Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Diana Verseghy is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Diana Verseghy.


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2006

GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview

Randal D. Koster; Y. C. Sud; Zhichang Guo; Paul A. Dirmeyer; Gordon B. Bonan; Keith W. Oleson; Edmond Chan; Diana Verseghy; Peter M. Cox; Harvey Davies; Eva Kowalczyk; C. T. Gordon; Shinjiro Kanae; David M. Lawrence; Ping Liu; David Mocko; Cheng-Hsuan Lu; K. L. Mitchell; Sergey Malyshev; B. J. McAvaney; Taikan Oki; Tomohito J. Yamada; A. J. Pitman; Christopher M. Taylor; Ratko Vasic; Yongkang Xue

Abstract The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) is a model intercomparison study focusing on a typically neglected yet critical element of numerical weather and climate modeling: land–atmosphere coupling strength, or the degree to which anomalies in land surface state (e.g., soil moisture) can affect rainfall generation and other atmospheric processes. The 12 AGCM groups participating in GLACE performed a series of simple numerical experiments that allow the objective quantification of this element for boreal summer. The derived coupling strengths vary widely. Some similarity, however, is found in the spatial patterns generated by the models, with enough similarity to pinpoint multimodel “hot spots” of land–atmosphere coupling. For boreal summer, such hot spots for precipitation and temperature are found over large regions of Africa, central North America, and India; a hot spot for temperature is also found over eastern China. The design of the GLACE simulations are described in full detai...


Journal of Climate | 1997

Cabauw Experimental Results from the Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes

T. H. C Hen; A. Henderson-Sellers; P. C. D. Milly; A. J. Pitman; A. C. M. Beljaars; Jan Polcher; Aaron Boone; Sam Chang; F. C Hen; C. E. Desborough; Robert E. Dickinson; Michael B. Ek; J. R. Garratt; N. Gedney; Jinwon Kim; Randal D. Koster; Eva Kowalczyk; K. Laval; J. Lean; Dennis P. Lettenmaier; Xu Liang; Kenneth E. Mitchell; Olga N. Nasonova; J. Noilhan; Alan Robock; Cynthia Rosenzweig; John C. Schaake; C. A. Schlosser; Y. S Hao; Andrey B. Shmakin

In the Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes phase 2a experiment, meteorological data for the year 1987 from Cabauw, the Netherlands, were used as inputs to 23 land-surface flux schemes designed for use in climate and weather models. Schemes were evaluated by comparing their outputs with long-term measurements of surface sensible heat fluxes into the atmosphere and the ground, and of upward longwave radiation and total net radiative fluxes, and also comparing them with latent heat fluxes derived from a surface energy balance. Tuning of schemes by use of the observed flux data was not permitted. On an annual basis, the predicted surface radiative temperature exhibits a range of 2 K across schemes, consistent with the range of about 10 W m22 in predicted surface net radiation. Most modeled values of monthly net radiation differ from the observations by less than the estimated maximum monthly observational error (6 10 Wm 2 2). However, modeled radiative surface temperature appears to have a systematic positive bias in most schemes; this might be explained by an error in assumed emissivity and by models’ neglect of canopy thermal heterogeneity. Annual means of sensible and latent heat fluxes, into which net radiation is partitioned, have ranges across schemes of


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2001

The Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d)

A. G. Slater; C. A. Schlosser; C. E. Desborough; A. J. Pitman; A. Henderson-Sellers; Alan Robock; K. Ya; Kenneth E. Mitchell; Aaron Boone; Harald Braden; F. C Hen; P. M. C Ox; P. de Rosnay; Robert E. Dickinson; Qingyun Duan; Jared K. Entin; N. Gedney; Jinwon Kim; V. K Oren; Eva Kowalczyk; Olga N. Nasonova; J. Noilhan; S. Schaake; Andrey B. Shmakin; Diana Verseghy; P. W Etzel; Y. X Ue; Qingcun Zeng

