Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Diane Van Opstal is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Diane Van Opstal.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2011

Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: Implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow

Malgorzata I. Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Grétel G. Oudesluijs; Marieke Joosten; Lutgarde C. P. Govaerts; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H. Galjaard

We report on the validation and implementation of the HumanCytoSNP-12 array (Illumina) (HCS) in prenatal diagnosis. In total, 64 samples were used to validate the Illumina platform (20 with a known (sub) microscopic chromosome abnormality, 5 with known maternal cell contamination (MCC) and 39 normal control samples). There were no false-positive or false-negative results. In addition to the diagnostic possibilities of arrayCGH, the HCS allows detection of regions of homozygosity (ROH), triploidy and helps recognising MCC. Moreover, in two cases of MCC, a deletion was correctly detected. Furthermore we found out that only about 50 ng of DNA is required, which allows a reporting time of only 3 days. We also present a prospective pilot study of 61 fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype tested with HCS. In 4 out of 61 (6.5%) fetuses, a clinically relevant abnormality was detected. We designed and present pre-test genetic counselling information on categories of possible test outcomes. On the basis of this information, about 90% of the parents chose to be informed about adverse health outcomes of their future child at infancy and childhood, and 55% also about outcomes at an adult stage. The latter issue regarding the right of the future child itself to decide whether or not to know this information needs to be addressed.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2009

Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: A prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples

Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Danielle de Jong; Cardi van den Berg; Hennie T. Brüggenwirth; Hajo I. J. Wildschut; Annelies de Klein; Robert-Jan H. Galjaard

The introduction of prenatal screening requires rapid high-throughput diagnosis of common aneuploidies. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) allows for quick, easily automated multiplex testing of these aneuploidies in one polymerase chain reaction. We performed a large prospective study using MLPA on 4000 amniotic fluid (AF) samples including all indications and compared its value to karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MLPA can reliably determine common aneuploidies with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Moreover, some mosaic cases and structural chromosome aberrations were detected as well. In cases of a male fetus, triploidies can be detected by an aberrant pattern of probe signals, which mimics maternal cell contamination (MCC). Macroscopic blood contamination was encountered in 3.2% of the AF samples. In 20% of these samples, an MLPA pattern was found consistent with MCC, although there were no false negatives of the most common aneuploidies. As the vast majority of inconclusive results (1.7%) is due to potential MCC, we designed a protocol in which we determine whether MLPA can be performed on blood-contaminated AF samples by testing if blood is of fetal origin. Then, the number of inconclusive results could be theoretically reduced to 0.05%. We propose an alternative interpretation of relative probe signals for rapid aneuploidy diagnosis (RAD). We discuss the value of MLPA for the detection of (submicroscopic) structural chromosome anomalies. MLPA is a reliable method that can replace FISH and could be used as a stand-alone test for RAD instead of karyotyping.


Molecular Cytogenetics | 2012

Genomic SNP array as a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of foetal ultrasound abnormalities

Malgorzata I. Srebniak; Marjan Boter; Grétel Oudesluijs; Titia E. Cohen-Overbeek; Lutgarde C. P. Govaerts; Karin E. M. Diderich; Renske Oegema; Maarten F. C. M. Knapen; Ingrid van de Laar; Marieke Joosten; Diane Van Opstal; Robert-Jan H. Galjaard

BackgroundWe have investigated whether replacing conventional karyotyping by SNP array analysis in cases of foetal ultrasound abnormalities would increase the diagnostic yield and speed of prenatal diagnosis in clinical practice.Findings/resultsFrom May 2009 till June 2011 we performed HumanCytoSNP-12 array (HCS) (http://www.Illumina.com) analysis in 207 cases of foetal structural abnormalities. HCS allows detecting unbalanced genomic abnormalities with a resolution of about 150/200 kb. All cases were selected by a clinical geneticist after excluding the most common aneuploidies by RAD (rapid aneuploidy detection). Pre-test genetic counselling was offered in all cases.In 24/207 (11,6%) foetuses a clinically relevant genetic abnormality was detected. Only 8/24 abnormalities would have been detected if only routine karyotyping was performed. Submicroscopic abnormalities were found in 16/207 (7,7%) cases. The array results were achieved within 1-2 weeks after amniocentesis.ConclusionsPrenatal SNP array testing is faster than karyotyping and allows detecting much smaller aberrations (~0.15 Mb) in addition to the microscopic unbalanced chromosome abnormalities detectable with karyotyping (~ > 5 Mb). Since karyotyping would have missed 66% (16/24) of genomic abnormalities in our cohort, we propose to perform genomic high resolution array testing assisted by pre-test counselling as a primary prenatal diagnostic test in cases of foetal ultrasound abnormalities.


