Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Deborah L. Rhatigan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Deborah L. Rhatigan.


Partner abuse | 2012

The Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders in a Community Sample of Female Victims of Intimate Partner Violence.

Alison M. Nathanson; Ryan C. Shorey; Vanessa Tirone; Deborah L. Rhatigan

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious, devastating, and prevalent problem. IPV places women at risk for negative health consequences, including increased mental health disorders. The majority of research to date has focused on mental health disorders among women in domestic violence shelters, and research is needed that examines mental health disorders among a broader range of women experiencing IPV. Therefore, this study examined the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and substance abuse disorders in a community sample of IPV victims (N = 94) using diagnostic interviews. Results showed that the majority of women met diagnostic criteria for a mental health disorder, with PTSD being the most common mental health disorder. Furthermore, psychological abuse was a significant predictor of both PTSD and depression, whereas physical aggression did not predict these outcomes. Implications of these findings for treatment and intervention work with battered women are discussed.


Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2011

Gender Differences in Depression and Anxiety Among Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: The Moderating Effect of Shame Proneness:

Ryan C. Shorey; Amanda E. Sherman; Aaron J. Kivisto; Sara R. Elkins; Deborah L. Rhatigan; Todd M. Moore

The current study examined the moderating role of shame proneness on the association between physical, psychological, and sexual intimate partner violence victimization and depressive and anxious symptoms among male and female college students (N = 967). Students completed self-report measures of dating violence, depression, anxiety, and shame proneness. Results showed that shame proneness moderated the association between all forms of victimization and mental health symptoms. A three-way interaction revealed that sexual victimization predicted symptoms of anxiety to a greater extent for men than for women at high levels of shame proneness. Furthermore, results showed that gender moderated the association between physical and psychological victimization and health outcomes, such that victimization was related to increased depressive and anxious symptoms for men but not for women. Interpretations of these findings are discussed in relation to violence interventions, including primary prevention, and men’s health.


Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2005

Reflections on Partner Violence 20 Years of Research and Beyond

Deborah L. Rhatigan; Todd M. Moore; Amy E. Street

The authors reflect on past research and technology as well as their hopes for future innovations within the field of intimate partner violence. They review work that has contributed to current conceptual definitions of partner violence, particularly those that have shaped the field’s broadened perspective. They discuss technological and measurement innovations that have contributed to more accurate assessments of violence prevalence. The authors believe that via these technologies, the true extent of violence within the home has been made known. In conclusion, the authors argue that to reduce violence between partners, there is an overwhelming need for future researchers to build on past data, develop improved theories, and apply those ideas to prevention and intervention techniques and programs. Furthermore, they believe that it is imperative for current and future programs to be extensively evaluated and tested for their effectiveness.


Partner abuse | 2011

Dating violence victimization and alcohol problems: An examination of the stress-buffering hypothesis for perceived support

Ryan C. Shorey; Deborah L. Rhatigan; Paula J. Fite; Gregory L. Stuart

Recent evidence suggests that victims of dating violence consume alcohol at greater rates than their nonvictimized peers, placing them at risk for the negative consequences produced by alcohol use. Thus, research that examines factors that protect victims from consuming alcohol is needed. Toward this end, the present study sought to examine whether perceived support served as a stress-buffering (moderating) variable on the relationship between dating violence victimization and alcohol problems among a sample of currently dating college students (N = 440). Partial support was found for the stress-buffering effect of perceived support, but this varied depending on the type of victimization examined. Implications of these findings for victim interventions and dating violence prevention programming are discussed.


Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment | 2009

Examining the interface between substance misuse and intimate partner violence.

Gregory L. Stuart; Timothy J. O’Farrell; Kenneth E. Leonard; Todd M. Moore; Jeff R. Temple; Susan E. Ramsey; Robert L. Stout; Christopher W. Kahler; Meggan M. Bucossi; Shawna M. Andersen; Patricia R. Recupero; Zach Walsh; Yael Chatav Schonbrun; David R. Strong; Emily F. Rothman; Deborah L. Rhatigan; Peter M. Monti

There is considerable theoretical and empirical support for a link between substance misuse and perpetration and victimization of intimate partner violence. This review briefly summarizes this literature and highlights current research that addresses the interface between treatment for substance abuse and intimate partner violence. Suggestions for future research and clinical implications are provided.


