Denise V. Clark

REPETITIVE ARRAYS CONTAINING A HOUSEKEEPING GENE HAVE ALTERED POLYTENE CHROMOSOME MORPHOLOGY IN DROSOPHILA

Abstract. Much of our understanding of gene and chromatin organization has been developed from observation of polytene chromosomes. We describe an experimental approach using transgenes that has allowed us to observe local changes in polytene morphology. A composite P transposon that contains a fusion between the regulatory region of Prat, a purine synthesis gene, and brown (bw), an eye pigment reporter, was transformed into the 65A10 polytene band and subjected to P-transposase mutagenesis. Arrays of up to 320 kb at 65A10 were recovered by selection for increased pigment, and pigment levels were found to be proportional to numbers of copies. In polytene chromosomes, the original transformant was found to split 65A10 into two thin bands separated by an interband. With increases in copy number, the interband became progressively denser, eventually forming a dark, amorphous, deformable structure unlike any previously reported. The persistence of Prat expression in development, together with the cytological appearance of these large arrays, suggest that the state of the Prat promoter is affecting polytene structure. Because this unique structure is distinct from bands, interbands, puffs, and the chromocenter, which comprise polytene chromosomes, we suggest that it is composed of an altered form of chromatin.

The Purine Synthesis Gene Prat2 Is Required for Drosophila Metamorphosis, as Revealed by Inverted-Repeat-Mediated RNA Interference

PRAT (phosphoribosylamidotransferase; E.C. 2.4.2.14) catalyzes the first reaction in de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis. In Drosophila melanogaster, the Prat and Prat2 genes are both highly conserved with PRAT sequences from prokaryotes and eukaryotes. However, Prat2 organization and expression during development is different from Prat. We used RNA interference (RNAi) to knock down expression of both Prat and Prat2 to investigate their functions. Using the GAL4–UAS system, Prat RNAi driven by Act5c–GAL4 or tubP–GAL4 causes variable pupal lethality (48–100%) and ∼50% female sterility, depending on the transgenic strains and drivers used. This observation agrees with the phenotype previously observed for Prat EMS-induced mutations. Prat2 RNAi driven by Act5C–GAL4 or tubP–GAL4 also results in variable pupal lethality (61–93%) with the different transgenic strains, showing that Prat2 is essential for fly development. However, Prat2 RNAi-induced arrested pupae have a head eversion defect reminiscent of the “cryptocephal” phenotype, whereas Prat RNAi-induced arrested pupae die later as pharate adults. We conclude that Prat2 is required during the prepupal stage while Prat is more important for the pupal stage. In addition, Prat and Prat2 double RNAi results in more severe pupal lethal phenotypes, suggesting that Prat and Prat2 have partially additive functions during Drosophila metamorphosis.

The purine biosynthesis enzyme PRAT detected in proenzyme and mature forms during development of Drosophila melanogaster.

Glutamine phosphoribosylpyrophosphate amidotransferase (PRAT; EC 2.4. 2.14) is the first and rate-limiting enzyme of de novo purine biosynthesis. PRAT expression in Drosophila development was examined to determine if it is correlated with cell proliferation and/or nutritional isolation. An antiserum, raised against the 16 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of PRAT, detects two proteins corresponding to a 60 kDa proenzyme and 55 kDa mature enzyme, consistent with a 53 amino acid propeptide predicted from the gene sequence. Mature enzyme is maternally expressed, and proenzyme appears in embryos at 2-8 h, corresponding to the interval during which zygotic transcription is initiated. Upon hatching of first instar larvae, proenzyme levels are reduced and remain low relative to mature enzyme. Adult females have higher levels of both proteins relative to males, consistent with maternal expression. Maternal expression reflects a requirement for the enzyme during embryogenesis, while reduction in expression following hatching reflects a switch to an exogenous source of purines. Prat mRNA levels follow a similar overall pattern in the same developmental stages examined for the protein. Discovery of a second gene encoding PRAT with 78% amino acid identity leads to the possibility that the antiserum raised against the carboxyl-terminus detects two enzymes.

The PRAT purine synthesis gene duplication in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis is associated with a retrotransposition event and diversification of expression patterns.

The Drosophila melanogaster Prat gene encodes amidophosphoribosyltransferase (PRAT; EC 2.4.2.14), which performs the first step in de novo purine nucleotide synthesis. Prat mutations have a recessive lethal phenotype that is found for other genes encoding enzymes in this pathway. The D. melanogaster genome project has revealed a second gene, CG10078 or Prat2, encoding a protein with 76% amino acid sequence identity with Prat. The two genes map to different arms of chromosome 3 and have different intron/exon organizations, as we confirmed by cDNA sequence analysis of Prat2. With the goal to determine the functional significance of this gene duplication, we isolated and sequenced two PRAT-encoding genes from Drosophila virilis. We find that the two D. virilis genes are orthologous to the two D. melanogaster genes in terms of intron/exon organization, amino acid coding sequence, and 5′ noncoding sequence. The absence of introns in both DmelPrat and DvirPrat genes suggests that Prat originated from a retrotransposition of Prat2 and that the gene duplication has been preserved in the two species since their divergence approximately 40 million years ago. Analysis of mRNA expression in development shows that maternal expression, detected in adult ovaries and embryos prior to the onset of zygotic transcription, is present for Prat but not Prat2 in both species. Taken together, these findings support the notion that two PRAT-encoding genes have evolved distinct functions in both Drosophila species.

A Link Between Impaired Purine Nucleotide Synthesis and Apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster

The biosynthetic pathways and multiple functions of purine nucleotides are well known. However, the pathways that respond to alterations in purine nucleotide synthesis in vivo in an animal model organism have not been identified. We examined the effects of inhibiting purine de novo synthesis in vivo and in cultured cells of Drosophila melanogaster. The purine de novo synthesis gene ade2 encodes phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase (EC 6.3.5.3). An ade2 deletion, generated by P-element transposon excision, causes lethality in early pupal development, with darkening, or necrosis, of leg and wing imaginal disc tissue upon disc eversion. Together with analysis of a previously isolated weaker allele, ade24, and an allele of the Prat gene, which encodes an enzyme for the first step in the pathway, we determined that the lethal arrest and imaginal disc phenotypes involve apoptosis. A transgene expressing the baculovirus caspase inhibitor p35, which suppresses apoptosis caused by other stresses such as DNA damage, suppresses both the imaginal disc tissue darkening and the pupal lethality of all three purine de novo synthesis mutants. Furthermore, we showed the presence of apoptosis at the cellular level in both ade2 and Prat mutants by detecting TUNEL-positive nuclei in wing imaginal discs. Purine de novo synthesis inhibition was also examined in tissue culture by ade2 RNA interference followed by analysis of genome-wide changes in transcript levels. Among the upregulated genes was HtrA2, which encodes an apoptosis effector and is thus a candidate for initiating apoptosis in response to purine depletion.

Expression Pattern Diversity and Functional Conservation Between Retroposed PRAT Genes from Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis

Gene duplication by retrotransposition duplicates only the coding and untranslated regions of a gene and, thus, biases retroduplicated genes toward having different expression patterns from their parental genes. As such, genes duplicated by retrotransposition are more likely to develop novel expression domains. To explore this idea further, we used the Prat/Prat2 gene duplication in Drosophila as a case study to examine the aftermath of a retrotransposition event that resulted in both the parent and the child gene becoming essential for survival. We used the Gal4-UAS transgene system with EGFP as a reporter to determine the developmental expression patterns of Prat and Prat2 from D. melanogaster (DmPrat and DmPrat2) and Prat from D. virilis (DvPrat). We also tested the functional equivalence of the protein products of DmPrat and DmPrat2. We found that each of the proteins could rescue DmPrat mutations, showing that the requirement for both Prat and Prat2 in Drosophila is not simply due to differences in protein function. In contrast, we found that the DmPrat and DmPrat2 genes have developed nonoverlapping patterns of expression, which correlate with their respective loss-of-function phenotypes. We further found that DvPrat expression is similar to DmPrat during development but differs in adult gonads. Thus, the function of the Prat retrogene has not diverged in the D. melanogaster and D. virilis lineages, while some aspects of its expression pattern have evolved. Finally, we have identified promoter elements, conserved upstream of DmPrat and DvPrat, that this retrogene has acquired to drive its expression.

Partial Functional Diversification of Drosophila melanogaster Septin Genes Sep2 and Sep5

The septin family of hetero-oligomeric complex-forming proteins can be divided into subgroups, and subgroup members are interchangeable at specific positions in the septin complex. Drosophila melanogaster has five septin genes, including the two SEPT6 subgroup members Sep2 and Sep5. We previously found that Sep2 has a unique function in oogenesis, which is not performed by Sep5. Here, we find that Sep2 is uniquely required for follicle cell encapsulation of female germline cysts, and that Sep2 and Sep5 are redundant for follicle cell proliferation. The five D. melanogaster septins localize similarly in oogenesis, including as rings flanking the germline ring canals. Pnut fails to localize in Sep5; Sep2 double mutant follicle cells, indicating that septin complexes fail to form in the absence of both Sep2 and Sep5. We also find that mutations in septins enhance the mutant phenotype of bazooka, a key component in the establishment of cell polarity, suggesting a link between septin function and cell polarity. Overall, this work suggests that Sep5 has undergone partial loss of ancestral protein function, and demonstrates redundant and unique functions of septins.

Transcriptional regulation of the purine de novo synthesis gene Prat in Drosophila melanogaster

The first step of the purine de novo synthesis pathway is catalyzed by amidophosphoribosyltransferase (E.C.2.4.2.14) which is encoded by two Prat genes in D. melanogaster, Prat and Prat2. Prat is a retrogene duplication of Prat2, where each gene has a distinct expression pattern. Prat transcription is restricted to proliferating tissues such as imaginal discs and the female germ line. Three conserved putative DNA replication-related element binding factor (DREF) sites lie upstream of the Prat coding region. These elements are upstream of many genes important in cell proliferation. We have found that DREF binds directly upstream of Prat and that the DRE sites associated with its activity are necessary for Prat expression; furthermore, we have determined that a second cis-acting element is present upstream of the Prat gene. Finally, the genes Distal-less, Mi-2 and dMyc, which influence Dref activity, do not appear to affect Prat transcription.