Debajyoti Bhowmik

The Effectiveness of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Molecular Monitoring Patterns in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Community Setting

BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated in clinical trials, including response to therapy, may not be representative of those treated in a community setting. Thus, we sought to determine the real-world effectiveness of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CML by evaluating response rates, all-cause discontinuation, and adherence. Response monitoring patterns were also analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective observational study, using the McKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology Network (MSH/USON) iKnowMed electronic health record database and medical charts, identified newly diagnosed CML patients who received first-line imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib from July 2007 to March 2011, and were then followed for ≥ 18 months. RESULTS Three hundred patients met study criteria (222 imatinib-treated, 34 dasatinib-treated, and 44 nilotinib-treated in the first-line). Molecular and cytogenetic response assessments were conducted less frequently than recommended (40% never had cytogenetic or molecular monitoring at any time). Patients treated with either dasatinib or nilotinib experienced higher response rates by 6, 12, and 18 months, faster time to major molecular response, and a significantly lower rate of all-cause treatment discontinuation within 18 months relative to imatinib-treated patients. Approximately 56% of all patients were adherent to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSION Dasatinib and nilotinib were more effective than imatinib as first-line therapy for CML in a community setting, as observed in descriptive and univariate analyses. The frequency of cytogenetic and molecular monitoring was lower than that recommended by current guidelines, including patients with no molecular or cytogenetic assessments during the 18-month follow-up. Therefore, MSH/USON is working toward improving compliance with response monitoring guidelines.

Determination of mild, moderate, and severe pain interference in patients with cancer

Abstract Effective assessment and management of pain in patients with cancer is strengthened by the patients report of how much pain interferes with daily functioning. This requires a clear delineation of different levels of pain interference. We derived optimal cutpoints for differentiating between mild, moderate, and severe pain interference assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and describe the prevalence and characteristics of pain-induced functional impairment in patients with cancer. Data were pooled across 3 Phase III pivotal trials. Patient-completed questionnaires included the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General Measure (FACT-G), and BPI. Optimal cutpoints for categorizing pain interference into 3 levels were derived using analysis of variance, with different cutpoint sets for BPI total interference (BPI-PITS, the average score of all 7 items), activity-related interference (BPI-WAW, the average score of work, general activity, and walking), and mood-related interference (BPI-REM, the average score of relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood) as independent variables and EQ5D–visual analog scale and total FACT-G score as dependent variables. To validate the cutpoints, we assessed whether interference categories were in concordance with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) levels. The optimal cutpoints were (2,5) for BPI-PITS, (2,6) for BPI-WAW, and (2,5) for BPI-REM. The mild (<2), moderate (2-5 or 2-6), and severe (>5 or >6) pain interference groups were significantly concordant with ECOG-PS levels (P < 0.0001). We empirically derived patient-reported pain interference categories in relation to clinician-rated performance status. These cutpoints may facilitate the conduct and interpretation of clinical evaluation, symptom epidemiology, and clinical trials.

Renal impairment and use of nephrotoxic agents in patients with multiple myeloma in the clinical practice setting in the United States

Renal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma and deterioration in renal function or renal failure may complicate clinical management. This retrospective study in patients with multiple myeloma using an electronic medical records database was designed to estimate the prevalence of renal impairment (single occurrence of estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 on or after multiple myeloma diagnosis) and chronic kidney disease (at least two eGFR values <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 after multiple myeloma diagnosis that had been measured at least 90 days apart), and to describe the use of nephrotoxic agents. Eligible patients had a first diagnosis of multiple myeloma (ICD‐9CM: 203.0x) between January 1, 2012 and March 31, 2015 with no prior diagnoses in the previous 6 months. Of 12,370 eligible patients, the prevalence of both renal impairment and chronic kidney disease during the follow‐up period was high (61% and 50%, respectively), and developed rapidly following the diagnosis of multiple myeloma (6‐month prevalence of 47% and 27%, respectively). Eighty percent of patients with renal impairment developed chronic kidney disease over the follow‐up period, demonstrating a continuing course of declining kidney function after multiple myeloma diagnosis. Approximately 40% of patients with renal impairment or chronic kidney disease received nephrotoxic agents, the majority of which were bisphosphonates. As renal dysfunction may impact the clinical management of multiple myeloma and is associated with poor prognosis, the preservation of renal function is critical, warranting non‐nephrotoxic alternatives where possible in managing this population.

