Dawn M. Cooley
Purdue University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dawn M. Cooley.
The Prostate | 2000
Karen Cornell; David G. Bostwick; Dawn M. Cooley; Greg Hall; H. Jay Harvey; Mattie J. Hendrick; Bendicht U. Pauli; James A. Render; George Stoica; David C. Sweet; David J. Waters
Pet dogs and men share a vulnerability for the development of prostate carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to further characterize the clinical and pathologic features of spontaneous canine prostate carcinoma.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2007
David J. Waters; Shuren Shen; Huiping Xu; Seema S. Kengeri; Dawn M. Cooley; Emily C. Chiang; Yu Chen; Deborah L. Schlittler; Carol P. Oteham; Gerald F. Combs; Lawrence T. Glickman; J. Steven Morris; David G. Bostwick
To move closer to the goal of individualized risk prediction for prostate cancer, we used an in vivo canine model to evaluate whether the susceptibility of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) to oxidative stress-induced DNA damage could identify those individuals with the highest prostatic DNA damage. This hypothesis was tested in a population of 69 elderly male beagle dogs after they had completed a 7-month randomized feeding trial to achieve the broad range of dietary selenium status observed in U.S. men. The alkaline Comet assay was used to directly compare the extent of DNA damage in PBLs with prostatic DNA damage in each dog. Using stepwise logistic regression, the sensitivity of PBLs to oxidative stress challenge with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) predicted dogs in the highest tertile of prostatic DNA damage. Dogs with PBLs highly sensitive to H2O2 were 7.6 times [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.5-38.3] more likely to have high prostatic DNA damage than those in the H2O2-resistant group. This risk stratification was observed in multivariate analysis that considered other factors that might influence DNA damage, such as age, toenail selenium concentration, and serum testosterone concentration. Our data show that the sensitivity of PBLs to oxidative stress challenge, but not endogenous DNA damage in PBLs, provides a noninvasive surrogate marker for prostatic DNA damage. These findings lend support to the concept that oxidative stress contributes to genotoxic damage, and that oxidative stress challenge may stratify men for prostate cancer risk. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(9):1906–10)
Mutation Research | 2001
Shuren Shen; Dawn M. Cooley; Lawrence T. Glickman; Nita W. Glickman; David J. Waters
Steady state levels of DNA damage are substantial in vertebrate animals as a consequence of exposure to endogenous and environmental mutagens. DNA damage may contribute to organismal senescence and an increased risk for specific age-related diseases. In this study, we determined if treatment with the neuroactive adrenal steroid, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), which exhibits antioxidant and anticarcinogenic properties in rodents, would reduce DNA damage in the brain and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) of elderly dogs. Elderly male dogs, physiologically equivalent to 59-69-year-old men, were randomly assigned to receive no treatment (n=9 dogs) or DHEA at 100mg/kg PO daily (n=8 dogs). Extent of DNA damage in brain cells and PBLs was measured using alkaline comet assay. The effect of DHEA treatment on the susceptibility of PBLs to H(2)O(2)-induced DNA damage was also measured. We found that elderly male dogs receiving daily DHEA treatment for 7 months had significantly less DNA damage detectable in their brain compared to age-matched control dogs. After 7 months treatment, DHEA-treated dogs also had a significant reduction in DNA damage in PBLs compared to pre-treatment levels. We also found that PBLs of dogs treated with DHEA were more resistant to H(2)O(2)-induced DNA damage than PBLs of untreated dogs. Our results did not show that basal DNA damage in PBLs was strongly correlated with DNA damage within the brain. The results of this study suggest that DHEA supplementation can significantly reduce steady state levels of DNA damage in the mammalian brain. Further evaluation of DHEA as a neuroactive agent and its effects on DNA damage and gene expression in other tissues and species is warranted.
Carcinogenesis | 2005
David J. Waters; Shuren Shen; Lawrence T. Glickman; Dawn M. Cooley; David G. Bostwick; Junqi Qian; Gerald F. Combs; J. Steven Morris
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2003
David J. Waters; Shuren Shen; Dawn M. Cooley; David G. Bostwick; Junqi Qian; Gerald F. Combs; Lawrence T. Glickman; Carol P. Oteham; Deborah L. Schlittler; J. Steven Morris
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2002
Dawn M. Cooley; Benjamin C. Beranek; Deborah L. Schlittler; Nita W. Glickman; Lawrence T. Glickman; David J. Waters
Mutation Research | 2004
David J. Waters; Emily C. Chiang; Dawn M. Cooley; J. Steven Morris
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine | 1998
Dawn M. Cooley; David J. Waters
Journals of Gerontology Series A-biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | 2003
Dawn M. Cooley; Deborah L. Schlittler; Lawrence T. Glickman; Michael Hayek; David J. Waters
Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers | 2006
David J. Waters; Shuren Shen; Seema S. Kengeri; Huiping Xu; Deborah L. Schlittler; Emily C. Chiang; Yu Chen; Carol P. Oteham; Dawn M. Cooley; David G. Bostwick; Lawrence T. Glickman; Gerald F. Combs; Steven Morris