Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Debra L. Richardson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Debra L. Richardson.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2009

The detection of differentially expressed microRNAs from the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a novel real-time PCR platform

Kimberly E. Resnick; Hansjuerg Alder; John P. Hagan; Debra L. Richardson; Carlo M. Croce; David E. Cohn

OBJECTIVE To determine the utility of serum miRNAs as biomarkers for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Twenty-eight patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer were identified from a tissue and serum bank. Serum was collected prior to definitive therapy. Fifteen unmatched, healthy controls were used for comparison. Serum was obtained from all patients. RNA was extracted using a derivation of the single step Trizol method. The RNA from 9 cancer specimens was compared to 4 normal specimens with real-time PCR using the TaqMan Array Human MicroRNA panel. Twenty-one miRNAs were differentially expressed between normal and patient serum. Real-time PCR for the 21 individual miRNAs was performed on the remaining 19 cancer specimens and 11 normal specimens. RESULTS Eight miRNAs of the original twenty-one were identified that were significantly differentially expressed between cancer and normal specimens using the comparative C(t) method. MiRNAs-21, 92, 93, 126 and 29a were significantly over-expressed in the serum from cancer patients compared to controls (p<.01). MiRNAs-155, 127 and 99b were significantly under-expressed (p<.01). Additionally, miRs-21, 92 and 93 were over-expressed in 3 patients with normal pre-operative CA-125. CONCLUSION We demonstrate that the extraction of RNA and subsequent identification of miRNAs from the serum of individuals diagnosed with ovarian cancer is feasible. Real-time PCR-based microarray is a novel and practical means to performing high-throughput investigation of serum RNA samples. miRNAs-21, 92 and 93 are known oncogenes with therapeutic and biomarker potential.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2009

A detailed analysis of the learning curve: Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer

Leigh G. Seamon; Jeffrey M. Fowler; Debra L. Richardson; Matthew J. Carlson; Sue Valmadre; Gary Phillips; David E. Cohn

OBJECTIVE To define the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma. METHODS Patient demographics and segmental operative times on all patients at one institution who underwent robotic comprehensive surgical staging (hysterectomy, pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy) for endometrial cancer were prospectively collected. Patients were arranged in order based on surgery date and outcomes were compared between quartiles (cases 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, and 61-79). Proficiency was defined as the point at which the slope of the curve becomes less steep for operative times. Efficiency was defined as the point at which the slope is zero. ANOVA or Fishers exact test was used to compare the procedure times. Locally weighted regression generated smoothed lines that represent operative time over the sequence of the operations. RESULTS 79 patients were comprehensively staged robotically. While age, the percentage of patients with >/=2 co-morbidities, number of patients with previous laparotomy, EBL, LOS and lymph node counts do not differ between groups, the first 20 patients had a lower BMI compared to the next 20 (27 vs. 34 kg/m(2), P=0.009). Operative times decreased from the first 20 cases to next 20, but was not significantly changed over the next three quartiles. Each component of the procedure has a separate learning curve. CONCLUSIONS Proficiency for robotic hysterectomy with pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer is achieved after 20 cases; however, the number of procedures to gain efficiency varies for each portion of the case and continues to improve over time.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008

Robotic Hysterectomy and Pelvic-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer

Leigh G. Seamon; David E. Cohn; Debra L. Richardson; Sue Valmadre; Matthew J. Carlson; Gary Phillips; Jeffrey M. Fowler

