Debbie L. Cohen
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Debbie L. Cohen.
Journal of Hypertension | 2014
Michael A. Weber; Ernesto L. Schiffrin; William B. White; Samuel J. Mann; Lars H Lindholm; John G. Kenerson; John M. Flack; Barry L. Carter; Barry J. Materson; C. Venkata S. Ram; Debbie L. Cohen; Jean Claude Cadet; Roger R. Jean‐Charles; Sandra J. Taler; David S. Kountz; Raymond R. Townsend; John Chalmers; Agustin J. Ramirez; George L. Bakris; Ji-Guang Wang; Aletta E. Schutte; John D. Bisognano; Rhian M. Touyz; D Sica; Stephen B. Harrap
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension in the Community A Statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension | 2014
Michael A. Weber; Ernesto L. Schiffrin; William B. White; Samuel J. Mann; Lars H Lindholm; John G. Kenerson; John M. Flack; Barry L. Carter; Barry J. Materson; C. Venkata S. Ram; Debbie L. Cohen; Jean‐Claude Cadet; Roger R. Jean‐Charles; Sandra J. Taler; David S. Kountz; Raymond R. Townsend; John Chalmers; Agustin J. Ramirez; George L. Bakris; Ji-Guang Wang; Aletta E. Schutte; John D. Bisognano; Rhian M. Touyz; D Sica; Stephen B. Harrap
Michael A. Weber, MD; Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD; William B. White, MD; Samuel Mann, MD; Lars H. Lindholm, MD; John G. Kenerson, MD; John M. Flack, MD; Barry L. Carter, Pharm D; Barry J. Materson, MD; C. Venkata S. Ram, MD; Debbie L. Cohen, MD; Jean-Claude Cadet, MD; Roger R. Jean-Charles, MD; Sandra Taler, MD; David Kountz, MD; Raymond R. Townsend, MD; John Chalmers, MD; Agustin J. Ramirez, MD; George L. Bakris, MD; Jiguang Wang, MD; Aletta E. Schutte, MD; John D. Bisognano, MD; Rhian M. Touyz, MD; Dominic Sica, MD; Stephen B. Harrap, MD
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2002
Roy D. Bloom; Vinaya Rao; Francis L. Weng; Robert A. Grossman; Debbie L. Cohen; Kevin C. Mange
Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) remains a common complication of immunosuppression. Although multiple risk factors have been implicated, none have been clearly identified as predisposing to the increased PTDM frequency observed in patients on tacrolimus. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been associated with diabetes and is a significant renal transplant comorbidity. In this study, records of 427 kidney recipients who had no known diabetes before transplantation were retrospectively examined. A multivariate logistic regression model was fit with covariates that had unadjusted relationships with PTDM to examine the independent relationship of HCV and the odds of development of PTDM by 12 mo posttransplant. A potential interaction between HCV and the use of tacrolimus as maintenance therapy on the odds of the development of PTDM was examined. Overall, PTDM occurred more frequently in HCV(+) than HCV(-) patients (39.4% versus 9.8%; P = 0.0005). By multivariate logistic regression, HCV (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63 to 11.83; P = 0.0001), weight at transplantation (adjusted OR 1.028; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.05; P = 0.001), and tacrolimus (adjusted OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.01 to 5.28; P = 0.047) were associated with PTDM. A significant interaction (P = 0.0001) was detected between HCV status and tacrolimus use for the odds of PTDM. Among the HCV(+) cohort, PTDM occurred more often in tacrolimus-treated than cyclosporine A-treated patients (57.8% versus 7.7%; P < 0.0001). PTDM rates in HCV(-) patients were similar between the two calcineurin inhibitors (10.0% versus 9.4%; P = 0.521, tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A). In conclusion, HCV is strongly associated with PTDM in renal transplant recipients and appears to account for the increased diabetogenicity observed with tacrolimus.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2012
Gian Paolo Rossi; Marlena Barisa; Bruno Allolio; Richard J. Auchus; Laurence Amar; Debbie L. Cohen; Christoph Degenhart; Jaap Deinum; Evelyn Fischer; Richard D. Gordon; Ralph Kickuth; Gregory Kline; André Lacroix; Steven B. Magill; Diego Miotto; Mitsuhide Naruse; Tetsuo Nishikawa; Masao Omura; Eduardo Pimenta; P.-F. Plouin; Marcus Quinkler; Martin Reincke; Ermanno Rossi; Lars Christian Rump; Fumitoshi Satoh; Leo J. Schultze Kool; Teresa Maria Seccia; Michael Stowasser; Akiyo Tanabe; Scott O. Trerotola
