Denny J. Padgett

Energy Expenditure and Activity of Transfemoral Amputees Using Mechanical and Microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knees

OBJECTIVE To quantify the energy efficiency of locomotion and free-living physical activity energy expenditure of transfemoral amputees using a mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee. DESIGN Repeated-measures design to evaluate comparative functional outcomes. SETTING Exercise physiology laboratory and community free-living environment. PARTICIPANTS Subjects (N=15; 12 men, 3 women; age, 42+/-9 y; range, 26-57 y) with transfemoral amputation. INTERVENTION Research participants were long-term users of a mechanical prosthesis (20+/-10 y as an amputee; range, 3-36 y). They were fitted with a microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis and allowed to acclimate (mean time, 18+/-8 wk) before being retested. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Objective measurements of energy efficiency and total daily energy expenditure were obtained. The Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire was used to gather subjective feedback from the participants. RESULTS Subjects demonstrated significantly increased physical activity-related energy expenditure levels in the participants free-living environment (P=.04) after wearing the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint. There was no significant difference in the energy efficiency of walking (P=.34). When using the microprocessor-controlled knee, the subjects expressed increased satisfaction in their daily lives (P=.02). CONCLUSIONS People ambulating with a microprocessor-controlled knee significantly increased their physical activity during daily life, outside the laboratory setting, and expressed an increased quality of life.

Iliofemoral arthrodesis and pseudarthrosis: a long-term functional outcome evaluation.

Reconstruction after the resection of pelvic tumors is a major challenge. It depends on many factors such as age, activity level, type of tumor, its adjuvant treatment, and the extent of the disease. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the functional and oncologic outcomes of patients who had an iliofemoral arthrodesis after resection of a pelvic sarcoma. Between 1981 and 1999, 20 males and 12 females with a mean age of 39.9 years (range, 10–71 years) had an iliofemoral arthrodesis, either as a solid fusion or primary pseudarthrosis, at one institution. The functional outcome was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and the Toronto Extremity Salvage scores. At a mean followup of 97 months (range, 14–226 months), 15 of 32 patients were alive, all without disease. The radiographic union rate was 86%. The mean overall Musculoskeletal Tumor Society and Toronto Extremity Salvage scores were 64% and 48%, respectively. Patients with a primary solid fusion did functionally better compared with patients who had pseudarthrosis (Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, 76%; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score, 71% versus Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, 52%; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score, 25%). Biomechanical analysis showed that the loss of motion in the hip is well-compensated. The authors conclude from this series that iliofemoral reconstruction after resection of a pelvic sarcoma provides acceptable and durable long-term results, not only from the oncologic, but also from the functional perspective.

Arthrodesis of the shoulder after tumor resection

Functional outcomes of patients with arthrodesis after resection of a shoulder girdle neoplasm are only sparsely reported. Fusion of the shoulder can be done as a primary reconstruction or secondarily for salvage of a failed limb-sparing procedure. We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients at a mean followup of 11 years. In eight patients, arthrodesis was done as the primary reconstruction and in 13 patients as the secondary procedure. There were no local recurrences, and no patient had metastatic disease develop. The overall Toronto extremity salvage and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were 81% (range, 46-97) and 23 points (range, 17-26), respectively. There was no difference with respect to function between patients who had their arthrodesis as a primary or secondary procedure. Eight of 21 patients (43%) had a complication that required major surgical intervention. Shoulder arthrodesis as a limb salvage procedure after tumor resection provides good function independent of whether the procedure is done primarily or secondarily. Because of the high complication rate, future efforts must be directed at surgical methods to decrease such complications. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series-no, or historical control group). See the Guidelines to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Rhomboid muscle electromyography activity during 3 different manual muscle tests

OBJECTIVE To determine which of 3 previously published rhomboid manual muscle tests (MMTs) elicits the maximal rhomboid electromyographic activity in an asymptomatic population. DESIGN Criterion standard. SETTING Motion analysis laboratory at tertiary care medical center. PARTICIPANTS Eleven male volunteers (age range, 24-40y) without shoulder or neck pain. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Peak 1-second normalized electromyographic activity in the rhomboid muscle during 8 different MMT positions, including 3 different rhomboid MMT positions (Kendall, Kendall-Alternative, Hislop-Montgomery). RESULTS The Kendall MMT (78% maximal voluntary contraction [MVC]) produced higher rhomboid electromyographic activity than the Kendall-Alternative (71% MVC) or the Hislop-Montgomery MMT (52% MVC), but the differences were not statistically significant. The posterior deltoid MMT generated the greatest rhomboid electromyographic activity of all MMTs, and 4% to 30% greater rhomboid electromyographic activity than the 3 rhomboid MMTs (P=.0001; posterior deltoid > Hislop-Montgomery). Electromyographic profiles of the Kendall and Kendall-Alternative MMTs were similar, whereas the Hislop-Montgomery MMT produced less upper trapezius activity (P=.0001 vs Kendall and Kendall-Alternative) and more latissimus dorsi activity (P=.0001 vs Kendall-Alternative). The standard MMT positions for the middle trapezius, levator scapula, posterior deltoid, and latissimus dorsi produced the maximal electromyographic activity for their respective target muscles. CONCLUSIONS The posterior deltoid MMT position should be used to produce maximal rhomboid electromyographic activity for normalization purposes during kinesiologic studies. The Kendall and Kendall-Alternative rhomboid MMT are likely to be clinically indistinct. It is unlikely that clinicians can use standard MMT positions to distinguish rhomboid strength from synergists, such as the levator scapula and middle trapezius muscle, for diagnostic purposes.