OBJECTIVE: To report the learning curve and outcomes after our first 105 patients underwent robotic hysterectomy and pelvic–aortic lymphadenectomy for the comprehensive staging of endometrial cancer. METHODS: We prospectively collected patient demographics, operative times, complications, pathologic results, and length of stay on all patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy pelvic–aortic lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I or occult stage II endometrial carcinoma. RESULTS: One hundred five patients at The Ohio State University between March 2006 and April 2008 underwent exploration with the intent of robotic hysterectomy pelvic–aortic lymphadenectomy. Ninety-two (87.6%) were completed robotically and 13 (12.4%) were converted. The probability of conversion was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4–25.7), 24% (95% CI 12.4–39.9), 35% (95% CI 15.9–59.6), and 48% (95% CI 19.1–77.8) for a body mass index of 40, 45, 50, and 55 kg/m2, respectively. The median body mass index was 34 kg/m2 (range 19–58). In patients who underwent a robotic hysterectomy pelvic–aortic lymphadenectomy (n=79, 75%) or a robotic hysterectomy–pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=6, 5.7%), the average operating time from skin opening to closure was 242 minutes (±50 minutes). The median estimated blood loss was 99 mL (±83 mL). The median number of lymph nodes recovered was 29 (range 9–56), 21 (range 5–40) pelvic nodes and 9 (range 2–21) aortic nodes. The median length of stay was 1 night. After analysis of the data, we determined approximately 20 cases are needed to gain proficiency. CONCLUSION: Early experience demonstrates that robotic hysterectomy pelvic–aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer is feasible, with approximately 20 procedures needed to gain proficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III


Gynecologic Oncology | 2015

Society of Gynecologic Oncology statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions

Johnathan M. Lancaster; C. Bethan Powell; Lee-may Chen; Debra L. Richardson

Women with germline mutations in the cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2, associated with Hereditary Breast & Ovarian Cancer syndrome, have up to an 85% lifetime risk of breast cancer and up to a 46% lifetime risk of ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers. Similarly, women with mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2, associated with the Lynch/Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) syndrome, have up to a 40-60% lifetime risk of both endometrial and colorectal cancers as well as a 9-12% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Mutations in other genes including TP53, PTEN, and STK11 are responsible for hereditary syndromes associated with gynecologic, breast, and other cancers. Evaluation of the likelihood of a patient having one of these gynecologic cancer predisposition syndromes enables physicians to provide individualized assessments of cancer risk, as well as the opportunity to provide tailored screening and prevention strategies such as surveillance, chemoprevention, and prophylactic surgery that may reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with these syndromes. Evaluation for the presence of a hereditary cancer syndrome is a process that includes assessment of clinical and tumor characteristics, education and counseling conducted by a provider with expertise in cancer genetics, and may include genetic testing after appropriate consent is obtained. This commentary provides guidance on identification of patients who may benefit from assessment for the presence of a hereditary breast and/or gynecologic cancer syndrome.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2009

Influence of intraoperative capsule rupture on outcomes in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez; Debra L. Richardson; Leigh G. Seamon; Giovanni D. Aletti; Cecelia A. Powless; Gary L. Keeney; David M. O'Malley; William A. Cliby

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of tumor capsule rupture on disease prognosis in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: All patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I epithelial ovarian cancer operated on at the Mayo Clinic and The Ohio State University between January 1991 and December 2007 were identified. Relevant tumor characteristics, procedures performed, adjuvant therapies, and follow-up were recorded and analyzed. Inclusion criteria included comprehensive staging. Cox proportional hazards, Kaplan-Meier estimation, log rank test, and &khgr;2 test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: There were 161 cases that met inclusion criteria. Seventy-four (46%) patients had intact capsules without positive cytology or surface involvement; 61 (38%) had capsule rupture; 33 (20%) had positive cytology; and 22 (14%) had surface involvement. Overall, 22 of 161 (14%) patients recurred and 12 of 161 (7%) patients died of their disease. In univariable analysis, both intraoperative capsule rupture and positive cytologic washings portended worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–8.9; P=.004 and HR 5.2, 95% CI 2.1–12.3; P<.001, respectively) and disease-specific survival (HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.3–15.4; P=.018 and HR 5.9, 95% CI 1.8–19.3; P=.005, respectively). In multivariable analysis, capsule rupture (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.8–10.9; P=.001) and positive cytologic washings (HR 6.4, 95% CI 2.5–16.0; P<.001) remained independent predictors of worse disease-free survival. Disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were shortest for stage IC cases with positive cytology, surface involvement, or both, that also had intraoperative rupture. CONCLUSION: In stage I epithelial ovarian cancer, intraoperative capsule rupture portends a higher risk of disease recurrence and death from disease. Careful intraoperative removal of ovarian masses is important, and recognizing the higher-risk nature of such cases is imperative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III


Gynecologic Oncology | 2008

Combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Debra L. Richardson; Floor J. Backes; Leigh G. Seamon; Vanna Zanagnolo; David M. O'Malley; David E. Cohn; Jeffrey M. Fowler; Larry J. Copeland

OBJECTIVE To describe the response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profile of combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab (GPB) for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS A chart review of all patients with recurrent EOC who were treated with D1, D15 GPB in a 28-day cycle at a single institution was performed. Standard doses were gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) or carboplatin AUC 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. All patients were analyzed for toxicity. RR and PFS were assessed in all patients who received at least 2 cycles of GPB. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were identified, and 33 received at least 2 cycles of GPB. The majority of patients (80%) were platinum sensitive. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of GPB (range 1-24). Sixteen patients (48%) had a complete response (CR), and 10 patients (30%) had a partial response (PR), for a total RR of 78%. An additional 5 patients (15%) had stable disease, and only 2 (6%) patients had progressive disease. The median overall PFS was 12 months (95% CI 7-15), with a median follow-up time of 10 months (2-22). Two patients (6%) had bowel perforations, and both survived. Hematologic toxicities were most common, with 29% and 14% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia respectively. CONCLUSIONS The combination of GPB demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment of recurrent EOC. However, serious toxicities occurred, and the safety profile of this combination requires further study.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2011

Addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel significantly improves progression-free survival in heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

David M. O'Malley; Debra L. Richardson; Patrick S. Rheaume; Ritu Salani; Eric L. Eisenhauer; Georgia A. McCann; Jeffrey M. Fowler; Larry J. Copeland; David E. Cohn; Floor J. Backes

OBJECTIVE Weekly paclitaxel has been shown to be an effective cytotoxic regimen for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and may act through inhibition of angiogenesis. Bevacizumab, a potent angiogenesis inhibitor, has also been shown to have activity in patients with EOC. Therefore, we sought to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel led to an increased survival compared to weekly paclitaxel alone. METHODS A single institutional review was conducted for patients with recurrent EOC treated with weekly paclitaxel (60-70mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28day cycle and those treated with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab (10-15mg/kg on day 1 and 15). Response rates (RR) were calculated, and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients treated with weekly paclitaxel and 41 patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab were identified. The groups were similar in demographics, initial optimal cytoreduction, stage, histology, grade, platinum sensitivity, and median number of previous regimens (4 vs. 4, p=0.69).The overall response rate (ORR) was 63% (complete response (CR) 34% and partial response (PR) 29%) for paclitaxel/bevacizumab and 48% (CR 17% and PR 31%) for weekly paclitaxel (p=0.23). Improvement in PFS was seen in those treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab in comparison to weekly paclitaxel alone (median PFS 13.2 vs. 6.2months, p<.01). There was a trend towards improved OS for paclitaxel/bevacizumab (median OS 20.6 vs. 9.1months; p=0.12). Toxicities were similar between the two regimens although more bowel perforations (2 vs. 0) were seen in the paclitaxel/bevacizumab group. CONCLUSION A significant increase in PFS with a trend towards improved OS was demonstrated in this heavily pretreated population treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab as compared to weekly paclitaxel alone. This data should be helpful in guiding future trials to determine the optimal care for women with recurrent EOC.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2009

Sustained progression-free survival with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer

J.D. Hurt; Debra L. Richardson; Leigh G. Seamon; J.F. Fowler; Larry J. Copeland; David E. Cohn; Eric L. Eisenhauer; Ritu Salani; David M. O'Malley