Twenty-one land surface schemes (LSSs) performed simulations forced by 18 yr of observed meteorological data from a grassland catchment at Valdai, Russia, as part of the Project for the Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(d). In this paper the authors examine the simulation of snow. In comparison with observations, the models are able to capture the broad features of the snow regime on both an intra- and interannual basis. However, weaknesses in the simulations exist, and early season ablation events are a significant source of model scatter. Over the 18-yr simulation, systematic differences between the models’ snow simulations are evident and reveal specific aspects of snow model parameterization and design as being responsible. Vapor exchange at the snow surface varies widely among the models, ranging from a large net loss to a small net source for the snow season. Snow albedo, fractional snow cover, and their interplay have a large effect on energy available for ablation, with differences among models most evident at low snow depths. The incorporation of the snowpack within an LSS structure affects the method by which snow accesses, as well as utilizes, available energy for ablation. The sensitivity of some models to longwave radiation, the dominant winter radiative flux, is partly due to a stability-induced feedback and the differing abilities of models to exchange turbulent energy with the atmosphere. Results presented in this paper suggest where weaknesses in macroscale snow modeling lie and where both theoretical and observational work should be focused to address these weaknesses.


Global and Planetary Change | 1998

The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization / / Schemes PILPS Phase 2 c Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons

Eric F. Wood; Dennis P. Lettenmaier; Xu Liang; Dag Lohmann; Aaron Boone; Sam Chang; Fei Chen; Yongjiu Dai; Robert E. Dickinson; Qingyun Duan; Michael B. Ek; Yeugeniy M. Gusev; Florence Habets; Parviz Irannejad; Randy Koster; Kenneth E. Mitchel; Olga N. Nasonova; J. Noilhan; John C. Schaake; Adam Schlosser; Yaping Shao; Andrey B. Shmakin; Diana Verseghy; Kirsten Warrach; Peter J. Wetzel; Yongkang Xue; Zong-Liang Yang; Qingcun Zeng

Abstract Sixteen land-surface schemes participating in the Project for the Intercomparison of Land-surface Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(c) were run using 10 years (1979–1988) of forcing data for the Red–Arkansas River basins in the Southern Great Plains region of the United States. Forcing data (precipitation, incoming radiation and surface meteorology) and land-surface characteristics (soil and vegetation parameters) were provided to each of the participating schemes. Two groups of runs are presented. (1) Calibration–validation runs, using data from six small catchments distributed across the modeling domain. These runs were designed to test the ability of the schemes to transfer information about model parameters to other catchments and to the computational grid boxes. (2) Base-runs, using data for 1979–1988, designed to evaluate the ability of the schemes to reproduce measured energy and water fluxes over multiple seasonal cycles across a climatically diverse, continental-scale basin. All schemes completed the base-runs but five schemes chose not to calibrate. Observational data (from 1980–1986) including daily river flows and monthly basin total evaporation estimated through an atmospheric budget analysis, were used to evaluate model performance. In general, the results are consistent with earlier PILPS experiments in terms of differences among models in predicted water and energy fluxes. The mean annual net radiation varied between 80 and 105 W m −2 (excluding one model). The mean annual Bowen ratio varied from 0.52 to 1.73 (also excluding one model) as compared to the data-estimated value of 0.92. The run-off ratios varied from a low of 0.02 to a high of 0.41, as compared to an observed value of 0.15. In general, those schemes that did not calibrate performed worse, not only on the validation catchments, but also at the scale of the entire modeling domain. This suggests that further PILPS experiments on the value of calibration need to be carried out.


Atmosphere-ocean | 2000

Parametrization of Peatland Hydraulic Properties for the Canadian Land Surface Scheme

Matthew G. Letts; Nigel T. Roulet; Neil T. Comer; Michael R. Skarupa; Diana Verseghy

Abstract A hydraulic parametrization is developed for peatland environments in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS). Three ‐wetland soil classes account for the typical variation in the hydraulic characteristics of the uppermost 0.5 m of organic soils. Review of the literature reveals that saturated hydraulic conductivity varies from a median of 1.0 × 10−7m/s in deeply humified sapric peat to 2.8 × 10−4 m/s in relatively undecomposed fibric peat. Average pore volume fraction ranges from 0.83 to 0.93. Parameters have been designed for the soil moisture characteristic curves for fibric, hemic and sapric peat using the Campbell (1974) equation employed in CLASS, and the van Genuchten (1980) formulation. There is little difference in modelled soil moisture between the two formulations within the range of conditions normally found in peatlands. Validation of modelled water table depth and peat temperature is performed for a fen in northern Québec and a bog in north‐central Minnesota. The new parametrization results in a more realistic simulation of these variables in peatlands than the previous version of CLASS, in which unrealistic mineral soil “equivalents “ were used for wetland soil climate modelling.


Global and Planetary Change | 1998

The project for intercomparison of land-surface parameterization schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 3. Spatial and temporal analysis of water fluxes

Dag Lohmann; Dennis P. Lettenmaier; Xu Liang; Eric F. Wood; Aaron Boone; Sam Chang; Fei Chen; Yongjiu Dai; C. E. Desborough; Robert E. Dickinson; Qingyun Duan; Michael B. Ek; Yeugeniy M. Gusev; Florence Habets; Parviz Irannejad; Randy Koster; Kenneth E. Mitchell; Olga N. Nasonova; J. Noilhan; John C. Schaake; Adam Schlosser; Yaping Shao; Andrey B. Shmakin; Diana Verseghy; Kirsten Warrach; Peter J. Wetzel; Yongkang Xue; Zong-Liang Yang; Qing Cun Zeng

The energy components of sixteen Soil-Vegetation Atmospheric Transfer (SVAT) schemes were analyzed and intercompared using 10 years of surface meteorological and radiative forcing data from the Red-Arkansas River basin in the Southern Great Plains of the United States. Comparisons of simulated surface energy fluxes among models showed that the net radiation and surface temperature generally had the best agreement among the schemes. On an average (annual and monthly) basis, the estimated latent heat fluxes agreed (to within approximate estimation errors) with the latent heat fluxes derived from a radiosonde-based atmospheric budget method for slightly more than half of the schemes. The sensible heat fluxes had larger differences among the schemes than did the latent heat fluxes, and the model-simulated ground heat fluxes had large variations among the schemes. The spatial patterns of the model-computed net radiation and surface temperature were generally similar among the schemes, and appear reasonable and consistent with observations of related variables, such as surface air temperature. The spatial mean patterns of latent and sensible heat fluxes were less similar than for net radiation, and the spatial patterns of the ground heat flux vary greatly among the 16 schemes. Generally, there is less similarity among the models in the temporal (interannual) variability of surface fluxes and temperature than there is in the mean fields, even for schemes with similar mean fields.


Journal of Climate | 2004

The Rhône-Aggregation Land Surface Scheme Intercomparison Project: An Overview

Aaron Boone; Florence Habets; J. Noilhan; Douglas B. Clark; Paul A. Dirmeyer; S. Fox; Yeugeniy M. Gusev; Ingjerd Haddeland; Randal D. Koster; Dag Lohmann; Sarith P. P. Mahanama; Kenneth E. Mitchell; Olga N. Nasonova; Guo Yue Niu; A. J. Pitman; Jan Polcher; Andrey B. Shmakin; Kenji Tanaka; B. J. J. M. van den Hurk; S. Vérant; Diana Verseghy; Pedro Viterbo; Zong-Liang Yang

The Rhone-Aggregation (Rhone-AGG) Land Surface Scheme (LSS) intercomparison project is an initiative within the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX)/Global Land-Atmosphere System Study (GLASS) panel of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). It is a intermediate step leading up to the next phase of the Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP) (Phase 2), for which there will be a broader investigation of the aggregation between global scales (GSWP-1) and the river scale. This project makes use of the Rhone modeling system, which was developed in recent years by the French research community in order to study the continental water cycle on a regional scale. The main goals of this study are to investigate how 15 LSSs simulate the water balance for several annual cycles compared to data from a dense observation network consisting of daily discharge from over 145 gauges and daily snow depth from 24 sites, and to examine the impact of changing the spatial scale on the simulations. The overall evapotranspiration, runoff, and monthly change in water storage are similarly simulated by the LSSs, however, the differing partitioning among the fluxes results in very different river discharges and soil moisture equilibrium states. Subgrid runoff is especially important for discharge at the daily timescale and for smaller-scale basins. Also, models using an explicit treatment of the snowpack compared better with the observations than simpler composite schemes. Results from a series of scaling experiments are examined for which the spatial resolution of the computational grid is decreased to be consistent with large-scale atmospheric models. The impact of upscaling on the domain-averaged hydrological components is similar among most LSSs, with increased evaporation of water intercepted by the canopy and a decrease in surface runoff representing the most consistent inter-LSS responses. A significant finding is that the snow water equivalent is greatly reduced by upscaling in all LSSs but one that explicitly accounts for subgrid-scale orography effects on the atmospheric forcing.


Global and Planetary Change | 2003

Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS Phase 2(e) 1: Experiment description and summary intercomparisons

Laura C. Bowling; Dennis P. Lettenmaier; Bart Nijssen; L. Phil Graham; Douglas B. Clark; Mustapha El Maayar; Richard Essery; Sven Goers; Yeugeniy M. Gusev; Florence Habets; Bart van den Hurk; Jiming Jin; Daniel S. Kahan; Dag Lohmann; Xieyao Ma; Sarith P. P. Mahanama; David Mocko; Olga N. Nasonova; Guo Yue Niu; Patrick Samuelsson; Andrey B. Shmakin; Kumiko Takata; Diana Verseghy; Pedro Viterbo; Youlong Xia; Yongkang Xue; Zong-Liang Yang

Abstract Twenty-one land-surface schemes (LSSs) participated in the Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterizations (PILPS) Phase 2(e) experiment, which used data from the Torne–Kalix Rivers in northern Scandinavia. Atmospheric forcing data (precipitation, air temperature, specific humidity, wind speed, downward shortwave and longwave radiation) for a 20-year period (1979–1998) were provided to the 21 participating modeling groups for 218 1/4° grid cells that represented the study domain. The first decade (1979–1988) of the period was used for model spin-up. The quality of meteorologic forcing variables is of particular concern in high-latitude experiments and the quality of the gridded dataset was assessed to the extent possible. The lack of sub-daily precipitation, underestimation of true precipitation and the necessity to estimate incoming solar radiation were the primary data concerns for this study. The results from two of the three types of runs are analyzed in this, the first of a three-part paper: (1) calibration–validation runs—calibration of model parameters using observed streamflow was allowed for two small catchments (570 and 1300 km2), and parameters were then transferred to two other catchments of roughly similar size (2600 and 1500 km2) to assess the ability of models to represent ungauged areas elsewhere; and 2) reruns—using revised forcing data (to resolve problems with apparent underestimation of solar radiation of approximately 36%, and certain other problems with surface wind in the original forcing data). Model results for the period 1989–1998 are used to evaluate the performance of the participating land-surface schemes in a context that allows exploration of their ability to capture key processes spatially. In general, the experiment demonstrated that many of the LSSs are able to capture the limitations imposed on annual latent heat by the small net radiation available in this high-latitude environment. Simulated annual average net radiation varied between 16 and 40 W/m2 for the 21 models, and latent heat varied between 18 and 36 W/m2. Among-model differences in winter latent heat due to the treatment of aerodynamic resistance appear to be at least as important as those attributable to the treatment of canopy interception. In many models, the small annual net radiation forced negative sensible heat on average, which varied among the models between −11 and 9 W/m2. Even though the largest evaporation rates occur in the summer (June, July and August), model-predicted snow sublimation in winter has proportionately more influence on differences in annual runoff volume among the models. A calibration experiment for four small sub-catchments of the Torne–Kalix basin showed that model parameters that are typically adjusted during calibration, those that control storage of moisture in the soil column or on the land surface via ponding, influence the seasonal distribution of runoff, but have relatively little impact on annual runoff ratios. Similarly, there was no relationship between annual runoff ratios and the proportion of surface and subsurface discharge for the basin as a whole.


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2006

Soil Moisture Memory in AGCM Simulations: Analysis of Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) Data

Sonia I. Seneviratne; Randal D. Koster; Zhichang Guo; Paul A. Dirmeyer; Eva Kowalczyk; David M. Lawrence; Ping Liu; David Mocko; Cheng-Hsuan Lu; Keith W. Oleson; Diana Verseghy

Abstract Soil moisture memory is a key aspect of land–atmosphere interaction and has major implications for seasonal forecasting. Because of a severe lack of soil moisture observations on most continents, existing analyses of global-scale soil moisture memory have relied previously on atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) experiments, with derived conclusions that are probably model dependent. The present study is the first survey examining and contrasting global-scale (near) monthly soil moisture memory characteristics across a broad range of AGCMs. The investigated simulations, performed with eight different AGCMs, were generated as part of the Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Overall, the AGCMs present relatively similar global patterns of soil moisture memory. Outliers are generally characterized by anomalous water-holding capacity or biases in radiation forcing. Water-holding capacity is highly variable among the analyzed AGCMs and is the main factor responsible for intermodel diffe...


Annals of Glaciology | 2004

Validation of the energy budget of an alpine snowpack simulated by several snow models (SnowMIP project)

Pierre Etchevers; E. Martin; Ross Brown; Charles Fierz; Yves Lejeune; Eric Bazile; Aaron Boone; Yongjiu Dai; Richard Essery; Alberto Fernandez; Yeugeniy M. Gusev; Rachel E. Jordan; Victor Koren; Eva Kowalczyk; N. Olga Nasonova; R. David Pyles; Adam Schlosser; Andrey B. Shmakin; Tatiana G. Smirnova; Ulrich Strasser; Diana Verseghy; Takeshi Yamazaki; Zong-Liang Yang

Abstract Many snow models have been developed for various applications such as hydrology, global atmospheric circulation models and avalanche forecasting. The degree of complexity of these models is highly variable, ranging from simple index methods to multi-layer models that simulate snow-cover stratigraphy and texture. In the framework of the Snow Model Intercomparison Project (SnowMIP), 23 models were compared using observed meteorological parameters from two mountainous alpine sites. The analysis here focuses on validation of snow energy-budget simulations. Albedo and snow surface temperature observations allow identification of the more realistic simulations and quantification of errors for two components of the energy budget: the net short- and longwave radiation. In particular, the different albedo parameterizations are evaluated for different snowpack states (in winter and spring). Analysis of results during the melting period allows an investigation of the different ways of partitioning the energy fluxes and reveals the complex feedbacks which occur when simulating the snow energy budget. Particular attention is paid to the impact of model complexity on the energy-budget components. The model complexity has a major role for the net longwave radiation calculation, whereas the albedo parameterization is the most significant factor explaining the accuracy of the net shortwave radiation simulation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Diana Verseghy's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrey B. Shmakin

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yongkang Xue

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olga N. Nasonova

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yeugeniy M. Gusev

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zong-Liang Yang

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eva Kowalczyk

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Mocko

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. J. Pitman

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W.G. Bailey

Simon Fraser University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge