Deborah Cox
Manchester Institute of Innovation Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Deborah Cox.
Technology Analysis & Strategic Management | 2006
Rebecca Boden; Deborah Cox; Maria Nedeva
Abstract Changes in the nature of science as a social practice were fundamentally organic and endogenous in nature prior to the 1970s. Since then changes in UK public science has been policy-led and the imperatives exogenous. This shift was the result of attempts to achieve strategic managed change in the sector using new public management (NPM) techniques. This paper explores the discourses that promoted the change effort and the NPM techniques and processes deployed to this end. It seeks to identify the aims and objectives of the intended strategic change and evaluates the extent to which they have been achieved. Our conclusion is that rather than a planned, strategic change process directed at improved economy, efficiency and effectiveness, what occurred was a poorly processed ideologically driven attempt to achieve political aims.
Luxembourg: European Union; 2015. Report No. ISBN 978-92-79-52922-1 doi: 10.2873/886211. | 2015
Patrice Muller; Cecilia Caliandro; Viktoriya Peycheva; Dimitri Gagliardi; Chiara Marzocchi; Ronald Ramlogan; Deborah Cox
This report provides an overview of the past and forecasted performance of SMEs from 2008 to 2016, and reviews in greater detail the contribution of SMEs to employment creation
In: RAW Rhodes, editor(s). Transforming British Government: Volume 2 - Changing Roles and Relationships. Houndmills: Macmillan; 2000.. | 2000
Philip Gummett; Deborah Cox; Rebecca Boden; Katharine Barker
This chapter examines the impact of administrative change in the 1980s and 1990s on the supply of science and technology services to British central government. Our concern is with the consequences of these changes for the operation of the supplying organisation, for its management for its customer department and for its relationship with its department. Hence, within our chosen policy domain, we explore the variety of organisational forms that have emerged during the late 1980s and 1990s. We seek to explain why they took the form that they did and we ask what effect these changes have had, in terms of the ostensible purposes of the reforms themselves.
Foresight | 2011
Katharine Barker; Deborah Cox; Thordis Sveinsdottir
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to describe and evaluate the use of a five‐step foresight process and the application of scenario methods to grasp the range of future alternatives that might confront researchers and research managers in European metrology research institutes. The sector is to be examined as a part of a larger study that aims to reflect on the potential future roles for the public research institutes, in several sectors (the other sectors in the study included civil space, plant science, geosurveys, and marine), towards the development of the European Research Area (ERA).Design/methodology/approach – The paper illustrates how scenario methods were used to, first, serve as a basis for policy recommendations for the field of European metrology research institutes and, second, help experts and stakeholders to network and actively discuss a shared vision of the future of the field.Findings – This case demonstrates the need for proactive strategic management which goes well beyond the instit...
Foresight | 2015
Lawrence Green; Deborah Cox; Krzysztof Borodako
The extent and diversity of social and community innovations, i.e. primarily “bottom-up” innovations designed to address some of the problems generated and gaps left by contemporary capitalism (Pol and Ville, 2009), has grown remarkably in the past decade. The harnessing by community groups, social entrepreneurs and digitally or proximally connected activists of physical, intellectual, social and network resources to drive innovation that addresses needs that are not adequately met by conventional systems, has become an ever more present feature of the innovation landscape. An era of dramatic and dynamic economic change has also drawn attention to a posited polarisation in earnings, ownership of assets and access to resources. This, in turn, has stimulated debate with respect to how assets might be shared more equitably and the implications of this for corporations, governments and citizens.
Research Evaluation | 2014
Stefan de Jong; Katharine Barker; Deborah Cox; Thordis Sveinsdottir; Peter van den Besselaar
Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. | 2004
Maria Nedeva; Deborah Cox; Rebecca Boden
Amsterdam: I.O.S Press; 2001. | 2001
Deborah Cox; Katharine Barker; Philip Gummett
In: Cox, Deborah; Gummett, Philip J. and Barker, Katharine E, editor(s). Government Laboratories - Transition and Transformation. Amsterdam: I.O.S Press; 2001. p. 96-19. | 2001
Luke Georghiou; Deborah Cox; Katharine Barker; Rebecca Boden; Philip Gummett
R & D Management | 2012
Katharine Barker; Deborah Cox; Thordis Sveinsdottir