Healthcare resource use and costs associated with renal impairment in US patients with bone metastases from solid tumors

Introduction During cancer progression, more than half of patients develop renal insufficiency, including chronic kidney disease. The primary and secondary objectives of this study were to estimate healthcare resource use and costs, respectively, associated with renal impairment in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors in the United States. Methods and materials This was a retrospective, observational cohort study conducted using administrative claims data for individuals with solid tumors and bone metastases. Control patients were matched to renal impairment patients using propensity scores (ratio up to 3:1) based on demographics, clinical characteristics, and baseline costs. Average per-patient per-year healthcare resource utilization and costs (total costs and cost components; 2013 dollars) were reported. Results In total, 2616 renal impairment patients were matched to 7211 control patients. Renal impairment patients had greater healthcare resource use compared with controls, including a greater mean number of hospital admissions (4.4 versus 2.1), longer average stay per hospital admission (7.4 versus 6.5 days), as well as greater mean number of physician office visits (22.9 versus 18.8), emergency department visits (3.1 versus 2.0), and hospital-based outpatient visits (18.8 versus 16.0) compared with control patients. Total costs were > 

Bone-targeted agent treatment patterns and the impact of bone metastases on patients with advanced breast cancer in real-world practice in six European countries

50,000 higher among renal impairment patients (

Healthcare resource use and costs associated with chronic kidney disease in US private insurance patients with multiple myeloma

142,267 versus

Bridging to survivorship in breast cancer: How BMI weighs in.

88,839; P < 0.001), with hospital costs accounting for

Economic burden of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma: analysis of US commercial claims database

72,557 for renal impairment patients, and

Examination of burden of skeletal-related events in patients naive to denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonates therapy in bone metastases from solid tumors population

27,858 for control patients (P < 0.001). Conclusion The healthcare resource use and costs associated with renal impairment in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors is high; efforts to reduce renal impairment in this population, including the potential avoidance of nephrotoxic agents, are warranted.

Chemotherapy Dose Intensity and Overall Survival Among Patients With Advanced Breast or Ovarian Cancer

Background Bone metastases (BMs) are common in patients with breast cancer and can lead to skeletal-related events (SREs), which are associated with increased pain and reduced quality of life (QoL). Bone-targeted agents (BTAs), like zoledronic acid and denosumab, reduce the incidence of SREs and delay progression of bone pain. Materials and methods We evaluated the management of BMs and pain in six European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK) using the Adelphi Breast Cancer Disease Specific Programme, which included a physician survey and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess the impact of BMs on pain and QoL. Results 301 physicians completed patient record forms for 2984 patients with advanced breast cancer; 1408 with BMs and 1136 with metastases at sites other than bone (non-BMs). Most patients with BMs (88%) received a BTA, with 81% receiving treatment during 3 months following BM diagnosis. For those who did not receive a BTA, the main reasons given were: very recent BM diagnosis, perceived low risk of bone complications, and short life expectancy. Most patients with BMs (68%) were experiencing bone pain and, of these, 97% were taking analgesics (including 28% receiving strong opioids). Despite this, moderate to severe pain was reported in 20% of patients who were experiencing pain. PROs were assessed in 766 patients with advanced breast cancer (392 with BMs, 374 with non-BMs). Overall, patients with BMs reported worse pain and QoL outcomes than those with non-BMs, those not receiving a BTA reported worse pain. Conclusion Despite the large proportion of patients receiving BTAs in this study, some patients with BMs are still not receiving early treatment to prevent SREs or to manage pain. Improving physicians’ understanding of the role of BTAs and the importance of early treatment following BM diagnosis has the potential to improve patient care.