Deborah Wells

Availability of Cord Blood Extends Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Access to Racial and Ethnic Minorities

Allogeneic transplant access can be severely limited for patients of racial and ethnic minorities without suitable sibling donors. Whether cord blood (CB) transplantation can extend transplant access because of the reduced stringency of required HLA-match is not proven. We prospectively evaluated availability of unrelated donors (URD) and CB according to patient ancestry in 553 patients without suitable sibling donors. URDs had priority if adequate donors were available. Otherwise ≥4/6 HLA-matched CB grafts were chosen utilizing double units to augment graft dose. Patients had highly diverse ancestries including 35% non-Europeans. In 525 patients undergoing combined searches, 10/10 HLA-matched URDs were identified in 53% of those with European ancestry, but only 21% of patients with non-European origins (P < .001). However, the majority of both groups had 5-6/6 CB units. The 269 URD transplant recipients were predominantly European, with non-European patients accounting for only 23%. By contrast, 56% of CB transplant recipients had non-European ancestries (P < .001). Of 26 patients without any suitable stem cell source, 73% had non-European ancestries (P < .001). Their median weight was significantly higher than CB transplant recipients (P <.001), partially accounting for their lack of a CB graft. Availability of CB significantly extends allo-transplant access, especially in non-European patients, and has the greatest potential to provide a suitable stem cell source regardless of race or ethnicity. Minority patients in need of allografts, but without suitable matched sibling donors, should be referred for combined URD and CB searches to optimize transplant access.

Donor-recipient allele-level HLA matching of unrelated cord blood units reveals high degrees of mismatch and alters graft selection.

The feasibility of selecting cord blood (CB) units at high-resolution HLA match has not been investigated. We analyzed the high-resolution donor–recipient HLA match of 100 double-unit 4–6/6 HLA-A,-B antigen, -DRB1 allele-matched CB grafts (units 1a and 1b) and their back-up units (n=377 units in total). The median cryopreserved graft dose was 2.9 × 107/kg/unit, and at high resolution these units had a median donor–recipient HLA-allele match of 5/8 (range 2–8/8) and 6/10 (range 2–9/10), respectively. We then evaluated how often use of high-resolution HLA-match criteria would change the original graft selection to substitute one or both of the back-up units for units 1a and/or 1b. On using a model in which both a higher eight-allele HLA match and a cell dose ⩾2.0 × 107/kg/unit were required, graft selection changed in 33% of transplants with minimal effect on cell dose (8.3% reduction). In summary, while units chosen based on HLA-A,-B antigen and -DRB1 allele match have substantial mismatch at higher resolution, CB selection based on high-resolution HLA match is possible in a significant proportion of patients without compromise in cell dose.

The Use of Back-up Units to Enhance the Safety of Unrelated Donor Cord Blood Transplantation

The inability to obtain additional stem cells is a disadvantage of unrelated donor cord blood transplantation (CBT). Moreover, in the event of problems with unit shipment, compromised unit quality, thaw mishaps, or graft failure, the time to secure a back-up graft could be unacceptable. Emergent shipment of 1 to 2 back-up units that have been previously typed and reserved could overcome this limitation. However, the advantages of this approach are not established. Therefore, we present our use of back-up units over a 5.5-year period. Six of 121 CBT recipients (5%) required back-up unit infusion. Indications included shipment mishaps (n = 2), poor unit viability (n = 2), significant infusion reaction (n = 1), and graft failure (n = 1). Lack of back-up units would have caused transplantation delay or infusion of inferior-quality units. Five of the 6 patients achieved sustained donor engraftment. We demonstrate that back-up units are emergently required in a significant minority of patients, supporting the incorporation of at least 1 back-up unit in cord blood (CB) selection algorithms to enhance CBT safety.

Prospective Evaluation of Unrelated Donor Cord Blood and Haploidentical Donor Access Reveals Graft Availability Varies by Patient Ancestry: Practical Implications for Donor Selection

The availability of cord blood (CB) and haploidentical (haplo) donors in all patient populations is not established. We have investigated the addition of haplo-CD34+ cells to CB grafts (haplo-CBT) to speed myeloid engraftment. Thus, we have prospectively assessed CB and haplo donor availability in adult patients without 8/8 HLA-allele matched unrelated donors (URDs). Analysis of 89 patients eligible for haplo-CBT revealed 4 distinct patient groups. First, 6 patients (7% of total, 33% non-European) underwent CBT only as they had no suitable family members to type. In group 2, 49 patients (45% non-European) received haplo-CBT using the first haplo donor chosen. Group 3 (n = 21, 76% non-European) underwent CBT with/without haplo. In this group, the first haplo donor chosen failed clearance in 20 patients and transplantation was too urgent to permit donor evaluation in 1. Fifty-three haplo donors were evaluated (2 to 6 per patient) for 21 group 3 patients, and 43 of 53 (81%) haplos failed clearance for predominantly medical and/or psychosocial reasons. Group 4, (n = 13, 85% non-European with a high median weight of 96 kilograms) had no CB grafts with/without no haplo donors. Overall, African patients had the worst donor availability with only 65% having a suitable CB graft and only 44% having a suitable haplo donor. Additionally, in non-European patients, a greater number of haplos required evaluation/patient to secure a suitable haplo graft. Although these data should be confirmed in a larger study, it suggests that there are barriers to the availability of both CB and haplo grafts in adult patients without 8/8 URDs, especially in those with African ancestry, and has multiple practical implications for patient management.

Validation of an Algorithm to Predict the Likelihood of an 8/8 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor at Search Initiation

A strategy to rapidly determine if a matched unrelated donor (URD) can be secured for allograft recipients is needed. We sought to validate the accuracy of (1) HapLogic match predictions and (2) a resultant novel Search Prognosis (SP) patient categorization that could predict 8/8 HLA-matched URD(s) likelihood at search initiation. Patient prognosis categories at search initiation were correlated with URD confirmatory typing results. HapLogic-based SP categorizations accurately predicted the likelihood of an 8/8 HLA-match in 830 patients (1530 donors tested). Sixty percent of patients had 8/8 URD(s) identified. Patient SP categories (217 very good, 104 good, 178 fair, 33 poor, 153 very poor, 145 futile) were associated with a marked progressive decrease in 8/8 URD identification and transplantation. Very good to good categories were highly predictive of identifying and receiving an 8/8 URD regardless of ancestry. Europeans in fair/poor categories were more likely to identify and receive an 8/8 URD compared with non-Europeans. In all ancestries very poor and futile categories predicted no 8/8 URDs. HapLogic permits URD search results to be predicted once patient HLA typing and ancestry is obtained, dramatically improving search efficiency. Poor, very poor, andfutile searches can be immediately recognized, thereby facilitating prompt pursuit of alternative donors.