CONTEXT In patients who seek surgical cure of primary aldosteronism (PA), The Endocrine Society Guidelines recommend the use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), which is invasive, technically challenging, difficult to interpret, and commonly held to be risky. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the complication rate of AVS and the ways in which it is performed and interpreted at major referral centers. DESIGN AND SETTINGS The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study conducted at major referral centers for endocrine hypertension worldwide. PARTICIPANTS Eligible centers were identified from those that had published on PA and/or AVS in the last decade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The protocols, interpretation, and costs of AVS were measured, as well as the rate of adrenal vein rupture and the rate of use of AVS. RESULTS Twenty of 24 eligible centers from Asia, Australia, North America, and Europe participated and provided information on 2604 AVS studies over a 6-yr period. The percentage of PA patients systematically submitted to AVS was 77% (median; 19-100%, range). Thirteen of the 20 centers used sequential catheterization, and seven used bilaterally simultaneous catheterization; cosyntropin stimulation was used in 11 centers. The overall rate of adrenal vein rupture was 0.61%. It correlated directly with the number of AVS performed at a particular center (P = 0.002) and inversely with the number of AVS performed by each radiologist (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Despite carrying a minimal risk of adrenal vein rupture and at variance with the guidelines, AVS is not used systematically at major referral centers worldwide. These findings represent an argument for defining guidelines for this clinically important but technically demanding procedure.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2010
Kristine Yaffe; Lynn Ackerson; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Patti Le Blanc; John W. Kusek; Ashwini R. Sehgal; Debbie L. Cohen; Cheryl A.M. Anderson; Lawrence J. Appel; Karen B. DeSalvo; Akinlolu Ojo; Stephen L. Seliger; Nancy Robinson; Gail Makos; Alan S. Go
OBJECTIVES: To investigate cognitive impairment in older, ethnically diverse individuals with a broad range of kidney function, to evaluate a spectrum of cognitive domains, and to determine whether the relationship between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cognitive function is independent of demographic and clinical factors.
The Lancet | 2017
Raymond R. Townsend; Felix Mahfoud; David E. Kandzari; Kazuomi Kario; Stuart J. Pocock; Michael A. Weber; Sebastian Ewen; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Andrew Sharp; Anthony Watkinson; Roland E. Schmieder; Axel Schmid; James W. Choi; Cara East; Anthony Walton; Ingrid Hopper; Debbie L. Cohen; Robert L. Wilensky; David P. Lee; Adrian Ma; Chandan Devireddy; Janice P. Lea; Philipp Lurz; Karl Fengler; Justin E. Davies; Neil Chapman; Sidney Cohen; Vanessa DeBruin; Martin Fahy
BACKGROUND Previous randomised renal denervation studies did not show consistent efficacy in reducing blood pressure. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the absence of antihypertensive medications. METHODS SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED was a multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Patients were enrolled at 21 centres in the USA, Europe, Japan, and Australia. Eligible patients were drug-naive or discontinued their antihypertensive medications. Patients with an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 150 mm Hg or greater and less than 180 mm Hg, office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 mm Hg or greater, and a mean 24-h ambulatory SBP of 140 mm Hg or greater and less than 170 mm Hg at second screening underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned to renal denervation or sham control. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing blood pressure were blinded to randomisation assignments. The primary endpoint, change in 24-h blood pressure at 3 months, was compared between groups. Drug surveillance was done to ensure patient compliance with absence of antihypertensive medication. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were assessed at 3 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02439749. FINDINGS Between June 25, 2015, and Jan 30, 2017, 353 patients were screened. 80 patients were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=38) or sham control (n=42) and followed up for 3 months. Office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months in the renal denervation group: 24-h SBP -5·5 mm Hg (95% CI -9·1 to -2·0; p=0·0031), 24-h DBP -4·8 mm Hg (-7·0 to -2·6; p<0·0001), office SBP -10·0 mm Hg (-15·1 to -4·9; p=0·0004), and office DBP -5·3 mm Hg (-7·8 to -2·7; p=0·0002). No significant changes were seen in the sham-control group: 24-h SBP -0·5 mm Hg (95% CI -3·9 to 2·9; p=0·7644), 24-h DBP -0·4 mm Hg (-2·2 to 1·4; p=0·6448), office SBP -2·3 mm Hg (-6·1 to 1·6; p=0·2381), and office DBP -0·3 mm Hg (-2·9 to 2·2; p=0·8052). The mean difference between the groups favoured renal denervation for 3-month change in both office and 24-h blood pressure from baseline: 24-h SBP -5·0 mm Hg (95% CI -9·9 to -0·2; p=0·0414), 24-h DBP -4·4 mm Hg (-7·2 to -1·6; p=0·0024), office SBP -7·7 mm Hg (-14·0 to -1·5; p=0·0155), and office DBP -4·9 mm Hg (-8·5 to -1·4; p=0·0077). Baseline-adjusted analyses showed similar findings. There were no major adverse events in either group. INTERPRETATION Results from SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED provide biological proof of principle for the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation. FUNDING Medtronic.
