Davina Porock

A meta-analysis of exercise interventions among people treated for cancer

GoalThis review applied meta-analytic procedures to integrate primary research findings that tested exercise interventions among people treated for cancer.MethodsExtensive literature searching strategies located published and unpublished intervention studies that tested exercise interventions with at least five participants (k=30). Primary study results were coded. Meta-analytic procedures were conducted.Main resultsThe overall weighted mean effect size (ES) for two-group comparisons was 0.52 (higher mean for treatment than control) for physical function, 0.35 for symptoms other than fatigue, and 0.27 for body composition. More modest positive ESs were documented for mood (0.19), quality of life (0.14), fatigue (0.11), and exercise behavior (0.04). ESs were larger among single-group pre–post design studies. ESs among control group participants were typically negative and not (statistically) significantly different from 0.ConclusionsExercise interventions resulted in small positive effects on health and well-being outcomes among existing studies. Future research should examine intervention-specific characteristics that result in optimal results, such as dose.

Predicting Breast cancer-related Lymphedema using self-reported symptoms

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the accuracy of using self-reported signs and symptoms to identify the presence of lymphedema as well as the usefulness of identifying clinically measurable lymphedema on the basis of certain symptoms elicited by the Lymphedema Breast Cancer Questionnaire (LBCQ). MethodsThis analysis used logistic regression to identify symptoms predictive of differences between symptom experiences of participants belonging to two distinct groups (study A): those with known post-breast cancer lymphedema (n = 40) and those in a control group of women with no history of breast cancer or lymphedema (n = 40). Symptoms in this model of best fit were used to examine their relation to limb circumferences of breast cancer survivors in a second independent data set (study B; n = 103) in which a diagnosis of known lymphedema was not previously determined using symptom experiences. ResultsThe presence of lymphedema was predicted by three symptoms comprising a model of best fit for study A (c = .952): “heaviness in past year,” “swelling now,” and “numbness in past year.” Using this model, prediction of absolute maximal circumferential limb difference (i.e., ≥2 cm) in study B showed that “heaviness in the past year” (p = .0279) and “swelling now” (p = .0007) were predictive. “Numbness in the past year” was not predictive. However, those with lesser limb differences reported this symptom more often. ConclusionsThe findings suggest that changes in sensations may be indicators of early lymphedema or other treatment-related sequelae that must be assessed carefully at each follow-up visit and over time. A combination of symptom assessment and limb volume measurement may provide the best clinical assessment data for identifying changes associated with post-breast cancer lymphedema.

The challenges of achieving person-centred care in acute hospitals: A qualitative study of people with dementia and their families

BACKGROUND Person-centred care has been identified as the ideal approach to caring for people with dementia. Developed in relation to long stay settings, there are challenges to its implementation in acute settings. However, international policy indicates that acute care for people with dementia should be informed by the principles of person-centred care and interventions should be designed to sustain their personhood. OBJECTIVES Using Kitwoods five dimensions of personhood as an a priori framework, the aim of this paper was to explore the way in which current approaches to care in acute settings had the potential to enhance personhood in older adults with dementia. DESIGN Data collected to explore the current experiences of people with dementia, family carers and co-patients (patients sharing the ward with people with mental health problems) during hospitalisation for acute illness were analysed using a dementia framework that described core elements of person centred care for people with dementia. SETTINGS Recruitment was from two major hospitals within the East Midlands region of the UK, focusing on patients who were admitted to general medical, health care for older people, and orthopaedic wards. PARTICIPANTS Participants were people aged over 70 on the identified acute wards, identified through a screeing process as having possible mental health problems. 34 patients and their relatives were recruited: this analysis focused on the 29 patients with cognitive impairment. METHOD The study involved 72 h of ward-based non-participant observations of care complemented by 30 formal interviews after discharge concerning the experiences of the 29 patients with cognitive impairment. Analysis used the five domains of Kitwoods model of personhood as an a priori framework: identity, inclusion, attachment, comfort and occupation. RESULTS While there were examples of good practice, health care professionals in acute settings were not grasping all opportunities to sustain personhood for people with dementia. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for the concept of person-centred care to be valued at the level of both the individual and the organisation/team for people with dementia to have appropriate care in acute settings.

