Deepa Jagadeesh

Primary CNS Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD): An International Report of 84 Cases in the Modern Era

We performed a multicenter, International analysis of solid organ transplant (SOT)‐related primary central nervous system (PCNS) posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Among 84 PCNS PTLD patients, median time of SOT‐to‐PTLD was 54 months, 79% had kidney SOT, histology was monomorphic in 83% and tumor was EBV+ in 94%. Further, 33% had deep brain involvement, 10% had CSF involvement, while none had ocular disease. Immunosuppression was reduced in 93%; additional first‐line therapy included high‐dose methotrexate (48%), high‐dose cytarabine (33%), brain radiation (24%) and/or rituximab (44%). The overall response rate was 60%, while treatment‐related mortality was 13%. With 42‐month median follow‐up, three‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 32% and 43%, respectively. There was a trend on univariable analysis for improved PFS for patients who received rituximab and/or high‐dose cytarabine. On multivariable Cox regression, poor performance status predicted inferior PFS (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.32–5.17, p = 0.006), while increased LDH portended inferior OS (HR 4.16, 95% CI 1.29–13.46, p = 0.02). Moreover, lack of response to first‐line therapy was the most dominant prognostic factor on multivariable analysis (HR 8.70, 95% CI 2.56–29.57, p = 0.0005). Altogether, PCNS PTLD appears to represent a distinct clinicopathologic entity within the PTLD spectrum that is associated with renal SOT, occurs late, is monomorphic and retains EBV positivity.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas in a large US multicenter cohort: prognostication in the modern era including impact of frontline therapy

BACKGROUND Optimal frontline therapy for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in the modern era remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS We examined patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes among 341 newly diagnosed PTCL patients from 2000 to 2011. Outcome was compared with a matched cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, and prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS PTCL subtypes included PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (31%), anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma (ALCL) (26%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (23%), NK/T-cell lymphoma (7%), acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (6%), and other (7%). Median age was 62 years (range 18-95 years), and 74% had stage III-IV disease. Twenty-three (7%) patients received only palliative care whereas 318 received chemotherapy: CHOP-like regimens (70%), hyperCVAD/MA (6%), or other (18%). Thirty-three patients (10%) underwent stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission. The overall response rate was 73% (61% complete); 24% had primary refractory disease. With 39-month median follow-up, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 32% and 52%. PFS and OS for PTCL patients were significantly inferior to matched patients with DLBCL. On multivariate analysis, stage I-II disease was the only significant pretreatment prognostic factor [PFS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.85, P = 0.007; OS: HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.78, P = 0.006]. ALK positivity in ALCL was prognostic on univariate analysis, but lost significance on multivariate analysis. The most dominant prognostic factor was response to initial therapy (complete response versus other), including adjustment for stage and SCT [PFS: HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.28, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17-0.40, P < 0.0001]. No overall survival difference was observed based on choice of upfront regimen or SCT in first remission. CONCLUSIONS This analysis identifies early-stage disease and initial treatment response as dominant prognostic factors in PTCL. No clear benefit was observed for patients undergoing consolidative SCT. Novel therapeutic approaches for PTCL are critically needed.

Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs): Changing the Treatment Landscape of Lymphoma

Opinion statementWhile strides advancing cancer treatment have made it possible to cure some malignancies, the effort to strike an intricate balance between attaining higher efficacy and lower toxicity has been difficult to accomplish, especially with conventional chemotherapy agents. Introduction of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) has brought us a step closer to this goal and made it possible to target the cancer cells and to minimize effects on normal tissue. Continued efforts have led to approval of two ADCs for cancer therapy, while many others are in various stages of clinical development. The design of ADCs allows them to be internalized into the cancer cells where the drug payload is released and leads to cell death. The key is to identify targets that are exclusively expressed on malignant cells with minimal or no expression on normal cells, which allows for selective killing of tumor cells. Development and approval of more potent ADCs could change the landscape of cancer therapy and possibly eliminate traditional chemotherapy agents from treatment algorithms. In this review, we discuss the ADCs that are being investigated in early and late stage clinical trials for the treatment of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Enteropathy-Associated T-Cell Lymphoma

Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma is a rare neoplasm with uniformly aggressive features that arises from intestinal T-cells. There is strong evidence supporting its association as a dire complication of celiac disease. The clinical presentation can vary from malabsorption and abdominal pain to an acute abdominal emergency. Originally, it was divided into types I and II in World Health Organization (WHO) classification schemes, reflective of epidemiology and differences in clinicopathologic features. The debate over the degree of separation of the two types is ongoing as new data emerges regarding the pathogenetics. The low incidence and variable patient factors are major barriers in conducting clinical trials and establishing standard treatment regimens. Yet, the collective experience demonstrates favorable outcomes with combination chemotherapy followed by an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients who can tolerate such treatment. The prognosis remains dismal; thus, future research studies are warranted to identify effective novel therapies that can improve outcomes in this rare disease entity.

Prognostic significance of pre-transplant quality of life in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

Quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Whether pre-HCT QOL adds prognostic information to patient and disease related risk factors has not been well described. We investigated the association of pre-HCT QOL with relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall mortality after allogeneic HCT. From 2003 to 2012, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant Scale instrument was administered before transplantation to 409 first allogeneic HCT recipients. We examined the association of the three outcomes with (1) individual QOL domains, (2) trial outcome index (TOI) and (3) total score. In multivariable models with individual domains, functional well-being (hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, P=0.025) and additional concerns (HR 1.39, P=0.002) were associated with reduced risk of relapse, no domain was associated with NRM, and better physical well-being was associated with reduced risk of overall mortality (HR 0.97, P=0.04). TOI was not associated with relapse or NRM but was associated with reduced risk of overall mortality (HR 0.93, P=0.05). Total score was not associated with any of the three outcomes. HCT-comorbidity index score was prognostic for greater risk of relapse and mortality but not NRM. QOL assessments, particularly physical functioning and functional well-being, may provide independent prognostic information beyond standard clinical measures in allogeneic HCT recipients.

XII. Hodgkin lymphoma in older patients: challenges and opportunities to improve outcomes

Advanced age is a known poor prognostic factor in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) [1]. Further, outcomes for HL patients aged≥60years are significantly and disproportionately inferior compared with younger patient populations (Figure 1) [2–4] and a standard treatment paradigm for older HL patients is lacking. The inferior outcome for older patients has been attributed to a variety of factors including presence of co-morbidities, poor performance status, histologic and biologic differences (e.g. mixed cellularity, EBV-related, and advanced-stage disease), inability to tolerate chemotherapy at full dose and schedule, and increased treatment-related toxicity and mortality. Compounding these challenges has been the underrepresentation of older patients in HL clinical trials, which is a barrier in the evaluation of disease biology and discovery of effective treatment strategies. Nonetheless, outcomes have improved for older HL patients over the past several decades, and there are recently published data and research endeavours in this patient population that are underway. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, biology, disease characteristics, prognostication, and treatment strategies for older HL patients.

Association of socioeconomic status with long-term outcomes in 1-year survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The relationship of socioeconomic status (SES) with long-term outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors has not been well described. We studied the association of SES with the outcomes of 283 consecutive allogeneic HCT recipients transplanted between 2003 and 2012 who had survived for at least 1 year in remission. Median annual household income was estimated using Census tract data and from ZIP code of residence. SES categories were determined by recursive partitioning analysis (low SES (<

Risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

51 000/year), N=203; high SES (⩾

Early stage, bulky Hodgkin lymphoma patients have a favorable outcome when treated with or without consolidative radiotherapy: potential role of PET scan in treatment planning

51 000/year), N=80). In multivariable analyses, low SES patients had higher risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.98, P=0.012) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.22, P=0.028), but similar risks of relapse mortality (HR 1.01, P=0.97) compared with high SES patients. A trend toward better survival and lower NRM for high SES patients with no chronic GVHD was observed; low SES patients without GVHD had similar survival as patients with chronic GVHD. In allogeneic HCT survivors who survive in remission for at least 1 year, SES is associated with long-term survival that is primarily mediated through higher risks of NRM. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms of health-care disparities and interventions to mitigate them.

GvHD-free, relapse-free survival after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with myeloid malignancies

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections in recent times. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) confers increased risk for CDI because of prolonged hospital stay, immunosuppression, the need to use broad-spectrum antibiotics and a complex interplay of preparative regimen and GvHD-induced gut mucosal damage. Our study evaluated risk factors (RF) for recurrent CDI in HSCT recipients given the ubiquity of traditional RF for CDI in this population. Of the 499 allogeneic HSCT recipients transplanted between 2005 and 2012, 61 (12%) developed CDI within 6 months before transplant or 2 years after transplant and were included in the analysis. Recurrent CDI occurred in 20 (33%) patients. One year incidence of CDI recurrence was 31%. Multivariable analyses identified the number of antecedent antibiotics other than those used to treat CDI as the only significant RF for recurrence (hazard ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.09–3.52, P=0.025). Most recurrences occurred within 6 months of the first CDI, and the recurrence of CDI was associated with a trend for increased risk of mortality. This prompts the need for further investigation into secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent CDI.