Dennis R. Holmes

Accuracy of Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Positivity by Physical Examination, Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BackgroundAxillary lymph node status continues to be among the most important prognostic variables regarding breast cancer survival. We were interested in our ability to accurately predict axillary nodal involvement by using physical examination and standard breast imaging studies in combination.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of 244 consecutive patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma between May 2008 and December 2010 who underwent physical examination of the axilla, digital mammography, axillary ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging and who had subsequent histopathologic evaluation of one or more axillary lymph nodes.ResultsA total of 62 (25%) of 244 women were found to have positive axillary lymph nodes on final histopathologic examination, 42% of whom were able to be identified preoperatively. The sensitivity for predicting axillary metastasis if any one or more examination modalities were suspicious was 56.5%. The specificity for predicting axillary metastasis if any three or more modalities were suspicious was 100%. Of the patients who had all four modalities negative, 14% were ultimately found to have histologically positive nodes at the time of surgery.ConclusionsPhysical examination and multimodal imaging in combination are useful for preoperative axillary staging and treatment planning. However, they remain inadequate definitive predictors of axillary lymph node involvement.

Increasing minority patient participation in cancer clinical trials using oncology nurse navigation

BACKGROUND Residential distance from an academic or cancer center is a significant barrier to minority patient participation in cancer research. Most cancer clinical trials (CTs) are only accessible at academic and cancer centers, yet most cancer patients receive treatment in their home communities where access to CTs may be limited. Oncology nurse navigation is an innovative approach for increasing minority CT participation by facilitating access to cancer CTs in communities where minority patients live. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of oncology nurse navigation on community-based recruitment of black patients to breast cancer CTs at a major cancer center. METHODS We merged the roles of a traditional oncology research nurse and a professional patient navigator to create a novel health care provider role, the oncology nurse navigator. The primary duties of the oncology nurse navigator were to engage black cancer patients in the offices of their community physicians and to collaborate with community physicians to increase black patient participation in cancer research. The oncology nurse navigator played a key role in all phases of the CT participation process (e.g., screening for eligibility and completion of informed consent and clinical research forms) and guided each patient around barriers in the health care system. The accrual of eligible patients to breast cancer CTs was used to assess the impact of oncology nurse navigation on community-based recruitment of blacks to cancer CTs. RESULTS Between January 2007 and December 2008, a total of 132 black breast cancer patients were screened by a single oncology nurse navigator for eligibility to University of Southern California-sponsored breast cancer CTs. Fifty-nine patients were eligible for CTs, and each was invited to participate in 1 or more CTs for which they were eligible. Fifty-one of 59 eligible black patients (86% of eligible patients) were enrolled to 1 or more research protocols. The estimated cost per enrolled patient was

Differentiation of Cancerous Lesions in Excised Human Breast Specimens Using Multiband Attenuation Profiles From Ultrasonic Transmission Tomography

5,677, nearly half the expected per patient cost of treating patients on CT at an academic or cancer center. CONCLUSIONS Oncology nurse navigation is an effective outreach strategy for increasing black patient participation in cancer research and may be achieved at nearly half the cost of traditional methods of enrolling patients in CTs at cancer centers.

Mammographic Findings after Intraoperative Radiotherapy of the Breast

This study examines the tissue differentiation capability of the recently developed high‐resolution ultrasonic transmission tomography (HUTT) system in the context of differentiating between benign and malignant tissue types in mastectomy specimens.

Features Associated with Successful Recruitment of Diverse Patients onto Cancer Clinical Trials: Report from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group

Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT) is a form of accelerated partial breast radiation that has been shown to be equivalent to conventional whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in terms of local cancer control. However, questions have been raised about the potential of f IORT to produce breast parenchymal changes that could interfere with mammographic surveillance of cancer recurrence. The purpose of this study was to identify, quantify, and compare the mammographic findings of patients who received IORT and EBRT in a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial of women with early stage invasive breast cancer undergoing breast conserving therapy between July 2005 and December 2009. Treatment groups were compared with regard to the 1, 2 and 4-year incidence of 6 post-operative mammographic findings: architectural distortion, skin thickening, skin retraction, calcifications, fat necrosis, and mass density. Blinded review of 90 sets of mammograms of 15 IORT and 16 EBRT patients demonstrated a higher incidence of fat necrosis among IORT recipients at years 1, 2, and 4. However, none of the subjects were judged to have suspicious mammogram findings and fat necrosis did not interfere with mammographic interpretation.

Performance and Practice Guideline for the Use of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in the Management of Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe clinical trials mechanism of standardized treatment and follow-up for cancer patients with similar stages and patterns of disease is the most powerful approach available for evaluating the efficacy of novel therapies, and clinical trial participation should protect against delivery of care variations associated with racial/ethnic identity and/or socioeconomic status. Unfortunately, disparities in clinical trial accrual persist, with African Americans (AA) and Hispanic/Latino Americans (HA) underrepresented in most studies.Study DesignWe evaluated the accrual patterns for 10 clinical trials conducted by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) 1999–2009, and analyzed results by race/ethnicity as well as by study design.ResultsEight of 10 protocols were successful in recruiting AA and/or HA participants; three of four randomized trials were successful. Features that were present among all of the successfully recruiting protocols were: (1) studies designed to recruit patients with regional or advanced-stage disease (2 of 2 protocols); and (2) studies that involved some investigational systemic therapy (3 of 3 protocols).DiscussionAA and HA cancer patients can be successfully accrued onto randomized clinical trials, but study design affects recruitment patterns. Increased socioeconomic disadvantages observed within minority-ethnicity communities results in barriers to screening and more advanced cancer stage distribution. Improving cancer early detection is critical in the effort to eliminate outcome disparities but existing differences in disease burden results in diminished eligibility for early-stage cancer clinical trials among minority-ethnicity patients.

Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

PurposeThe American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) sought to provide an evidence-based guideline on the use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in the management of clinical stage II and III invasive breast cancer.MethodsA comprehensive nonsystematic review was performed of selected peer-reviewed literature published since 2000. The Education Committee of the ASBrS convened to develop guideline recommendations.ResultsA performance and practice guideline was prepared to outline the baseline assessment and perioperative management of patients with clinical stage II–III breast cancer under consideration for NST.RecommendationsPreoperative or NST is emerging as an important initial strategy for the management of invasive breast cancer. From the surgeon’s perspective, the primary goal of NST is to increase the resectability of locally advanced breast cancer, increase the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy, and decrease surgical morbidity. To ensure optimal patient selection and efficient patient care, the guideline recommends: (1) baseline breast and axillary imaging; (2) minimally invasive biopsies of breast and axillary lesions; (3) determination of tumor biomarkers; (4) systemic staging; (5) care coordination, including referrals to medical oncology, radiation oncology, plastic surgery, social work, and genetic counseling, if indicated; (6) initiation of NST; (7) post-NST breast and axillary imaging; and (8) decision for surgery based on extent of disease at presentation, patient choice, clinical response to NST, and genetic testing results, if performed.

Analysis of the Impact of Intraoperative Margin Assessment with Adjunctive Use of MarginProbe versus Standard of Care on Tissue Volume Removed

Multiple long‐term studies have demonstrated a propensity for breast cancer recurrences to develop near the site of the original breast cancer. Recognition of this local recurrence pattern laid the foundation for the development of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) approaches designed to limit the radiation treatment field to the site of the malignancy. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of APBI in general, and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), in particular, for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). As a result, use of APBI, remains controversial. A prospective nonrandomized trial was designed to determine if patients with pure DCIS considered eligible for concurrent IORT based on preoperative mammography and contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE‐MRI) could be successfully treated using IORT with minimal need for additional therapy due to inadequate surgical margins or excessive tumor size. Between November 2007 and June 2014, 35 women underwent bilateral digital mammography and bilateral breast CE‐MRI prior to selection for IORT. Patients were deemed eligible for IORT if their lesion was ≤4 cm in maximal diameter on both digital mammography and CE‐MRI, pure DCIS on minimally invasive breast biopsy or wide local excision, and considered resectable with clear surgical margins using breast‐conserving surgery (BCS). Postoperatively, the DCIS lesion size determined by imaging was compared with lesion size and surgical margin status obtained from the surgical pathology specimen. Thirty‐five patients completed IORT. Median patient age was 57 years (range 42–79 years) and median histologic lesion size was 15.6 mm (2–40 mm). No invasive cancer was identified. In more than half of the patients in our study (57.1%), MRI failed to detect a corresponding lesion. Nonetheless, 30 patients met criteria for negative margins (i.e., margins ≥2 mm) whereas five patients had positive margins (<2 mm). Two of the five patients with positive margins underwent mastectomy due to extensive imaging‐occult DCIS. Three of the five patients with positive margins underwent successful re‐excision at a subsequent operation prior to subsequent whole breast irradiation. A total of 14.3% (5/35) of patients required some form of additional therapy. At 36 months median follow‐up (range of 2–83 months, average 42 months), only two patients experienced local recurrences of cancer (DCIS only), yielding a 5.7% local recurrence rate. No deaths or distant recurrences were observed. Imaging‐occult DCIS is a challenge for IORT, as it is for all forms of breast‐conserving therapy. Nonetheless, 91.4% of patients with DCIS were successfully managed with BCS and IORT alone, with relatively few patients requiring additional therapy.

Triangle Resection with Crescent Mastopexy: An Oncoplastic Breast Surgical Technique for Managing Inferior Pole Lesions

Breast conserving surgery has been accepted as the optimal local therapy for women with early breast cancer, emphasizing the necessity to balance oncologic goals with patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes. In the move to enhance a surgeons ability to achieve histologically clear margins intraoperatively at the initial surgery, the MarginProbe (Dune Medical Devices, Caesarea, Israel) has emerged as an effective tool to accomplish that task. Based on previously reported success using the device, we assessed cosmesis and tissue resection volumes among participants in a randomized-controlled trial comparing the standard of care lumpectomy performed with and without the MarginProbe. The use of the MarginProbe device resulted in a 57% reduction in reexcision rates compared to the control group with a small increase in tissue volume removed at the primary lumpectomy. When total tissue volumes removed were analyzed, the device and control groups were still very similar after normalization to bra cup size. We concluded that the MarginProbe is an effective device to assist surgeons in determining margin status intraoperatively while allowing for better patient cosmetic outcomes due to the smaller volumes of tissue resected and the reduction in patient referrals for second surgeries due to positive margins.

Intraoperative radiotherapy in breast conserving surgery

Resection of inferior pole breast cancers commonly produces inferior cosmetic results, particularly when resection of skin is required. The triangle resection with mastopexy is one of several oncoplastic breast surgical techniques that enable resection of inferior pole lesions with preservation if not improvement of breast cosmesis. This procedure may be combined with unilateral or bilateral mastopexy to further improve breast cosmesis in patients with mild to moderate ptosis.Resection of inferior pole breast cancers commonly produces inferior cosmetic results, particularly when resection of skin is required. The triangle resection with mastopexy is one of several oncoplastic breast surgical techniques that enable resection of inferior pole lesions with preservation if not improvement of breast cosmesis. This procedure may be combined with unilateral or bilateral mastopexy to further improve breast cosmesis in patients with mild to moderate ptosis.