Dennis Kelleher

Cellular restoration in HIV infected persons treated with abacavir and a protease inhibitor: Age inversely predicts naive CD4 cell count increase

ObjectiveTo characterize early and later indices of cellular restoration among HIV-1 infected persons treated with abacavir and one protease inhibitor and to identify predictors of CD4 cell increases. MethodsFlow-cytometric analyses of lymphocyte phenotypes among 71 antiretroviral treatment naive adults in a 48 week treatment trial. ResultsDuring the first 4 weeks of therapy, increases in naive and memory CD4 cells and in B cells were seen; naive CD8 cells increased while CD8 cells remained stable as memory CD8 cells decreased. During the second phase total CD4 and naive CD4 and CD8 cells increased while total CD8 and memory CD8 cells decreased. The numbers of CD4 cells that expressed CD28 increased from a median of 308 × 106/l at baseline to 477 × 106/l at week 48. Higher baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels predicted the magnitude of early CD4 (r = 0.35;P = 0.01), memory CD4 (r = 0.38;P = 0.001) and CD28 CD4 cell (r = 0.29;P = 0.01) restoration but was not related to second phase changes. Younger age predicted a greater second phase (but not first phase) increase in naive CD4 cells (r = −0.31;P = 0.03). ConclusionsHigher baseline levels of HIV-1 replication determine the magnitude of first phase CD4 cell increases after suppression of HIV-1 replication. Second phase (primarily naive) CD4 cell increases are not related to HIV-1 replication but are inversely relate to age suggesting that thymic potential is a major determinant of long term cellular restoration in HIV-1 infected persons receiving antiretroviral therapy.

Antiretroviral effect and safety of abacavir alone and in combination with zidovudine in HIV-infected adults

Objectives:To evaluate, over 12 weeks, the antiretroviral activity and safety of abacavir, used alone and in combination with zidovudine (ZDV), as treatment for HIV-1-infected subjects who had limited or no antiretroviral treatment. Design:Seventy-nine HIV-1-infected subjects, with CD4 cell counts 200–500 × 106/l and <12 weeks of previous treatment with ZDV were enrolled in a multicenter study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four cohorts receiving abacavir monotherapy for the first 4 weeks (200, 400, or 600 mg every 8 h daily, or 300 mg every 12 h daily) and, thereafter, combination therapy of abacavir with 600 mg ZDV or ZDV placebo, administered in a double-blind manner for an additional 8 weeks. Methods:Antiretroviral activity was assessed by measuring changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4+ cell counts. Safety was assessed by monitoring clinical adverse events and laboratory abnormalities during the 12-week period and for 4 weeks post-treatment. Results:Treatment with abacavir, alone or in combination with ZDV, produced marked decreases in plasma HIV-1 RNA loads and increases in CD4+ cell counts in all groups. At week 4, median plasma HIV-1 RNA loads decreased by 1.11–1.77 log10 copies/ml and median CD4+ cell counts increased by 63–111 × 106/l in all groups. At week 12, median HIV-1 RNA loads decreased by 1.02–2.24 log10 copies/ml (abacavir monotherapy) and by 1.81–2.01 log10 copies/ml (abacavir-ZDV); median CD4+ cell counts increased by 79–195 × 106/l (abacavir monotherapy) and by 93–142 × 106/l (abacavir-ZDV). At week 12, the percentage of subjects who had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 and 40 copies/ml were 28 and 11%, respectively (abacavir monotherapy) and 69 and 22%, respectively (abacavir-ZDV). Eight subjects (10%) discontinued the study prematurely because of adverse events; nausea (n = 4) and hypersensitivity (n = 3) were the most common reasons for withdrawal. There were no deaths among the study subjects. Conclusions:In HIV-infected subjects who have received little or no prior antiretroviral therapy, treatment with abacavir alone or in combination with ZDV is well tolerated and resulted in sustained improvements in key immunologic and virologic efficacy parameters through 12 weeks.

