Diana L. Blithe

Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Emergency contraception can prevent unintended pregnancies, but current methods are only effective if used as soon as possible after sexual intercourse and before ovulation. We compared the efficacy and safety of ulipristal acetate with levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. METHODS Women with regular menstrual cycles who presented to a participating family planning clinic requesting emergency contraception within 5 days of unprotected sexual intercourse were eligible for enrolment in this randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. 2221 women were randomly assigned to receive a single, supervised dose of 30 mg ulipristal acetate (n=1104) or 1.5 mg levonorgestrel (n=1117) orally. Allocation was by block randomisation stratified by centre and time from unprotected sexual intercourse to treatment, with allocation concealment by identical opaque boxes labelled with a unique treatment number. Participants were masked to treatment assignment whereas investigators were not. Follow-up was done 5-7 days after expected onset of next menses. The primary endpoint was pregnancy rate in women who received emergency contraception within 72 h of unprotected sexual intercourse, with a non-inferiority margin of 1% point difference between groups (limit of 1.6 for odds ratio). Analysis was done on the efficacy-evaluable population, which excluded women lost to follow-up, those aged over 35 years, women with unknown follow-up pregnancy status, and those who had re-enrolled in the study. Additionally, we undertook a meta-analysis of our trial and an earlier study to assess the efficacy of ulipristal acetate compared with levonorgestrel. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00551616. FINDINGS In the efficacy-evaluable population, 1696 women received emergency contraception within 72 h of sexual intercourse (ulipristal acetate, n=844; levonorgestrel, n=852). There were 15 pregnancies in the ulipristal acetate group (1.8%, 95% CI 1.0-3.0) and 22 in the levonorgestrel group (2.6%, 1.7-3.9; odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.35-1.31). In 203 women who received emergency contraception between 72 h and 120 h after sexual intercourse, there were three pregnancies, all of which were in the levonorgestrel group. The most frequent adverse event was headache (ulipristal acetate, 213 events [19.3%] in 1104 women; levonorgestrel, 211 events [18.9%] in 1117 women). Two serious adverse events were judged possibly related to use of emergency contraception; a case of dizziness in the ulipristal acetate group and a molar pregnancy in the levonorgestrel group. In the meta-analysis (0-72 h), there were 22 (1.4%) pregnancies in 1617 women in the ulipristal acetate group and 35 (2.2%) in 1625 women in the levonorgestrel group (OR 0.58, 0.33-0.99; p=0.046). INTERPRETATION Ulipristal acetate provides women and health-care providers with an effective alternative for emergency contraception that can be used up to 5 days after unprotected sexual intercourse. FUNDING HRA Pharma.

Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel.

BACKGROUND Emergency contraception (EC) does not always work. Clinicians should be aware of potential risk factors for EC failure. STUDY DESIGN Data from a meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of ulipristal acetate (UPA) with levonorgestrel were analyzed to identify factors associated with EC failure. RESULTS The risk of pregnancy was more than threefold greater for obese women compared with women with normal body mass index (odds ratio (OR), 3.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-6.53; p<.0001), whichever EC was taken. However, for obese women, the risk was greater for those taking levonorgestrel (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.05-9.44, p=.0002) than for UPA users (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 0.89-7.00; ns). For both ECs, pregnancy risk was related to the cycle day of intercourse. Women who had intercourse the day before estimated day of ovulation had a fourfold increased risk of pregnancy (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 2.33-8.20; p<.0001) compared with women having sex outside the fertile window. For both methods, women who had unprotected intercourse after using EC were more likely to get pregnant than those who did not (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 2.22-8.96; p=.0002). CONCLUSIONS Women who have intercourse around ovulation should ideally be offered a copper intrauterine device. Women with body mass index >25 kg/m(2) should be offered an intrauterine device or UPA. All women should be advised to start effective contraception immediately after EC.