Journal of Traumatic Stress | 2009

The effects of PTSD symptomatology on laboratory-based aggression.

Aaron J. Kivisto; Todd M. Moore; Sara R. Elkins; Deborah L. Rhatigan

The present study sought to examine the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology and aggression using a highly controlled, quasi-experimental laboratory-based aggression paradigm among a sample of 85 undergraduate students not help-seeking for current PTSD phenomena. Congruent with theory and past research, results showed that PTSD symptomatology was positively associated with aggression. In demonstrating this effect using a laboratory-based methodology, the present study provides a heuristic for future researchers to explore potential mediators and moderators of the PTSD-aggression relationship.


Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2013

A Preliminary Investigation of the Influence of Subjective Norms and Relationship Commitment on Stages of Change in Female Intimate Partner Violence Victims

Ryan C. Shorey; Vanessa Tirone; Alison M. Nathanson; Vanessa A. Handsel; Deborah L. Rhatigan

Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a prevalent and serious problem throughout the world, causing devastating mental and physical health problems for victims. Recent research has begun to focus on factors that may influence women’s decisions to stay or leave their abusive partners, as interventions for batterers has only resulted in minimal success in reducing IPV. Therefore, this study preliminarily examined the influence of women’s perceptions of their social network members’ subjective norms and their relationship commitment on stages of change to end an abusive relationship among a community sample of female IPV victims (N = 84). Results showed that subjective norms and women’s relationship commitment were associated with women’s stages of change. Relationship commitment did not mediate the relation between subjective norms and stages of change. These findings indicate that a number of factors contribute to women’s stay/leave decision-making process, and close social network members could be included in interventions designed to keep women safe.


Violence & Victims | 2011

Antisociality and intimate partner violence: the facilitating role of shame.

Aaron J. Kivisto; Katherine L. Kivisto; Todd M. Moore; Deborah L. Rhatigan

Numerous theories classify distinct subtypes of men who perpetrate violence against female partners. These theories contend that a large portion of these men possess antisocial characteristics that may increase risk for violence. Affectively, these men have been found to externalize their emotions, including shame and guilt, and it has been suggested that this process contributes to the perpetration of partner violence. Therefore, this study sought to examine the role of shame and guilt in the association between antisociality and partner violence perpetration (i.e., psychological, physical, and sexual). Based on a sample of 423 undergraduate men, this study found that shame moderated the association between antisociality and partner violence perpetration such that as shame increases, the associations between antisociality and all three types of partner violence perpetration increase. These findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of typological models of partner violence and have clinical implications for batterer intervention programs.


Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2012

Who Gets Blamed for Intimate Partner Violence? The Relative Contributions of Perpetrator Sex Category, Victim Confrontation, and Observer Attitudes

Cindy Stewart; Todd M. Moore; Travis S. Crone; Stacie Craft DeFreitas; Deborah L. Rhatigan

The present study examined the effects of perpetrator sex category, victim confrontation, observer sex category, and observer attitudes on attributions of blame and behavioral stability for partner violence. Data were collected from 728 college-aged students enrolled at 2 universities in the United States. Results demonstrated that males and females attributed less blame and behavioral stability to female perpetrators than male perpetrators, especially if the perpetrator was provoked. Moreover, attitudes toward women and violence were important for predicting attributions, and some of the evidence for observer effects was reduced to nonsignificance once these variables were added to the model.


Violence Against Women | 2010

The Role of Female Behavior and Attributions in Predicting Behavioral Responses to Hypothetical Male Aggression

Deborah L. Rhatigan; Alison M. Nathanson

Research suggests that situational characteristics influence attributions for violent events. The present study examined the effect of confrontational female behavior on women’s positive and negative attributions for their boyfriends’ abusive behavior and the influence of confrontational behavior and attributions on intentions to remain involved with those partners. College women (N = 293) read descriptions of scenes that involved dating conflict and provided attribution ratings and stay/leave intentions. Results showed that female behavior predicted positive and negative attributions as well as behavioral intentions. Individual differences were less critical to the prediction of attributions or intentions. Limitations, future directions, and clinical implications are discussed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Deborah L. Rhatigan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cindy Stewart

University of Houston–Downtown

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge