Deborah Harrop
Sheffield Hallam University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Deborah Harrop.
Journal of Public Health | 2016
S. Fowler Davis; Pam Enderby; Deborah Harrop; L. Hindle
Objectives The objective was to identify a selection of the best examples of the public health contributions by Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) in order to encourage a wider awareness and participation from that workforce to public health practice. Study design A mapping exercise was used to identify evidence-based interventions that could lead to health improvements across a population. Methods A rapid review was undertaken to identify evidence, followed by a survey of Allied Health Profession (AHP) practitioners and an expert panel consensus method to select the examples of AHP public health interventions. Results Nine evidence-based interventions are identified and selected as examples of current AHP good practice. These examples represent a contribution to public health and include screening interventions, secondary prevention and risk management. Conclusions This study contributes to a strategy for AHPs in public health by appraising the effectiveness and impact of some exemplar AHP practices that contribute to health improvement. There is a need for AHPs to measure the impact of their interventions and to demonstrate evidence of outcomes at population level.
BMC Public Health | 2018
Katarzyna Machaczek; Peter Allmark; Elizabeth Goyder; Gordon Grant; Tom Ricketts; Nick Pollard; Andrew Booth; Deborah Harrop; Stephanie de-la Haye; Karen Collins; Geoff Green
BackgroundDepression is the largest contributor to disease burden globally. The evidence favouring physical activity as a treatment for mild-to-moderate depression is extensive and relatively uncontested. It is unclear, however, how to increase an uptake of physical activity amongst individuals experiencing mild-to-moderate depression. This leaves professionals with no guidance on how to help people experiencing mild-to-moderate depression to take up physical activity. The purpose of this study was to scope the evidence on interventions to increase the uptake of physical activity amongst individuals experiencing mild-to-moderate depression, and to develop a model of the mechanisms by which they are hypothesised to work.MethodsA scoping study was designed to include a review of primary studies, grey literature and six consultation exercises; two with individuals with experience of depression, two pre-project consultations with physical activity, mental health and literature review experts, one with public health experts, and one with community engagement experts.ResultsTen papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Consultation exercises provided insights into the mechanisms of an uptake of physical activity amongst individuals experiencing mild-to-moderate depression; evidence concerning those mechanisms is (a) fragmented in terms of design and purpose; (b) of varied quality; (c) rarely explicit about the mechanisms through which the interventions are thought to work. Physical, environmental and social factors that may represent mediating variables in the uptake of physical activity amongst people experiencing mild-to-moderate depression are largely absent from studies.ConclusionsAn explanatory model was developed. This represents mild-to-moderate depression as interfering with (a) the motivation to take part in physical activity and (b) the volition that it is required to take part in physical activity. Therefore, both motivational and volitional elements are important in any intervention to increase physical activity in people with mild-to-moderate depression. Furthermore, mild-to-moderate depression-specific factors need to be tackled in any physical activity initiative, via psychological treatments such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. We argue that the social and environmental contexts of interventions also need attention.
Systematic Reviews | 2015
Ahmad Salah Eldin Alreni; Deborah Harrop; Anil Gumber; Sionnadh McLean
BackgroundUpper limb disability is a common musculoskeletal condition frequently associated with neck pain. Recent literature has reported the need to utilise validated upper limb outcome measures in the assessment and management of patients with neck pain. However, there is a lack of clear guidance about the suitability of available measures, which may impede utilisation. This review will identify all available measures of upper limb function developed for use in neck pain patients and evaluate their measurement and practical properties in order to identify those measures that are most appropriate for use in clinical practice and research.Methods/designThis review will be performed in two phases. Phase one will identify all measures used to assess upper limb function for patients with neck pain. Phase two will identify all available studies of the measurement and practical properties of identified instrument. The COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstrument (COSMIN) will be used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. To ensure methodological rigour, the findings of this review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline.DiscussionOptimal management of patients with neck pain should incorporate upper limb rehabilitation. The findings of this study will assist clinicians who seek to utilise suitable and accurate measures to assess upper limb function for a patient with neck pain. In addition, the findings of this study may suggest new research directions to support the development of upper limb outcome measures for patients with neck pain.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42015016624
New Review of Academic Librarianship | 2013
Deborah Harrop; Beatrice Turpin
Health Services and Delivery Research | 2015
Steven M Ariss; Pam Enderby; Tony Smith; Susan Nancarrow; Mike Bradburn; Deborah Harrop; Stuart G. Parker; Ann McDonnell; Simon Dixon; Tony Ryan; Alexandra Hayman; Michael J. Campbell
Archive | 2015
Shona Kelly; Larissa E. Davies; Deborah Harrop; Alex McClimens; David Peplow; Nick Pollard
Archive | 2016
Punita Chowbey; Deborah Harrop
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing | 2018
Nicola Clibbens; Deborah Harrop; Sally Blackett
Systematic Reviews | 2017
Helen Quirk; Helen Crank; Deborah Harrop; Emma Hock; Robert Copeland
Archive | 2017
Anil Gumber; Bhanu Ramaswamy; Rachel Ibbotson; Mubarak Ismail; Oranuch Thongchundee; Deborah Harrop; Peter Allmark; Abdur Rauf