Deborah T. Blumenthal

A Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND Concurrent treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy followed by maintenance temozolomide is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A, is currently approved for recurrent glioblastoma. Whether the addition of bevacizumab would improve survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is not known. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we treated adults who had centrally confirmed glioblastoma with radiotherapy (60 Gy) and daily temozolomide. Treatment with bevacizumab or placebo began during week 4 of radiotherapy and was continued for up to 12 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. At disease progression, the assigned treatment was revealed, and bevacizumab therapy could be initiated or continued. The trial was designed to detect a 25% reduction in the risk of death and a 30% reduction in the risk of progression or death, the two coprimary end points, with the addition of bevacizumab. RESULTS A total of 978 patients were registered, and 637 underwent randomization. There was no significant difference in the duration of overall survival between the bevacizumab group and the placebo group (median, 15.7 and 16.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio for death in the bevacizumab group, 1.13). Progression-free survival was longer in the bevacizumab group (10.7 months vs. 7.3 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.79). There were modest increases in rates of hypertension, thromboembolic events, intestinal perforation, and neutropenia in the bevacizumab group. Over time, an increased symptom burden, a worse quality of life, and a decline in neurocognitive function were more frequent in the bevacizumab group. CONCLUSIONS First-line use of bevacizumab did not improve overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Progression-free survival was prolonged but did not reach the prespecified improvement target. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00884741.).

Dose-Dense Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial

PURPOSE Radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumor MGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status. RESULTS A total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P = .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P < .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P < .001), and response (P = .012). There was increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P < .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue. CONCLUSION This study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.

Treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan for recurrent high-grade glial tumors

Response rates to second‐line chemotherapy in recurrent high‐grade glial tumors are low and new effective treatments are needed. The objective of this study was to evaluate response rates and tolerability of chemotherapy with bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent high‐grade gliomas.

RTOG 0825: Phase III double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating bevacizumab (Bev) in patients (Pts) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).

1 Background: Chemoradiation (CRT) with temozolomide (TMZ/RT→TMZ) is the standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM. This trial determined if the addition of Bev to standard CRT improves survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS This phase III trial was conducted by the RTOG, NCCTG, and ECOG. Neurologically stable pts > 18 yrs with KPS ≥ 60, and > 1cm3 tumor tissue block, were randomized to Arm 1: standard CRT + placebo or Arm 2: standard CRT plus Bev (10 mg/kg iv q 2wks). Experimental treatment began at wk 4 of radiation then thru 6-12 cycles of maintenance chemotherapy. Protocol specified co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS, with significance levels of .023 and .002, respectively. At progression, treatment was unblinded and pts allowed to crossover or continue Bev. Symptom, QOL and neurocognitive (NCF) testing was performed in the majority of pts. Secondary analyses evaluated impact of MGMT methylation (meth) and prognostic 9 gene signature status. RESULTS From 978 registered pts, 637 were randomized. Inadequate tissue (n=105) and blood on imaging (n=40) were key reasons for non-randomization. No difference was found between arms for OS (median 16.1 vs. 15.7 mo, p = 0.11). PFS was extended for Arm 2 (7.3 vs. 10.7 mo, p = 0.004). Pts with MGMT meth had superior OS (23.2 vs. 14.3 mo, p < 0.001) and PFS (14.1 vs. 8.2 mo, p < 0.001). Neither the 9 gene signature nor MGMT predicted selective benefit for Bev treatment, but best prognosis pts (MGMT meth, favorable 9-gene), had a worse survival trend with Bev (15.7 vs 25 mo p = 0.08). To date, 128 pts were unblinded on Arm 1 (salvage Bev in 86) and 87 pts on Arm 2 (continued Bev in 39). Increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity was seen with Bev, mostly neutropenia, hypertension, and DVT/PE. CONCLUSIONS The addition of Bev for newly diagnosed GBM did not improve OS, did improve PFS but did not reach the significance criterion. MGMT and 9 gene profile did not identify selective benefit, but risk subset results suggested strongly against the upfront use of Bev in the best prognosis pts. Full interpretation of the PFS results incorporating symptom burden, QOL, and NCF is ongoing. Support: NCI U10 CA 21661, U10 CA37422, and Genentech. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT00884741.

Short Delay in Initiation of Radiotherapy May Not Affect Outcome of Patients With Glioblastoma: A Secondary Analysis From the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Database

PURPOSE To analyze the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) database of patients with glioblastoma and appraise whether outcome was influenced by time to initiation of radiation therapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1974 through 2003, adult patients with histologically confirmed supratentorial glioblastoma were enrolled onto 16 RTOG studies. Of 3,052 enrolled patients, 197 patients (6%) were either initially rendered ineligible or had insufficient chronologic data, leaving a cohort of 2,855 patients for the present analysis. We selected four patient groups based on the interval from surgery to the start of RT: <or= 2 weeks, 2 to 3 weeks, 3 to 4 weeks, more than 4 weeks to the protocol eligibility limit of 6 weeks. Survival times were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis incorporated variables of time interval, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, and treatment regimen. RESULTS No decrement in survival could be identified with increasing time to initiation of RT. Among our four temporal groupings, median survival time was unexpectedly and significantly greater in the group with the longest interval (> 4 weeks) than in those with the shortest delay (<or= 2 weeks): respectively, 12.5 months versus 9.2 months (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, with overall survival as the end point, time interval more than 4 weeks and lower RPA class were both significant predictors of improved outcome. Treatment regimen was not a significant factor. CONCLUSION There is no evident reduction in survival by delaying initiation of RT within the relatively narrow constraint of 6 weeks. An unanticipated yet significantly superior outcome was identified for patients for whom RT was delayed beyond 4 weeks from surgery.

Phase II trial of preirradiation and concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytomas: RTOG BR0131

The primary objectives of this phase II study were to evaluate the use of preirradiation temozolomide followed by concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) and mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (MOA). Preirradiation temozolomide (150 mg/m(2)/day) was given on a 7-day-on/7-day-off schedule for up to six cycles. The primary end point was the response rate during the 6-month, pre-RT chemotherapy. Tumor tissue was analyzed for the presence of chromosomal deletions on 1p and 19q and for MGMT-promoter methylation. Forty-two patients were enrolled; 39 were eligible. The objective response rate was 32% (6% [complete response, CR], 26% [partial response PR]), and the rate of progression during pre-RT chemotherapy was 10%. The worst nonhematological toxicity was grade 4 in three patients (8%). Twenty-two patients completed concurrent chemotherapy and RT. There were no grade 4 nonhematological toxicities during the concurrent chemotherapy and RT. Seventeen of 28 (60.7%) evaluable cases had codeletion of 1p/19q; all 17 were free from progression at 6 months. Sixteen of 20 (80%) evaluable cases had MGMT-promoter methylation; all 16 were free from progression at 6 months. In conclusion, the rate of progression of 10% during pre-RT temozolomide chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AO and MAO compared favorably with prior experience with pre-RT PCV chemotherapy (20% in RTOG 9402). The toxicity of the dose-intense pre-RT regimen used in this study may warrant evaluation of other, less intense dosing strategies. Future studies will need to prospectively stratify patients according to the presence of deletions of chromosomes 1p and 19q.

Capecitabine-induced multifocal leukoencephalopathy: A report of five cases

Capecitabine is used to treat advanced breast and gastrointestinal malignancies. A single case of encephalopathy and three cases of peripheral neuropathy are the only neurotoxicities reported. The authors report five additional cases of capecitabine-induced multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Primary intracranial neoplasms in patients with HIV

Objective: To report a series of HIV-infected patients with intracranial tumors not known to be associated with immunodeficiency. Background: The spectrum of HIV-associated diseases is changing with improved treatments and prolonged patient survival. Although primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and toxoplasmosis continue to be the most common intracranial lesions in HIV-infected patients, the recognition of other pathologic entities is increasingly important. Methods: The clinical characteristics and outcome of eight HIV-infected patients with nine intracranial neoplasms other than PCNSL are reported. In addition, all available pathologic specimens were tested for evidence of either HIV or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. An additional 28 patients reported in the literature are summarized. Results: Five of eight patients had a glioblastoma multiforme; other tumors included an anaplastic ependymoma, a low-grade glioma, a subependymoma, and a leiomyosarcoma. More than half of the patients developed their tumor ≥6 years after the diagnosis of HIV infection. Patient prognosis and survival was best predicted by tumor histology. Treatment response and outcome did not appear to be influenced by HIV infection. Only the leiomyosarcoma demonstrated evidence of latent EBV infection. Conclusions: HIV-infected patients are at risk for intracranial neoplasms other than PCNSL, and benefit from aggressive tumor-specific therapy. It is possible that gliomas are occurring at a higher rate than in the general population. There was no evidence of HIV or EBV infection in any glial tumor.

Early pathologic findings and long-term improvement in anti-Ma2–associated encephalitis

A 67-year-old man sequentially developed anti-Ma2–associated paraneoplastic encephalitis (PNE) and contralateral herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE). Brain biopsy 1 month before HSE revealed extensive infiltrates of T cells, B cells, and plasma cells. Most T cells expressed the cytotoxic granule–associated protein TIA-1 and the membranolytic protein granzyme-B. Although recovery was thought to be unlikely, treatment of the PNE with corticosteroids and resection of the associated lung cancer resulted in dramatic improvement for 21 months.

Intracranial meningiomas: diagnosis and treatment.

Meningiomas are extra-axial CNS tumors which have a female predominance and occur in middle-to-late adult life. Most meningiomas (90%) are benign, 6% are atypical and a small proportion (2%) are malignant [1–5]. Most patients diagnosed with a meningioma undergo surgical resection to relieve neurological symptoms [3–7]. Complete surgical resection is often curative. For most incompletely resected or recurrent tumors not previously irradiated, radiotherapy is administered [3,4,8,9]. Radiotherapy may be administered as either conventional external beam irradiation or stereotactically by linear accelerator, gamma knife or cyberknife radiosurgery . Advocates of stereotactic radiotherapy have suggested this therapy in lieu of surgery particularly in poor surgical risk patients, patients with meningiomas in eloquent or surgically inaccessible locations and in patients of advanced age [10–15]. When the meningioma is unresectable or all other treatments (e.g., surgery and radiotherapy) have failed, hormonal chemotherapy may be considered [16–25]. Notwithstanding limited data, hydroxyurea has been modestly successful in patients with recurrent meningiomas.