Journal of Clinical Hypertension | 2014
Michael A. Weber; Ernesto L. Schiffrin; William B. White; Samuel J. Mann; Lars H Lindholm; John G. Kenerson; John M. Flack; Barry L. Carter; Barry J. Materson; C. Venkata S. Ram; Debbie L. Cohen; Jean‐Claude Cadet; Roger R. Jean‐Charles; Sandra J. Taler; David S. Kountz; Raymond R. Townsend; John Chalmers; Agustin J. Ramirez; George L. Bakris; Ji-Guang Wang; Aletta E. Schutte; John D. Bisognano; Rhian M. Touyz; D Sica; Stephen B. Harrap
Michael A. Weber, MD; Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD; William B. White, MD; Samuel Mann, MD; Lars H. Lindholm, MD; John G. Kenerson, MD; John M. Flack, MD; Barry L. Carter, Pharm D; Barry J. Materson, MD; C. Venkata S. Ram, MD; Debbie L. Cohen, MD; Jean-Claude Cadet, MD; Roger R. Jean-Charles, MD; Sandra Taler, MD; David Kountz, MD; Raymond R. Townsend, MD; John Chalmers, MD; Agustin J. Ramirez, MD; George L. Bakris, MD; Jiguang Wang, MD; Aletta E. Schutte, MD; John D. Bisognano, MD; Rhian M. Touyz, MD; Dominic Sica, MD; Stephen B. Harrap, MD
Circulation | 2013
Bonnie Spring; Judith K. Ockene; Samuel S. Gidding; Dariush Mozaffarian; Shirley M. Moore; Milagros C. Rosal; Michael D Brown; Dorothea K. Vafiadis; Debbie L. Cohen; Lora E. Burke; Donald M. Lloyd-Jones
The American Heart Association (AHA) has adopted a bold new strategy in framing its 2020 goals: “By 2020, to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20% while reducing deaths from cardiovascular diseases and stroke by 20%.”1 By medically treating cardiovascular risk biomarkers and the disease itself, clinicians played a major role in achieving the AHA’s 2010 goal to reduce coronary heart disease, stroke, and risk by 25%.1 Now, however, with direct annual cardiovascular disease–related costs projected to triple, from
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2011
Manjula Kurella Tamura; Dawei Xie; Kristine Yaffe; Debbie L. Cohen; Valerie Teal; Scott E. Kasner; Steven R. Messé; Ashwini R. Sehgal; John W. Kusek; Karen B. DeSalvo; Denise Cornish-Zirker; Janet Cohan; Stephen L. Seliger; Glenn M. Chertow; Alan S. Go
272 billion in 2010 to
Journal of Hypertension | 2014
Imran H. Iftikhar; Christopher W. Valentine; Lia Rita Azeredo Bittencourt; Debbie L. Cohen; Annette C. Fedson; Thorarinn Gislason; Thomas Penzel; Craig L. Phillips; Lin Yu-sheng; Allan I. Pack; Ulysses J. Magalang
818 billion in 2030,2 economic realities necessitate a new approach. To avoid bankrupting the healthcare system, we must improve the distribution of cardiovascular health levels across the population by preserving cardiovascular health from childhood and by treating health risk behaviors to help more individuals improve their cardiovascular health into older ages. This heightened emphasis on preventing disease by addressing health behaviors leads to 3 novel emphases in the 2020 goals: (1) Preserving positive “cardiovascular health” by promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors; (2) treating unhealthful behaviors (poor-quality diet, excess energy intake, physical inactivity, smoking), in addition to risk biomarkers (adverse blood lipids, high blood pressure, hyperglycemia, obesity); and (3) a combination of individual-level and population-based health promotion strategies that aim to shift the majority of the public toward the next level of improved cardiovascular health. The 7 metrics that define cardiovascular health (smoking, diet quality, physical activity level, body mass index, blood pressure, blood cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose) are each classified into 3 clinical strata (ideal, intermediate, and poor). Individuals with all 7 metrics at ideal levels are considered to have “ideal cardiovascular health.” However, the prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health is very low in the US population, and the prevalence of poor-quality diet, physical inactivity, and overweight/obesity is alarmingly high, presaging …