OBJECTIVE To determine efficacy, toxicity, and survival in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) receiving combination of weekly paclitaxel and biweekly bevacizumab (PB). METHODS We reviewed chemotherapy logs identifying all patients receiving combination PB. Toxicities were graded using CTCAEv3.0 criteria. Response rates (RR) were measured using RECIST criteria or by CA-125 levels per modified Rustin criteria. RR and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined and plotted using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS Fifty-one patients receiving at least two cycles of chemotherapy were evaluable for survival and 55 patients receiving one cycle of PB were evaluable in toxicity analysis. The mean number of previous regimens was four. The overall median PFS was 7 months and median OS was 12 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 60% (CR 25% and PR 35%). Median PFS for complete and partial responders were 14 and 5 months respectively. Stable disease was seen in 26% with median PFS of 6 months. Thirteen experienced treatment delays for a variety of factors. The most G3/4 toxicities were fatigue (16%), hematologic (9%) and neurotoxicity (7%). Three patients (5%) experienced bowel perforations. CONCLUSIONS Combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab is feasible and demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile and a high response rate. These observations should be useful in planning future clinical trials with this combination therapy.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2010

Which factors predict bowel complications in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer being treated with bevacizumab

Debra L. Richardson; Floor J. Backes; J.D. Hurt; Leigh G. Seamon; Larry J. Copeland; J. Fowler; David E. Cohn; David M. O'Malley

BACKGROUND Increased rates of bowel perforation in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with bevacizumab have been reported, but the risk factors for this association are uncertain. We sought to identify factors associated with bowel perforation and fistula formation in recurrent EOC patients treated with bevacizumab. METHODS A chart review of all patients treated with bevacizumab for recurrent EOC at a single institution was performed. Pertinent patient characteristics and treatment information were collected. Univariate logistic regression was performed to analyze multiple variables. RESULTS One hundred twelve patients who were treated with 160 different bevacizumab regimens were identified. The median age was 60 years (range, 29-78 years). Patients had received a median of 4 prior chemotherapy regimens (range, 1-10). The median number of cycles was 4 (range, 0.5-31). Ten patients (9%) were diagnosed with bowel perforations, and another 2 patients (1.8%) were diagnosed with fistulas. The 30-day mortality following perforation was 50%, with 30% of patients dying within 1 week. Patients with rectovaginal nodularity were more likely to develop a bowel perforation or fistula than those who did not have this finding, OR=3.64 (95% CI=1.1 to 12.1, p=0.04). None of the other variables were significantly associated with bowel perforations or fistula formation. CONCLUSIONS Rectovaginal nodularity is associated with an increased risk of bowel perforation or fistula formation for patients with recurrent EOC treated with bevacizumab. Careful consideration should be given prior to initiating bevacizumab treatment in EOC patients with rectovaginal nodularity since the mortality rate with bevacizumab associated bowel perforations is 50%.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2015

Risk of Occult Uterine Sarcoma in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.

Kimberly A. Kho; Ken Yu Lin; Martin Lorenzo Hechanova; Debra L. Richardson

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the frequency of unsuspected sarcoma identified postoperatively in women undergoing surgery for benign gynecologic indications at our institution. METHODS: Patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications from 2000 to 2014 at our institution were identified. Patients who did not have a preoperative suspicion for malignancy and were found to have uterine sarcoma on pathology postoperatively were considered to have an occult uterine sarcoma. Relevant clinical and pathologic data were collected for this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: A total of 10,119 hysterectomies for benign gynecologic indications were performed between 2000 and 2014. Among these, nine patients were found to have uterine sarcoma, with an overall rate 1 in 1,124 (95% confidence interval 1/592–1/2,457). These malignancies included five leiomyosarcomas, two endometrial stromal sarcomas, and two uterine adenosarcomas. Median age was 39 years (range 25–53 years). Among women found to have occult sarcoma, hysterectomy was performed as a primary indication for abnormal bleeding (77.8%) and leiomyomas (22.2%). Cases included six total abdominal hysterectomies, two total vaginal hysterectomies, and one supracervical hysterectomy. One case required manual morcellation during abdominal hysterectomy. Power morcellation was not used in any of the cases. CONCLUSION: In summary, occult uterine sarcoma occurs in 0.089% or 1 in 1,124 hysterectomies for benign indications in our population. The frequency is lower than the rate derived in earlier reports and by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in their pooled analysis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Debra L. Richardson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Siobhan M. Kehoe

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jayanthi S. Lea

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Nagel

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dustin B. Manders

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew J. Carlson

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge