Deepa Senapathi
University of Reading
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Deepa Senapathi.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences | 2015
Deepa Senapathi; Luísa G. Carvalheiro; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Cassie-Ann Dodson; Rebecca. L. Evans; Megan Mckerchar; R. Daniel Morton; Ellen D. Moss; Stuart Roberts; William E. Kunin; Simon G. Potts
Change in land cover is thought to be one of the key drivers of pollinator declines, and yet there is a dearth of studies exploring the relationships between historical changes in land cover and shifts in pollinator communities. Here, we explore, for the first time, land cover changes in England over more than 80 years, and relate them to concurrent shifts in bee and wasp species richness and community composition. Using historical data from 14 sites across four counties, we quantify the key land cover changes within and around these sites and estimate the changes in richness and composition of pollinators. Land cover changes within sites, as well as changes within a 1 km radius outside the sites, have significant effects on richness and composition of bee and wasp species, with changes in edge habitats between major land classes also having a key influence. Our results highlight not just the land cover changes that may be detrimental to pollinator communities, but also provide an insight into how increases in habitat diversity may benefit species diversity, and could thus help inform policy and practice for future land management.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2011
Deepa Senapathi; Malcolm A. C. Nicoll; Céline Teplitsky; Carl G. Jones; Ken Norris
There is growing evidence of changes in the timing of important ecological events, such as flowering in plants and reproduction in animals, in response to climate change, with implications for population decline and biodiversity loss. Recent work has shown that the timing of breeding in wild birds is changing in response to climate change partly because individuals are remarkably flexible in their timing of breeding. Despite this work, our understanding of these processes in wild populations remains very limited and biased towards species from temperate regions. Here, we report the response to changing climate in a tropical wild bird population using a long-term dataset on a formerly critically endangered island endemic, the Mauritius kestrel. We show that the frequency of spring rainfall affects the timing of breeding, with birds breeding later in wetter springs. Delays in breeding have consequences in terms of reduced reproductive success as birds get exposed to risks associated with adverse climatic conditions later on in the breeding season, which reduce nesting success. These results, combined with the fact that frequency of spring rainfall has increased by about 60 per cent in our study area since 1962, imply that climate change is exposing birds to the stochastic risks of late reproduction by causing them to start breeding relatively late in the season.
Functional Ecology | 2017
Deepa Senapathi; Mark A. Goddard; William E. Kunin; Katherine C. R. Baldock
Summary 1.This review assesses current knowledge about the interplay between landscape and pollinator communities. Our primary aim is to provide an evidence base, identify key gaps in knowledge and highlight initiatives that will help develop and improve strategies for pollinator conservation. 2.Human-dominated landscapes (such as arable land and urban environments) can have detrimental impacts on pollinator communities but these negative effects can be ameliorated by proximity to semi-natural habitat and habitat corridors. There is also evidence to suggest that increased landscape heterogeneity and landscape configuration can play an important role in the maintenance of diverse pollinator communities. 3.Landscape characteristics have direct impacts on pollinator communities but can also influence abundance and richness through interaction with other drivers such as changing climate or increased chemical inputs in land management. 4.The majority of existing literature focuses on specific hymenopteran groups but there is a lack of information on the impact of landscape changes on non-bee taxa. Research is also needed on the effectiveness of management interventions for pollinators and multiple year observations are required for both urban and rural initiatives. 5.Current policies and monitoring schemes could contribute data that will plug gaps in knowledge, thus enabling greater understanding of relationships between landscapes and pollinator populations. This would in turn help design mitigation and adaptation strategies for pollinator conservation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Ecology Letters | 2017
Vesna Gagic; David Kleijn; András Báldi; Gergely Boros; Helene Bracht Jørgensen; Zoltán Elek; Michael P. D. Garratt; G. Arjen de Groot; Katarina Hedlund; Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki; Lorenzo Marini; Emily A. Martin; Ines Pevere; Simon G. Potts; Sarah Redlich; Deepa Senapathi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Stanisław Świtek; Henrik G. Smith; Viktoria Takacs; Piotr Tryjanowski; Wim H. van der Putten; Stijn van Gils; Riccardo Bommarco
