Dhiraj Gupta

Efficacy of Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Evidence From Randomized and Nonrandomized Controlled Trials

Background—Catheter ablation (CA) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation, but few high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exist, leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results—We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, OpenGrey, and clinicaltrials.gov for RCTs and non-RCTs reporting clinical outcomes after CA for persistent atrial fibrillation. Forty-six eligible studies were identified containing 3819 patients. After a single procedure, CA significantly reduced the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.53; P<0.001). Outcomes were better if the pulmonary veins were encircled (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; P=0.01), and electrical isolation reduced AF recurrence compared with purely anatomic encirclement (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.86; P=0.02). Linear ablation within the left atrium (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10–0.49; P<0.001), but not complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35–1.18; P=0.15), significantly reduced AF recurrence. Results were not improved by performing more extensive linear lesion sets (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41–1.43; P=0.40) or from biatrial ablation (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31–1.24; P=0.17). Where data were available, the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s). Sensitivity analyses showed that inclusion of non-RCTs increased statistical power without biasing the calculated effect sizes. Conclusions—For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy. The most efficacious strategy is likely to combine isolation of the pulmonary veins with limited linear ablation within the left atrium.Background— Catheter ablation (CA) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation, but few high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exist, leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of RCTs and non-RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results— We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, OpenGrey, and [clinicaltrials.gov][1] for RCTs and non-RCTs reporting clinical outcomes after CA for persistent atrial fibrillation. Forty-six eligible studies were identified containing 3819 patients. After a single procedure, CA significantly reduced the risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.53; P <0.001). Outcomes were better if the pulmonary veins were encircled (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; P =0.01), and electrical isolation reduced AF recurrence compared with purely anatomic encirclement (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.86; P =0.02). Linear ablation within the left atrium (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10–0.49; P <0.001), but not complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35–1.18; P =0.15), significantly reduced AF recurrence. Results were not improved by performing more extensive linear lesion sets (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41–1.43; P =0.40) or from biatrial ablation (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.31–1.24; P =0.17). Where data were available, the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s). Sensitivity analyses showed that inclusion of non-RCTs increased statistical power without biasing the calculated effect sizes. Conclusions— For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy. The most efficacious strategy is likely to combine isolation of the pulmonary veins with limited linear ablation within the left atrium. [1]: http://clinicaltrials.gov

The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Background: A detailed appreciation of left atrial/pulmonary vein (LA/PV) anatomy may be important in improving the safety and success of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

Relationship between contact force sensing technology and medium-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter study of 600 patients.

Contact force sensing (CFS) technology improves acute pulmonary vein isolation durability; however, its impact on the clinical outcome of ablating atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown.

Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values

Aims Force-Time Integral (FTI) is commonly used as a marker of ablation lesion quality during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), but does not incorporate power. Ablation Index (AI) is a novel lesion quality marker that utilizes contact force, time, and power in a weighted formula. Furthermore, only a single FTI target value has been suggested despite regional variation in left atrial wall thickness. We aimed to study AIs and FTIs relationships with PV reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study, and regional threshold values that predicted no reconnection. Methods and results Forty paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients underwent contact force-guided PVI, and the minimum and mean AI and FTI values for each segment were identified according to a 12-segment model. All patients underwent repeat electrophysiology study at 2 months, regardless of symptoms, to identify sites of PV reconnection. Late PV reconnection was seen in 53 (11%) segments in 25 (62%) patients. Reconnected segments had significantly lower minimum AI [308 (252-336) vs. 373 (323-423), P < 0.0001] and FTI [137 (92-182) vs. 228 (157-334), P < 0.0001] compared with non-reconnected segments. Minimum AI and FTI were both independently predictive, but AI had a smaller P value. Higher minimum AI and FTI values were required to avoid reconnection in anterior/roof segments than for posterior/inferior segments (P < 0.0001). No reconnection was seen where the minimum AI value was ≥370 for posterior/inferior segments and ≥480 for anterior/roof segments. Conclusion The minimum AI value in a PVI segment is independently predictive of reconnection of that segment at repeat electrophysiology study. Higher AI and FTI values are required for anterior/roof segments than for posterior/inferior segments to prevent reconnection.

Biatrial linear ablation in sustained nonpermanent AF: Results of the substrate modification with ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (SMAN-PAF) trial

BACKGROUND More advanced atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with lower success rates after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and the optimal ablation strategy is uncertain. OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of additional linear ablation (lines) compared to PVI alone. METHODS In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 122 patients (mean age 61.9 ± 10.5 years; left atrial diameter 43 ± 6 mm) with persistent AF (PeAF) or sustained (>12 hours) paroxysmal AF (SusPAF) with risk factors for atrial substrate were included and followed up for 12 months. Patients were randomized to PVI-only or PVI + lines (left atrial roof line, mitral isthmus line, and tricuspid isthmus line) group. Holter monitoring was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months and according to symptoms. The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting ≥30 seconds. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups; 61% had PeAF and 39% SusPAF. Successful PVI was achieved for 98% of pulmonary veins, and bidirectional block was obtained in 90% of lines. The primary end point occurred in 38% of the PVI + lines group and 32% of the PVI-only group (P = .50), which was consistent in both PeAF (36% vs 28%; P = .45) and SusPAF (42% vs 39%; P = .86). Compared with the PVI-only group, the PVI + lines group had higher procedure duration (209 ± 52 minutes vs 172 ± 44 minutes; P < .001), ablation time (4352 ± 1084 seconds vs 2503 ± 1061 seconds; P < .001), and radiation exposure (Dose-area product 3992 ± 6496 Gy·cm(2) vs 2106 ± 1679 Gy·cm(2); P = .03). Quality of life (disease-specific Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life questionnaire and mental component scale of the Short Form 36 Health Survey) improved significantly during the study but did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION Adding lines to wide antral PVI in substrate-based AF requires significantly more ablation, increases procedure duration and radiation dose, but provides no additional clinical benefit.

Improving Safety in Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Study of the Use of Ultrasound to Guide Vascular Access

The most frequent complications of AF ablation (AFA) are related to vascular access, but there is little evidence as to how these can be minimized.

Recurrence of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia During the Second Month of the Blanking Period Is Associated With More Extensive Pulmonary Vein Reconnection at Repeat Electrophysiology Study

Background—Current guidelines recommend a 3-month blanking period after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) may be due to transient proarrhythmic factors. However, studies have suggested that these factors resolve by 1 month. PV reconnection (PVrc) is strongly associated with postblanking AT recurrence in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. We hypothesized that ERAT occurring beyond 4 weeks after PVI is associated with PVrc at repeat electrophysiology study. Methods and Results—Forty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent mandatory repeat electrophysiology study 2 months after PVI, regardless of symptoms, to document the number of reconnected PVs. Antiarrhythmic drugs, including &bgr;-blockers, were discontinued 4 weeks after PVI. Patients were instructed to record a 30-second ECG everyday between the 2 procedures using a portable monitor, with additional recordings for symptoms. ERAT was defined as ≥30 seconds of AT. Patients recorded a total of 3293 ECGs. Four (10%) patients had ERAT in the first 4 weeks (M1) only, 2 (5%) in month 2 (M2) only, and 11 (28%) in both. PVrc of 1 PV was identified in 12 (30%) patients and of >1 PV in 13 (32%) patients. ERAT in M2 was associated with PVrc, whereas M1 was not (11/13 [85%] versus 0/4 [0%]; P=0.006). M2 ERAT was strongly associated with PVrc of >1 PV (10/13 [77%] versus 3/27 [11%] without M2 ERAT; P<0.0001). Conclusions—ERAT occurring beyond 4 weeks after PVI is associated with PVrc and particularly of PVrc of >1 PV. ERAT confined to M1 is unrelated to underlying PVrc. The relationship between ERAT beyond 4 weeks after PVI and postblanking AT recurrence merits further investigation.

Prospective use of Ablation Index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation

Late recovery of ablated tissue leading to reconnection of pulmonary veins remains common following radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF. Ablation Index (AI), a novel ablation quality marker, incorporates contact force (CF), time, and power in a weighted formula. We hypothesized that prospective use of our previously published derived AI targets would result in better outcomes when compared to CF‐guided ablation.

A randomized-controlled trial comparing conventional with minimal catheter approaches for the mapping and ablation of regular supraventricular tachycardias.

AIMS To compare the use of a minimal (MIN) with a conventional (CON) catheter approach for the mapping and ablation of regular supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) and typical atrial flutter (AFL) in the setting of a randomized-controlled trial. METHODS AND RESULTS Two hundred patients (age 51.2 +/- 15.9 years, 99 male) were randomized to a MIN or CON group. The MIN approach involved using two catheters for AFL, one to three for other SVT (ablation catheter included), whereas the CON approach involved three and five catheters, respectively. Acute procedural success was similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in overall procedure times, fluoroscopy times, or radiation doses. Procedure times were shorter for AFL ablation in MIN compared with CON [60 (30-150) vs. 85 (40-200) min, median (range), P = 0.03] from subgroup analysis. A median of three (one to six) catheters was used in MIN and five (three to seven) in CON (P < 0.0001). Catheter costs were significantly lower in MIN compared with CON [6.1 (2-61) vs. 8.5 (4.4-21.3) units, P < 0.0001, where one unit is equivalent to the cost of a diagnostic quadripolar catheter]. At 6-week follow-up, two patients in MIN (2.1%) and three patients in CON (3.2%) had documented recurrence of the index arrhythmia. CONCLUSION The use of a MIN approach in the treatment of SVT and AFL is as effective, quick, and safe as using a CON approach and is therefore more cost-effective.

Reablated Sites of Acute Reconnection After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Do Not Predict Sites of Late Reconnection at Repeat Electrophysiology Study

Acute reconnection of pulmonary veins (PVs) is frequently seen in the waiting period following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). There are concerns that reablation at these sites may not be durably effective due to tissue edema caused by the initial ablation. We aimed to prospectively study the relationship between acute and late reconnection.