Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Deborah S. Ashcraft is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Deborah S. Ashcraft.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2001

Multicenter Survey of the Changing In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Clinical Isolates of Bacteroides fragilis Group, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, and Peptostreptococcus Species

Kenneth E. Aldridge; Deborah S. Ashcraft; Karl Cambre; Carl L. Pierson; Stephen G. Jenkins; Jon E. Rosenblatt

ABSTRACT In vitro surveys of antimicrobial resistance among clinically important anaerobes are an important source of information that can be used for clinical decisions in the choice of empiric antimicrobial therapy. This study surveyed the susceptibilities of 556 clinical anaerobic isolates from four large medical centers using a broth microdilution method. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the only antimicrobial agent to which all the isolates were susceptible. Similarly, imipenem, meropenem, and metronidazole were highly active (resistance, <0.5%), whereas the lowest susceptibility rates were noted for penicillin G, ciprofloxacin, and clindamycin. For most antibiotics, blood isolates were less susceptible than isolates from intra-abdominal, obstetric-gynecologic, and other sources. All isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group were susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam and metronidazole, while resistance to imipenem and meropenem was low (<2%). For these same isolates, resistance rates (intermediate and resistant MICs) to ampicillin-sulbactam, cefoxitin, trovafloxacin, and clindamycin were 11, 8, 7, and 29%, respectively. Among the individual species of the B. fragilis group, the highest resistance rates were noted among the following organism-drug combinations: for clindamycin,Bacteroides distasonis and Bacteroides ovatus; for cefoxitin, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, B. distasonis, and Bacteroides uniformis; for ampicillin-sulbactam,B. distasonis, B. ovatus, and B. uniformis; and for trovafloxacin, Bacteroides vulgatus. For the carbapenens, imipenem resistance was noted among B. fragilis and meropenem resistance was seen among B. fragilis, B. vulgatus, and B. uniformis. With few exceptions all antimicrobial agents were highly active against isolates of Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, andPeptostreptococcus. These data further establish and confirm that clinically important anaerobes can vary widely in their antimicrobial susceptibilities. Fortunately most antimicrobial agents were active against the test isolates. However, concern is warranted for what appears to be a significant increases in resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam and clindamycin.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2005

In Vitro Synergy of Daptomycin plus Rifampin against Enterococcus faecium Resistant to both Linezolid and Vancomycin

George A. Pankey; Deborah S. Ashcraft; Nalini Patel

ABSTRACT In vitro synergy testing of daptomycin plus rifampin was performed against 24 unique isolates of Enterococcus faecium resistant to both linezolid and vancomycin. Synergy testing showed that 21/24 (88%) were synergistic and 3/24 (12%) were indifferent by the Etest method. Time-kill assays revealed synergy for 18/24 (75%) and indifference for 6/24 (25%).


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2005

In Vitro Synergy of Ciprofloxacin and Gatifloxacin against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

George A. Pankey; Deborah S. Ashcraft

ABSTRACT Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa with combined decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, and piperacillin is increasingly being found as a cause of nosocomial infections. It is important to look for combinations of drugs that might be synergistic. Ciprofloxacin resistance by P. aeruginosa is mediated in part by an efflux pump mechanism. Gatifloxacin, an 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, inhibits a staphylococcal efflux pump. An earlier in vitro study using an Etest synergy method and time-kill assay suggested synergy of ciprofloxacin and gatifloxacin against P. aeruginosa. Synergy testing was performed by Etest and time-kill assay for 31 clinically unique, plasmid DNA distinct, U.S. P. aeruginosa isolates. Etest MICs for ciprofloxacin were 4 to >32 μg/ml, and for gatifloxacin they were >32 μg/ml. Ciprofloxacin plus gatifloxacin showed synergy by the Etest method for 6 (19%) of the 31 P. aeruginosa isolates using a summation fractional inhibitory concentration of ≤0.5 for synergy. Synergy was demonstrated for 13/31 (42%) of isolates by time-kill assay. No antagonism was detected. The remaining isolates were indifferent to the combination. The Etest method and time-kill assay were 65% (20/31) concordant. The mechanism of the in vitro synergy may include P. aeruginosa ciprofloxacin efflux pump inhibition by gatifloxacin.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2003

Bacteremia due to Bacteroides fragilis group: distribution of species, beta-lactamase production, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

Kenneth E. Aldridge; Deborah S. Ashcraft; Megan O'Brien; Charles V. Sanders

ABSTRACT A retrospective analysis of susceptibility data on 542 blood isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group tested from 1987 to 1999 by the same NCCLS-recommended broth microdilution method throughout is presented. Metronidazole, β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, carbapenems, and trovafloxacin were the most active agents (susceptibility of ≥93%). Among the cephalosporin-cephamycins, the order of activity was cefoxitin > ceftizoxime > cefotetan = cefotaxime = cefmetazole > ceftriaxone. All isolates were resistant to penicillin G, and 22% were resistant to clindamycin. The susceptibility rates to piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem were affected least among isolates resistant to cefoxitin or clindamycin. Except for piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem, the B. fragilis species was more susceptible than were the non-B. fragilis species. These data underscore the importance of susceptibility testing of the B. fragilis group and can serve as a guide in the choice of empirical antimicrobial therapy.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2015

Detection of a New cfr-Like Gene, cfr(B), in Enterococcus faecium Isolates Recovered from Human Specimens in the United States as Part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program

Lalitagauri M. Deshpande; Deborah S. Ashcraft; Heather P. Kahn; George A. Pankey; Ronald N. Jones; David J. Farrell; Rodrigo E. Mendes

ABSTRACT Two linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates (MICs, 8 μg/ml) from unique patients of a medical center in New Orleans were included in this study. Isolates were initially investigated for the presence of mutations in the V domain of 23S rRNA genes and L3, L4, and L22 ribosomal proteins, as well as cfr. Isolates were subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (just one band difference), and one representative strain was submitted to whole-genome sequencing. Gene location was also determined by hybridization, and cfr genes were cloned and expressed in a Staphylococcus aureus background. The two isolates had one out of six 23S rRNA alleles mutated (G2576T), had wild-type L3, L4, and L22 sequences, and were positive for a cfr-like gene. The sequence of the protein encoded by the cfr-like gene was most similar (99.7%) to that found in Peptoclostridium difficile, which shared only 74.9% amino acid identity with the proteins encoded by genes previously identified in staphylococci and non-faecium enterococci and was, therefore, denominated Cfr(B). When expressed in S. aureus, the protein conferred a resistance profile similar to that of Cfr. Two copies of cfr(B) were chromosomally located and embedded in a Tn6218 similar to the cfr-carrying transposon described in P. difficile. This study reports the first detection of cfr genes in E. faecium clinical isolates in the United States and characterization of a new cfr variant, cfr(B). cfr(B) has been observed in mobile genetic elements in E. faecium and P. difficile, suggesting potential for dissemination. However, further analysis is necessary to access the resistance levels conferred by cfr(B) when expressed in enterococci.


Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease | 2009

The detection of synergy between meropenem and polymyxin B against meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii using Etest and time-kill assay.

George A. Pankey; Deborah S. Ashcraft

Time-kill assay and Etest testing for synergy of meropenem (MER) (1x MIC) plus polymyxin B (1/4, 1/2, and 1x MIC) were performed against 8 genetically unique MER-resistant clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Time-kill assay demonstrated synergy for all isolates, whereas Etest showed synergy in 5 isolates and indifference in 3.


Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease | 2011

Detection of synergy using the combination of polymyxin B with either meropenem or rifampin against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

George A. Pankey; Deborah S. Ashcraft

Polymyxin B (PB) plus meropenem (MER) or rifampin (RIF) was tested by Etest® method and time-kill assay (TKA) against 14 genetically unique clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. PB + MER: Etest, 43% synergy; TKA, 64% synergy. Concordance between methods was 79%. For PB + RIF: Etest, 21% synergy; TKA, 100% synergy. Concordance between methods was 21%.


Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease | 2013

Comparison of 3 Etest® methods and time-kill assay for determination of antimicrobial synergy against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella species☆

George A. Pankey; Deborah S. Ashcraft; Adriana Dornelles

Increasing global antibiotic resistance has resulted in more use of antibiotic combinations. There is a lack of a gold standard for in vitro testing of these combinations for synergy or antagonism. Time-kill assay (TKA) may be used but is labor intensive and not practical for clinical use. Etest® synergy methods are more rapid and easier to perform, but there is no agreement regarding which method is best. We tested 31 clinical genetically unique Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella isolates with the combination of meropenem and polymyxin B by TKA and 3 Etest methods, each in triplicate: Method 1, MIC:MIC; Method 2, direct overlay; and Method 3, cross. Overall, testing with Etest synergy methods showed the following agreement with TKA: Method 1: 25/31 (80.6%), Method 2: 7/31 (22.6%), and Method 3: 8/31 (25.8%). The MIC:MIC method had the highest agreement (80.6%, κ = 0.59, P < 0.001) and should be evaluated more extensively.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2014

Time-Kill Assay and Etest Evaluation for Synergy with Polymyxin B and Fluconazole against Candida glabrata

George A. Pankey; Deborah S. Ashcraft; Heather P. Kahn; Abdulrahim Ismail

ABSTRACT Fluconazole-resistant Candida glabrata is an emerging pathogen that causes fungemia. Polymyxin B, a last-resort antibiotic used to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, has been found to possess in vitro fungicidal activity and showed synergy with fluconazole against a single strain of C. glabrata. Since both agents may be used simultaneously in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, this study was performed to test for possible synergy of this combination against 35 C. glabrata blood isolates, using 2 methods: a time-kill assay and an experimental MIC-MIC Etest method. Thirty-five genetically unique C. glabrata bloodstream isolates were collected from 2009 to 2011, identified using an API 20C system, and genotyped by repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR). MICs were determined by Etest and broth microdilution methods. Synergy testing was performed using a modified bacterial Etest synergy method and time-kill assay, with final results read at 24 h. The Etest method showed synergy against 19/35 (54%) isolates; the time-kill assay showed synergy against 21/35 (60%) isolates. Isolates not showing drug synergy had an indifferent status. Concordance between methods was 60%. In vitro synergy of polymyxin B and fluconazole against the majority of C. glabrata isolates was demonstrated by both methods. The bacterial Etest synergy method adapted well when used with C. glabrata. Etest was easier to perform than time-kill assay and may be found to be an acceptable alternative to time-kill assay with antifungals.


Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases | 2009

In Vitro Synergy of Levofloxacin Plus Piperacillin/Tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Vladimir Chachanidze; Aixa Curbelo-Irizarry; Deborah S. Ashcraft; George A. Pankey

In vitro synergy testing using levofloxacin (LVX) plus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) was performed by Etest and time-kill assay (TKA) for 31 unique fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. The Etest method showed synergy for 9/31 (29%) of isolates, while TKA showed synergy with 14/31 (45%) of isolates. When comparing the Etest method and TKA, concordant results for synergy, antagonism, and indifference were obtained for 24/31 (77%) of the isolates tested.

Collaboration


Dive into the Deborah S. Ashcraft's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth E. Aldridge

University Medical Center New Orleans

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rodrigo E. Mendes

Federal University of São Paulo

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge