Derek J. Hausenloy
Semmelweis University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Derek J. Hausenloy.
Pharmacological Reviews | 2014
Péter Ferdinandy; Derek J. Hausenloy; G. Heusch; Gary F. Baxter; Rainer Schulz
Pre-, post-, and remote conditioning of the myocardium are well described adaptive responses that markedly enhance the ability of the heart to withstand a prolonged ischemia/reperfusion insult and provide therapeutic paradigms for cardioprotection. Nevertheless, more than 25 years after the discovery of ischemic preconditioning, we still do not have established cardioprotective drugs on the market. Most experimental studies on cardioprotection are still undertaken in animal models, in which ischemia/reperfusion is imposed in the absence of cardiovascular risk factors. However, ischemic heart disease in humans is a complex disorder caused by, or associated with, cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, insulin resistance, heart failure, altered coronary circulation, and aging. These risk factors induce fundamental alterations in cellular signaling cascades that affect the development of ischemia/reperfusion injury per se and responses to cardioprotective interventions. Moreover, some of the medications used to treat these risk factors, including statins, nitrates, and antidiabetic drugs, may impact cardioprotection by modifying cellular signaling. The aim of this article is to review the recent evidence that cardiovascular risk factors and their medication may modify the response to cardioprotective interventions. We emphasize the critical need to take into account the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and concomitant medications when designing preclinical studies for the identification and validation of cardioprotective drug targets and clinical studies. This will hopefully maximize the success rate of developing rational approaches to effective cardioprotective therapies for the majority of patients with multiple risk factors.
Cardiovascular Research | 2017
Derek J. Hausenloy; David Garcia-Dorado; Hans Erik Bøtker; Sean M. Davidson; James M. Downey; Felix B. Engel; Robert B. Jennings; Sandrine Lecour; Jonathan Leor; Rosalinda Madonna; Michel Ovize; Cinzia Perrino; Fabrice Prunier; Rainer Schulz; Joost P.G. Sluijter; Linda W. van Laake; Jakob Vinten-Johansen; Derek M. Yellon; Kirsti Ytrehus; Gerd Heusch; Péter Ferdinandy
Ischaemic heart disease and the heart failure that often results, remain the leading causes of death and disability in Europe and worldwide. As such, in order to prevent heart failure and improve clinical outcomes in patients presenting with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, novel therapies are required to protect the heart against the detrimental effects of acute ischaemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). During the last three decades, a wide variety of ischaemic conditioning strategies and pharmacological treatments have been tested in the clinic-however, their translation from experimental to clinical studies for improving patient outcomes has been both challenging and disappointing. Therefore, in this Position Paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart, we critically analyse the current state of ischaemic conditioning in both the experimental and clinical settings, provide recommendations for improving its translation into the clinical setting, and highlight novel therapeutic targets and new treatment strategies for reducing acute myocardial IRI.Ischaemic heart disease and the heart failure that often results, remain the leading causes of death and disability in Europe and worldwide. As such, in order to prevent heart failure and improve clinical outcomes in patients presenting with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, novel therapies are required to protect the heart against the detrimental effects of acute ischaemia/reperfusion injury. During the last three decades, a wide variety of ischaemic conditioning strategies and pharmacological treatments have been tested in the clinic - however, their translation from experimental to clinical studies for improving patient outcomes has been both challenging and disappointing. Therefore, in this Position Paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart, we critically analyse the current state of ischaemic conditioning in both the experimental and clinical settings, provide recommendations for improving its translation into the clinical setting, and highlight novel therapeutic targets and new treatment strategies for reducing acute myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury.
Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2014
Joost P.G. Sluijter; Gianluigi Condorelli; Sean M. Davidson; Felix B. Engel; Péter Ferdinandy; Derek J. Hausenloy; Sandrine Lecour; Rosalinda Madonna; Michel Ovize; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Rainer Schulz; Linda W. van Laake
The morbidity and mortality from ischemic heart disease (IHD) remain significant worldwide. The treatment for acute myocardial infarction has improved over the past decades, including early reperfusion of occluded coronary arteries. Although it is essential to re-open the artery as soon as possible, paradoxically this leads to additional myocardial injury, called acute ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), for which currently no effective therapy is available. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are required to protect the heart from acute IRI in order to reduce myocardial infarction size, preserve cardiac function and improve clinical outcomes in patients with IHD. In this review article, we will first outline the pathophysiology of acute IRI and review promising therapeutic strategies for cardioprotection. These include novel aspects of mitochondrial function, epigenetics, circadian clocks, the immune system, microvesicles, growth factors, stem cell therapy and gene therapy. We discuss the therapeutic potential of these novel cardioprotective strategies in terms of pharmacological targeting and clinical application.
(Vol.978184). (2012) | 2012
Juan Carlos Kaski; Derek J. Hausenloy; Bernard J. Gersh; Derek M. Yellon
Preface.- Introduction.- Myocardial reperfusion injury: The clinical importance and magnitude of the problem, JC Kaski and G Ambrosio.- Section I. Myocardial reperfusion injury - Pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms.- The no-reflow phenomenon leading to myocardial injury and dysfunction- Consequences of reperfusion injury: Pathophysiology and molecular basis, H M Piper.- The coronary microcirculation experts view, A Pries.- The pathologists view, R Virmani.- The interventionists view.- Commonly asked questions.- Pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms - Established facts and future research avenues - An integrated view, D Yellon.- Section II. Diagnosis.- The electrocardiogram.- Biomarkers.- Angiography.- Echocardiography.- MRI.- SPECT.- PET, P Camici.- Commonly asked questions.- An integrated view on diagnostic strategies - Identifying salvageable myocardium.- Diagnostic algorithms.- Section III. Management - Currently available tools and future perspectives.- An integrated view on management - What is effective and what is not.- Discrepancies between results of treatment in experimental models and patients. Management algorithms, B Gersh.- Catheter lab options, M Marzilli.- Myocardial protection - Metabolic issues, WC Stanley.- Myocardial protection - Preconditioning.- New pharmacological options.- Assessment of treatment efficacy.- Commonly asked questions.- Future perspectives, JC Kaski, D Yellon and B Gersch.
Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation | 2016
Derek J. Hausenloy; Luciano Candilio; Richard Evans; Cono Ariti; David P. Jenkins; Shyamsunder Kolvekar; Rosemary Knight; Gudrun Kunst; Christopher Laing; Jennifer M. Nicholas; John Pepper; Steven Robertson; Maria Xenou; Timothy Clayton; Derek M. Yellon
Archive | 2016
Derek J. Hausenloy; Luciano Candilio; Derek M. Yellon
Archive | 2016
Selvaraj Shanmuganathan; Derek J. Hausenloy; Michael R. Duchen; Derek M. Yellon
Archive | 2012
Juan Carlos Kaski; Derek J. Hausenloy; Bernard J. Gersh; Derek M. Yellon
Archive | 2010
Vinod Venugopal; Chris Laing; Andrew Ludman; Derek M. Yellon; Derek J. Hausenloy
Archive | 2009
Derek J. Hausenloy; Derek M. Yellon