Diana Weil

Towards tuberculosis elimination: an action framework for low-incidence countries

This paper describes an action framework for countries with low tuberculosis (TB) incidence (<100 TB cases per million population) that are striving for TB elimination. The framework sets out priority interventions required for these countries to progress first towards “pre-elimination” (<10 cases per million) and eventually the elimination of TB as a public health problem (less than one case per million). TB epidemiology in most low-incidence countries is characterised by a low rate of transmission in the general population, occasional outbreaks, a majority of TB cases generated from progression of latent TB infection (LTBI) rather than local transmission, concentration to certain vulnerable and hard-to-reach risk groups, and challenges posed by cross-border migration. Common health system challenges are that political commitment, funding, clinical expertise and general awareness of TB diminishes as TB incidence falls. The framework presents a tailored response to these challenges, grouped into eight priority action areas: 1) ensure political commitment, funding and stewardship for planning and essential services; 2) address the most vulnerable and hard-to-reach groups; 3) address special needs of migrants and cross-border issues; 4) undertake screening for active TB and LTBI in TB contacts and selected high-risk groups, and provide appropriate treatment; 5) optimise the prevention and care of drug-resistant TB; 6) ensure continued surveillance, programme monitoring and evaluation and case-based data management; 7) invest in research and new tools; and 8) support global TB prevention, care and control. The overall approach needs to be multisectorial, focusing on equitable access to high-quality diagnosis and care, and on addressing the social determinants of TB. Because of increasing globalisation and population mobility, the response needs to have both national and global dimensions. Action framework for countries with low tuberculosis incidence: a coherent approach for eliminating tuberculosis http://ow.ly/H03ZZ

WHO's new end TB strategy.

On May 19, 2014, the 67th World Health Assembly (WHA) adopted WHO’s “Global strategy and targets for tuberculosis prevention, care and control after 2015”. This post-2015 global tuberculosis strategy, labelled the End TB Strategy, was shaped during the past 2 years. A wide range of stakeholders—from ministries of health and national tuberculosis programmes to technical and scientifi c institutions, fi nancial and development partners, civil society and health activists, non-governmental organisations, and the private sector—contributed to its development. The strategy has a vision of making the world free of tuberculosis, with zero deaths, disease, and suff ering due to the disease (see appendix p 1 for summary of the End TB Strategy). In 2013, 9 million people fell ill with tuberculosis and 1·5 million died; about a quarter of them were HIV positive. Poor and deprived groups also bore the brunt of the enormous socioeconomic burden imposed by the disease and deaths. Concerned by this persistent human suff ering due to tuberculosis, but encouraged by the progress achieved during the past two decades and recognising the need to mount a multisectoral response to eff ectively address the problem, the health ministers at the WHA approved WHO’s proposal to push the limit of ambition to “end the global tuberculosis epidemic” by 2035, marked by well defi ned milestones and targets set along the way. Ending the tuberculosis epidemic implies bringing the levels of tuberculosis in the whole world down to converge with those already attained by many rich countries: fewer than ten new tuberculosis cases occurring per 100 000 population per year amounting to 90% reduction in tuberculosis incidence and tuberculosis deaths reduced by 95%. The rich countries achieved remarkable reductions in the tuberculosis burden not only by delivering adequate tuberculosis services, but also by pursuing universal access to health care and social protection while rapidly improving nutrition and economic conditions. Ending the tuberculosis epidemic in high-incidence countries needs a similar approach that guarantees access to high-quality tuberculosis care and prevention to all while simul taneously addressing the social determinants of tuberculosis. To this eff ect, elimination of catastrophic costs that tuberculosis-aff ected families face is an important milestone to be achieved under the End TB Strategy well within the next decade. Importantly, though, achievement of universal access to currently available methods of tuberculosis care and prevention will not be enough to end the epidemic within two decades. Global investments and eff orts are also essential to develop improved methods to diagnose, treat, and prevent tuberculosis. Equal emphasis on achievement of universal access to tuberculosis care and prevention, addressing of weaknesses in health systems and social determinants of tuberculosis, and pursuing of research and innovation for improved approaches and strategies constitute the core of the End TB Strategy. The achievements of the past two decades provide the basis for further progress. The DOTS (directly observed treatment, short-course) strategy of 1995 expanded access to high-quality tuberculosis care. The Stop TB Strategy of 2006 widened its scope to address management of all forms of tuberculosis including HIV-associated and drug-resistant tuberculosis, through engagement of communities, involvement of all care providers, strengthening of health systems, and fostering of research. Subsequently, the tuberculosis-related Millennium Development Goal to “halt and begin to reverse the incidence of tuberculosis” was achieved; 37 million lives were saved between 2000 and 2013; and a new rapid molecular test to simultaneously diagnose tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance was developed and two novel drugs were introduced. These achievements notwithstanding, the enormity of the task ahead cannot be overemphasised. Overall, the current 2% annual reduction in the global tuberculosis incidence is too slow to achieve an end to the epidemic in the foreseeable future. Tuberculosis remains a top infectious killer of men and women. A third of estimated incident tuberculosis cases go un-notifi ed or undiagnosed and close to half a million multidrug-resistant cases emerge each year. HIV-associated tuberculosis aff ects more than a million people a year. An estimated 2 billion people with latent tuberculosis infection form a reservoir that sustains the global epidemic. Analyses of constraints to global tuberculosis control bring four major persisting barriers to the fore. First, weak health systems including the unregulated non-state sector prevent reaching the currently available methods of diagnosis and treatment to all sections of the populations and a lack of universal health coverage and social protection inhibit provision of comprehensive tuberculosis care and prevention without further impoverishment to those who need it most. Second, determinants such as poverty, under nutrition, migration, and ageing populations enhance vulnerability and maintain the cycle of infection and disease. The risk of tuberculosis is further enhanced by non-communicable health problems such as diabetes, harmful use of alcohol, and tobacco smoking. Third, the lack of optimum methods—a point-of-care test for rapid diagnosis of disease and latent infection; better and safer drug regimens to shorten treatment; and a vaccine to prevent Lancet 2015; 385: 1799–801

Management of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: WHO guidelines for low tuberculosis burden countries

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is characterised by the presence of immune responses to previously acquired Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection without clinical evidence of active tuberculosis (TB). Here we report evidence-based guidelines from the World Health Organization for a public health approach to the management of LTBI in high risk individuals in countries with high or middle upper income and TB incidence of <100 per 100 000 per year. The guidelines strongly recommend systematic testing and treatment of LTBI in people living with HIV, adult and child contacts of pulmonary TB cases, patients initiating anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment, patients receiving dialysis, patients preparing for organ or haematological transplantation, and patients with silicosis. In prisoners, healthcare workers, immigrants from high TB burden countries, homeless persons and illicit drug users, systematic testing and treatment of LTBI is conditionally recommended, according to TB epidemiology and resource availability. Either commercial interferon-gamma release assays or Mantoux tuberculin skin testing could be used to test for LTBI. Chest radiography should be performed before LTBI treatment to rule out active TB disease. Recommended treatment regimens for LTBI include: 6 or 9 month isoniazid; 12 week rifapentine plus isoniazid; 3–4 month isoniazid plus rifampicin; or 3–4 month rifampicin alone. Guidelines on LTBI for low TB incidence countries – essential element of the @WHO #EndTB strategy and TB elimination http://ow.ly/RW8xn

The WHO policy package to combat antimicrobial resistance

To bring international attention to a growing public health threat, the World Health Organization (WHO) selected antimicrobial resistance as the theme for World Health Day 2011. Antimicrobial resistance is a threat to all branches of medical and public health practice. It challenges the control of infectious diseases, jeopardizes progress on health outcomes by increasing morbidity and mortality and imposes huge costs on societies. In the European Union, about 25000 patients die each year from infections caused by selected multidrug-resistant bacteria and the associated costs are estimated at about 1.5 billion euros per year.

MDR Tuberculosis: Critical Steps for Prevention and Control

ultidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis is defined as disease caused by strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that are at least resistant to treatment with isoniazid and rifampicin; extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis refers to disease caused by multidrug-resistant strains that are also resistant to treatment with any fluoroquinolone and any of the injectable drugs used in treatment with second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs (amikacin, capreomycin, and kanamycin). MDR tuberculosis and XDR tuberculosis are serious threats to the progress that has been made in the control of tuberculosis worldwide over the past decade. 1,2 In 2008, an estimated 440,000 cases of MDR tuberculosis emerged globally. 1 India and China carry the greatest estimated burden of MDR tuberculosis, together accounting for almost 50% of the world’s total cases. More than three quarters of the estimated cases of MDR tuberculosis occur in previously untreated patients. The proportion of MDR cases among new cases and previously treated cases of tuberculosis reported globally from 1994 through 2009 ranged from 0 to 28.3% and from 0 to 61.6%, respectively (Fig. 1). The highest proportions of MDR cases, and the most severe drug-resistance patterns, appear in the countries of the former Soviet Union. By 2009, a total of 58 countries had reported at least one case of XDR tuberculosis. In eight countries, reported cases of XDR tuberculosis account for more than 10% of all cases of MDR tuberculosis, and six of these countries were part of the former Soviet Union. By far the largest number of cases of XDR tuberculosis has been reported from South Africa (10.5% of all cases of MDR tuberculosis in that country), owing to rapid spread among people infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). National programs are failing to diagnose and treat MDR tuberculosis. Globally, just under 30,000 cases of MDR tuberculosis were reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2008 (7% of the estimated total), of which less than one fifth were managed according to international guidelines. The vast majority of the remaining cases probably are not diagnosed or, if diagnosed, are mismanaged. This problem remains despite the evidence that management of MDR tuberculosis is cost-effective 3 and that treatment of MDR tuberculosis, and even treatment of XDR tuberculosis, is feasible in persons who are not infected with HIV. 4,5

Financial burden for tuberculosis patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

In order to inform the development of appropriate strategies to improve financial risk protection, we conducted a systematic literature review of the financial burden of tuberculosis (TB) faced by patients and affected families. The mean total costs ranged from

Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: rationale, definitions and key considerations.

55 to

Health-system strengthening and tuberculosis control

8198, with an unweighted average of

Beyond UHC: monitoring health and social protection coverage in the context of tuberculosis care and prevention.

847. On average, 20% (range 0–62%) of the total cost was due to direct medical costs, 20% (0–84%) to direct non-medical costs, and 60% (16–94%) to income loss. Half of the total cost was incurred before TB treatment. On average, the total cost was equivalent to 58% (range 5–306%) of reported annual individual and 39% (4–148%) of reported household income. Cost as percentage of income was particularly high among poor people and those with multidrug-resistant TB. Commonly reported coping mechanisms included taking a loan and selling household items. The total cost of TB for patients can be catastrophic. Income loss often constitutes the largest financial risk for patients. Apart from ensuring that healthcare services are fairly financed and delivered in a way that minimises direct and indirect costs, there is a need to ensure that TB patients and affected families receive appropriate income replacement and other social protection interventions. Costs and income loss put people with TB at financial risk, requiring mitigation with social protection interventions http://ow.ly/sqgRU

Translational research for tuberculosis elimination: priorities, challenges, and actions

The impact of current interventions to improve early detection of tuberculosis (TB) seems to have been saturated. Case detection trends have stagnated. TB incidence is falling in most settings worldwide, but the rate of decline is far lower than expected. There is growing evidence from national TB prevalence surveys and other research of a large pool of undetected TB in the community. Intensified efforts to further break down access barriers and scale up new and rapid diagnostic tools are likely to improve the situation. However, will these be enough? Or do we also need to reach out more towards people who do not actively seek care with well-recognisable TB symptoms? There have recently been calls to revisit TB screening, particularly in high-risk groups. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening for TB in people with human immunodeficiency virus infection and in close TB contacts. Should other risk groups also be screened systematically? Could mass, community-wide screening, which the WHO has discouraged over the past four decades, be of benefit in some situations? If so, what screening tools and approaches should be used? The WHO is in the process of seeking answers to these questions and developing guidelines on systematic screening for active TB. In this article, we present the rationale, definitions and key considerations underpinning this process.The impact of current interventions to improve early detection of tuberculosis (TB) seems to have been saturated. Case detection trends have stagnated. TB incidence is falling in most settings worldwide, but the rate of decline is far lower than expected. There is growing evidence from national TB prevalence surveys and other research of a large pool of undetected TB in the community. Intensified efforts to further break down access barriers and scale up new and rapid diagnostic tools are likely to improve the situation. However, will these be enough? Or do we also need to reach out more towards people who do not actively seek care with well-recognisable TB symptoms? There have recently been calls to revisit TB screening, particularly in high-risk groups. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening for TB in people with human immunodeficiency virus infection and in close TB contacts. Should other risk groups also be screened systematically? Could mass, community-wide screening, which the WHO has discouraged over the past four decades, be of benefit in some situations? If so, what screening tools and approaches should be used? The WHO is in the process of seeking answers to these questions and developing guidelines on systematic screening for active TB. In this article, we present the rationale, definitions and key considerations underpinning this process.