Deborah Schechtman

Opposing cardioprotective actions and parallel hypertrophic effects of δPKC and ɛPKC

Conflicting roles for protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes in cardiac disease have been reported. Here, δPKC-selective activator and inhibitor peptides were designed rationally, based on molecular modeling and structural homology analyses. Together with previously identified activator and inhibitor peptides of ɛPKC, δPKC peptides were used to identify cardiac functions of these isozymes. In isolated cardiomyocytes, perfused hearts, and transgenic mice, δPKC and ɛPKC had opposing actions on protection from ischemia-induced damage. Specifically, activation of ɛPKC caused cardioprotection whereas activation of δPKC increased damage induced by ischemia in vitro and in vivo. In contrast, δPKC and ɛPKC caused identical nonpathological cardiac hypertrophy; activation of either isozyme caused nonpathological hypertrophy of the heart. These results demonstrate that two related PKC isozymes have both parallel and opposing effects in the heart, indicating the danger in the use of therapeutics with nonselective isozyme inhibitors and activators. Moreover, reduction in cardiac damage caused by ischemia by perfusion of selective regulator peptides of PKC through the coronary arteries constitutes a major step toward developing a therapeutic agent for acute cardiac ischemia.

Adaptor proteins in protein kinase C-mediated signal transduction

Spatial and temporal organization of signal transduction is essential in determining the speed and precision by which signaling events occur. Adaptor proteins are key to organizing signaling enzymes near their select substrates and away from others in order to optimize precision and speed of response. Here, we describe the role of adaptor proteins in determining the specific function of individual protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes. These isozyme-selective proteins were called collectively RACKs (receptors for activated C-kinase). The role of RACKs in PKC-mediated signaling was determined using isozyme-specific inhibitors and activators of the binding of each isozyme to its respective RACK. In addition to anchoring activated PKC isozymes, RACKs anchor other signaling enzymes. RACK1, the anchoring protein for activated βIIPKC, binds for example, Src tyrosine kinase, integrin, and phosphodiesterase. RACK2, the εPKC-specific RACK, is a coated-vesicle protein and thus is involved in vesicular release and cell–cell communication. Therefore, RACKs are not only adaptors for PKC, but also serve as adaptor proteins for several other signaling enzymes. Because at least some of the proteins that bind to RACKs, including PKC itself, regulate cell growth, modulating their interactions with RACKs may help elucidate signaling pathways leading to carcinogenesis and could result in the identification of novel therapeutic targets.

Isozyme-specific inhibitors and activators of protein kinase C.

We describe here the methods we have used to generate selective peptide inhibitors and activators of PKC-mediated signaling. These approaches should be applicable to any signaling event that is dependent on protein-protein interaction. Furthermore, targeting downstream enzymes in signal transduction has been notoriously difficult as there are often families of related enzymes in each cell. The approaches we have used overcame this difficulty and may prove useful not only in basic research, but also in drug discovery.

Protein Kinase C δ (δPKC)-Annexin V Interaction A REQUIRED STEP IN δPKC TRANSLOCATION AND FUNCTION

Protein kinase C (PKC) plays a critical role in diseases such as cancer, stroke, and cardiac ischemia, and participates in a variety of signal transduction pathways such as apoptosis, cell proliferation, and tumor suppression. Though much is known about PKC downstream signaling events, the mechanisms of regulation of PKC activation and subsequent translocation have not been elucidated. Protein-protein interactions regulate and determine the specificity of many cellular signaling events. Such a specific protein-protein interaction is described here between δPKC and annexin V. We demonstrate, at physiologically relevant conditions, that a transient interaction between annexin V and δPKC occurs in cells after δPKC stimulation, but before δPKC translocates to the particulate fraction. Evidence of δPKC-annexin V binding is provided also by FRET and by in vitro binding studies. Dissociation of the δPKC-annexin V complex requires ATP and microtubule integrity. Furthermore, depletion of endogenous annexin V, but not annexin IV, with siRNA inhibits δPKC translocation following PKC stimulation. A rationally designed eight amino acid peptide, corresponding to the interaction site for δPKC on annexin V, inhibits δPKC translocation and δPKC-mediated function as evidenced by its protective effect in a model of myocardial infarction. Our data indicate that translocation of δPKC is not simply a diffusion-driven process, but is instead a multi-step event regulated by protein-protein interactions. We show that following cell activation, δPKC-annexin V binding is a transient and an essential step in the function of δPKC, thus identifying a new role for annexin V in PKC signaling and a new step in PKC activation.

