Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Debra Sue Dyer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Debra Sue Dyer.


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2014

ACR-STR practice parameter for the performance and reporting of lung cancer screening thoracic computed tomography (CT): 2014 (Resolution 4)

Ella A. Kazerooni; John H. M. Austin; William C. Black; Debra Sue Dyer; Todd R. Hazelton; Ann N. Leung; Michael F. McNitt-Gray; Reginald F. Munden; Sudhakar Pipavath

Author(s): Kazerooni, Ella A; Austin, John HM; Black, William C; Dyer, Debra S; Hazelton, Todd R; Leung, Ann N; McNitt-Gray, Michael F; Munden, Reginald F; Pipavath, Sudhakar; American College of Radiology; Society of Thoracic Radiology | Abstract: The American College of Radiology, with more than 30,000 members, is the principal organization of radiologists, radiation oncologists,and clinical medical physicists in the United States. The College is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance thescience of radiology, improve radiologic services to the patient, study the socioeconomic aspects of the practice of radiology, and encouragecontinuing education for radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and persons practicing in allied professional fields.The American College of Radiology will periodically define new practice parameters and technical standards for radiologic practice to helpadvance the science of radiology and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing practice parameters andtechnical standards will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated.Each practice parameter and technical standard, representing a policy statement by the College, has undergone a thorough consensusprocess in which it has been subjected to extensive review and approval. The practice parameters and technical standards recognize that the safeand effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document.Reproduction or modification of the published practice parameter and technical standard by those entities not providing these services is notauthorized.?


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2010

ACR appropriateness criteria® hemoptysis.

Jean Jeudy; Arfa Khan; Tan-Lucien H. Mohammed; Judith K. Amorosa; Kathleen Brown; Debra Sue Dyer; Jud W. Gurney; Heber MacMahon; Anthony Saleh; Kay H. Vydareny

Hemoptysis is defined as the expectoration of blood originating from the tracheobronchial tree or pulmonary parenchyma, ranging from 100 mL to 1 L in volume over a 24-hour period. This article reviews the literature on the indications and usefulness of radiologic studies for the evaluation of hemoptysis. The following recommendations are the result of evidence-based consensus by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Radiology: (1) Initial evaluation of patients with hemoptysis should include a chest radiograph; (2) Patients at high risk for malignancy (>40 y old, >40 pack-year smoking history) with negative chest radiograph, computed tomography (CT) scan, and bronchoscopy can be followed with observation for the following 3 years. Radiography and CT are recommended imaging modalities for follow-up. Bronchoscopy may complement imaging during the period of observation; (3) In patients who are at high risk for malignancy and have suspicious chest radiograph findings, CT is suggested for initial evaluation; CT should also be considered in patients who are active or exsmokers, despite a negative chest radiograph; and (4) Massive hemoptysis can be effectively treated with either surgery or percutaneous embolization. Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT before embolization or surgery can define the source of hemoptysis as bronchial systemic, nonbronchial systemic, and/or pulmonary arterial. Percutaneous embolization may be used initially to halt the hemorrhage before definitive surgery.


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2011

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® screening for pulmonary metastases.

Tan Lucien H Mohammed; Aqeel A. Chowdhry; Gautham P. Reddy; Judith K. Amorosa; Kathleen Brown; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E. Ginsburg; Darel E. Heitkamp; Jean Jeudy; Jacobo Kirsch; Heber MacMahon; J. Anthony Parker; James G. Ravenel; Anthony Saleh; Rakesh Shah

Screening for pulmonary metastatic disease is an important step for staging a patient with a known or recently discovered malignancy. Here we present our recommendations for screening for metastatic disease based on recommendations from the literature and experiences of pulmonary radiologists. In short, chest computed tomographic (CT) screening is the most appropriate tool for evaluation of pulmonary metastasis in the majority of cases. Chest computed tomographic screening is also recommended for follow-up and to determine response to therapy. Other modalities such as chest radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and scintigraphy will also be discussed. Please note that this study is a summary of the complete version of this topic, which is available on the ACR website at www.acr.org. Practitioners are encouraged to refer to the complete version.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2014

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Blunt Chest Trauma

Jonathan H. Chung; Christian W. Cox; Tan Lucien H Mohammed; Jacobo Kirsch; Kathleen Brown; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E. Ginsburg; Darel E. Heitkamp; Jeffrey P. Kanne; Ella A. Kazerooni; Loren Ketai; James G. Ravenel; Anthony Saleh; Rakesh Shah; Robert M. Steiner; Robert D. Suh

Imaging is paramount in the setting of blunt trauma and is now the standard of care at any trauma center. Although anteroposterior radiography has inherent limitations, the ability to acquire a radiograph in the trauma bay with little interruption in clinical survey, monitoring, and treatment, as well as radiographys accepted role in screening for traumatic aortic injury, supports the routine use of chest radiography. Chest CT or CT angiography is the gold-standard routine imaging modality for detecting thoracic injuries caused by blunt trauma. There is disagreement on whether routine chest CT is necessary in all patients with histories of blunt trauma. Ultimately, the frequency and timing of CT chest imaging should be site specific and should depend on the local resources of the trauma center as well as patient status. Ultrasound may be beneficial in the detection of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pericardial hemorrhage; transesophageal echocardiography is a first-line imaging tool in the setting of suspected cardiac injury. In the blunt trauma setting, MRI and nuclear medicine likely play no role in the acute setting, although these modalities may be helpful as problem-solving tools after initial assessment. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2013

ACR appropriateness criteria routine chest radiographs in intensive care unit patients.

Judith K. Amorosa; Mark Bramwit; Tan Lucien H Mohammed; Gautham P. Reddy; Kathleen Brown; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E. Ginsburg; Darel E. Heitkamp; Jean Jeudy; Jacobo Kirsch; Heber MacMahon; James G. Ravenel; Anthony Saleh; Rakesh Shah

Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiographs in the ICU. Having analyzed this practice, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has made the following recommendations: • When monitoring a stable patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a portable chest radiograph is appropriate for clinical indications only. • It is appropriate to obtain a chest radiograph after placement of an endotracheal tube, central venous line, Swan-Ganz catheter, nasogastric tube, feeding tube, or chest tube. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The strongest data contributing to these recommendations were derived from a meta-analysis of 8 trials comprising 7,078 ICU patients by Oba and Zaza [1].


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2011

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute respiratory illness in immunocompetent patients.

Jacobo Kirsch; José Ramírez; Tan-Lucien H. Mohammed; Judith K. Amorosa; Kathleen Brown; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E. Ginsburg; Darel E. Heitkamp; Jean Jeudy; Heber MacMahon; James G. Ravenel; Anthony Saleh; Rakesh Shah

Acute respiratory illness is defined as one or more of the following: cough, sputum production, chest pain, or dyspnea (with or without fever). The workup of these patients depends on many factors, including clinical presentation and the suspected etiology. This study reviews the literature on the indications and usefulness of radiologic studies for the evaluation of acute respiratory illness in the immunocompetent patient. The following recommendations are the result of evidence-based consensus by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Radiology. Chest radiographs are usually appropriate in (1) patients with positive physical examination or risk factors for pneumonia, (2) for the assessment of complicated pneumonia, or (3) in cases of emerging infections and biological warfare agents such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, H1N1, and anthrax. Computed tomography, although having a more limited role, is usually appropriate (1) in the assessment of complicated pneumonia and (2) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome, H1N1, or anthrax and a normal radiograph.


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2013

ACR appropriateness criteria® radiographically detected solitary pulmonary nodule

Jeffrey P. Kanne; Leif Jensen; Tan Lucien H Mohammed; Jacobo Kirsch; Judith K. Amorosa; Kathleen Brown; Jonathan H. Chung; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E. Ginsburg; Darel E. Heitkamp; Ella A. Kazerooni; Loren Ketai; J. Anthony Parker; James G. Ravenel; Anthony Saleh; Rakesh Shah

The solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is a common medical problem for which management can be quite complex. Imaging remains at the center of management of SPNs, and computed tomography is the primary modality by which SPNs are characterized and followed up for stability. This manuscript summarizes the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for radiographically detected solitary pulmonary nodules and briefly reviews the various imaging techniques available. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2012

ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Acute Respiratory Illness in Immunocompromised Patients

Darel E. Heitkamp; Tan Lucien H Mohammed; Jacobo Kirsch; Judith K. Amorosa; Kathleen Brown; Jonathan H. Chung; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E. Ginsburg; Jeffrey P. Kanne; Ella A. Kazerooni; Loren Ketai; J. Anthony Parker; James G. Ravenel; Anthony Saleh; Rakesh Shah

The respiratory system is often affected by complications of immunodeficiency, typically manifesting clinically as acute respiratory illness. Ongoing literature reviews regarding the appropriateness of imaging in these patients are critical, as advanced medical therapies such as stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy, and immunosuppressive therapies for autoimmune disease continue to keep high the population of immunosuppressed patients in our health care system today. This ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) topic describes clinical scenarios of acute respiratory illness in immunocompromised patients with cough, dyspnea, chest pain, and fever; in those with negative, equivocal, or nonspecific findings on chest radiography; in those with diffuse or confluent opacities on chest radiography; and in those in whom noninfectious disease is suspected. The use of chest radiography, chest CT, transthoracic needle biopsy, and nuclear medicine imaging are all discussed in the contexts of these clinical scenarios. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2013

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pulmonary hypertension.

Kathleen Brown; Antonio Gutierrez; Tan Lucien H Mohammed; Jacobo Kirsch; Jonathan H. Chung; Debra Sue Dyer; Mark E. Ginsburg; Darel E. Heitkamp; Jeffrey P. Kanne; Ella A. Kazerooni; Loren H. Ketai; J. Anthony Parker; James G. Ravenel; Anthony Saleh; Rakesh Shah; Robert M. Steiner; Robert D. Suh

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) may be idiopathic or related to a variety of diseases. The diagnosis, accurate assessment of etiology and severity, prognosis, treatment response, and follow-up of PH can be achieved using a diverse set of diagnostic examinations. In this review, the role of imaging in the evaluation of PH as suggested by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has been discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The development and review of the guidelines include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of Thoracic Imaging | 2010

ACR Appropriateness Criteria on chronic dyspnea: suspected pulmonary origin.

Debra Sue Dyer; Arfa Khan; Tan-Lucien H. Mohammed; Judith K. Amorosa; Poonam Batra; Jud W. Gurney; Jean Jeudy; Larry Kaiser; Heber MacMahon; Suhail Raoof; Kay H. Vydareny

Dyspnea, described as breathlessness or shortness of breath, is usually caused by cardiopulmonary disease. The role of imaging in chronic dyspnea (>1 mo in duration) with suspected pulmonary origin is reviewed as suggested by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Collaboration


Dive into the Debra Sue Dyer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen Brown

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Saleh

New York Methodist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James G. Ravenel

Medical University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark E. Ginsburg

Columbia University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rakesh Shah

North Shore-LIJ Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge