Dennis W. Luckey
University of Colorado Denver
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dennis W. Luckey.
JAMA Pediatrics | 2010
John Eckenrode; Mary I. Campa; Dennis W. Luckey; Charles R. Henderson; Robert Cole; Harriet Kitzman; Elizabeth Anson; Kimberly Sidora-Arcoleo; Jane Powers; David L. Olds
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course development of 19-year-old youths whose mothers participated in the program. DESIGN Randomized trial. SETTING Semirural community in New York. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred ten youths from the 400 families enrolled in the Elmira Nurse-Family Partnership program. Intervention Families received a mean of 9 home visits (range, 0-16) during pregnancy and 23 (range, 0-59) from birth through the childs second birthday. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Youth self-reports of educational achievement, reproductive behaviors, welfare use, and criminal involvement. RESULTS Relative to the comparison group, girls in the pregnancy and infancy nurse-visited group were less likely to have been arrested (10% vs 30%; relative risk [RR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.82) and convicted (4% vs 20%; 0.20; 0.05-0.85) and had fewer lifetime arrests (mean: 0.10 vs 0.54; incidence RR [IRR], 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.54) and convictions (0.04 vs 0.37; 0.11; 0.02-0.51). Nurse-visited girls born to unmarried and low-income mothers had fewer children (11% vs 30%; RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12-1.02) and less Medicaid use (18% vs 45%; 0.40; 0.18-0.87) than their comparison group counterparts. CONCLUSIONS Prenatal and infancy home visitation reduced the proportion of girls entering the criminal justice system. For girls born to high-risk mothers, there were additional positive program effects consistent with results from earlier phases of this trial. There were few program effects for boys.
JAMA Pediatrics | 2010
Harriet Kitzman; David L. Olds; Robert Cole; Carole Hanks; Elizabeth Anson; Kimberly J. Arcoleo; Dennis W. Luckey; Michael D. Knudtson; Charles R. Henderson; John Holmberg
OBJECTIVE To test the effect of prenatal and infancy home visits by nurses on 12-year-old, firstborn childrens use of substances, behavioral adjustment, and academic achievement. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Public system of obstetric and pediatric care in Memphis, Tennessee. PARTICIPANTS We studied 12-year-old, firstborn children (n = 613) of primarily African American, economically disadvantaged women (743 randomized during pregnancy). INTERVENTION Program of prenatal and infancy home visits by nurses. OUTCOME MEASURES Use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana; internalizing, externalizing, and total behavioral problems; and academic achievement. RESULTS By the time the firstborn child was 12 years of age, those visited by nurses, compared with those in the control group, reported fewer days of having used cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana during the 30-day period before the 12-year interview (0.03 vs 0.18, P = .02) and were less likely to report having internalizing disorders that met the borderline or clinical threshold (22.1% vs 30.9%, P = .04). Nurse-visited children born to mothers with low psychological resources, compared with their control group counterparts, scored higher on the Peabody Individual Achievement Tests in reading and math (88.78 vs 85.70, P = .009) and, during their first 6 years of education, scored higher on group-administered standardized tests of math and reading achievement (40.52 vs 34.85, P = .02). No statistically significant program effects were found on childrens externalizing or total behavioral problems. CONCLUSIONS Through age 12, the program reduced childrens use of substances and internalizing mental health problems and improved the academic achievement of children born to mothers with low psychological resources.
Prevention Science | 2012
Ruth O’Brien; Patricia Moritz; Dennis W. Luckey; Maureen W. McClatchey; Erin M. Ingoldsby; David L. Olds
Participant attrition is a major influence on the effectiveness of evidence-based interventions. Assessing predictors of participant attrition and nurse and site characteristics associated with it could lay a foundation for increasing retention and engagement. We examined this issue in the national expansion of the Nurse-Family Partnership, an evidence-based program of prenatal and infancy home visiting for low-income, first-time mothers, their children, and families. Using a mixed methods approach, we examined participant, nurse, and site predictors of participant attrition and completed home visits. We used mixed multivariate regression models to identify participant, nurse, program, and site predictors of addressable attrition and completed home visits during pregnancy and the first year of the child’s life for 10,367 participants at 66 implementation sites. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with nurse home visitors and supervisors at selected sites with the highest (N = 5 sites) and lowest (N = 6 sites) rates of participant addressable attrition and employed qualitative methods to synthesize themes that emerged in nurses’ descriptions of the strategies they used to retain participants. Mothers who were younger, unmarried, African American, and visited by nurses who ceased employment had higher rates of attrition and fewer home visits. Hispanic mothers, those living with partners, and those employed at registration had lower rates of attrition. Those who were living with partners and employed had more home visits. Nurses in high retention sites adapted the program to their clients’ needs, were less directive, and more collaborative with them. Increasing nurses’ flexibility in adapting this structured, evidence-based program to families’ needs may increase participant retention and completed home visits.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 1996
Cara Wright-Talamante; Asma Cheema; Jeannette Riddle; Dennis W. Luckey; Annette K. Taylor; Randi J. Hagerman
The aim is this study is to compare the longitudinal changes in IQ scores of females and males with fragile X syndrome and controls and to assess the impact on IQ of molecular variations of the FMR-1 gene in males. Medical records from the child development unit at a university-affiliated childrens hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Chart review yielded 35 males with fragile X (19 with a fully methylated full mutation, 9 with a mosaic pattern, and 7 with a partially unmethylated full mutation) 16 females with fragile X and a full mutation, 9 female controls, and 9 male controls who had repeated standardized IQ testing separated by 7 months to 13 years. The differences between the first and last IQ scores from the same IQ test were compared by t tests and subsequently by analysis of variance. Overall, a significant IQ decline was seen in 10/35 (28%) of fragile X males, 0/9 (0%) of control males, 6/16 (36%) of fragile X females, and 1/9 (11%) of control females. The initial t tests and analysis of variance showed a significant difference in IQ (p = 0.02) between fragile X males and control males but did not show a significant difference between males and females with fragile X syndrome or between fragile X and control females. When an analysis of covariance was carried out with the initial IQ as a covariable, a significant difference persisted between fragile X and control males, with a greater IQ decline in fragile X males. There were limitations in using the same IQ test. A comparison among the molecular subgroups of males yielded a significant IQ decline in 3/9 (33%) of mosaic males, 6/19 (32%) of fully methylated full mutation males, and 1/7 (14%) of partially methylated full mutation males. An analysis of covariance using the initial IQ and the intertest interval as covariables demonstrated significant differences between the fragile X molecular subgroups and the controls. Our findings show that a substantial percentage of both male and female fragile X patients and female control patients demonstrated significant IQ decline. There was a significant difference in the IQ change between fragile X and control males. There were no significant differences between fragile X and female controls. There were also significant differences in IQ decline among males with different molecular patterns compared with controls. Males with a mosaic pattern versus control males had the most significant decline of the molecular subtypes. Although the numbers were limited, there was no significant IQ decline in males with less than 50% methylation of the full mutation. This suggests that a small amount of FMR-1 protein production, which is often seen in males with less than 50% methylation, protects against significant IQ decline.
JAMA Pediatrics | 2014
David L. Olds; John Holmberg; Nancy Donelan-McCall; Dennis W. Luckey; Michael D. Knudtson; JoAnn Robinson
IMPORTANCE The Nurse-Family Partnership delivered by nurses has been found to produce long-term effects on maternal and child health in replicated randomized trials. A persistent question is whether paraprofessional home visitors might produce comparable effects. OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of prenatal and infancy/toddler home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses on child development at child ages 6 and 9 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized trial in public and private care settings in Denver, Colorado, of 735 low-income women and their first-born children (85% of the mothers were unmarried; 47% were Hispanic, 35% were non-Hispanic white, 15% were African American, and 3% were American Indian/Asian). INTERVENTIONS Home visits provided from pregnancy through child age 2 years delivered in one group by paraprofessionals and in the other by nurses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Reports of childrens internalizing, externalizing, and total emotional/behavioral problems, and tests of childrens language, intelligence, attention, attention dysfunction, visual attention/task switching, working memory, and academic achievement. We hypothesized that program effects on cognitive-related outcomes would be more pronounced among children born to mothers with low psychological resources. We report paraprofessional-control and nurse-control differences with P < .10 given similar effects in a previous trial, earlier effects in this trial, and limited statistical power. RESULTS There were no significant paraprofessional effects on emotional/behavioral problems, but paraprofessional-visited children born to mothers with low psychological resources compared with control group counterparts exhibited fewer errors in visual attention/task switching at age 9 years (effect size = -0.30, P = .08). There were no statistically significant paraprofessional effects on other primary outcomes. Nurse-visited children were less likely to be classified as having total emotional/behavioral problems at age 6 years (relative risk [RR] = 0.45, P = .08), internalizing problems at age 9 years (RR = 0.44, P = .08), and dysfunctional attention at age 9 years (RR = 0.34, P = .07). Nurse-visited children born to low-resource mothers compared with control-group counterparts had better receptive language averaged over ages 2, 4, and 6 years (effect size = 0.30, P = .01) and sustained attention averaged over ages 4, 6, and 9 years (effect size = 0.36, P = .006). There were no significant nurse effects on externalizing problems, intellectual functioning, and academic achievement. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Children born to low-resource mothers visited by paraprofessionals exhibited improvement in visual attention/task switching. Nurse-visited children showed improved behavioral functioning, and those born to low-resource mothers benefited in language and attention but did not improve in intellectual functioning and academic achievement. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00438282 and NCT00438594.
Prevention Science | 2013
Erin M. Ingoldsby; Pilar Baca; Maureen W. McClatchey; Dennis W. Luckey; Mildred Ramsey; Joan M. Loch; Jan Lewis; Terrie S. Blackaby; Mary B. Petrini; Bobbie J. Smith; Mollie McHale; Marianne Perhacs; David L. Olds
We evaluated an intervention to increase participant retention and engagement in community practice settings of the Nurse–Family Partnership (NFP), an evidence-based program of nurse home visiting for low-income, first-time parents. Using a quasi-experimental design (6 intervention and 11 control sites that delivered the NFP), we compared intervention and control sites on retention and number of completed home visits during a 10-month period after the intervention was initiated. Nurses at the five intervention sites were guided in tailoring the frequency, duration, and content of the visits to participants’ needs. NFP nurses at the control sites delivered the program as usual. At the intervention sites, participant retention and completed home visits increased from the pre-intervention to intervention periods, while at the control sites, these outcomes decreased from the pre-intervention to intervention periods, leading to a significant intervention–control difference in change in participant retention (hazard ratio, 0.42; p = 0.015) and a 1.4 visit difference in change in completed home visits (p < 0.001, ES = 0.36). We conclude that training nurse home visitors to promote adaptation of program dosage and content to meet families’ needs shows promise as a way to improve participant retention and completed home visits.
Prevention Science | 2015
David L. Olds; Pilar Baca; Maureen W. McClatchey; Erin M. Ingoldsby; Dennis W. Luckey; Michael D. Knudtson; Joan M. Loch; Mildred Ramsey
We conducted a cluster-based randomized controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve participant retention in community replication sites of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP). We registered 26 sites and randomized them into three groups: retention intervention (RI, N = 9), delayed RI (DRI, N = 6), or control (C, NFP as usual, N = 11). The RI consisted of training nurses to give more explicit control over the frequency of visits and content of the program to the parent participants. Two of the sites assigned to the RI, two assigned to the DRI, and two out of four nurses in one other site assigned to the DRI chose not to participate in the intervention. Primary analyses (intention to treat) contrasted changes in participant retention and completed visits (the primary outcomes) in the two intervention groups (RI and DRI) compared to control sites, focusing on differences in performance among baseline cohorts compared to cohorts enrolled during the first year during which the retention intervention was implemented. Compared to baseline, retention declined in the control sites over time but stayed the same in the RI and DRI sites (p value for interaction = 0.099). Compared to baseline, the number of completed home visits declined over time in the control sites but did not in the RI and DRI sites, producing a significant treatment difference in change in mean completed home visits over time (2.71 visits, SE = 1.164, p = 0.020). The intervention offset a decline over time in retention and completed home visits found in the control group during the time covered by this trial. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the intervention indicated that improvements are needed to promote its uptake.
Pediatrics | 2005
David L. Olds; Dennis W. Luckey; Charles R. Henderson
In Reply .— Dr Glauber raises a common challenge to trials that examine a wide range of outcomes but do not make Bonferroni-like adjustments for multiple comparisons. We share Dr Glaubers concern about overinterpreting single statistically significant treatment differences. We have taken the position from the beginning of this program of research, however, that we generally would not make statistical adjustments for multiple comparisons. Instead, each of the 3 trials of this nurse home-visitor program has been guided by specific hypotheses grounded in a theoretical model; we treat with skepticism each treatment effect that meets the threshold of conventional statistical significance unless it coheres with other findings within the trial and with other relevant findings outside of the trial.1 Moreover, we have taken the position that findings from a single trial are an insufficient foundation for guiding policy or practice.1 Instead of making adjustments to P values, we have focused on conducting replication trials of the intervention with different populations across different contexts and time points in history. Questions of replicability, in our view, are of substantial importance from the standpoint of science and …
JAMA | 1997
David L. Olds; John Eckenrode; Charles R. Henderson; Harriet Kitzman; Jane Powers; Robert Cole; Kimberly Sidora; Pamela Morris; Lisa M. Pettitt; Dennis W. Luckey
JAMA | 1998
David L. Olds; Charles R. Henderson; Robert Cole; John Eckenrode; Harriet Kitzman; Dennis W. Luckey; Lisa M. Pettitt; Kimberly Sidora; Pamela Morris; Jane Powers