δPKC-annexin V interaction; a required step in δPKC translocation and function

Protein kinase C (PKC) plays a critical role in diseases such as cancer, stroke, and cardiac ischemia, and participates in a variety of signal transduction pathways such as apoptosis, cell proliferation, and tumor suppression. Though much is known about PKC downstream signaling events, the mechanisms of regulation of PKC activation and subsequent translocation have not been elucidated. Protein-protein interactions regulate and determine the specificity of many cellular signaling events. Such a specific protein-protein interaction is described here between δPKC and annexin V. We demonstrate, at physiologically relevant conditions, that a transient interaction between annexin V and δPKC occurs in cells after δPKC stimulation, but before δPKC translocates to the particulate fraction. Evidence of δPKC-annexin V binding is provided also by FRET and by in vitro binding studies. Dissociation of the δPKC-annexin V complex requires ATP and microtubule integrity. Furthermore, depletion of endogenous annexin V, but not annexin IV, with siRNA inhibits δPKC translocation following PKC stimulation. A rationally designed eight amino acid peptide, corresponding to the interaction site for δPKC on annexin V, inhibits δPKC translocation and δPKC-mediated function as evidenced by its protective effect in a model of myocardial infarction. Our data indicate that translocation of δPKC is not simply a diffusion-driven process, but is instead a multi-step event regulated by protein-protein interactions. We show that following cell activation, δPKC-annexin V binding is a transient and an essential step in the function of δPKC, thus identifying a new role for annexin V in PKC signaling and a new step in PKC activation.

Structural shifts of aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes were instrumental for the early evolution of retinoid-dependent axial patterning in metazoans

Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) catabolize toxic aldehydes and process the vitamin A-derived retinaldehyde into retinoic acid (RA), a small diffusible molecule and a pivotal chordate morphogen. In this study, we combine phylogenetic, structural, genomic, and developmental gene expression analyses to examine the evolutionary origins of ALDH substrate preference. Structural modeling reveals that processing of small aldehydes, such as acetaldehyde, by ALDH2, versus large aldehydes, including retinaldehyde, by ALDH1A is associated with small versus large substrate entry channels (SECs), respectively. Moreover, we show that metazoan ALDH1s and ALDH2s are members of a single ALDH1/2 clade and that during evolution, eukaryote ALDH1/2s often switched between large and small SECs after gene duplication, transforming constricted channels into wide opened ones and vice versa. Ancestral sequence reconstructions suggest that during the evolutionary emergence of RA signaling, the ancestral, narrow-channeled metazoan ALDH1/2 gave rise to large ALDH1 channels capable of accommodating bulky aldehydes, such as retinaldehyde, supporting the view that retinoid-dependent signaling arose from ancestral cellular detoxification mechanisms. Our analyses also indicate that, on a more restricted evolutionary scale, ALDH1 duplicates from invertebrate chordates (amphioxus and ascidian tunicates) underwent switches to smaller and narrower SECs. When combined with alterations in gene expression, these switches led to neofunctionalization from ALDH1-like roles in embryonic patterning to systemic, ALDH2-like roles, suggesting functional shifts from signaling to detoxification.

Retinoic Acid and VEGF Delay Smooth Muscle Relative to Endothelial Differentiation to Coordinate Inner and Outer Coronary Vessel Wall Morphogenesis

Rationale: Major coronary vessels derive from the proepicardium, the cellular progenitor of the epicardium, coronary endothelium, and coronary smooth muscle cells (CoSMCs). CoSMCs are delayed in their differentiation relative to coronary endothelial cells (CoEs), such that CoSMCs mature only after CoEs have assembled into tubes. The mechanisms underlying this sequential CoE/CoSMC differentiation are unknown. Retinoic acid (RA) is crucial for vascular development and the main RA-synthesizing enzyme is progressively lost from epicardially derived cells as they differentiate into blood vessel types. In parallel, myocardial vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression also decreases along coronary vessel muscularization. Objective: We hypothesized that RA and VEGF act coordinately as physiological brakes to CoSMC differentiation. Methods and Results: In vitro assays (proepicardial cultures, cocultures, and RALDH2 [retinaldehyde dehydrogenase-2]/VEGF adenoviral overexpression) and in vivo inhibition of RA synthesis show that RA and VEGF act as repressors of CoSMC differentiation, whereas VEGF biases epicardially derived cell differentiation toward the endothelial phenotype. Conclusion: Experiments support a model in which early high levels of RA and VEGF prevent CoSMC differentiation from epicardially derived cells before RA and VEGF levels decline as an extensive endothelial network is established. We suggest this physiological delay guarantees the formation of a complex, hierarchical, tree of coronary vessels.

Protein folding creates structure-based, noncontiguous consensus phosphorylation motifs recognized by kinases

Kinases can recognize consensus motifs that are noncontiguous in folded proteins. Origami-Like Substrate Recognition Proteins fold into complex three-dimensional structures, yet most sites in proteins that are modified posttranslationally have been identified within short linear consensus motifs in the primary amino acid sequence. Duarte et al. found that kinases can recognize a consensus site that is formed by distinct noncontiguous parts of the folded substrate protein. They characterized in α-tubulin an example of what they termed a “structurally formed” consensus site, a threonine residue phosphorylated by a specific member of the protein kinase C (PKC) family, and then identified structurally formed consensus sites in other substrates of PKC and PKA (protein kinase A). Thus, researchers need to look beyond the linear sequence of the protein to its three-dimensional structure to identify all of the potential consensus phosphorylation sites in a protein. Linear consensus motifs are short contiguous sequences of residues within a protein that can form recognition modules for protein interaction or catalytic modification. Protein kinase specificity and the matching of kinases to substrates have been mostly defined by phosphorylation sites that occur in linear consensus motifs. However, phosphorylation can also occur within sequences that do not match known linear consensus motifs recognized by kinases and within flexible loops. We report the identification of Thr253 in α-tubulin as a site that is phosphorylated by protein kinase C βI (PKCβI). Thr253 is not part of a linear PKC consensus motif. Instead, Thr253 occurs within a region on the surface of α-tubulin that resembles a PKC phosphorylation site consensus motif formed by basic residues in different parts of the protein, which come together in the folded protein to form the recognition motif for PKCβI. Mutations of these basic residues decreased substrate phosphorylation, confirming the presence of this “structurally formed” consensus motif and its importance for the protein kinase–substrate interaction. Analysis of previously reported protein kinase A (PKA) and PKC substrates identified sites within structurally formed consensus motifs in many substrates of these two kinase families. Thus, the concept of consensus phosphorylation site motif needs to be expanded to include sites within these structurally formed consensus motifs.

Revisiting protein kinase–substrate interactions: Toward therapeutic development

Identifying conformational interactions between kinases and their substrates may improve the development and clinical success of kinase inhibitors. Gloss Protein phosphorylation is a common posttranslational modification and is involved in many physiological and pathophysiological processes. Among other diseases, the deregulation of protein kinase activities can lead to cellular transformation and cancer. Thus, kinases are good drug targets. Understanding how kinases interact with their substrates may elucidate processes that lead to disease, as well as aid in the development of better, more specific kinase inhibitors with improved clinical success. In this Review, which contains 4 figures, 2 tables, and 129 references, we summarize the advances in understanding how kinases physically interact with their substrates and discuss the technologies to detect kinase substrates. Despite the efforts of pharmaceutical companies to develop specific kinase modulators, few drugs targeting kinases have been completely successful in the clinic. This is primarily due to the conserved nature of kinases, especially in the catalytic domains. Consequently, many currently available inhibitors lack sufficient selectivity for effective clinical application. Kinases phosphorylate their substrates to modulate their activity. One of the important steps in the catalytic reaction of protein phosphorylation is the correct positioning of the target residue within the catalytic site. This positioning is mediated by several regions in the substrate binding site, which is typically a shallow crevice that has critical subpockets that anchor and orient the substrate. The structural characterization of this protein-protein interaction can aid in the elucidation of the roles of distinct kinases in different cellular processes, the identification of substrates, and the development of specific inhibitors. Because the region of the substrate that is recognized by the kinase can be part of a linear consensus motif or a nonlinear motif, advances in technology beyond simple linear sequence scanning for consensus motifs were needed. Cost-effective bioinformatics tools are already frequently used to predict kinase-substrate interactions for linear consensus motifs, and new tools based on the structural data of these interactions improve the accuracy of these predictions and enable the identification of phosphorylation sites within nonlinear motifs. In this Review, we revisit kinase-substrate interactions and discuss the various approaches that can be used to identify them and analyze their binding structures for targeted drug development.

FERM domain interaction with myosin negatively regulates FAK in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) regulates cellular processes that affect several aspects of development and disease. The FAK N-terminal FERM (4.1 protein-ezrin-radixin-moesin homology) domain, a compact clover-leaf structure, binds partner proteins and mediates intramolecular regulatory interactions. Combined chemical cross-linking coupled to MS, small-angle X-ray scattering, computational docking and mutational analyses showed that the FAK FERM domain has a molecular cleft (~998 Å(2)) that interacts with sarcomeric myosin, resulting in FAK inhibition. Accordingly, mutations in a unique short amino acid sequence of the FERM myosin cleft, FP-1, impaired the interaction with myosin and enhanced FAK activity in cardiomyocytes. An FP-1 decoy peptide selectively inhibited myosin interaction and increased FAK activity, promoting cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through activation of the AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Our findings uncover an inhibitory interaction between the FAK FERM domain and sarcomeric myosin that presents potential opportunities to modulate the cardiac hypertrophic response through changes in FAK activity.