Del Favero G

SERUM NEUROTENSIN IN HUMAN PANCREATIC CANCER

The role of neurotensin as a physiologic regulator of exocrine pancreatic secretion is known, but the hormone has only recently been recognized as important mitogen in vitro for human cancer cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variations of serum levels of neurotensin in pancreatic cancer. We studied 58 patients: 13 control subjects, 20 pancreatic cancer patients, 11 chronic pancreatitis patients, and 14 cases of extrapancreatic disease. No differences were found between serum values of neurotensin in pancreatic cancer and control subjects or extrapancreatic disease. Significantly higher values were detected in chronic pancreatitis than in pancreatic cancer patients (P <0.04). In chronic pancreatitis patients, the serum levels of neurotensin were correlated with serum amylase (r = 0.95, P <0.01). Lower levels of neurotensin were found in stage IV pancreatic cancer than in stages I-II (t = 1.82, P <0.04) and in grade II than in grade I (t = 2.21, P <0.02). Significant correlations were found between serum levels of neurotensin and two indices of nutrition: albumin (r = 0.60, P <0.05) and the percentage reduction in body weight (Z = 2.20, P <0.02). No correlations were found between serum levels of the hormone and size of the neoplasm or the survival of patients. We can conclude that the serum variations of neurotensin do not seem to be related to the progression of human pancreatic cancer. The variation of serum levels of the hormone may be linked to a poor nutritional status of the patient.

Comparison of two newly identified tumor markers (CAR-3 and DU-PAN-2) with CA 19-9 in patients with pancreatic cancer

We compared the diagnostic utility of DU-PAN-2 and CAR-3 with that of CA 19-9 in differentiating pancreatic cancer (23 patients) from chronic pancreatitis (16 patients) and various extra-pancreatic diseases (28 patients) mainly of the upper gastrointestinal and biliary tract. The influence of some pathophysiologic variables on the three markers was also assessed. The sensitivities of the three markers in detecting pancreatic cancer were: CA 19-9, 83%; DU-PAN-2, 56%; and CAR-3, 39%. In patients with chronic pancreatitis and extra-pancreatic diseases, CA 19-9 gave the highest number of false positives. Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that the ability of CAR-3 to discriminate between pancreatic cancer and other diseases was similar to that of CA 19-9, whereas DU-PAN-2 was a less reliable discriminator. Correlations were found between the behavior of all three markers and that of the cholestasis indices (ALP and GGT). Our findings indicate that DU-PAN-2 and CAR-3 serum determinations do not provide any more information than does CA 19-9 alone. The latter remains the marker of choice in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, even though it cannot be considered a definitive aid. Serum levels of all three markers increase in the presence of extrahepatic cholestasis, possibly due to interference with the hepatic clearance of glycoproteins and destruction of ductal biliary epithelium.