Dawei Lin
University of Georgia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dawei Lin.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2005
Zhi-Jie Liu; Wolfram Tempel; Joseph D. Ng; Dawei Lin; Ashit K. Shah; Lirong Chen; Peter S. Horanyi; Jeff E. Habel; Irina Kataeva; Hao Xu; Hua Yang; Jessie Chang; Huang L; Chang Sh; Weihong Zhou; Doowon Lee; Jeremy L. Praissman; Hua Zhang; M.G. Newton; John P. Rose; Jane S. Richardson; David C. Richardson; Bi-Cheng Wang
Using a high degree of automation, the crystallography core at the Southeast Collaboratory for Structural Genomics (SECSG) has developed a high-throughput protein-to-structure pipeline. Various robots and automation procedures have been adopted and integrated into a pipeline that is capable of screening 40 proteins for crystallization and solving four protein structures per week. This pipeline is composed of three major units: crystallization, structure determination/validation and crystallomics. Coupled with the protein-production cores at SECSG, the protein-to-structure pipeline provides a two-tiered approach for protein production at SECSG. In tier 1, all protein samples supplied by the protein-production cores pass through the pipeline using standard crystallization screening and optimization procedures. The protein targets that failed to yield diffraction-quality crystals (resolution better than 3.0 A) become tier 2 or salvaging targets. The goal of tier 2 target salvaging, carried out by the crystallomics core, is to produce the target proteins with increased purity and homogeneity, which would render them more likely to yield well diffracting crystals. This is performed by alternative purification procedures and/or the introduction of chemical modifications to the proteins (such as tag removal, methylation, surface mutagenesis, selenomethionine labelling etc.). Details of the various procedures in the pipeline for protein crystallization, target salvaging, data collection/processing and high-throughput structure determination/validation, as well as some examples, are described.
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics | 2005
Zhi-Jie Liu; Ashit K. Shah; Jeff E. Habel; Joseph D. Ng; Irina Kataeva; Hao Xu; Peter S. Horanyi; Hua Yang; Jessie Chang; M. Zhao; Lei Huang; Sue Chang; Wolfram Tempel; Lirong Chen; Weihong Zhou; Doowon Lee; Dawei Lin; Hua Zhang; M. Gary Newton; John P. Rose; Bi-Cheng Wang
Proteins derived from the coding regions of Pyrococcus furiosus are targets for three-dimensional X-ray and NMR structure determination by the Southeast Collaboratory for Structural Genomics (SECSG). Of the 2200 open reading frames (ORFs) in this organism, 220 protein targets were cloned and expressed in a high-throughput (HT) recombinant system for crystallographic studies. However, only 96 of the expressed proteins could be crystallized and, of these, only 15 have led to structures. To address this issue, SECSG has recently developed a two-tier approach to protein production and crystallization. In this approach, tier-1 efforts are focused on producing protein for new Pfu(italics?) targets using a high-throughput approach. Tier-2 protein production efforts support tier-1 activities by (1) producing additional protein for further crystallization trials, (2) producing modified protein (further purification, methylation, tag removal, selenium labeling, etc) as required and (3) serving as a salvaging pathway for failed tier-1 proteins. In a recent study using this two-tiered approach, nine structures were determined from a set of 50 Pfu proteins, which failed to produce crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis. These results validate this approach and suggest that it has application to other HT crystal structure determination applications.
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2005
Zhi-Jie Liu; Dawei Lin; Wolfram Tempel; Jeremy L. Praissman; John P. Rose; Bi-Cheng Wang
Fig. 4 in the article by Liu et al. [(2005), Acta Cryst. D61, 520–527] was labelled incorrectly. A corrected version of the figure is given here. Also in §3.1.3 of the original article the Cr Kα wavelength was given incorrectly. It should be 2.29 A.
Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology | 2005
Marc L. Pusey; Zhi-Jie Liu; Wolfram Tempel; Jeremy L. Praissman; Dawei Lin; Bi-Cheng Wang; Jose A. Gavira; Joseph D. Ng
Journal of Proteome Research | 2005
Irina Kataeva; Jessie Chang; Hao Xu; Chi Hao Luan; Jizhong Zhou; Vladimir N. Uversky; Dawei Lin; Peter S. Horanyi; Zhi-Jie Liu; Lars G. Ljungdahl; John P. Rose; Ming Luo; Bi-Cheng Wang
Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2005
Zhi-Jie Liu; Dawei Lin; Wolfram Tempel; Jeremy L. Praissman; John P. Rose; Bi-Cheng Wang
Journal of Theoretical Biology | 2006
Yuhong Wang; Wei Li; Tongtong Zhang; Chuanfang Ding; Zhibin Lu; Nanye Long; John P. Rose; Bi-Cheng Wang; Dawei Lin
Archive | 2005
Dawei Lin; Zhi-Jie Liu; Jeremy L. Praissman; John P. Rose; Wolfram Tempel; Bi-Cheng Wang
Acta Crystallographica Section A | 2005
John P. Rose; Zhi-Jie Liu; Lirong Chen; Weihong Zhou; Doowon Lee; Dawei Lin; Wolfram Tempel; Z.-Q. Fu; Bi-Cheng Wang
Archive | 2004
Dawei Lin; Zhi-Jie Liu; Jeremy L. Praissman; John P. Rose; Wolfram Tempel; B.-C. Wang