Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dgi Scott is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dgi Scott.


Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2013

2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides

Jc Jennette; Ronald J. Falk; P. A. Bacon; Neil Basu; Maria C. Cid; Ferrario F; Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez; W. L. Gross; Loïc Guillevin; Hagen Ec; Gary S. Hoffman; David Jayne; Cornelis Kallenberg; Peter Lamprecht; Carol A. Langford; Raashid Luqmani; Alfred Mahr; Eric L. Matteson; Peter A. Merkel; Seza Ozen; Charles D. Pusey; Niels Rasmussen; Rees Aj; Dgi Scott; Ulrich Specks; John H. Stone; Kei Takahashi; Richard A. Watts

2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides J. Jennette;R. Falk;P. Bacon;N. Basu;M. Cid;F. Ferrario;L. Flores-Suarez;W. Gross;L. Guillevin;E. Hagen;G. Hoffman;D. Jayne;C. Kallenberg;P. Lamprecht;C. Langford;R. Luqmani;A. Mahr;E. Matteson;P. Merkel;S. Ozen;C. Pusey;N. Rasmussen;A. Rees;D. Scott;U. Specks;J. Stone;K. Takahashi;R. Watts; Arthritis & Rheumatism


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2009

EULAR recommendations for the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis

Chetan Mukhtyar; L. Guillevin; Maria C. Cid; Bhaskar Dasgupta; K. de Groot; W. L. Gross; Thomas Hauser; Bernhard Hellmich; David Jayne; Cornelis Kallenberg; Peter A. Merkel; H. Raspe; Carlo Salvarani; Dgi Scott; Ca Stegeman; Richard A. Watts; Kerstin Westman; James Witter; Hasan Yazici; Raashid Luqmani

Objectives: To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. Methods: An expert group (consisting of 10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunologists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search using a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion. Results: In all, 15 recommendations were made for the management of small and medium vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by low quality of evidence and by EULAR standardised operating procedures. Conclusions: On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, recommendations have been made for the evaluation, investigation, treatment and monitoring of patients with small and medium vessel vasculitis for use in everyday clinical practice.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2009

EULAR Recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis

Chetan Mukhtyar; L. Guillevin; Maria C. Cid; Bhaskar Dasgupta; K. de Groot; W. L. Gross; Thomas Hauser; Bernhard Hellmich; David Jayne; Cornelis Kallenberg; Peter A. Merkel; H. Raspe; Carlo Salvarani; Dgi Scott; Ca Stegeman; Richard A. Watts; Kerstin Westman; James Witter; Hasan Yazici; Raashid Luqmani

Objectives: To develop European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Methods: An expert group (10 rheumatologists, 3 nephrologists, 2 immunolgists, 2 internists representing 8 European countries and the USA, a clinical epidemiologist and a representative from a drug regulatory agency) identified 10 topics for a systematic literature search through a modified Delphi technique. In accordance with standardised EULAR operating procedures, recommendations were derived for the management of large vessel vasculitis. In the absence of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of a consensus opinion. Results: Seven recommendations were made relating to the assessment, investigation and treatment of patients with large vessel vasculitis. The strength of recommendations was restricted by the low level of evidence and EULAR standardised operating procedures. Conclusions: On the basis of evidence and expert consensus, management recommendations for large vessel vasculitis have been formulated and are commended for use in everyday clinical practice.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2008

Outcomes from studies of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis: a systematic review by the European League Against Rheumatism Systemic Vasculitis Task Force

Chetan Mukhtyar; Oliver Flossmann; Bernhard Hellmich; P. A. Bacon; Maria C. Cid; Jw Cohen-Tervaert; W. L. Gross; Loïc Guillevin; D Jayne; Alfred Mahr; Peter A. Merkel; Heiner Raspe; Dgi Scott; James Witter; Halil Yazici; Raashid Luqmani

