Deepak Prakash Borde

The application of European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk-score for risk stratification in Indian patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To validate European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk-score for predicting mortality and STS risk-score for predicting morbidity in Indian patients after cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS EuroSCORE II and STS risk-scores were obtained pre-operatively for 498 consecutive patients. The patients were followed for mortality and various morbidities. The calibration of the scoring systems was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The discriminative capacity was estimated by area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS The mortality was 1.6%. For EuroSCORE II and STS risk-score C-statics of 5.43 and 6.11 were obtained indicating satisfactory model fit for both the scores. Area under ROC was 0.69 and 0.65 for EuroSCORE II and STS risk-score with P values of 0.068 and 0.15, respectively, indicating poor discriminatory power. Good fit and discrimination was obtained for renal failure, long-stay in hospital, prolonged ventilator support and deep sternal wound infection but the scores failed in predicting risk of reoperation and stroke. Mortality risk was correctly estimated in low (< 2%) and moderate (2-5%) risk patients, but over-estimated in high-risk (> 5%) patients by both scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS EuroSCORE II and STS risk-scores have satisfactory calibration power in Indian patients but their discriminatory power is poor. Mortality risk was over-estimated by both the scoring systems in high-risk patients. The present study highlights the need for forming a national database and formulating risk stratification tools to provide better quality care to cardiac surgical patients in India.

Prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: Is CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score useful?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common arrhythmia after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The identification of patients at risk for POAF would be helpful to guide prophylactic therapy. Presently, there is no simple preoperative scoring system available to predict patients at higher risk of POAF. In a retrospective observational study, we evaluated the usefulness of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score to predict POAF after CABG. MATERIALS AND METHODS After obtaining approval from Institutional Review Board, 729 patients undergoing CABG on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were enrolled. Patients were followed in the postoperative period for POAF. A multiple regression analysis was run to predict POAF from various variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to test discriminatory power of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score to predict POAF. RESULTS POAF occurred in 95 (13%) patients. The patients with POAF had higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores than those without POAF (4.09 ± 0.90 vs. 2.31 ± 1.21; P < 0.001). The POAF rates after cardiac surgery increased with increasing CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores. The odds ratio for predicting POAF was highest with higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores (3.68). When ROC curve was calculated for the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores, area of 0.87 was obtained, which was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was found useful in predicting POAF after CABG. This scoring system is simple and convenient to use in the preoperative period to alert the clinician about higher probability of POAF after CABG surgery.

Management of patients with hematological malignancies undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

The number of patients with a previously diagnosed malignancy who need cardiac surgery is increasing. Patients with hematological malignancies represent only 0.38% of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The literature in this subset of patients is limited to only a few retrospective case series, with limited number of patients undergoing emergency cardiac surgery. We describe three cases with hematological malignancies namely chronic myelogenous leukemia, acute promyelocytic leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia presenting for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Two patients were taken up for emergency CABG in view of ongoing ischemia, one of them was on preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump support. No mortality was observed. Two patients needed transfusion of blood products which was guided by thromboelastography. One patient developed superficial sternal wound infection requiring antibiotic therapy.

Risk Stratification in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) Surgery—Role of EuroSCORE II

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the EuroSCORE II for risk stratification in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. DESIGN A retrospective observational study. SETTING Two tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Participants were 1,211 patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. INTERVENTIONS No interventions were implemented. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The EuroSCORE II estimated the operative risk for each patient. The calibration of the scoring system was assessed using the Hosmer Lemeshow test, and the discriminative capacity was estimated with area under receiver operating characteristic curves. The incidence, patient characteristics, causes of intraoperative conversion to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB), and outcome were studied. The all-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.39%. Predicted mortality with the EuroSCORE II was 2.03±1.63. Using the Hosmer Lemeshow test, a C statistic of 8.066 (p = 0.472) was obtained, indicating satisfactory model fit. The calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.706 (p = 0.0002), indicating good discriminatory power. Emergency intraoperative conversion to ONCAB occurred in 6.53% of patients. The mortality in the ONCAB group was significantly higher compared with patients who underwent successful OPCAB surgery (15.18% v 1.5%, p<0.0001). On multiple regression analysis with conversion to ONCAB as the endpoint, associated factors were patients with a higher EuroSCORE II (odds ratio = 1.13, confidence interval = 1.03-1.27) and more-than-trivial mitral regurgitation (odds ratio = 1.84, confidence interval = 1.07-3.06). Net reclassification improvement of 0.714 (p<0.0001) was obtained when on-pump conversion was added to the EuroSCORE II. CONCLUSIONS The EuroSCORE II has satisfactory calibration and discrimination power to predict mortality after OPCAB surgery. Intraoperative conversion to ONCAB is a major complication of OPCAB surgery. A higher EuroSCORE II also predicts higher probability of conversion to ONCAB.

