Debra B. Novotny

HER-2/neu Amplification in Benign Breast Disease and the Risk of Subsequent Breast Cancer

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine whether the presence of HER-2/neu gene amplification and/or overexpression in benign breast disease was associated with an increased risk of subsequent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a nested case-control study of a cohort of women who were diagnosed with benign breast disease at the Mayo Clinic and who were subsequently observed for the development of breast cancer. Patients who developed breast cancer formed the case group, and a matched sample from the remaining cohort served as controls. Benign tissue samples from 137 cases and 156 controls and malignant tissues from 99 cases provided DNA or tissue for evaluation of HER-2/neu amplification and protein overexpression. RESULTS Among the controls, seven benign tissues (4.5%) demonstrated low-level HER-2/neu amplification, whereas 13 benign (9.5%) and 18 malignant (18%) tissue specimens from cases exhibited amplification. HER-2/neu amplification in benign breast biopsies was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio ¿OR = 2.2; 95% confidence interval ¿CI, 0.9 to 5.8); this association approached statistical significance. The risks for breast cancer associated with benign breast histopathologic diagnoses were OR = 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.9) for lesions exhibiting proliferation without atypia and OR = 1.5 (95% CI, 0.4 to 5.6) for the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. For women having both HER-2/neu amplification and a proliferative histopathologic diagnosis (either typical or atypical), the risk of breast cancer was more than seven-fold (OR = 7.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 60.8). Overexpression of the HER-2/neu protein product, defined as membrane staining in 10% or more of epithelial cells, was found in 30% of the breast tumors but was not detected in any of the benign breast tissues. Case patients who had HER-2/neu gene amplification in their malignant tumor were more likely to have had HER-2/neu amplification in their prior benign biopsy (P =.06, Fishers exact test). CONCLUSION Women with benign breast biopsies demonstrating both HER-2/neu amplification and a proliferative histopathologic diagnosis may be at substantially increased risk for subsequent breast cancer.

Comparison of HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to predict benefit from dose escalation of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients

PURPOSE HER2 is a clinically important tumor marker in breast cancer; however, there is controversy regarding which method reliably measures HER2 status. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. METHODS This is a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study, using 524 tumor blocks collected from breast cancer patients registered to clinical trial CALGB 8541. IHC employed CB11 and AO-11-854 monoclonal antibodies; FISH used PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe kit; PCR utilized differential PCR (D-PCR) methodology. RESULTS Cases HER2 positive by IHC, FISH and D-PCR were 24%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. FISH and IHC were clearly related (kappa = 64.8%). All three methods demonstrated a similar relationship for DFS and OS. By any method, for patients with HER2-negative tumors, there was little or no effect of dose of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. For patients with HER2-positive tumors, all three methods predicted a benefit from dose-intense (high-dose) compared with low- or moderate-dose adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. CONCLUSION FISH is a reliable method to predict clinical outcome following adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy for stage II breast cancer patients. There is a moderate level of concordance among the three methods (IHC, FISH, PCR). None of the methods is clearly superior. Although IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors yielded the greatest interaction with dose of therapy in predicting outcome, no combination of assays tested was statistically superior.

Effect of exogenous gonadotropins on endometrial maturation in oocyte donors

OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) on endometrial maturation. DESIGN Prospective, before and after evaluation of midluteal endometrial biopsies in oocyte donors spontaneous and subsequent COH cycles. SETTING Tertiary academic medical center assisted reproductive technologies clinic. PATIENT(S) Nineteen oocyte donors. INTERVENTION(S) Exogenous gonadotropins, endometrial biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Endometrial histology and an immunohistochemical marker of uterine receptivity, the alphavbeta3 vitronectin. RESULT(S) Glandular and stromal dyssynchrony was more common after COH in 16 (80%) of 20 cycles than 6 (30%) of 20 spontaneous cycles (P <.05). Glandular lag was more frequent in COH cycles and unaffected by progesterone administration. The beta3 subunit of the alphavbeta3 vitronectin receptor was present in 9 (45%) of 20 spontaneous and 2 (10%) of 20 COH cycles (P <.05). CONCLUSION(S) Exogenous gonadotropin use in healthy reproductive age women did not result in endometrial evidence of a luteal phase defect. A greater incidence of glandular-stromal dyssynchrony resulted from the use of exogenous gonadotropins. The presence of alphavbeta3 was noted in most endometrial specimens demonstrating in phase glandular maturation. We conclude that endometrial dyssynchrony that results from delayed glandular development most likely represents a normal histologic variant.

Human alveolar macrophage-56 and carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibodies in the differential diagnosis between primary ovarian and metastatic gastrointestinal carcinomas

The immunohistochemical expression and localization of monoclonal antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and human alveolar macrophage (HAM-56) were evaluated in primary ovarian and metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry was performed using an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method with capillary gap technology on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 41 primary ovarian epithelial neoplasms, 17 metastatic gastrointestinal malignancies, and 10 tumors of uncertain primary origin. Overall, immunostaining for HAM-56 was positive in 35 (85%) ovarian epithelial neoplasms compared with only two (12%) gastrointestinal cancers. Carcinoembryonic antigen was positive in 16 (39%) ovarian versus 13 (76%) GI tumors. Of the primary ovarian neoplasms, 22 were positive for HAM-56 only, 13 were positive for both HAM-56 and CEA, three were positive for CEA only (all mucinous neoplasms), and three were negative for both. Of the primary GI neoplasms, 12 were positive for CEA only (including all eight colon cancers), one was positive for both HAM-56 and CEA, one was positive for HAM-56 only, and three were negative for both. Of the 10 neoplasms of unknown origin at initial presentation, six were positive for HAM-56 only, three were positive for CEA only, none was positive for both HAM-56 and CEA, and one was negative for both. Only three of these 10 neoplasms remained of indeterminate origin after pathological review and clinical follow-up. When positive, CEA was usually strong and generalized in GI cancers but weak and focal in ovarian neoplasms. The HAM-56 positivity in ovarian neoplasms was typically focal and largely limited to areas with glandular or papillary differentiation with apical linear accentuation. We conclude that an immunohistochemical panel using both HAM-56 (Enzo Diagnostics, Syosset, NY) and CEA monoclonal antibodies is helpful in differentiating primary ovarian neoplasms from metastatic gastrointestinal malignancies, and in evaluating metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site.

Are epithelial cells in fat or connective tissue a reliable indicator of tumor invasion in fine-needle aspiration of the breast?

The diagnosis of breast carcinoma tumor invasion by fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) cytology continues to be controversial. To assess the reliability of predicting tumor invasion by FNA, we examined the cytologic smears of 183 FNAs of benign and malignant solid epithelial lesions of the breast for which histologic follow‐up was available. The study group consisted of 94 invasive carcinomas, eight pure ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and 81 benign lesions (fibroadenoma, fibrocystic changes, papilloma, adenosis). Epithelial cellularity, presence of epithelial cells in dispersed fat droplets and presence of epithelium within intact fragments of fibrofatty connective tissue were tabulated. Epithelial cellularity in dispersed fat was semiquantitatively scored. The cytologic diagnosis of the epithelial cells in all cases was recorded as benign, malignant, or indeterminant for malignancy.