (PSEs occurred in 23% of patients with a psychiatric history vs 12% of patients without such a history, P<0.001). The relative rates of AED-related PSEs were similar when controlling for non-AED predictors and when analyzing only patients on monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences between the newer AEDs in terms of their PSE profiles. Patients taking levetiracetan experience significantly more PSEs than average, and patients taking gabapentin and lamotrigine experience significantly fewer PSEs. Even with the medication with the highest rate of PSEs (levetiracetam), less than 10% of patients discontinued it because of PSEs. A past psychiatric condition is the most significant nondrug predictor of AED-related PSEs.

Patient-reported cognitive side effects of antiepileptic drugs: predictors and comparison of all commonly used antiepileptic drugs.

Subjective cognitive side effects (CSEs) are common in patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The objective of this study was to predict which patients are at risk for CSEs, and compare the CSE profiles of all commonly used AEDs. In this nonrandomized retrospective study, medical records of 1694 adult outpatients with epilepsy seen at our center over a 5-year period who had taken one or more AEDs were examined. Non-AED predictors of CSEs were investigated, and rates of AED-related CSEs were compared in 1189 patients (546 on monotherapy) newly started on an AED at our center. The average rate of AED-related intolerable CSEs (leading to dosage change or discontinuation) was 12.8%. On multivariate analysis, no significant non-AED predictors of CSEs were found. Significantly more intolerable CSEs were attributed to topiramate (21.5% of 130 patients) than to most other AEDs, including carbamazepine (9.9%), gabapentin (7.3%), levetiracetam (10.4%), lamotrigine (8.9%), oxcarbazepine (11.6%), and valproate (8.3%). CSE rates with zonisamide (14.9%) were significantly higher than those for gabapentin and lamotrigine. After exclusion of CSEs during the first 8 weeks of therapy, rates of CSEs were lower, but relative differences remained unchanged. In monotherapy, significantly more intolerable CSEs occurred with topiramate (11.1% of 18 patients) than with carbamazepine or valproate, and both phenytoin and zonisamide were associated with more CSEs than valproate. From this study, it can be concluded that intolerable patient-reported CSEs are most common with topiramate, followed by zonisamide, phenytoin, and oxcarbazepine. They are least likely to be reported with gabapentin, valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and levetiracetam.

Correlating lamotrigine serum concentrations with tolerability in patients with epilepsy

Objective: To correlate lamotrigine (LTG) serum concentrations (levels) with tolerability in patients with epilepsy. Methods: The charts of 811 outpatients with epilepsy who had received LTG and were seen at the Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center after January 1, 2000, were reviewed. Data gathered included levels, dosage, duration of use, concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), clinical toxicity, specific side effects, and efficacy. Rates of toxicity, specific side effects, and efficacy were calculated and correlated with serum levels. Results: In total, 3,731 LTG levels were recorded. A regimen was categorized as toxic if the patient experienced side effects that led to a dosage change or discontinuation of LTG. Of 3,919 AED regimens, 9.4% were toxic and 30.7% of patients had at least one toxic regimen. Toxicity increased with increasing LTG levels (p < 0.0001): With levels <5.0 μg/mL, 7% of patients were toxic; with levels of 5 to 10 μg/mL, 14%; with 10 to 15 μg/mL, 24%; with 15 to 20 μg/mL, 34%; and with >20 μg/mL, 59%. The correlation between levels and tolerability was independent of concurrent medication. Increasing efficacy, as measured by seizure freedom for a 6-month period, occurred up to levels of >20 μg/mL. Conclusions: There is a correlation between LTG serum level and tolerability, independent of the use of other AEDs. Adverse effects requiring a dose change are uncommon with the most frequently encountered LTG concentrations (<10 μg/mL) and occur in only 7.4% of patients at levels obtained during the majority of clinical trials (<5 μg/mL). An initial target range of 1.5 to 10 μg/mL is suggested, though higher levels, up to >20 μg/mL, are often tolerated and can lead to additional efficacy in refractory patients.

Effect of age and comedication on levetiracetam pharmacokinetics and tolerability.

Summary:  Purpose: To compare pharmacokinetics and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) in older versus younger adults.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Donepezil to Improve Memory in Epilepsy

Summary:  Purpose: To determine whether an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, such as donepezil, would improve memory or other cognitive/psychological functions in epilepsy patients with subjective memory complaints.

Social-Capital Formation and American Fraternal Association: New Empirical Evidence

Rare membership and lodge data from a late nineteenth-century American fraternal order provide support for the existence of bridging ties among its members along class and neighborhood lines, though not across racial or gender lines. Lodge-related political activity centered on issues of exclusivity, such as the desirability of non-English speaking members. The orders system of government was more top-heavy and hierarchical than democratic; decisionmaking power resided with established members at the organizations national level. Overall, the data paint a picture of an American fraternal lodge unlike that represented in the contemporary literature about social-capital formation in the Golden Age of Fraternity.

Venous air emboli from intravenous catheterization: A report of iatrogenic intravascular pneumocephalus

Pneumocephalus in the absence of a recent intracranial or intrathecal procedure is a significant radiographic finding and may be clinically relevant. Pneumocephalus secondary to intravenous catheterization may be a more common finding than previously expected. Although pneumocephalus is often associated with pathological conditions, recognition of a characteristic pattern of intravenous pneumocephalus in the presence of intravenous catheterization may aid the clinician in determining a patients underlying condition. This unexpected radiographic finding should not necessarily be cause for alarm, and there is no evidence that intravenous pneumocephalus alone is harmful. We present a patient with intravenous pneumocephalus and a review of the literature.