Simultaneously enhancing ecosystem services provided by biodiversity below and above ground is recommended to reduce dependence on chemical pesticides and mineral fertilisers in agriculture. However, consequences for crop yield have been poorly evaluated. Above ground, increased landscape complexity is assumed to enhance biological pest control, whereas below ground, soil organic carbon is a proxy for several yield-supporting services. In a field experiment replicated in 114 fields across Europe, we found that fertilisation had the strongest positive effect on yield, but hindered simultaneous harnessing of below- and above-ground ecosystem services. We furthermore show that enhancing natural enemies and pest control through increasing landscape complexity can prove disappointing in fields with low soil services or in intensively cropped regions. Thus, understanding ecological interdependences between land use, ecosystem services and yield is necessary to promote more environmentally friendly farming by identifying situations where ecosystem services are maximised and agrochemical inputs can be reduced.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Mark A. K. Gillespie; Mathilde Baude; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Nigel Boatman; Giles E. Budge; Andrew Crowe; Jane Memmott; R. Daniel Morton; Stéphane Pietravalle; Simon G. Potts; Deepa Senapathi; Simon M. Smart; William E. Kunin
1. Ecological processes operating on large spatio-temporal scales are difficult to disentangle with traditional empirical approaches. Alternatively, researchers can take advantage of ‘natural’ experiments, where experimental control is exercised by careful site selection. Recent advances in developing protocols for designing these ‘pseudo-experiments’ commonly do not consider the selection of the focal region and predictor variables are usually restricted to two. Here, we advance this type of site selection protocol to study the impact of multiple landscape scale factors on pollinator abundance and diversity across multiple regions. 2. Using datasets of geographic and ecological variables with national coverage, we applied a novel hierarchical computation approach to select study sites that contrast asmuch as possible in four key variables,while attempting tomaintain regional comparability and national representativeness. There were three main steps to the protocol: (i) selection of six 100 9 100 km2 regions that collectively provided land cover representative of the national land average, (ii) mapping of potential sites into a multivariate space with axes representing four key factors potentially influencing insect pollinator abundance, and (iii) applying a selection algorithm which maximized differences between the four key variables, while controlling for a set of external constraints. 3. Validation data for the site selection metrics were recorded alongside the collection of data on pollinator populations during two field campaigns. While the accuracy of the metric estimates varied, the site selection succeeded in objectively identifying field sites that differed significantly in values for each of the four key variables. Between-variable correlations were also reduced or eliminated, thus facilitating analysis of their separate effects. 4. This study has shown that national datasets can be used to select randomized and replicated field sites objectively within multiple regions and alongmultiple interacting gradients. Similar protocols could be used for studying a range of alternative research questions related to land use or other spatially explicit environmental variables, and to identify networks of field sites for other countries, regions, drivers and response taxa in a wide range of scenarios.
Ecosystems | 2018
Michael P. D. Garratt; Riccardo Bommarco; David Kleijn; Emily A. Martin; Simon R. Mortimer; Sarah Redlich; Deepa Senapathi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Stanisław Świtek; Viktoria Takacs; S.H. van Gils; W.H. van der Putten; Simon G. Potts
Abstract Soil organic matter (SOM) is declining in most agricultural ecosystems, impacting multiple ecosystem services including erosion and flood prevention, climate and greenhouse gas regulation as well as other services that underpin crop production, such as nutrient cycling and pest control. Ecological intensification aims to enhance crop productivity by including regulating and supporting ecosystem service management into agricultural practices. We investigate the potential for increased SOM to support the ecological intensification of arable systems by reducing the need for nitrogen fertiliser application and pest control. Using a large-scale European field trial implemented across 84 fields in 5 countries, we tested whether increased SOM (using soil organic carbon as a proxy) helps recover yield in the absence of conventional nitrogen fertiliser and whether this also supports crops less favourable to key aphid pests. Greater SOM increased yield by 10%, but did not offset nitrogen fertiliser application entirely, which improved yield by 30%. Crop pest responses depended on species: Metopolophium dirhodum were more abundant in fertilised plots with high crop biomass, and although population growth rates of Sitobion avenae were enhanced by nitrogen fertiliser application in a cage trial, field populations were not affected. We conclude that under increased SOM and reduced fertiliser application, pest pressure can be reduced, while partially compensating for yield deficits linked to fertiliser reduction. If the benefits of reduced fertiliser application and increased SOM are considered in a wider environmental context, then a yield cost may become acceptable. Maintaining or increasing SOM is critical for achieving ecological intensification of European cereal production.
Current opinion in insect science | 2015
Deepa Senapathi; Jacobus C. Biesmeijer; Thomas D. Breeze; David Kleijn; Simon G. Potts; Luísa G. Carvalheiro
International Journal of Climatology | 2009
Deepa Senapathi; Fiona M. Underwood; Emily Black; Malcolm A. C. Nicoll; Ken Norris
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2017
Michael P. D. Garratt; Deepa Senapathi; Duncan J. Coston; Simon R. Mortimer; Simon G. Potts
Ibis | 2007
Deepa Senapathi; Ioannis N. Vogiatzakis; Panchapakesan Jeganathan; Jennifer A. Gill; Rhys E. Green; Christopher G. R. Bowden; Asad R. Rahmani; Deborah J. Pain; Ken Norris