Davide Bosso

Locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Current and emerging treatment strategies

Although nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a widespread malignant tumor, it is particularly frequent in Southeast Asia. Although T1 tumors can be effectively controlled with exclusive radiotherapy, this treatment modality is insufficient for most NPC patients, who present with locally advanced disease at diagnosis. In fact, for stages ranging from T2b N0 to T4 N3, definitive scientific evidence supports the use of concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with standard external beam radiotherapy. This treatment approach has shown a statistically significant advantage in terms of overall survival, with respect to radiotherapy alone. Several trials have also investigated the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. Platinum compounds, anthracyclines and taxanes are among the chemotherapy agents employed. This review focuses on the clinical results obtained in the field of adjuvant/concurrent/neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced NPC, for which exclusive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy currently represents the standard treatment approach.

Potential value of Gleason score in predicting the benefit of cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

AIM This study aimed to identify predictive/prognostic factors in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with cabazitaxel. PATIENTS & METHODS Patients were enrolled from March 2011 to December 2011 in an international expanded access program. In January 2012, when cabazitaxel became commercially available, a prospective study was initiated at University Federico II of Naples and at Rionero in Vulture Hospital. RESULTS Forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study. Patients received a median of nine cycles of cabazitaxel. Median progression-free survival was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.7-8.0). Seventeen patients were still alive at the time of the analysis, with a median overall survival of 14 months (95% CI: 11-16). At multivariate analysis, a higher Gleason score (≥ 8) appeared to be associated with prolonged progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.18-0.72); however, the higher Gleason score showed no statistical impact on overall survival. CONCLUSION We hypothesize that the Gleason score has the potential to be incorporated in the clinical decision-making process for definition of treatment strategy in docetaxel-pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. We encourage further experimentation in this setting.

Peg-filgrastim and cabazitaxel in prostate cancer patients.

To determine the impact of prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating growth factor (G-CSF) on the risk of febrile neutropenia in a cohort of patients enrolled at the University Federico II of Naples and treated with cabazitaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We carried out a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients enrolled at our institution in a compassionate-use programme with cabazitaxel, aimed at providing early access to the drug before its commercial availability in mCRPC patients. Besides baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, data on treatment efficacy and toxicity, as well as those on the use of G-CSF per patient per cycle were extracted. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Fisher’s exact test was used to explore a relationship between a single event of grade 3 or more neutropenia or febrile neutropenia and previous use of G-CSF. Univariate analysis was carried out to evaluate predictors of grade 3 or more neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia. Of 34 patients enrolled at our institution from December 2010 to December 2011, 32 had received at least one dose of cabazitaxel and were included in the analysis. Patients received a median of 10 cabazitaxel cycles. Grade 3 or more neutropenia was common, occurring in 64.5% of patients. Three patients (9.3%) developed febrile neutropenia. Twenty-seven patients received prophylaxis with G-CSF during at least one cycle using peg-filgrastim. The risk of grade 3 or more neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia per patient and per cycle was seven times lower when G-CSF was used. Baseline neutrophil count of less than 4570/mm3 was the strongest predictor of grade 3 or more neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia. No toxic death was reported. Only one patient discontinued cabazitaxel because of an adverse event. Our analysis suggests that prophylaxis with peg-filgrastim may considerably reduce the incidence of grade 3 or more neutropenia and, possibly, of febrile neutropenia in mCRPC patients treated with cabazitaxel. Further analyses involving a larger population are warranted to confirm our results.

Carboplatin plus etoposide in heavily pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

AIMS Carboplatin plus etoposide has modest efficacy in docetaxel-pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. We hypothesized that carboplatin-etoposide could still exert some therapeutic activity after docetaxel, cabazitaxel and either abiraterone or enzalutamide. PATIENTS & METHODS We enrolled 15 patients in the first step of a Phase II trial. The target sample size is 46 patients. The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival after 12 weeks. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was 11 weeks (range: 8-18), while median overall survival was 18 weeks (range: 12-26). Of seven patients with measurable disease, two had a partial response, two showed stable disease and the remaining three had progressive disease as the best radiological response. Five patients were considered progression-free after 12 weeks, prompting continuation of the trial. CONCLUSION Our preliminary findings support the hypothesis that carboplatin plus etoposide may yield some clinical benefit in a population of patients who failed all currently approved therapeutic options for prostate cancer.

Cabazitaxel in castration resistant prostate cancer with brain metastases: 3 case reports

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy for men. The skeleton is the most common metastatic site but, following an improvement in survival, metastases in uncommon sites are being found more frequently in clinical practice, especially brain metastases. Despite the new drugs now available for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, no clinical evidence exists about their effectiveness on brain metastases. We describe the clinical history of 3 patients treated with cabazitaxel plus whole brain radiotherapy. These case reports demonstrate that cabazitaxel is highly active and well tolerated in brain metastases.

Calcitriol: a better option than vitamin D in denosumab-treated patients with kidney failure?

Denosumab has been proven to be at least as effective with respect to zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. Although denosumab can be considered to have a more favorable toxicity profile compared to zoledronic acid in terms of kidney toxicity and flu-like symptoms, hypocalcemia is twice as frequent with denosumab. Importantly, denosumab is not metabolized by the kidney and it may be employed even in patients with severe kidney failure. Like zoledronic acid, denosumab is administered with oral calcium and vitamin D. As conversion of vitamin D to its active form is progressively impaired with a creatinine clearance < 70 ml/min, we speculate that calcitriol may be a better option than vitamin D in denosumab-treated patients with impaired kidney function.

Lack of Cumulative Toxicity Associated With Cabazitaxel Use in Prostate Cancer

AbstractCabazitaxel provided a survival advantage compared with mitoxantrone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer refractory to docetaxel. Grade 3 to 4 (G3–4) neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were relatively frequent in the registrative XRP6258 Plus Prednisone Compared to Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone in Hormone Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer (TROPIC) trial, but their incidence was lower in the Expanded Access Program (EAP). Although cumulative doses of docetaxel are associated with neuropathy, the effect of cumulative doses of cabazitaxel is unknown. In this retrospective review of prospectively collected data, the authors assessed “per cycle” incidence and predictors of toxicity in the Italian cohort of the EAP, with a focus on the effect of cumulative doses of cabazitaxel.The study population consisted of 218 Italian patients enrolled in the cabazitaxel EAP. The influence of selected variables on the most relevant adverse events identified was assessed using a Generalized Estimating Equations model at univariate and multivariate analysis.“Per cycle” incidence of G 3 to 4 neutropenia was 8.7%, whereas febrile neutropenia was reported in 0.9% of cycles. All events of febrile neutropenia occurred during the first 3 cycles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher prior dose of cabazitaxel was associated with decreased odds of having G3 to 4 neutropenia (OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.86–0.93; P < 0.01), febrile neutropenia (OR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34–0.81; P < 0.01) and G3 to 4 anemia (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.86–1; P = 0.07). Patients with a body surface area >2 m2 presented increased odds of having G 3 to 4 neutropenia (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.86–1; P = 0.07), but decreased odds of having G3 to 4 anemia.Among the toxicities assessed, the authors did not identify any that appeared to be associated with a higher number of cabazitaxel cycles delivered. Prior cumulative dose was associated with reduced G3 to 4 neutropenia and anemia. The apparent protective effect associated with higher doses of cabazitaxel is likely to be affected by early dose reduction and early toxicity-related treatment discontinuation. Because this analysis is limited by its retrospective design, prospective trials are required to assess the optimal duration of cabazitaxel treatment.

The evolving role of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review

ABSTRACT Introduction: While the majority of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors currently used for the therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are small molecule agents inhibiting multiple targets, monoclonal antibodies are inhibitors of specific targets, which may decrease off-target effects while preserving on-target activity. A few monoclonal antibodies have already been approved for mRCC (bevacizumab, nivolumab), while many others may play an important role in the therapeutic scenario of mRCC. Areas covered: This review describes emerging monoclonal antibodies for treating RCC. Currently, bevacizumab, a VEGF monoclonal antibody, is approved in combination with interferon for the therapy of metastatic RCC, while nivolumab, a Programmed Death (PD)-1 inhibitor, is approved following prior VEGF inhibitor treatment. Other PD-1 and PD-ligand (L)-1 inhibitors are undergoing clinical development. Expert opinion: Combinations of inhibitors of the PD1/PD-L1 axis with VEGF inhibitors or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA)-4 inhibitors have shown promising efficacy in mRCC. The development of biomarkers predictive for benefit and rational tolerable combinations are both important pillars of research to improve outcomes in RCC.

Non-AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: A single-institution experience

AIM To evaluate the outcomes and potential prognostic factors in patients with non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related Kaposis sarcoma (KS). METHODS Patients with histologically proven non-AIDS-related KS treated with systemic chemotherapy were included in this retrospective analysis. In some cases, the human herpes virus 8 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The patients were staged according to the Mediterranean KS staging system. A multivariable model was constructed using a forward stepwise selection procedure. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all tests were two-sided. RESULTS Thirty-two cases were included in this analysis. The average age at diagnosis was 70 years, with a male/female ratio of approximately 2:1. Eighty-four percent of the cases had classic KS. All patients received systemic chemotherapy containing one of the following agents: vinca alkaloid, taxane, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Ten patients (31.5%) experienced a partial response, and a complete response was achieved in four patients (12.4%) and stable disease in sixteen cases (50%). Two patients (6.2%) were refractory to the systemic treatment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.7 mo, whereas the median overall survival was 28.5 mo. At multivariate analysis, the presence of nodular lesions (vs macular lesions only) was significantly related to a lower PFS (hazard ratio: 3.09; 95%CI: 1.18-8.13, P = 0.0133). CONCLUSION Non-AIDS-related KS appears mostly limited to the skin and is well-responsive to systemic therapies. Our data show that nodular lesions may be associated with a shorter PFS in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Non-small cell lung cancer: from targeted therapy to tailored therapy.

Since large, randomized controlled trials showed a positive effect of chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over two decades ago [1,2], a considerable number of Phase III trials have been carried out, defining current clinical recommendations for the management of the disease [3]. As platinum compounds quickly emerged as the mainstay of treatment of NSCLC in the first-line setting, cisplatin and carboplatin have been combined in a wide variety of regimens, with a 1-year survival rate increasing from 10 to 15% with first-generation agents (e.g., mitomycin, ifosfamide) to 20 -25% associated with second-generation agents such as etoposide [2]. A plateau, with a 1-year survival rate around 30 -35% and a median overall survival around 8 -10 months, has been achieved with a number of third-generation regimens [3], including cisplatin and gemcitabine, cisplatin and docetaxel, carboplatin and paclitaxel, and cisplatin and vinorelbine [4,5]. In spite of comparable results in terms of survival and progression-free survival, third-generation agents present a remarkably heterogeneous toxicity profile, which should be wisely incorporated in the decision-making process for the choice of first-line treatment. In fact, as exemplified by Scagliotti et al. [4], grade 3 -4 neutropenia and nausea/vomiting were prominent side effects of vinorelbine/cisplatin, while grade 3 -4 thrombocytopenia was most frequent with gemcitabine/cisplatin, and grade 3/4 alopecia and peripheral neurotoxicity were most common with carboplatin paclitaxel. Taking such data into account, the treating physician should regard patients with diabetic neuropathy to be unsuitable to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel, which may represent the treatment of choice in patients unable to tolerate hydration required for or expected nephotoxic effects of cisplatin. Similarly, cisplatin and gemcitabine may be inappropriate in patients with bleeding disorders or history of hemoptysis. With the advent of targeted therapy for treatment of NSCLC, the choice of the chemotherapy agents to be employed has become even more critical, as our efforts to increase treatment efficacy by combining chemotherapy with targeted agents may be vain if overlapping side effects cause unacceptable toxicity. In fact, unlike small molecules such as gefitinib, erlotinib and crizotinib, which are employed as single agents [3], monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and bevacizumab, respectively, directed at EGFR and VEGF, showed to be effective when combined with chemotherapy [6-8]. While rash is the main side effect associated with cetuximab [8], bevacizumab causes a variety of toxic effects such as hypertension, bleeding, fatigue and thrombosis/embolism both when employed in combination with chemotherapy as in NSCLC [6,7] and as single agent as in kidney cancer [9]. In particular, in a meta-analysis involving 14,277 patients with solid tumors treated with bevacizumab, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy increased the risk of severe bleeding by 60%, with a greater than threefold