The spectrum of endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptor modulators

Progesterone receptor modulators (PRM) are hormonally active drugs effective in the management of endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata. The endometrial effects of progestin blockade by PRMs in premenopausal women are currently being evaluated in several clinical trials, but few pathologists have had access to these materials and published information of the histological changes is scanty. Eighty-four endometrial specimens from women receiving one of four different PRMs were reviewed by a panel of seven experienced gynecologic pathologists to develop consensus observations and interpretive recommendations as part of an NIH-sponsored workshop. Although the pathologists were blinded to agent, dose, and exposure interval, the review was intended to provide an overview of the breadth of possible findings, and a venue to describe unique features. Endometrial histology included inactive and normal-appearing cycling endometrium. Overtly premalignant lesions (atypical hyperplasia or EIN) were not seen. In a subset of cases, asymmetry of stromal and epithelial growth resulted in prominent cystically dilated glands with admixed estrogen (mitotic) and progestin (secretory) epithelial effects of a type not encountered in contemporary clinical practice. The variety of endometrial appearances suggested that findings might differ by agent and dose over time according to relationships that must be specified for each agent. The constellation of changes seen in those endometria with cystically dilated glands is so novel that new terminology and diagnostic criteria are required for pathologists to recognize them. The panel has designated these changes as PRM-associated endometrial changes (PAEC). Additional follow-up studies will be needed to fully define their natural history and relationship to specific agents and administration regimens.

CDB-2914 for Uterine Leiomyomata Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether 3-month administration of CDB-2914, a selective progesterone receptor modulator, reduces leiomyoma size and symptoms. METHODS: Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata were randomly assigned to CDB-2914 at 10 mg (T1) or 20 mg (T2) daily or to placebo (PLC) for 3 cycles or 90–102 days if no menses occurred. The primary outcome was leiomyoma volume change determined by magnetic resonance imaging at study entry and within 2 weeks of hysterectomy. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of amenorrhea, change in hemoglobin and hematocrit, ovulation inhibition, and quality-of-life assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were allocated, and 18 completed the trial. Age and body mass index were similar among groups. Leiomyoma volume was significantly reduced with CDB-2914 administration (PLC 6%; CDB-2914 –29%; P=.01), decreasing 36% and 21% in the T1 and T2 groups, respectively. During treatment, hemoglobin was unchanged, and the median estradiol was greater than 50 pg/mL in all groups. CDB-2914 eliminated menstrual bleeding and inhibited ovulation (% ovulatory cycles: CDB-2914, 20%; PLC, 83%; P=.001). CDB-2914 improved the concern scores of the uterine leiomyoma symptom quality-of-life subscale (P=.04). One CDB-2914 woman developed endometrial cystic hyperplasia without evidence of atypia. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Compared with PLC, CDB-2914 significantly reduced leiomyoma volume after three cycles, or 90–102 days. CDB-2914 treatment resulted in improvements in the concern subscale of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Quality of Life assessment. In this small study, CDB-2914 was well-tolerated without serious adverse events. Thus, there may be a role for CDB-2914 in the treatment of leiomyomata. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov,www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00290251 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

Efficacy and tolerability of CDB-2914 treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb study

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the P receptor modulator CDB-2914 (Ulipristal, CDB). DESIGN Randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. SETTING Clinical research center. PATIENT(S) Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. INTERVENTION(S) Once-daily oral CDB (10 or 20 mg) or placebo (PLC) for 12 weeks (treatment 1). A second 3-month treatment with CDB (treatment 2) was offered. A computer-generated blocked randomization was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined total fibroid volume (TFV) change was the primary outcome; amenorrhea and quality of life (QOL) were secondary end points. RESULT(S) Treatment 1 TFV increased 7% in the PLC group, but decreased 17% and 24% in the CDB10 and CDB20 groups. The TFV decreased further in treatment 2 (-11%). Amenorrhea occurred in 20/26 women taking CDB and none on PLC. Ovulation resumed after CDB. Hemoglobin improved only with CDB (11.9 ± 1.5 to 12.9 ± 1.0 g/dL) as did the Fibroid QOL Questionnaire symptom severity, energy/mood, and concern subscores, and overall QOL scores. The CDB was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. Adverse events were unchanged during treatments. CONCLUSION(S) Administration of CDB-2914 for 3-6 months controls bleeding, reduces fibroid size, and improves QOL.