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 antagonist alters regional activation and effective connectivity in an emotional-arousal circuit during expectation of abdominal pain.

Alterations in corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) signaling pathways have been implicated in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) pathophysiology. We aimed to (1) determine the effect of the selective CRF receptor 1 antagonist (CRF1) GW876008 relative to placebo, on regional activation and effective connectivity of a stress-related emotional–arousal circuit during expectation of abdominal pain using functional magnetic resonance imaging in human subjects with a diagnosis of IBS and healthy controls (HCs), and (2) examine GW876008 effects on state–trait anxiety and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis response. Although there were no drug-related effects on peripheral HPA activity, significant central effects were observed in brain regions associated with the stress response. Effective connectivity analysis showed drug-induced normalizations between key regions of the emotional–arousal circuit in patients. During pain expectation, orally administered GW876008 relative to placebo produced significant blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal reductions in the amygdala, hippocampus, insula, anterior cingulate, and orbitomedial prefrontal cortices across groups. Patients showed significantly greater BOLD responses in the left locus coeruleus and hypothalamus after placebo compared with HCs, and BOLD signal decreases in the left hypothalamus after drug. The inhibitory effects of GW876008 in the hypothalamus in patients were moderated by anxiety; patients having average and high levels of state anxiety showed drug-related BOLD decreases. GW876008 represents a novel tool for elucidating the neuronal mechanisms and circuitry underlying hyperactivation of CRF/CRF1 signaling and its role in IBS pathophysiology. The unique state anxiety effects observed suggest a potential pathway for therapeutic benefit of CRF1 receptor antagonism for patients with stress-sensitive disorders.

Impaired Emotional Learning and Involvement of the Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Signaling System in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS Alterations in central corticotropin-releasing factor signaling pathways have been implicated in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to characterize the effects of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF-R1) antagonist, GW876008, on brain and skin conductance responses during acquisition and extinction of conditioned fear to the threat of abdominal pain in subjects with IBS and healthy individuals (controls). METHODS We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, 3-period crossover study of 11 women with IBS (35.50 ± 12.48 years old) and 15 healthy women (controls) given a single oral dose (20 mg or 200 mg) of the CRF-R1 antagonist or placebo. Blood-oxygen level-dependent responses were analyzed using functional magnetic resonance imaging in a tertiary care setting. RESULTS Controls had greater skin conductance responses during acquisition than extinction, validating the fear-conditioning paradigm. In contrast, during extinction, women with IBS had greater skin conductance responses than controls-an effect normalized by administration of a CRF-R1 antagonist. Although the antagonist significantly reduced activity in the thalamus in patients with IBS and controls during acquisition, the drug produced greater suppression of blood-oxygen level-dependent activity in a wide range of brain regions in IBS patients during extinction, including the medial prefrontal cortex, pons, hippocampus, and anterior insula. CONCLUSIONS Although CRF signaling via CRF-R1 is involved in fear acquisition and extinction learning related to expected abdominal pain in patients with IBS and controls, this system appears to be up-regulated in patients with IBS. This up-regulation might contribute to the previously reported abnormal brain responses to expected abdominal pain.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Umeclidinium and Vilanterol Alone and in Combination: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Umeclidinium bromide (GSK573719; UMEC), a new long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA), is in development with vilanterol (GW642444; VI), a selective long-acting β2 agonist (LABA), as a once-daily inhaled combination therapy for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A single dose healthy volunteer study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of inhaled umeclidinium (500 µg) and vilanterol (50 µg) when administered separately and in combination using a novel dry powder inhaler (NDPI). Co-administration of single inhaled doses of umeclidinium and vilanterol to healthy Japanese subjects was well tolerated and not associated with meaningful changes in systemic exposure or PD effects compared with administration of either compound individually. Pharmacokinetic assessments showed rapid absorption for both drugs (Tmax = 5 min for both umeclidinium and vilanterol) followed by rapid elimination with median tlast of 4–5 h for umeclidinium and median tlast of 1.5–2.0 h for vilanterol. Assessments of pharmacokinetic interaction were inconclusive since for umeclidinium, Cmax following combination was higher than umeclidinium alone but not AUC whereas for vilanterol, AUC following combination was higher than vilanterol alone but not Cmax. There were no obvious trends observed between individual maximum supine heart rate and umeclidinium Cmax or vilanterol Cmax when delivered as umeclidinium 500 µg and vilanterol 50 µg combination or when delivered as umeclidinium or vilanterol alone. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00976144

Dose-response effect of a β3-adrenergic receptor agonist, solabegron, on gastrointestinal transit, bowel function, and somatostatin levels in health

beta(3)-Adrenoceptors(beta(3)-AR) are expressed by cholinergic myenteric neurons and beta(3)-AR agonists are effective in experimental models of diarrhea. Our aim was to explore the effects of a beta(3)-AR agonist, solabegron, on gastrointestinal transit, safety, bowel function, plasma somatostatin, and solabegron pharmacokinetics (PK) following single and multiple doses. In a single-center, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 36 healthy volunteers were randomized to oral solabegron (50 or 200 mg twice daily) or placebo. Transit was measured by a validated method ((99m)Tc-labeled egg meal and (111)In charcoal delivered to the colon via delayed-release capsule). Stool frequency, form, and ease of passage were measured on a validated daily diary; plasma somatostatin by radioimmunoassay and plasma solabegron and its active metabolite by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy analysis followed by PK analysis using noncompartmental methods. There were no overall or dose-related effects of solabegron on gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit, plasma somatostatin levels, stool frequency, form, or ease of passage in healthy volunteers. Solabegron and active metabolite exposures (area under the curve and maximum serum concentration) at both dose levels were consistent with PK at similar doses in previous phase I studies. We concluded that 7 days of the beta(3)-AR agonist, solabegron, 50 or 200 mg twice daily, did not significantly alter gastrointestinal or colonic transit or bowel function. In this study, medication was generally well tolerated with few adverse events reported and no clinically significant changes in vital signs observed. Further studies on clinical efficacy, visceral sensitivity, and gastrointestinal transit are required in irritable bowel syndrome patients.

Effect of verapamil on systemic exposure and safety of umeclidinium and vilanterol: a randomized and open-label study.

Background The combination of umeclidinium (UMEC), a long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist, and vilanterol (VI), a selective long-acting β2 agonist, is in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of once-daily, inhaled UMEC and UMEC/VI when co-administered with oral verapamil, a moderate P-glycoprotein transporter and moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor frequently used by patients with COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities. Methods Subjects were randomized to one of two 13-day treatment regimens: UMEC 500 μg or UMEC 500 μg/VI 25 μg. All subjects received a single tablet containing 240 mg verapamil on each of days 9–13. Results Repeat doses of UMEC and UMEC/VI in combination with and without verapamil were safe and well tolerated. There was no increase in systemic exposure of UMEC when administered in combination with VI compared to UMEC alone. UMEC maximum concentration was similar with or without verapamil; a moderate increase in UMEC area under the curve (approximately 1.4-fold) was observed with verapamil. Verapamil did not increase systemic exposure to VI following administration of the UMEC/VI combination. Conclusion Administration of UMEC and UMEC/VI combination was well tolerated and did not show clinically relevant increases in systemic exposure for either drug. The UMEC/VI combination is unlikely to have a clinically meaningful drug–drug interaction with moderate P-glycoprotein transporter and CYP3A4 inhibitor drugs.

Initial assessment of single and repeat doses of inhaled umeclidinium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Two randomised studies

To characterise the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics (bronchodilatory effect) and pharmacokinetics of inhaled umeclidinium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The first investigation was a single dose, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00515502) in which ipratropium bromide-sensitive patients received umeclidinium (250μg, 500μg, and 1000μg), tiotropium bromide 18μg or placebo. Patients were randomised to receive four out of five possible treatments as an incomplete block four-way cross-over. A subsequent study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT700732472) was focused on assessment of safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of umeclidinium (250μg and 1000μg) administered once-daily for 7 days in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. Of the 24 patients randomised for the single dose study, 20 completed; 31 out of 38 patients completed the repeat dose study. Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate and transient. Examination of heart rate, QTc interval, blood pressure and clinical laboratory assessments raised no concern over the safety of umeclidinium. Evidence of pharmacology was demonstrated in first study by statistically significant increases in specific airway conductance (sGaw) for up to 24h for all active treatments compared with placebo. Increases in forced expiratory volume in 1s were also observed. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that maximum observed plasma umeclidinium concentration (Cmax) was reached rapidly (time to Cmax: ∼5-15min) after single and repeat doses; 1.5-1.9-fold accumulation was observed after repeat-dosing. Single and repeat doses of umeclidinium were well tolerated and produced clinically relevant lung function improvements over 24h in patients with COPD.

Viral dynamics and their relations to baseline factors and longer term virologic responses in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients receiving abacavir in combination with HIV-1 protease inhibitors

From a study of 71 HIV-1-infected patients receiving abacavir in combination with 1 of 5 different HIV-1 protease inhibitors (indinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, or amprenavir), we found that the baseline HIV-1 RNA levels were highly predictive of the viral decay rates. The baseline HIV-1 RNA levels were negatively correlated with the first phase viral decay rates (r = -0.77, P < 0.001) and positively correlated with the second phase viral decay rates (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). In addition, the first phase viral decay rate was positively correlated with CD4+ cell increases. No significant correlation was found between viral decay rates and longer term (24 weeks) virologic responses, and no difference in viral decay rates was found among the 5 study regimens. These data suggest that the potency of the 5 treatment regimens was similar and was not predictive of long-term virologic failure.

Effect of Disease Severity in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Inhaler-Specific Inhalation Profiles Through the ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler.

Abstract Background: Two studies were undertaken to characterize the maximal effort inhalation profiles of healthy subjects and patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through a moderate-resistance dry powder inhaler (DPI). Correlations between inhaler-specific inhalation characteristics and inhaler-independent lung function parameters were investigated. Methods: Healthy subjects (n = 15), patients with mild, moderate, or severe asthma (n = 45), and patients with mild, moderate, severe, or very-severe COPD (n = 60) were included in the studies. Inhalation pressure drop versus time profiles were recorded using an instrumented ELLIPTA® DPI or bespoke resistor component with equivalent resistivity. Inhaler-independent lung function assessments included pharyngometry, spirometry, plethysmography, and diffusion. Results: For the inhaler-specific inhalation profiles, the mean maximal effort peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFRs) varied across the subgroups from 65.8–110.6 L/min (range: 41.6–142.9). Peak pressure drop, PIFR, inhaled volume, and average inhalation flow rate (primary endpoints) did not differ markedly between healthy subjects and patients with asthma or mild COPD. Moderate, severe, and very-severe COPD patients demonstrated lower mean peak pressure drops, PIFRs and inhaled volumes, which tended to decrease with increasing COPD severity. Severe and very-severe COPD patients demonstrated shorter mean inhalation times compared with all other participants. Inhaler-independent lung function parameters were consistent with disease severity, and statistically significant (p < 0.05) strong correlations (R > 0.7) with components of the inhaler-specific inhalation profiles were observed in the COPD cohort; correlations in the asthma cohort tended to be weaker. Conclusions: All participants achieved a maximal effort PIFR ≥ 41.6 L/min through the moderate resistance of the ELLIPTA inhaler. Patients with asthma achieved similar inhalation profiles to healthy subjects, but increasing COPD severity tended to reduce a patients inhalation capability. Correlation analyses suggest that some lung function parameters may be a useful indicator of ability to inhale efficiently through a moderate-resistance DPI, such as the ELLIPTA inhaler.