Professional tears: developing emotional intelligence around death and dying in emergency work

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES This paper explores how emergency nurses manage the emotional impact of death and dying in emergency work and presents a model for developing expertise in end-of-life care delivery. BACKGROUND Care of the dying, the deceased and the bereaved is largely conducted by nurses and nowhere is this more demanding than at the front door of the hospital, the Emergency Department. Whilst some nurses find end-of-life care a rewarding aspect of their role, others avoid opportunities to develop a relationship with the dying and bereaved because of the intense and exhausting nature of the associated emotional labour. DESIGN Qualitative study using unstructured observations of practice and semistructured interviews. METHODS Observation was conducted in a large Emergency Department over 12 months. We also conducted 28 in-depth interviews with emergency staff, patients with terminal illnesses and their relatives. RESULTS Emergency nurses develop expertise in end-of-life care giving by progressing through three stages of development: (1) investment of the self in the nurse-patient relationship, (2) management of emotional labour and (3) development of emotional intelligence. Barriers that prevent the transition to expertise contribute to occupational stress and can lead to burnout and withdrawal from practice. CONCLUSIONS Despite the emotional impact of emergency deaths, nurses who invest their therapeutic self into the nurse-patient relationship are able to manage the emotional labour of caring for the dying and their relatives through the development of emotional intelligence. They find reward in end-of-life care that ultimately creates a more positive experience for patients and their relatives. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE The emergency nurse caring for the dying patient is placed in a unique and privileged position to make a considerable impact on the care of the patient and the experience for their family. This model can build awareness in managing the emotive aspects involved in care delivery and develop fundamental skills of nursing patients near the end of life.

Care in specialist medical and mental health unit compared with standard care for older people with cognitive impairment admitted to general hospital: randomised controlled trial (NIHR TEAM trial)

Objective To develop and evaluate a best practice model of general hospital acute medical care for older people with cognitive impairment. Design Randomised controlled trial, adapted to take account of constraints imposed by a busy acute medical admission system. Setting Large acute general hospital in the United Kingdom. Participants 600 patients aged over 65 admitted for acute medical care, identified as “confused” on admission. Interventions Participants were randomised to a specialist medical and mental health unit, designed to deliver best practice care for people with delirium or dementia, or to standard care (acute geriatric or general medical wards). Features of the specialist unit included joint staffing by medical and mental health professionals; enhanced staff training in delirium, dementia, and person centred dementia care; provision of organised purposeful activity; environmental modification to meet the needs of those with cognitive impairment; delirium prevention; and a proactive and inclusive approach to family carers. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: number of days spent at home over the 90 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes: structured non-participant observations to ascertain patients’ experiences; satisfaction of family carers with hospital care. When possible, outcome assessment was blind to allocation. Results There was no significant difference in days spent at home between the specialist unit and standard care groups (median 51 v 45 days, 95% confidence interval for difference −12 to 24; P=0.3). Median index hospital stay was 11 versus 11 days, mortality 22% versus 25% (−9% to 4%), readmission 32% versus 35% (−10% to 5%), and new admission to care home 20% versus 28% (−16% to 0) for the specialist unit and standard care groups, respectively. Patients returning home spent a median of 70.5 versus 71.0 days at home (−6.0 to 6.5). Patients on the specialist unit spent significantly more time with positive mood or engagement (79% v 68%, 2% to 20%; P=0.03) and experienced more staff interactions that met emotional and psychological needs (median 4 v 1 per observation; P<0.001). More family carers were satisfied with care (overall 91% v 83%, 2% to 15%; P=0.004), and severe dissatisfaction was reduced (5% v 10%, −10% to 0%; P=0.05). Conclusions Specialist care for people with delirium and dementia improved the experience of patients and satisfaction of carers, but there were no convincing benefits in health status or service use. Patients’ experience and carers’ satisfaction might be more appropriate measures of success for frail older people approaching the end of life. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01136148

Barriers to Pain Management: Caregiver Perceptions and Pain Talk by Hospice Interdisciplinary Teams

As patients are cared for in their homes by family caregivers, several challenges arise in effective pain and symptom management. Despite hospices reputation as the gold standard for terminal care, there is still a need to improve pain management practices, including challenges that caregivers face, related to pain assessment, reluctance and fear of administering medication, noncompliance with pain medicine regimens, and hesitance to report pain. The hospice philosophy of care promotes service for both patients and their family by an interdisciplinary team, and total pain management is a goal of this care. The aim of this control phase of a larger National Cancer Institute-funded mixed methods study was to understand the current practice of hospice assessment and collaboration on informal caregiver issues related to pain management. This study of 30 hospice caregiver--patient dyads from one rural hospice found that 87% of caregivers indicated concern with at least one question on the Caregiver Pain Medicine Questionnaire. Interdisciplinary team discussions for 23 of the dyads were recorded over nine months for a total of 86 sessions. Although caregiver concerns were identified with the Caregiver Pain Medicine Questionnaire by the research team, there was only one discussion of caregiver pain-related concerns during the hospice team meeting. This despite the finding that 38% of the time involved in a patient discussion is spent on pain-related talk. These findings indicate an opportunity for improvement by hospice teams through focusing on caregiver assessment and intervention.

The MDS Mortality Risk Index: The evolution of a method for predicting 6-month mortality in nursing home residents

BackgroundAccurate prognosis is vital to the initiation of advance care planning particularly in a vulnerable, at risk population such as care home residents. The aim of this paper is to report on the revision and simplification of the MDS Mortality Rating Index (MMRI) for use in clinical practice to predict the probability of death in six months for care home residents.MethodsThe design was a secondary analysis of a US Minimum Data Set (MDS) for long term care residents using regression analysis to identify predictors of mortality within six months.ResultsUsing twelve easy to collect items, the probability of mortality within six months was accurately predicted within the MDS database. The items are: admission to the care home within three months; lost weight unintentionally in past three months; renal failure; chronic heart failure; poor appetite; male; dehydrated; short of breath; active cancer diagnosis; age; deteriorated cognitive skills in past three months; activities of daily living score.ConclusionA lack of recognition of the proximity of death is often blamed for inappropriate admission to hospital at the end of an older persons life. An accurate prognosis for older adults living in a residential or nursing home can facilitate end of life decision making and planning for preferred place of care at the end of life. The original MMRI was derived and validated from a large database of long term care residents in the USA. However, this simplification of the revised index (MMRI-R) may provide a means for facilitating prognostication and end of life discussions for application outside the USA where the MDS is not in use. Prospective testing is needed to further test the accuracy of the MMRI-R and its application in the UK and other non-MDS settings.

Trajectories of End-of-Life Care in the Emergency Department

STUDY OBJECTIVE The emergency department (ED) is the gateway to the hospital setting. Despite the intentions from the end-of-life care strategy in the UK to improve care provision, the ED has increasingly become the access site for end-of-life support. Little attention has been given to this aspect of the work of the ED, even as the quality of end-of-life care in hospitals has become the subject of increasing concerns. We explore end-of-life care in the ED and provide an understanding of how care is delivered to the dying, deceased and bereaved in the emergency setting. METHODS Observation was carried out in a large urban ED during 12 months. This was complemented by detailed interviews with emergency staff, patients diagnosed with a terminal condition, who had visited the ED in the previous 6 months, and their relatives. Data were analyzed thematically, following the normal conventions of ethnographic research. RESULTS Two distinct trajectories of end-of-life care were identified in the ED; the spectacular and the subtacular. Patients and family members experiencing end-of-life care in the ED have distinctly different care because of the nature of these 2 trajectories, frequently resulting in dissatisfaction for staff and distress and frustration for patients and their relatives. CONCLUSION The ED is priority driven, focused on resuscitation and the prolongation of life. As a result of the consuming nature of the spectacular death, a reluctance to build relationships with the dying, and a lack of educational support, the care needs of patients in the subtacular trajectory are somewhat neglected. These trajectories can be used to identify the shortfalls in end-of-life care in the ED and raise serious concerns for policy in regard to staffing, resources, and professional development.

Hospice and nonhospice nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE To compare hospice residents in nursing homes with residents who are noted as end-stage, but not in hospice programs. DESIGN Descriptive comparison of the outcomes reported on Minimum Data Set (MDS) for all residents admitted to Missouri nursing homes in 1999. SETTING Nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS Residents of nursing homes designated as either hospice or end-stage on admission MDS. MEASUREMENTS Percentage of hospice residents having various conditions as compared with other end-stage residents. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS Overall the clinical conditions of both hospice and nonhospice end-stage residents were similar. A greater percentage of hospice residents were found to have living wills, DNR orders, and cancer, and to be in moderate or severe pain. Hospice and nonhospice residents experienced similar time from admission to death or discharge (20 and 36 days, respectively). Based on the clinical condition of the two groups, it would appear that there are limited clinical reasons for the low utilization of the hospice benefit in nursing homes. The increased prevalence of advance care planning may lead toward use of hospice or may result from hospice enrollment. Hospice services seem to be thought of more frequently for residents with cancer and residents experiencing pain. Nursing homes must recognize their role as caregivers to the dying before palliative care is seen as a need for nursing home residents. Nursing homes need education in determining when a patient is appropriate for palliative care as only 4% are designated as end of life, and only 2% are shown to be receiving hospice care in hospice-contracted facilities.

The use of interviews in Q methodology: card content analysis.

Background: Although much has been published in the literature on how to perform a Q methodological study, the use of interviews within this process has received little attention. Approach: The purpose of this review is to explore the use of interviews in a Q methodological study. Results: An introduction to Q methodology is provided. The aims of an interview within a Q methodological study are described, and how these aims lend themselves to a particular method of analysis is explored. How to perform this analysis is outlined. Discussion: The use of interviews can increase the validity of a Q methodological study by providing the participants rationale for analysis of the factor arrays. When to perform the interviews is still under debate, and further study is required to determine whether the timing affects the results.