Deborah R. Schuller

Relationship between the five-factor model of personality and unipolar, bipolar and schizophrenic patients

The purpose of this study was to examine personality differences among three different Axis I disorders-recovered patients with unipolar depression (n = 62), euthymic patients with bipolar disorder (n = 34), and patients with schizophrenia in the residual phase of their illness (n = 41) using the five-factor model of personality (FFM). The dimensions of the FFM-Neuroticism (N), Extraversion (E), Openness (O), Agreeableness (A), and Conscientiousness (C)-were measured with composite scores derived from the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI) and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). While no group differences emerged on N or C, the bipolar patients scored significantly higher on the Positive Emotion facet (subscale) of E than the unipolar patients. The schizophrenic patients scored lower on the Feelings, Values and Actions facets of O than did the unipolar and bipolar patients. The unipolar patients scored higher on A than the schizophrenic patients.

Bipolar disorder, unipolar depression and the Five-Factor Model of Personality.

We examined differences between personality characteristics of euthymic bipolar disorder patients (BD) (n = 34) and recovered unipolar depressed patients (UD) (n = 74) using the taxonomy of the Five-Factor Model of personality (FFM) as measured by composite scales derived from the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI) and the revised NEO PI (NEO PI-R). Euthymic BD patients scored significantly higher on the Openness (O) dimension and the Positive Emotions facet of the E dimension than did recovered UD patients. For O, euthymic BD patients scored higher on the Feelings facet. These results suggest not only that euthymic BD patients are more likely to experience positive affects than recovered UD patients, but also that euthymic BD patients are more receptive to their positive and negative feelings than are recovered UD patients.

Seasonal and non-seasonal depression and the five-factor model of personality

The purpose of this study was to compare the personality characteristics of patients with non-psychotic, major depression, seasonal subtype (SAD) to patients with non-psychotic, major depression, without seasonality (non-SAD). The patients were consecutive referrals to a university-affiliated mood disorders outpatient clinic. The personality characteristics were assessed using the five-factor model of personality (FFM) as measured by the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). Patients were assessed during the acute depressive episode. Controlling for severity of depression, differences were found on only one of the five dimensions, with the SAD patients (n = 43) scoring significantly higher on the Openness dimension than non-SAD patients (n = 57). Based on these results we infer SAD patients may represent a psychologically distinct subgroup of depressed patients-more imaginative, more emotionally sensitive and likely to entertain unconventional ideas than non-SAD patients. This personality constellation may explain why individuals with SAD are more sensitive to and may amplify the mild dysphoria typically associated with winter months.

The Overlap Of Depressive Personality Disorder and Dysthymia: A Categorical Problem With a Dimensional Solution

In this paper we review the research literature on depressive personality. We begin with a brief discussion of the historical antecedents of the current debate, noting the long-standing uncertainty about the relation of this construct to both major mood disorders and normal temperament. Then we examine the DSM-IV Appendix B construct of depressive personality disorder, in particular its controversial overlap with dysthymic disorder. This overlap is discussed within the construct validation criteria proposed by Robins and Guze (1970), high-lighting recent developments and responding to criticisms of our previous theoretical review. Finally, we examine dimensional alternatives to the current proposed depressive personality disorder construct using the framework of the five-factor model. We conclude that, despite persuasive evidence for the existence of depressive personality traits, support is insufficient for the inclusion of depressive personality disorder as currently defined. Instead, we propose that depressive traits are best conceptualized dimensionally, and as part of an overarching model of personality structure, rather than as a discrete diagnostic entity. Since this conclusion could also be drawn for many existing personality disorders, the issues raised here are relevant to the construction of DSM-V.