Effect of Perioperative Pregabalin on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCABG): A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

OBJECTIVES Use of pregabalin is increasing in cardiac surgical patients. However, studies using comprehensive scoring systems are lacking on the drugs impact on postoperative recovery. The authors tested the hypothesis that perioperative oral pregabalin improves the postoperative quality of recovery as assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) questionnaire in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). DESIGN This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTINGS Tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing OPCABG. INTERVENTIONS Patients were assigned randomly to the following 2 groups: the pregabalin group (those who received pregabalin, 150 mg capsule orally, 1 hour before surgery and 2 days postoperatively [75 mg twice a day] starting after extubation; n = 37); and the control group (those who received 2 similar-looking multivitamin capsules at similar times; n = 34). The QoR-40 scores were noted preoperatively and 24 hours after extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Both groups were comparable in terms of preoperative patient characteristics and baseline QoR-40 scores. Global scores were significantly improved in the pregabalin group compared with the control group in the postoperative period (177±9 v 170±9; p = 0.002). QoR-40 values in the dimensions of emotional state (p = 0.005), physical comfort (p = 0.04), and pain (p = 0.02) were improved in the pregabalin group. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative pregabalin improved postoperative quality of recovery as assessed using the QoR-40 questionnaire in patients undergoing OPCABG. Perioperative pregabalin offered advantages beyond better pain control, such as improved physical comfort and better emotional state; therefore, the drugs use in the perioperative period is recommended.

Variations of transesophageal echocardiography practices in India: A survey by Indian College of Cardiac Anaesthesia

Context: Use of perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has expanded in India. Despite attempts to standardize the practice of TEE in cardiac surgical procedures, variation in practice and application exists. This is the first online survey by Indian College of Cardiac Anaesthesia, research and academic wing of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists (IACTA). Aims: We hypothesized that variations in practice of intraoperative TEE exist among centers and this survey aimed at analyzing them. Settings and Design: This is an online survey conducted among members of the IACTA. Subjects and Methods: All members of IACTA were contacted using online questionnaire fielded using SurveyMonkey™ software. There were 21 questions over four pages evaluating infrastructure, documentation of TEE, experience and accreditation of anesthesiologist performing TEE, and finally impact of TEE on clinical practice. Questions were also asked about national TEE workshop conducted by the IACTA, and suggestions were invited by members on overseas training. Results: Response rate was 29.7% (382/1222). 53.9% were from high-volume centers (>500 cases annually). TEE machine/probe was available to 75.9% of the respondents and those in high-volume centers had easier (86.9%) access. There was poor documentation of preoperative consent (23.3%) as well as TEE findings (66%). Only 18.2% of responders were board qualified. Almost 90% of the responders felt surgeons respected their TEE diagnosis. Around half of the responders felt that new intraoperative findings by TEE were considered in decision-making in most of the cases and 70% of the responders reported that surgical plan was altered based on TEE finding more than 10 times in the last year. Despite this, only 5% of the responders in this survey were monetarily awarded for performing impactful skill of TEE. Majority (57%) felt that there is no need for overseas training for Indian cardiac anesthesiologists. Conclusions: In this survey of members of the IACTA, use of TEE has increased substantially, but still a lot of variations in practice patterns exist in India. There is urgent need for improving TEE certification and upgrade documentation standards, motivate use of TTE across all centers, promote awareness and usefulness of TEE use among surgical fraternity, monitor impact of TEE, and support separate remuneration policy in India.

Intraoperative conversion to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is independently associated with higher mortality in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A propensity-matched analysis

Context: One of the main limitations of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is the occasional need for intraoperative conversion (IOC) to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. IOC is associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality and postoperative morbidity. The impact of IOC on outcome cannot be assessed by a randomized control design. Aims: The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and impact of IOC on the outcome in patients undergoing OPCAB. Settings and Design: Three tertiary care level hospitals; retrospective observational study. Subjects and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 1971 consecutive patients undergoing  OPCAB from January 2012 to October 2015 at three tertiary care level hospitals by four surgeons. The incidence, patient characteristics, cause of IOC, and its impact on outcome were studied. Statistical Analysis Used: The cohort was divided into two groups according to IOC. Univariate logistic regression was performed to describe the predictors of IOC. Variables that were found to be significant in univariate analysis were introduced into multivariate model, and adjusted odds ratio (OR) was calculated. To further assess the independent effect of IOC on mortality, propensity score matching with a 5:1 ratio of non-IOC to IOC was performed. Results: The overall all-cause in-hospital mortality was 2.6%. IOC was needed in 128 (6.49%) patients. The mortality in the IOC group was significantly higher than non-IOC group (21 of 128 [16.4%] vs. 31 of 1843 [1.7%], P = 0.0001). The most common cause for IOC was hemodynamic disturbances during grafting to the obtuse marginal artery (51/128; 40%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, left main disease, pulmonary hypertension, and mitral regurgitation independently predicted IOC. We obtained a propensity-matched sample of 692 patients (No IOC 570; IOC 122), and IOC had OR of 16.26 (confidence interval 6.3-41; P < 0.0001) for mortality in matched population. Conclusions: Emergency IOC increases odds for mortality by 16-fold. Hence, identification of patients at higher risk of IOC may improve the outcome.

Perioperative management of emergency aortic valve replacement for infective endocarditis after liver transplantation.

226 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia  Vol. 16:3  Jul-Sep-2013 was subsequently noted to have could have caused chest pain with dyspnea. Acute chest pain can also be caused by non-dissection acute aortic syndromes; they should ordinarily be considered in the differential diagnosis. Figure 1 of the indexed article shows a crescent shaped separate lumen (potential true lumen of a dissection) and a larger, similarly enhancing possible false lumen. The crescent structure could equally represent an intramural hematoma (IMH).[3] However, this cannot be an IMH because IMH does not enhance and there is no dissection flap; it is actually better delineated on a plain non-contrast scan because of its relative higher attenuation.[3] IMH has other distinguishing features such as constant relationship relative to the aorta while a dissection classically spirals around the aorta in a longitudinal fashion, as it progresses.[3] That this patient did not have an IMH is confirmed further by the epiaortic scan [Figure 5 of the indexed article], which shows an aortic wall of homogeneous echo density and a normal wall thickness.[7] IMH as a pathologic entity deserves to be highlighted as the presence of a pericardial effusion with potential aortic pathology is an ominous marker of severity.

Mitral Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (MAPSE): A simple, reliable echocardiographic parameter to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction by transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing off pump CABG

OBJECTIVES This studys objective was to test the hypothesis that transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-based mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) measurement is useful in perioperative settings to detect left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING Tertiary-care level hospitals. PARTICIPANTS The study comprised 116 patients undergoing OPCAB to obtain cutoffs of MAPSE to detect LV dysfunction. These cutoffs were validated in another 105 patients from 2 other institutions. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS In 116 patients who had undergone OPCAB during the study period with TEE monitoring, MAPSE was measured post hoc at the lateral and septal mitral (and average) annulus using the software tool M.mode.ify (http://www.ultrasoundoftheweek.com/M.mode.ify). Receiver operating curves were constructed to obtain cutoff values of MAPSE at the lateral and septal (and average) annulus of the mitral valve to predict LV systolic dysfunction, which was defined by an ejection fraction <52% for men and <54% for women as measured using the biplane method of disks. These cutoff values then were validated in another 105 patients. LV systolic dysfunction was present in 43% patients. Youdens index values of 9mm for lateral MPASE (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC] 0.93 [confidence interval {CI} 0.87-0.97]; p < 0.0001); 7mm for septal MAPSE (AUC 0.87 [CI 0.79-0.92]; p < 0.0001); and 9mm for average MAPSE (AUC 0.92 [CI 0.86-0.96]; p < 0.0001) were obtained. These cutoffs were statistically significant in the validation cohort (p < 0.0001) with an AUC of 0.84 (CI 0.75-0.90), sensitivity of 86.2%, specificity of 80.8%, positive predictive value of 84.8%, and negative predictive value of 82.6%. CONCLUSIONS MAPSE is a simple, rapid, and reliable method to detect LV dysfunction using TEE in patients undergoing OPCAB. Its use as screening tool for LV dysfunction is recommended.

Are cardiac surgical patients at increased risk of difficult intubation

Background and Aims: Safe airway management is the cornerstone of contemporary anaesthesia practice, and difficult intubation (DI) remains a major cause of anaesthetic morbidity and mortality. The surgical category, particularly cardiac surgery as a risk factor for DI has not been studied extensively. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis whether cardiac surgical patients are at increased risk of DI. Methods: During the study, 627 patients (329 cardiac and 298 non-cardiac surgical) were enrolled. Pre-operative demographic and other variables associated with DI were assessed. Patients with Cormack Lehane grade III and IV or use of bougie in Cormack grade II were defined as DI. The incidence of anticipated and unanticipated DI was assessed. Factors associated with DI were described using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: The overall incidence of DI was 122/627 (19.46%). The incidence of DI was higher in cardiac surgery patients (24%) as compared to non-cardiac surgery patients (14.4% P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with DI were greater age, male sex, higher Mallampati grade, and anticipated DI, but not cardiac surgery. The incidence of unanticipated DI was 48.1% and 53.4% in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery patients, respectively. Conclusion: Although there was a higher incidence of DI in cardiac surgical patients, cardiac surgery is not an independent risk factor for DI. Rather, other factors play more important role. About half of the DI both in cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries were unanticipated.