Development of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 for clinical indications

CDB-2914 (17 alpha-acetoxy-11 beta-[4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione) is a 19-norprogesterone derivative that acts as an antagonist in progesterone-responsive tissues. It binds to progesterone receptors A and B with high affinity. After oral dosing in humans, CDB-2914 serum levels peak at 60-90 min. CDB-2914 binds to serum proteins and is cleared slowly. Doses of 1, 10 and 50 mg exhibit proportional increases in peak serum levels, but serum levels from higher doses, 100 and 200 mg, are not dose-dependent, suggesting saturation of carrier sites. The biological effects of CDB-2914 vary according to time of the menstrual cycle that the drug is given. In the mid-follicular phase, CDB-2914 (50 mg) inhibits follicular development and delays ovulation and menses. At 100 mg, in some cases the original follicle ceases development and a new follicle is recruited. Endometrial maturation is delayed at all doses tested (10, 50, 100 mg). Given at mid-luteal phase, there was a dose-dependent effect on menses, with higher doses (100-200 mg) resulting in earlier menses. On average, CDB-2914 tends to lengthen the menstrual cycle by approximately 1-2 days although the amount of delay varies with timing in the menstrual cycle and dose.

Metabolic fate of human choriogonadotropin.

Review of the literature reveals a number of recent insights concerning the metabolic fate of human choriogonadotropin (hCG). In man, only a fraction (21.7%) of the circulating hCG molecules is excreted in urine. Results from animal studies indicate that the retained hCG is taken up by various tissues, principally kidney, liver, and ovary, where degradation occurs. Ovarian uptake is receptor mediated and saturable. Hepatic uptake of hCG is not preceded by desialylation, and blockade of hepatic receptors for galactose-terminated glycoproteins does not impair hepatic accumulation of hCG. Kidney uptake is quantitatively the most important; parenchymal metabolism, as well as excretion in urine constitute major renal components of hCG disposal. The intracellular products of hCG catabolism in kidney include certain fragments of the hCG molecule that exhibit relative resistance to processing by degradative enzymes. These products are fragments of the hCG beta subunit that lack the hCG beta carboxyterminal antigenic determinant, but retain an hCG beta core antigenic determinant, and, thus, they are designated beta-core molecules. Both kidney from hCG-infused rat and urine from pregnant women contain beta-core molecules in great abundance, in fact, in greater abundance than hCG, itself. Structural characterizations of the beta-core purified from pregnancy urine indicate a mol. wt of about 10,000 and an absence of sialic acid, galactose, and carboxyterminal peptide region, including O-linked oligosaccharides. Human volunteers given purified hCG or hCG beta by infusion excrete beta-core in their urines, which establishes the existence of catabolic pathways in humans for the production of beta-core. Thus, urinary excretion of beta-core may reflect an important fate for the metabolic products of hCG degradation.