Diagnostic specificity of the dependent and self-critical personality dimensions in major depression

Validational studies of self-critical and dependent personality dimensions as vulnerability factors for depression have been tested primarily with depressed samples, employing research designs devised to address state vs. trait and trait-situational congruity issues. In this study we examined the diagnostic specificity to depression of these two personality dimensions, comparing Self-Criticism and Dependency scores as measured by the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ) in two samples of outpatients: (1) panic disorder with agoraphobia; and (2) non-psychotic, unipolar major depression. As hypothesized, the two groups differed on Self-Criticism, with the depressed group scoring higher, but no differences were found for Dependency. These findings were similar even when depressed mood was partialed out. These results complement a growing body of research associating Self-Criticism, as specifically measured by the DEQ, with depression.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Revised Personal Style Inventory (PSI)

The revised Personal Style Inventory (PSI) was developed to measure the sociotropy and autonomy personality dimensions; both of these dimensions are thought to confer specific vulnerabilities to the onset, maintenance, and reoccurrence of depression. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the theoretical structure that informed the construction of the PSI. Using a large sample of nonclinical participants (n = 869) and a sample of outpatients with major depression (n = 101), both the items and the subscales of the PSI decomposed into factor structures that were, overall, fair to good representations of the theoretical model. Modifications were needed at the subscale level to achieve an adequate fit for the nonclinical and clinical samples, which provide implications for both the measurement and theory of the PSI and the sociotropy and autonomy domains.

A comparison of personality characteristics of seasonal and nonseasonal major depression

During the acute depressive episode, seasonal affective disorder (SAD) patients (N = 24) differ significantly from non-SAD major depressives (N = 17) on five of 13 personality variables measured, although severity of depression appears to be similar. SAD patients score significantly lower on the self-criticism and dependency dimensions of the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ) and significantly higher on three personality trait scales (including schizotypal, narcissistic, and avoidant) of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI). Our data suggest that those with seasonal depression may represent a psychologically distinct subgroup of depressives.

Predictors of professional and personal satisfaction with a career in psychiatry.

Background: Many factors, including personal experience and personality traits, contribute to the emotional difficulties that psychiatrists experience in their professional work. The nature of the work itself also plays a significant role. Objective: To determine those personal and professional characteristics that predict satisfaction with the practice of psychiatry. Method: We mailed a questionnaire that included items pertaining to aspects of personal and professional life to the entire population of psychiatrists in Ontario (N = 1574). Results: Of the 1574, 52% (n = 802) responded. We conducted a series of regression analyses to determine factors related to career satisfaction or regret. A belief in the intrinsic value of psychiatry, a low perceived degree of emotional burden from patients, financial success, and satisfaction with psychotherapeutic work emerged consistently as significant predictors. A subsequent discriminant function analysis indicated that all 4 of these variables accurately predicted those psychiatrists with extreme satisfaction or dissatisfaction with work. Conclusions: These results reveal several variables associated with career satisfaction in the practice of psychiatry that might be useful to discuss with residents who are beginning their careers.

Personality and symptom profiles of the angry hostile depressed patient

Fava, Rosenbaum, McCarthy, Pava, Steingard and Bless (1991) have recently proposed the existence of a subtype of depressed patients who experience anger attacks. The aim of this study was to assess if depressed patients categorized as high angry hostile have symptoms and personality profiles distinct from depressed patients categorized as low angry hostile. From a sample of 125 depressed outpatients, 26 patients were classified as high angry hostile and 25 patients as low angry hostile. The symptom profiles of these tow groups were remarkably similar, with the high angry hostile patients exhibiting more interpersonal sensitivity. The high angry hostile patients were rated as less interpersonally agreeable and less conscientious than low angry hostile patients. These results provide only partial support for the angry hostile subtype of depression.

Differential pharmacological treatment response in high angry hostile and low angry hostile depressed patients: a retrospective analysis

Fava et al., Am. J. Psychiatry 150 (1993)1158-1163, have recently proposed the existence of a sub-type of depressed patients who experience anger attacks. These investigators hypothesized that patients who experience anger attacks will respond better to a specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication than will depressed patients who do not experience anger attacks. Using a non-randomized, archival treatment methodology, 158 patients were classified as either high angry hostile (n = 83) or low angry hostile (n = 75). These patients had been treated with either a primarily noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (desipramine) a SSRI (sertraline or paroxetine), or the combined serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), venlafaxine. A 2 (high angry hostile/low angry hostile) x 3 (medication type) analysis of variance (ANOVA) was non-significant, indicating no differential treatment effects.