Human Reproduction | 2010

The fate of the mosaic embryo: chromosomal constitution and development of Day 4, 5 and 8 human embryos

Margarida Avo Santos; Gijs Teklenburg; Nick S. Macklon; Diane Van Opstal; G. Heleen Schuring-Blom; Pieter-Jaap Krijtenburg; Johanna de Vreeden-Elbertse; Bart C.J.M. Fauser; Esther B. Baart

BACKGROUND Post-zygotic chromosome segregation errors are very common in human embryos after in vitro fertilization, resulting in mosaic embryos. However, the significance of mosaicism for the developmental potential of early embryos is unknown. We assessed chromosomal constitution and development of embryos from compaction to the peri-implantation stage. METHODS From 112 cryopreserved Day 4 human embryos donated for research, 21 were immediately fixed and all cells were analysed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes 1, 7, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y. The remaining 91 embryos were thawed, with 54 embryos undergoing biopsy of one or two cells which were fixed and analysed by FISH. Biopsied embryos were kept in standard culture conditions for 24 h. Embryos arrested before cavitation (n = 24) were fixed whereas developing Day 5 blastocysts (n = 24) were co-cultured for a further 72 h on an endometrial monolayer followed by fixation. Cell numbers were counted and all nuclei were analysed by FISH. Data from a previous FISH analysis on cryopreserved good-quality Day 5 blastocysts (n = 36) were also included in the present study. RESULTS FISH analysis was successful for 18 Day 4 fixed embryos and, according to our definition, 83% were mosaic and 11% showed a chaotic chromosomal constitution. FISH analysis of two blastomeres from Day 4 developing embryos showed that 54% were mosaic, 40% were normal and 6% were abnormal. Analysis of Day 4, 5 and 8 whole embryos showed a decrease in incidence of mosaicism over time, from 83% on Day 4 to 42% on Day 8. A significant positive correlation was observed between the total cell number and the percentage of normal cells in developing Day 5 and Day 8 embryos but not in developing Day 4 or embryos arrested before cavitation. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that both the developmental arrest of a significant proportion of mosaic embryos on Day 4, and the cell death or reduced proliferation of aneuploid cells within an embryo may be responsible for the observed decrease of aneuploid blastomeres from compaction to the peri-implantation stage.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 1999

Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in multiple gestations? Experience with 500 cases

Cardi van den Berg; Armando P. G. Braat; Diane Van Opstal; Dicky Halley; Wim J. Kleijer; Nicolette S. den Hollander; Helen Brandenburg; L. Pijpers; Frans J. Los

500 women with multiple pregnancies underwent amniocentesis or chorionic villus (CV) sampling at our department between January 1988 and July 1997. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the laboratory aspects and the consequences of discordant results in these pregnancies in relation to the method of sampling. Uncertain results in one or both samples, requiring further investigation were more frequent in CV samples (eight times in 163 paired samples, 5 per cent) than in amniotic fluid (AF) samples (once in 298 paired samples, 0·3 per cent). Sampling one fetus twice (erroneous sampling) was seen only once among 163 pregnancies with two CV samples in our study. Cross contamination due to mixed sampling was discovered in two of seven pregnancies that underwent DNA diagnosis in CV and might be a rather regular occuring phenomenon. In none of the 500 pregnancies mixed sampling caused diagnostic dilemmas. A third sampling problem, maternal cell contamination caused a diagnostic problem once among the AF samples. Selective fetal reduction appeared safer after CV sampling than after amniocentesis. Subsequently, CV sampling instead of amniocentesis has become the method of choice for prenatal diagnosis in multiple pregnancies in our department. Copyright


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2016

Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Part I - Clinical Impact

Dick Oepkes; G. C. M. L. Page-Christiaens; Caroline J. Bax; Mireille N. Bekker; C. M. Bilardo; Elles M.J. Boon; G. Heleen Schuring-Blom; A. Coumans; Brigitte H. W. Faas; Robert-Jan H. Galjaard; A. T. J. I. Go; Lidewij Henneman; Merryn V. E. Macville; Eva Pajkrt; Ron Suijkerbuijk; Karin Huijsdens-van Amsterdam; Diane Van Opstal; E. J. (Joanne) Verweij; Marjan M. Weiss; Erik A. Sistermans

To evaluate the clinical impact of nationwide implementation of genome‐wide non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in pregnancies at increased risk for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 (TRIDENT study).


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2012

Phenotypic variability of atypical 22q11.2 deletions not including TBX1

Judith M.A. Verhagen; Karin E. M. Diderich; Grétel Oudesluijs; Grazia M.S. Mancini; Alex J. Eggink; Anna C. Verkleij-Hagoort; Irene A.L. Groenenberg; Patrick J. Willems; Frederik A. du Plessis; Stella A. de Man; Malgorzata I. Srebniak; Diane Van Opstal; Lorette O M Hulsman; Laura J.C.M. van Zutven; Marja W. Wessels

Interstitial deletions of the chromosome 22q11.2 region are the most common microdeletions in humans. The TBX1 gene is considered to be the major candidate gene for the main features in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, including congenital heart malformations, (para)thyroid hypoplasia, and craniofacial abnormalities. We report on eight patients with atypical deletions of chromosome 22q11.2. These deletions comprise the distal part of the common 22q11.2 deleted region but do not encompass the TBX1 gene. Ten similar patients with overlapping distal 22q11.2 deletions have been reported previously. The clinical features of these patients are described and compared to those found in the classic 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. We discuss the possible roles of a position effect or haploinsufficiency of distally located genes (e.g., CRKL) in the molecular pathogenesis of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 1998

Uniparental disomy with and without confined placental mosaicism: a model for trisomic zygote rescue

Frans J. Los; Diane Van Opstal; Cardi van den Berg; Armando P. G. Braat; Senno Verhoef; Eveline Wesby‐Van Swaay; Ans van den Ouweland; Dicky Halley

In the population of children born after prenatal cytogenetic investigation in chorionic villi at our department from 1992 to 1995 (N=3940), three are known to us with uniparental disomy. One case of maternal heterodisomy 16 was prenatally discovered because of trisomy 16 in direct chorionic villi with subsequently normal amniotic fluid cells. The other two had normal karyotypes in chorionic villi. Maternal heterodisomy 15 was postnatally detected in one of them because of Prader–Willi syndrome. Maternal hetero/isodisomy 16 was accidentally encountered in the other case in the course of prenatal DNA analysis of the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 region at 16p13.3.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 1998

Prospective prenatal investigations on potential uniparental disomy in cases of confined placental trisomy

Diane Van Opstal; Cardi van den Berg; Wout H. Deelen; Helen Brandenburg; Titia E. Cohen-Overbeek; Dicky Halley; Ans van den Ouweland; Peter In't Veld; Frans J. Los

In most reported cases of uniparental disomy (UPD) associated with confined placental mosaicism (CPM), a high level of mosaicism or a full trisomy was found in chorionic villi. At the time that we started our investigations, it was not quite clear whether fetal UPD also existed in the more frequently occurring low levels of mosaicism. During a 4‐year period, a follow‐up amniocentesis was performed in all cases of mosaic or non‐mosaic trisomy detected in chorionic villus (CV) semi‐direct preparations and suspected to be confined to the placenta. We performed fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on uncultured amniotic fluid cells to differentiate between generalized mosaicism and CPM. We found 29 cases of CPM and we determined the incidence of UPD in 23 of these cases. Normal biparental chromosome contributions were found in 22 cases. In one case, we detected a maternal heterodisomy for chromosome 16. UPD appeared to be a rare phenomenon in the cases of CPM (type I and/or type III) that we encountered in 3958 consecutively investigated CV samples, and is not the cause of the pregnancy complications found in seven out of 23 cases with CPM.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2000

Accuracy of abnormal karyotypes after the analysis of both short- and long-term culture of chorionic villi

Cardi van den Berg; Diane Van Opstal; Helen Brandenburg; Hajo I. J. Wildschut; Nicolette S. den Hollander; Leen Pijpers; Robert Jan H. Galjaard; Frans J. Los

We report in detail the cytogenetic results of 1838 consecutive chorionic villus samples with the availability of both short‐term culture (STC‐villi) and long‐term culture (LTC‐villi) preparations in 1561 cases (84.9%). A high degree of laboratory success (99.5%) and diagnostic accuracy (99.8%) was observed; in four cases of low mosaicism, all four associated with the final birth of a normal child, a small risk of uncertainty was accepted. The combined analysis of STC‐ and LTC‐villi reduced follow‐up amniocenteses by one‐third in comparison with the analysis of STC‐villi alone. We believe that the desired level of quality and accuracy of prenatal cytogenetics in chorionic villi can only be achieved when both STC‐ and LTC‐villi are available. We conclude that CVS might then be the mode of prenatal diagnosis of first choice in pregnancies with a high (cytogenetic) risk. Copyright

Collaboration


Dive into the Diane Van Opstal's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cardi van den Berg

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frans J. Los

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karin E. M. Diderich

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marieke Joosten

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen Brandenburg

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Femke de Vries

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge