Diane Sawchuck
University of British Columbia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Diane Sawchuck.
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada | 2007
Robert M. Liston; Diane Sawchuck; David Young; Normand Brassard; Kim Campbell; Greg Davies; William Ehman; Dan Farine; Duncan F. Farquharson; Emily F. Hamilton; Michael Helewa; Owen Hughes; Ian Lange; Jocelyne Martel; Vyta Senikas; Ann E. Sprague; Bernd K. Wittmann; Martin Pothier; Judy Scrivener
OBJECTIVE This guideline provides new recommendations pertaining to the application and documentation of fetal surveillance in the antepartum and intrapartum period that will decrease the incidence of birth asphyxia while maintaining the lowest possible rate of obstetrical intervention. Pregnancies with and without risk factors for adverse perinatal outcomes are considered. This guideline presents an alternative classification system for antenatal fetal non-stress testing and intrapartum electronic fetal surveillance to what has been used previously. This guideline is intended for use by all health professionals who provide antepartum and intrapartum care in Canada. OPTIONS Consideration has been given to all methods of fetal surveillance currently available in Canada. OUTCOMES Short- and long-term outcomes that may indicate the presence of birth asphyxia were considered. The associated rates of operative and other labour interventions were also considered. EVIDENCE A comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials published between January 1996 and March 2007 was undertaken, and MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database were used to search the literature for all new studies on fetal surveillance both antepartum and intrapartum. The level of evidence has been determined using the criteria and classifications of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. SPONSOR This consensus guideline was jointly developed by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and the British Columbia Perinatal Health Program (formerly the British Columbia Reproductive Care Program or BCRCP) and was partly supported by an unrestricted educational grant from the British Columbia Perinatal Health Program.
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada | 1996
Dean Leduc; Anne Biringer; Lily Lee; Jessica Dy; Thomas Corbett; Louise Duperron; Ian Lange; Suzanne Muise; Barbara Parish; Lexy Regush; Kathi Wilson; Grace Yeung; Joan Crane; Robert Gagnon; Diane Sawchuck; Vyta Senikas
OBJECTIVE To review the most current literature in order to provide evidence-based recommendations to obstetrical care providers on induction of labour. OPTIONS Intervention in a pregnancy with induction of labour. OUTCOMES Appropriate timing and method of induction, appropriate mode of delivery, and optimal maternal and perinatal outcomes. EVIDENCE Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2010 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., labour, induced, labour induction, cervical ripening) and key words (e.g., induce, induction, augmentation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to the end of 2010. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The evidence in this document was rated using criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care (Table 1). SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Prostaglandins E(2) (cervical and vaginal) are effective agents of cervical ripening and induction of labour for an unfavourable cervix. (I) 2. Intravaginal prostaglandins E(2) are preferred to intracervical prostaglandins E(2) because they results in more timely vaginal deliveries. (I).
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010
Peter von Dadelszen; Diane Sawchuck; Romy McMaster; M. Joanne Douglas; Shoo K. Lee; Sarah Saunders; Robert M. Liston; Laura A. Magee
OBJECTIVE: To reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy by using an active model of guideline implementation. METHODS: This study used a preintervention and postintervention cohort comparison design. We interrogated the British Columbia Perinatal Database Registry for 6 years of existing prospectively gathered data (fiscal years 2000–2001 to 2005–2006), introduced the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy guidelines, and assessed the incidence of the combined adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes for the next 2 years (fiscal years 2006–2007 and 2007–2008). The combined adverse maternal outcome was maternal death, life-threatening, or life-altering complications. The combined perinatal outcome included the severe complications of prematurity and hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. RESULTS: Eighteen thousand seventy-six women were diagnosed with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy in British Columbia from 2000–2001 to 2007–2008. Outcomes were compared preguideline (n=13,150 deliveries) and postguideline (n=4,926 deliveries) implementation. The incidence of the combined adverse maternal outcome decreased from 3.1% to 1.9% (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.48–0.75). There was a concomitant fall in the incidence of the combined adverse perinatal outcome. CONCLUSION: The active introduction of standardized management of women with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is associated with reduced maternal and perinatal risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada | 2012
Peter von Dadelszen; Tabassum Firoz; Rebecca Gordon; G Justus Hofmeyr; Shifana Lalani; Beth Payne; James M. Roberts; Katherine C. Teela; Marianne Vidler; Diane Sawchuck; Laura A. Magee
The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, in particular preeclampsia, matter because adverse events occur in women with preeclampsia and, to a lesser extent, in women with the other hypertensive disorders. These adverse events are maternal, perinatal, and neonatal and can alter the life trajectory of each individual, should that life not be ended by complications. In this review we discuss a number of priorities and dilemmas that we perceive to be facing health services in low and middle income countries as they try to prioritize interventions to reduce the health burden related to preeclampsia. These priorities and dilemmas relate to calcium for preeclampsia prevention, risk stratification, antihypertensive and magnesium sulphate therapy, and mobile health. Significant progress has been and is being made to reduce the impact of preeclampsia in low and middle income countries, but it remains a priority focus as we attempt to achieve Millennium Development Goal 5.
Reproductive Health | 2016
Asif Raza Khowaja; Rahat Qureshi; Diane Sawchuck; Olufemi T. Oladapo; Olalekan O. Adetoro; Elizabeth A. Orenuga; Mrutyunjaya Bellad; Ashalata Mallapur; Umesh Charantimath; Esperança Sevene; Khátia Munguambe; Helena Boene; Marianne Vidler; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Peter von Dadelszen
BackgroundGlobally, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are major contributors to maternal and perinatal mortality; of which the vast majority of deaths occur in less developed countries. In addition, a disproportionate number of morbidities and mortalities occur due to delayed access to health services. The Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) Trial aims to task-shift to community health workers the identification and emergency management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia to improve access and timely care. Literature revealed paucity of published feasibility assessments prior to initiating large-scale community-based interventions. Arguably, well-conducted feasibility studies can provide valuable information about the potential success of clinical trials prior to implementation. Failure to fully understand the study context risks the effective implementation of the intervention and limits the likelihood of post-trial scale-up. Therefore, it was imperative to conduct community-level feasibility assessments for a trial of this magnitude.MethodsA mixed methods design guided by normalization process theory was used for this study in Nigeria, Mozambique, Pakistan, and India to explore enabling and impeding factors for the CLIP Trial implementation. Qualitative data were collected through participant observation, document review, focus group discussion and in-depth interviews with diverse groups of community members, key informants at community level, healthcare providers, and policy makers. Quantitative data were collected through health facility assessments, self-administered community health worker surveys, and household demographic and health surveillance.ResultsRefer to CLIP Trial feasibility publications in the current and/or forthcoming supplement.ConclusionsFeasibility assessments for community level interventions, particularly those involving task-shifting across diverse regions, require an appropriate theoretical framework and careful selection of research methods. The use of qualitative and quantitative methods increased the data richness to better understand the community contexts.Trial registrationNCT01911494
Medical Hypotheses | 2014
Diane Sawchuck; Bernd K. Wittmann
This hypothesis proposes pre-eclampsia is caused by intra-abdominal hypertension in pregnancy. Sustained or increasing intra-abdominal pressure ⩾12mmHg causes impaired venous return to the heart, systemic vascular resistance, ischemia reperfusion injury, intestinal permeability, translocation of lipopolysaccharide endotoxin to the liver, cytotoxic immune response, systemic inflammatory response, pressure transmission to thoracic and intra-cranial compartments, and multi-organ dysfunction. This hypothesis is predicated on Pascals law, evidence founded in the intra-abdominal hypertension literature, and the adapted equation ΔIAP-P=ΔIAVF/Cab, where ΔIAP-P=change in intra-abdominal pressure in pregnancy, ΔIAVF=change in intra-abdominal vector force (volume and force direction) and Cab=abdominal compliance. Factors causing increased intra-abdominal pressure in pregnancy include: progressive uterine expansion, obstetrical factors that increase intra-uterine volume excessively or acutely, maternal anthropometric measurements that affect intra-abdominal pressure thresholds, maternal postures that increase abdominal force direction, abdominal compliance that is decreased, diminished with advancing gestation, or has reached maximum expansion, habitation at high altitude, and rapid drops in barometric pressure. We postulate that the threshold for lipopolysaccharide translocation depends on the magnitude of intra-abdominal pressure, the intestinal microbiome complex, and the degree of intestinal permeability. We advance that delivery cures pre-eclampsia through the mechanism of abdominal decompression.
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada | 2014
Rebecca Gordon; Laura A. Magee; Beth Payne; Tabassum Firoz; Diane Sawchuck; Domena Tu; Marianne Vidler; Dane A. De Silva; Peter von Dadelszen
OBJECTIVE To review systematically the magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) dosing regimens tested in low and middle income countries (LMICs) for women with preeclampsia (prevention) and/or eclampsia (treatment). DATA SOURCES We searched Medline, EMBASE, IPA, CINAHL, CDSR, and CENTRAL databases for relevant English language publications. STUDY SELECTION Our search yielded 753 publications, of which 26 (10 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) evaluated MgSO4 for preeclampsia and/or eclampsia in World Bank-classified LMICs. DATA EXTRACTION Independent, by two authors. DATA SYNTHESIS Twenty-five studies were conducted in hospital settings and one in the community. Rates of eclampsia were usually < 5% (median 3.0%, range 0.0% to 26.5%) even when MgSO4 was administered for eclampsia. When dosage varied from the standard Pritchard or Zuspan regimens, almost all (n = 22) reduced the dose or duration of treatment, most commonly because of concerns about maternal safety, cost, or resource availability. Four trials of a loading dose only (4 g IV + 10 g IM) versus loading plus maintenance dosing of 5 g/4 hr IM found no difference in eclampsia recurrence (RR 1.64; 95% CI 0.48 to 5.65, n = 396). One study documented less eclampsia recurrence associated with community administration of a MgSO4 loading dose before referral to a care facility versus treatment in a care facility (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.49, n = 265). CONCLUSION Use of MgSO4 for eclampsia treatment and prevention has been well-studied in LMICs, but concern remains about potential toxicity. Further studies are needed to identify the minimum effective dosage of MgSO4 for management of preeclampsia and eclampsia and whether MgSO4 loading can be safely administered in the community.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics | 2012
Peter von Dadelszen; J. Mark Ansermino; Guy A. Dumont; G Justus Hofmeyr; Laura A. Magee; Matthews Mathai; Diane Sawchuck; Kate Teela; James M. Roberts
The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP; pre‐existing hypertension, gestational hypertension, and pre‐eclampsia) remain important causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries. The paper summarizes the current state of evidence around possible technologies to support community‐based improvements in maternal and perinatal outcomes for women with pre‐eclampsia. Through the testing and, where proven, introduction of these technologies, we believe that HDP‐related progress toward achieving Millennium Development Goal 5 can best be accelerated. The evidence and discussion are presented under the following headings: (1) prediction; (2) prevention; (3) diagnosis; (4) risk stratification; (5) decision aids; (6) treatment; (7) geographic information systems; (8) communication; and (9) community and patient education.
Reproductive Health | 2016
Marianne Vidler; Umesh Ramadurg; Umesh Charantimath; Geetanjali Katageri; Chandrashekhar Karadiguddi; Diane Sawchuck; Rahat Qureshi; Shafik Dharamsi; Anjali Joshi; Peter von Dadelszen; Richard J. Derman; Mrutyunjaya Bellad; Shivaprasad S. Goudar; Ashalata Mallapur
BackgroundKarnataka State continues to have the highest rates of maternal mortality in south India at 144/100,000 live births, but lower than the national estimates of 190–220/100,000 live births. Various barriers exist to timely and appropriate utilization of services during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum. This study aimed to describe the patterns and determinants of routine and emergency maternal health care utilization in rural Karnataka State, India.MethodsThis study was conducted in Karnataka in 2012–2013. Purposive sampling was used to convene twenty three focus groups and twelve individual interviews with community and health system representatives: Auxiliary Nurse Midwives and Staff Nurses, Accredited Social Health Activists, community leaders, male decision-makers, female decision-makers, women of reproductive age, medical officers, private health care providers, senior health administrators, District health officers, and obstetricians. Local researchers familiar with the setting and language conducted all focus groups and interviews, these researchers were not known to community participants. All discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated to English for analysis. A thematic analysis approach was taken utilizing an a priori thematic framework as well as inductive identification of themes.ResultsMost women in the focus groups reported regular antenatal care attendance, for an average of four visits, and more often for high-risk pregnancies. Antenatal care was typically delivered at the periphery by non-specialised providers. Participants reported that sought was care women experienced danger signs of complications. Postpartum care was reportedly rare, and mainly sought for the purpose of neonatal care. Factors that influenced women’s care-seeking included their limited autonomy, poor access to and funding for transport for non-emergent conditions, perceived poor quality of health care facilities, and the costs of care.ConclusionsRural south Indian communities reported regular use of health care services during pregnancy and for delivery. Uptake of maternity care services was attributed to new government programmes and increased availability of maternity services; nevertheless, some women delayed disclosure of pregnancy and first antenatal visit. Community-based initiatives should be enhanced to encourage early disclosure of pregnancies and to provide the community information regarding the importance of facility-based care. Health facility infrastructure in rural Karnataka should also be enhanced to ensure a consistent power supply and improved cleanliness on the wards.Trial registrationNCT01911494
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada | 2013
Shifana Lalani; Tabassum Firoz; Laura A. Magee; Diane Sawchuck; Beth Payne; Rebecca Gordon; Marianne Vidler; Peter von Dadelszen
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of drugs for comprehensive management of preeclampsia in national essential medicine lists (EMLs) in low and middle income countries (LMICs) METHODS We collected EMLs from the 144 LMICs identified by the World Bank through broad-based Internet searches and in collaboration with the World Health Organization. We identified therapies for hypertension, eclampsia, preeclampsia complications (e.g., pulmonary edema, thrombosis), preterm birth, and labour induction contained in the EMLs. RESULTS In 91 EMLs obtained from 144 LMICs, the most commonly listed parenteral antihypertensive therapies were verapamil (63.7%), hydralazine (61.5%), sodium nitroprusside (48.3%), and propranolol (39.6%). The most prevalent oral antihypertensive therapies were nifedipine (95.6%), methyldopa (93.4%), propranolol (90.1%), and atenolol (87.9%). For eclampsia/preeclampsia, magnesium sulphate was present in 84.6% of EMLs and calcium gluconate in 85.7%. For pulmonary edema, most EMLs (94.5%) listed oral furosemide, for thrombosis 92.3% listed heparin, for acceleration of fetal pulmonary maturity 90.1% listed parenteral dexamethasone, and for labour induction 97.8% listed oxytocin or a prostanoid (usually misoprostol, 40.7%). CONCLUSION EMLs of LMICs provide comprehensive coverage of preeclampsia pharmacotherapy. These EMLs may be used as advocacy tools to ensure the availability of these therapies within each country.