Contraceptive Efficacy of a Novel Spermicidal Microbicide Used With a Diaphragm : A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: Women need products that protect against both pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The acid buffering gel is a nondetergent spermicide that may provide this dual protection by reinforcing normal vaginal acidity to inactivate both sperm and acid-sensitive sexually transmitted pathogens. The objective of this study was to assess the gel’s contraceptive effects, safety, and acceptability. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, noninferiority study at 11 centers, comparing 621women who used an acid buffering gel plus diaphragm with 300 women who used a nonoxynol-9 spermicide plus diaphragm for 6 months. A double-masked study extension followed 234 women for an additional 6 months of use. RESULTS: The 6-month pregnancy rate per hundred women was 10.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.1–13.1%) for acid buffering gel and 12.3 (95% CI 7.7–16.9) for nonoxynol-9 spermicide users. The difference in rates was –2.2% with a 95% CI –7.7 to 3.3%. Consistent and correct use 6-month pregnancy rates were 4.7% for acid buffering gel and 6.1% for nonoxynol-9 spermicide users, calculated from those cycles where diary entries indicated such use. Adverse events and acceptability were similar between the two groups. Pregnancy probabilities were similar between groups participating in the 12-month study extension. CONCLUSION: An acid buffering gel used with a diaphragm is a safe, acceptable contraceptive with efficacy comparable to that of a common commercial spermicide with diaphragm. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00065858 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

Combined Transdermal Testosterone Gel and the Progestin Nestorone Suppresses Serum Gonadotropins in Men

CONTEXT Testosterone (T) plus progestin combinations are the most promising hormonal male contraceptives. Nestorone (NES), a progestin without estrogenic or androgenic activity, when combined with T may be an excellent candidate for male contraception. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to determine the effect of transdermal NES gel alone or with T gel on gonadotropin suppression. DESIGN AND SETTING The randomized, unblinded clinical trial was conducted at two academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS A total of 140 healthy male volunteers participated. INTERVENTIONS One hundred subjects were randomized initially (20 per group) to apply NES gel 2 or 4 mg, T gel 10 g, or T gel 10 g plus NES gel 2 or 4 mg daily for 20 d. Because only about half of the subjects in T plus NES 4 mg group suppressed serum gonadotropins to 0.5 IU/liter or less (suboptimal suppression), two additional groups of 20 men were randomized to apply daily T gel 10 g plus NES gel 6 or 8 mg. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE Suppression of serum LH and FSH concentrations to 0.5 IU/liter or less after treatment was the main outcome variable. RESULTS A total of 119 subjects were compliant with gel applications with few study-related adverse events. NES alone reduced gonadotropins significantly but less than T gel alone. Combined T gel 10g plus NES gel 6 or 8 mg suppressed both serum gonadotropins to 0.5 IU/liter or less in significantly more men than either gel alone. CONCLUSION Transdermal NES gel alone had gonadotropin suppression activity. Combined transdermal NES (6 or 8 mg) plus T gel demonstrated safe and effective suppression of gonadotropins, justifying a longer-term study of this combination for suppression of spermatogenesis.

A New Combination of Testosterone and Nestorone Transdermal Gels for Male Hormonal Contraception

CONTEXT Combinations of testosterone (T) and nestorone (NES; a nonandrogenic progestin) transdermal gels may suppress spermatogenesis and prove appealing to men for contraception. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of T gel alone or combined with NES gel in suppressing spermatogenesis. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a randomized, double-blind, comparator clinical trial conducted at two academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-nine healthy male volunteers participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS Volunteers were randomized to one of three treatment groups applying daily transdermal gels (group 1: T gel 10 g+NES 0 mg/placebo gel; group 2: T gel 10 g+NES gel 8 mg; group 3: T gel 10 g+NES gel 12 mg). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE The main outcome variable of the study was the percentage of men whose sperm concentration was suppressed to 1 million/ml or less by 20-24 wk of treatment. RESULTS Efficacy data analyses were performed on 56 subjects who adhered to the protocol and completed at least 20 wk of treatment. The percentage of men whose sperm concentration was 1 million/ml or less was significantly higher for T+NES 8 mg (89%, P<0.0001) and T+NES 12 mg (88%, P=0.0002) compared with T+NES 0 mg group (23%). The median serum total and free T concentrations in all groups were maintained within the adult male range throughout the treatment period. Adverse effects were minimal in all groups. CONCLUSION A combination of daily NES+T gels suppressed sperm concentration to 1 million/ml or less in 88.5% of men, with minimal adverse effects, and may be further studied as a male transdermal hormonal contraceptive.