Dennis L. Weisman
Kansas State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dennis L. Weisman.
Journal of Regulatory Economics | 1996
Donald J. Kridel; David E. M. Sappington; Dennis L. Weisman
We review recent empirical studies of the performance of incentive regulation in the telecommunications industry. These studies provide evidence that productivity, infrastructure investment, profit levels, telephone penetration, and new service offerings have increased under incentive regulation. Service rates have generally remained stable or decreased slightly, and service quality does not appear to have been affected adversely. There is no evidence that incentive regulation has led to streamlined regulatory proceedings. Strong evidence that incentive regulation has reduced the costs of providing telephone service has not yet materialized.
Journal of Regulatory Economics | 1995
Dennis L. Weisman
Congress is considering telecommunications reform legislation that would allow the Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) to enter the interLATA long-distance market. A concern is that a vertically-integrated RBOC would be able to discriminate against its rivals. A proposed remedy would require the RBOCs to reduce their access market share as a precondition to interLATA entry. We show formally that such a precondition likely contributes to higher long-distance prices and enhances the risk of discrimination. Furthermore, the lower the share of access profits retained by an RBOC, the weaker are its incentives to lower long-distance prices.
Information Economics and Policy | 1999
Alfred E. Kahn; Timothy J. Tardiff; Dennis L. Weisman
A device for a brake system including two independent hydraulic lines extending from a dual type brake master cylinder and connected to the respective rear wheel brakes. The device is compactly formed with its essential parts housed in a single casing and can be readily mounted across the two hydraulic lines midway thereof to serve two functions, one of warning the driver of any fluid leakage possibly occurring in one or the other of the two hydraulic lines and the other of adjusting the ratio of the front to the rear wheel brake pressure for maximized overall braking efficiency. A pair of differential pistons are slidably fitted in aligned cylinder bores to define in each an input and an output hydraulic chamber communicating with each other through a normally open control valve, which is closed upon movement of the associated piston under differential pressure. Also, a balance piston is arranged between the differential pistons and movable with either of them to actuate a switch unit inserted in an electrical alarm circuit.
Information Economics and Policy | 1993
Donald J. Kridel; Dale E. Lehman; Dennis L. Weisman
Abstract Demand estimation and welfare analysis for telecommunications services have often been plagued by apparent inconsistencies between actual consumer behavior and standard economic theory. The latter posits that consumers will subscribe to services when their consumers surplus exceeds the subscription price. This paper presents an alternative model of subscription behavior under uncertainty. Drawing on the option value literature, we show that expected consumers surplus is generally not an adequate basis for subscription decisions. We present an empirical example in which option value significantly improves demand estimation. We discuss policy implications, including possible ‘market failures’ in which socially beneficial new technology is not deployed.
Information Economics and Policy | 2005
Dennis L. Weisman
Abstract A growing concern on the part of regulators in the telecommunications and electric power industries is that the adoption of price-cap regulation may weaken incentives for investment in service quality. This analysis reveals that participation by the regulated firm in complementary, competitive markets may serve to temper this incentive. Paradoxically, commonly used revenue-share penalties can (actually) serve to reduce investment in quality. In contrast, profit-share penalties and increased information dissemination regarding the regulated firms compliance with quality benchmarks provide unambiguous incentives for increased investment in quality, ceteris paribus .
Journal of Regulatory Economics | 1993
Dennis L. Weisman
A substantial body of recent research finds thatprice-cap regulation is superior tocost-based regulation in that many of the distortions associated with the latter are reduced or eliminated entirely. We prove that the hybrid application ofcost-based and price-cap regulation that characterizes current regulatory practice in the United States telecommunications industry may generate qualitative distortions greater in magnitude than those realized undercost-based regulation. It follows thatprice-based regulation in practice may be welfare-inferior tocost-based regulation. The analysis further reveals that the firm subject to this modified form ofprice-based regulation may have incentives to engage in pure waste.
Journal of Regulatory Economics | 2001
Dennis L. Weisman; Jaesung Kang
A regulated upstream monopolist supplies an essential input to firms in a downstream market. If an upstream monopolist vertically integrates downstream, non-price discrimination becomes a concern. Discrimination always arises in equilibrium when the vertically integrated provider (VIP) is no less efficient than its rivals in the downstream market, but it does not always arise when the VIP is less efficient than its rivals. Numerical simulations that parameterize the regulators ability to monitor discrimination in the case of long-distance telephone service in the U.S. reveal that pronounced efficiency differentials are required for the incentive to discriminate not to arise in equilibrium.
Archive | 2000
Dale E. Lehman; Dennis L. Weisman
Acknowledgements. 1. Introduction and Overview. 2. Industry Trends and Market Structure. 3. The Stock Market Reacts. 4. A Jurisdictional Model. 5. The FCCs Efficient - Firm Standard - Telric. 6. Back to the Future. 7. Explaining State Regulatory Actions. 8. Conclusions. References. Name Index. Subject Index.
Information Economics and Policy | 1996
David E. M. Sappington; Dennis L. Weisman
Abstract We examine the merits of revenue sharing in incentive regulation plans. We demonstrate how revenue sharing can be employed to construct an incentive plan that ensures strict gains for both consumers and the regulated firm relative to a pure profit-sharing plan. Revenue sharing is also shown to diminish incentives for wasteful expenditures and price discrimination by the regulated firm, and to limit regulatory expropriation of the firm.
Journal of Regulatory Economics | 1998
Dennis L. Weisman
In Weisman (1995), I construct a model to investigate the incentives of a vertically-integrated regulated firm to discriminate against downstream rivals. This model suggests that the RBOCs do not have the same incentives to discriminate as AT&T prior to divestiture. Reiffen (1998) questions this and other conclusions. This reply addresses his claims.