Objectives: We undertook a systematic literature review as a background to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for conducting clinical trials in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody associated vasculitis (AAV), and to assess the quality of evidence for outcome measures in AAV. Methods: Using a systematic Medline search, we categorised the identified studies according to diagnoses. Factors affecting remission, relapse, renal function and overall survival were identified. Results: A total of 44 papers were reviewed from 502 identified by our search criteria. There was considerable inconsistency in definitions of end points. Remission rates varied from 30% to 93% in Wegener granulomatosis (WG), 75% to 89% in microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and 81% to 91% in Churg–Strauss syndrome (CSS). The 5-year survival for WG, MPA and CSS was 74–91%, 45–76% and 60–97%. Relapse (variably defined) was common in the first 2 years but the frequency varied: 18% to 60% in WG, 8% in MPA, and 35% in CSS. The rate of renal survival in WG varied from 23% at 15 months to 23% at 120 months. Methods used to assess morbidity varied between studies. Ignoring the variations in definitions of the stage of disease, factors influencing remission, relapse, renal and overall survival included immunosuppressive therapy used, type of organ involvement, presence of ANCA, older age and male gender. Conclusions: Factors influencing remission, relapse, renal and overall survival include the type of immunosuppressive therapy used, pattern of organ involvement, presence of ANCA, older age and male gender. Methodological variations between studies highlight the need for a consensus on terminology and definitions for future conduct of clinical studies in AAV.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2003

British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register

A J Silman; Deborah Symmons; Dgi Scott; I Griffiths

The British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) established a nationwide register for patients with rheumatological disorders treated with biologic agents. The register is designed as a national prospective study whose primary purpose is to assess long term toxicity from the use of these agents in routine practice. In addition, the data will be capable of addressing the benefits from their use in relation to their toxicity. One specific feature of the BSR register is the recruitment and collection of data from a parallel comparison group, comprising patients with active rheumatoid arthritis treated with conventional disease modifying agents. Both class specific and drug specific analyses of the group treated with biologicals are planned.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2001

Geoepidemiology of systemic vasculitis: comparison of the incidence in two regions of Europe

Richard A. Watts; Ma Gonzalez-Gay; Se Lane; C Garcia-Porrua; Graham Bentham; Dgi Scott

OBJECTIVE The aetiopathogenesis of the primary systemic vasculitides (PSV) is unknown but includes both environmental and genetic factors. The development of classification criteria/definitions for PSV allows comparison of the epidemiology between different regions. METHODS The same methods and the American College of Rheumatology (1990) criteria or Chapel Hill definitions were used to compare the epidemiology of Wegeners granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, microscopic polyangiitis, and polyarteritis nodosa in Norwich (east England population 413 500) and Lugo (northwest Spain population 204 100). Patients with PSV were identified between 1 January 1988 and 31 December 1998. RESULTS Overall, the incidence of PSV in adults was almost equal in Norwich (18.9/million) and Spain (18.3/million). The incidence of Wegeners granulomatosis in Norwich (10.6/million) was greater than in Spain (4.9/million). There was a marked age-specific increase in incidence in Norwich with a peak age 65–74 years (52.9/million), but a virtually equal age distribution between ages 45 and 74 in Lugo (34.1/million). There was no significant increase with time in either population, or evidence of cyclical changes in incidence. CONCLUSION These data support the suggestion that environmental factors may be important in the pathogenesis of PSV.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2001

Epidemiology of vasculitis in Europe

Richard A. Watts; Se Lane; Dgi Scott; Wenche Koldingsnes; Hans Nossent; Ma Gonzalez-Gay; C Garcia-Porrua; Graham Bentham

We recently compared the annual incidence of primary systemic vasculitis (PSV) in two different regions of Europe (Norwich, UK (latitude 52°N) and Lugo, Spain (latitude 43°N)).1Wegeners granulomatosis (WG) was more common in Norwich (10.6/million) than in Spain (4.9/million), though the overall incidence of PSV was similar. This supports the idea that environmental factors may be important in the aetiopathogenesis of PSV. To extend our observations we have now studied the incidence of PSV in northern Europe (Tromso, Norway (latitude 70°N)). …


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2010

EULAR points to consider in the development of classification and diagnostic criteria in systemic vasculitis

Neil Basu; Richard A. Watts; Ingeborg M. Bajema; Bo Baslund; Thorsten A. Bley; Maarten Boers; Paul A. Brogan; Leonard H. Calabrese; Maria C. Cid; Jw Cohen-Tervaert; Luis Felipe Flores-Suárez; Shouichi Fujimoto; K. de Groot; L. Guillevin; Gulen Hatemi; Thomas Hauser; D Jayne; C Jennette; Cornelis Kallenberg; Shigeto Kobayashi; Mark A. Little; Alfred Mahr; John McLaren; Peter A. Merkel; Seza Ozen; Xavier Puéchal; Niels Rasmussen; Alan D. Salama; Carlo Salvarani; C. O. S. Savage

Objectives The systemic vasculitides are multiorgan diseases where early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve outcomes. Robust nomenclature reduces diagnostic delay. However, key aspects of current nomenclature are widely perceived to be out of date, these include disease definitions, classification and diagnostic criteria. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to identify deficiencies and provide contemporary points to consider for the development of future definitions and criteria in systemic vasculitis. Methods The expert panel identified areas of concern within existing definitions/criteria. Consequently, a systematic literature review was undertaken looking to address these deficiencies and produce ‘points to consider’ in accordance with standardised European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) operating procedures. In the absence of evidence, expert consensus was used. Results There was unanimous consensus for re-evaluating existing definitions and developing new criteria. A total of 17 points to consider were proposed, covering 6 main areas: biopsy, laboratory testing, diagnostic radiology, nosology, definitions and research agenda. Suggestions to improve and expand current definitions were described including the incorporation of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody and aetiological factors, where known. The importance of biopsy in diagnosis and exclusion of mimics was highlighted, while equally emphasising its problems. Thus, the role of alternative diagnostic tools such as MRI, ultrasound and surrogate markers were also discussed. Finally, structures to develop future criteria were considered. Conclusions Limitations in current classification criteria and definitions for vasculitis have been identified and suggestions provided for improvement. Additionally it is proposed that, in combination with the updated evidence, these should form the basis of future attempts to develop and validate revised criteria and definitions of vasculitis.


Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2001

Time to first occurrence of erosions in inflammatory polyarthritis: Results from a prospective community‐based study

M. Bukhari; Beverley Harrison; Mark Lunt; Dgi Scott; D. Symmons; A J Silman

OBJECTIVE To examine the time of occurrence of first radiographic erosions in a cohort of patients with inflammatory polyarthritis. METHODS Patients were recruited through the Norfolk Arthritis Register, which follows up patients annually. Patients with features of rheumatoid arthritis (other than erosions) sufficient, together with erosions, to meet the American College of Rheumatology (formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) 1987 revised criteria were requested to undergo radiographic examinations of the hands and feet at the first and/or second annual followup visits. All patients were requested to undergo radiographic examinations at the fifth annual followup visit. The most recent erosion-free radiograph was identified for 416 eligible patients, and these data were used to derive the duration of disease since the recalled date of onset of first symptoms. The rate of occurrence of first erosions was then determined (as a cumulative prevalence and as an incidence rate using Poisson regression) from analysis of followup films. Patients were assumed to be free of erosions at symptom onset. RESULTS The cumulative prevalence of erosions in patients whose first film was obtained 12-24 months after disease onset was 36%, equivalent to an incidence rate of 24.5/1,000 patient-months. We identified 3 analysis groups of patients who were free of erosions based on films obtained 12-24 months, 24-36 months, and 36-60 months since the recalled date of onset of first symptoms. New erosions were observed in all 3 groups, with cumulative prevalences of 23%, 28%, and 47%, respectively. These were equivalent to first-erosion incidence rates/1,000 patient-months of 5.4 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.8-83), 6.8 (95% CI 4.7-10.0), and 13.0 (95% CI 8.9-19.2), respectively. CONCLUSION Many patients with erosive disease first develop their erosions >2 years from disease onset.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2001

Benchmarking: the five year outcome of rheumatoid arthritis assessed using a pain score, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) in a community and a clinic based sample

N J Wiles; Dgi Scott; E M Barrett; P Merry; E Arie; Karl Gaffney; A J Silman; D. Symmons

BACKGROUND Treatment, and therefore outcome, of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) will improve in the next few years. However, improvement in outcome can only be judged against the probability of certain outcomes with current conventional treatment. AIM To document the five year outcome of RA in the late 1990s. SETTING Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR). DESIGN Longitudinal observational cohort study. METHODS 318 patients with recent onset inflammatory polyarthritis recruited by NOAR in 1990–91 completed five years of follow up. Four groups were assessed: the whole cohort, all those referred to hospital, those who satisfied criteria for RA at baseline, and those referred to hospital who satisfied criteria for RA at baseline. Outcome was assessed with a visual analogue scale for pain, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS Of the RA hospital attenders, 50% had a visual analogue scale pain score of 5 cm or less and an HAQ score of 1.125 or less. SF-36 scores were reduced in all domains. Results are presented as cumulative percentages. CONCLUSIONS These results can be used for comparison and to set targets for improvement.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dgi Scott's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janice Mooney

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Se Lane

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Symmons

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karl Gaffney

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M Somerville

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. N. Jois

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge