Diana J. Slater

Reciprocal DNA topoisomerase II cleavage events at 5'-TATTA-3' sequences in MLL and AF-9 create homologous single-stranded overhangs that anneal to form der(11) and der(9) genomic breakpoint junctions in treatment-related AML without further processing

Few t(9;11) translocations in DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor-related leukemias have been studied in detail and the DNA damage mechanism remains controversial. We characterized the der(11) and der(9) genomic breakpoint junctions in a case of AML following etoposide and doxorubicin. Etoposide-, etoposide metabolite- and doxorubicin-induced DNA topoisomerase II cleavage was examined in normal homologues of the MLL and AF-9 breakpoint sequences using an in vitro assay. Induction of DNA topoisomerase II cleavage complexes in CEM and K562 cell lines was investigated using an in vivo complex of enzyme assay. The translocation occurred between identical 5′-TATTA-3′ sequences in MLL intron 8 and AF-9 intron 5 without the gain or loss of bases. The 5′-TATTA-3′ sequences were reciprocally cleaved by DNA topoisomerase II in the presence of etoposide, etoposide catechol or etoposide quinone, creating homologous 4-base 5′ overhangs that would anneal to form both breakpoint junctions without any processing. der(11) and der(4) translocation breakpoints in a treatment-related ALL at the same site in MLL are consistent with a damage hotspot. Etoposide and both etoposide metabolites induced DNA topoisomerase II cleavage complexes in the hematopoietic cell lines. These results favor the model in which the chromosomal breakage leading to MLL translocations in DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor-related leukemias is a consequence of DNA topoisomerase II cleavage.

MLL-SEPTIN6 fusion recurs in novel translocation of chromosomes 3, X, and 11 in infant acute myelomonocytic leukaemia and in t(X;11) in infant acute myeloid leukaemia, and MLL genomic breakpoint in complex MLL-SEPTIN6 rearrangement is a DNA topoisomerase II cleavage site

We examined the MLL translocation in two cases of infant AML with X chromosome disruption. The G-banded karyotype in the first case suggested t(X;3)(q22;p21)ins(X;11)(q22;q13q25). Southern blot analysis showed one MLL rearrangement. Panhandle PCR approaches were used to identify the MLL fusion transcript and MLL genomic breakpoint junction. SEPTIN6 from chromosome band Xq24 was the partner gene of MLL. MLL exon 7 was joined in-frame to SEPTIN6 exon 2 in the fusion transcript. The MLL genomic breakpoint was in intron 7; the SEPTIN6 genomic breakpoint was in intron 1. Spectral karyotyping revealed a complex rearrangement disrupting band 11q23. FISH with a probe for MLL confirmed MLL involvement and showed that the MLL-SEPTIN6 junction was on the der(X). The MLL genomic breakpoint was a functional DNA topoisomerase II cleavage site in an in vitro assay. In the second case, the karyotype revealed t(X;11)(q22;q23). Southern blot analysis showed two MLL rearrangements. cDNA panhandle PCR detected a transcript fusing MLL exon 8 in-frame to SEPTIN6 exon 2. MLL and SEPTIN6 are vulnerable to damage to form recurrent translocations in infant AML. Identification of SEPTIN6 and the SEPTIN family members hCDCrel and MSF as partner genes of MLL suggests a common pathway to leukaemogenesis.

Panhandle and reverse-panhandle PCR enable cloning of der(11) and der(other) genomic breakpoint junctions of MLL translocations and identify complex translocation of MLL, AF-4, and CDK6

We used panhandle PCR to clone the der(11) genomic breakpoint junction in three leukemias with t(4;11) and devised reverse-panhandle PCR to clone the breakpoint junction of the other derivative chromosome. This work contributes two elements to knowledge on MLL translocations. First is reverse-panhandle PCR for cloning breakpoint junctions of the other derivative chromosomes, sequences of which are germane to understanding the MLL translocation process. The technique revealed duplicated sequences in one case of infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and small deletions in a case of treatment-related ALL. The second element is discovery of a three-way rearrangement of MLL, AF-4, and CDK6 in another case of infant ALL. Cytogenetic analysis was unsuccessful at diagnosis, but suggested t(4;11) and del(7)(q21q31) at relapse. Panhandle PCR analysis of the diagnostic marrow identified a breakpoint junction of MLL intron 8 and AF-4 intron 3. Reverse-panhandle PCR identified a breakpoint junction of CDK6 from band 7q21-q22 and MLL intron 9. CDK6 encodes a critical cell cycle regulator and is the first gene of this type disrupted by MLL translocation. Cdk6 is overexpressed or disrupted by translocation in many cancers. The in-frame CDK6-MLL transcript is provocative with respect to a potential contribution of the predicted Cdk6-MLL fusion protein in the genesis of the ALL, which also contains an in-frame MLL-AF4 transcript. The sequences in these three cases show additional MLL genomic breakpoint heterogeneity. Each breakpoint junction suggests nonhomologous end joining and is consistent with DNA damage and repair. CDK6-MLL is a new fusion of both genes.

MLL Genomic Breakpoint Distribution Within the Breakpoint Cluster Region in De Novo Leukemia in Children

Purpose: To assess translocation breakpoint distribution within the MLL genomic breakpoint cluster region (bcr), 40 cases of de novo leukemia in children were examined by karyotype and Southern blot analysis. Patients and Methods: Criteria for inclusion were karyotypic or molecular rearrangement of chromosome band 11q23. Of the 40 cases, 31 occurred in infants. Twenty cases were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 17 were acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 3 were biphenotypic. Results: Karyotype identified 27 cases with translocation of chromosome band 11q23 and 2 with abnormalities of band 11q13 but not 11q23. Southern blot analysis showed rearrangement within the MLL genomic bcr in 38 of the 40 cases. In these 38, additional probe-restriction digest combinations localized MLL genomic breakpoints to the 5‘ portion of the bcr in 14 cases and to the 3’ portion in 18; material was insufficient for further localization to 5‘ or 3’ within the bcr in 6 cases. In the two remaining cases, both with t(4;11)(q21;q23), one breakpoint mapped 5‘ of the bcr between intron 3 and exon 5, whereas the other breakpoint was neither within nor 5’ of the MLL genomic bcr. Conclusions: Suggested trends warranting investigation in more patients were breakpoint sites in the 3‘ bcr in AML and in patients older than 12 months. The distribution of MLL genomic breakpoints within the bcr in de novo leukemia in children is distinct from that in adults, where the breakpoints cluster in the 5’ portion of the bcr.

Duplicated regions of AF-4 intron 4 at t(4;11) translocation breakpoints*

BACKGROUND AF-4 is a common partner gene of MLL. AF-4 breakpoints occur in introns, but most AF-4 introns are uncharacterized. METHODS AND RESULTS We cloned AF-4 intron 4 and examined the frequency of breakpoints in this intron. The 5.8-kb intron is rich in repeat sequences and was the site of translocation in 3 of 17 leukemias with t(4;11). We cloned the der (11) and der (4) breakpoints and isolated the fusion transcripts in the cell line MV4-11 and in a de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Both translocations joined MLL intron 6 and AF-4 intron 4. In MV4-11, 249 bases from AF-4 were present in both derivative chromosomes, indicating duplication. In the de novo ALL, duplication of 446 bases from MLL and AF-4 occurred. Reciprocal fusion transcripts were expressed. CONCLUSIONS Intronic sequence of AF-4 is useful for molecular diagnosis of t(4;11). Duplicated intronic regions suggest staggered chromosomal breakage.