Dianne L. Brien
United States Geological Survey
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dianne L. Brien.
Geology | 2001
Mark E. Reid; Thomas W. Sisson; Dianne L. Brien
Catastrophic collapses of steep volcano flanks threaten many populated regions, and understanding factors that promote collapse could save lives and property. Large collapses of hydrothermally al- tered parts of Mount Rainier have generated far-traveled debris flows; future flows would threaten densely populated parts of the Puget Sound region. We evaluate edifice collapse hazards at Mount Rainier using a new three-dimensional slope stability method incorporating detailed geologic mapping and subsurface geophysical imaging to de- termine distributions of strong (fresh) and weak (altered) rock. Quan- titative three-dimensional slope stability calculations reveal that size- able flank collapse ( .0.1 km 3 ) is promoted by voluminous, weak, hydrothermally altered rock situated high on steep slopes. These con- ditions exist only on Mount Rainiers upper west slope, consistent with the Holocene debris-flow history. Widespread alteration on lower flanks or concealed in regions of gentle slope high on the edifice does not greatly facilitate collapse. Our quantitative stability assessment method can also provide useful hazard predictions using reconnais- sance geologic information and is a potentially rapid and inexpensive new tool for aiding volcano hazard assessments.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2000
Mark E. Reid; Sarah B. Christian; Dianne L. Brien
Catastrophic flank collapses have occurred at many stratovolcanoes worldwide. We present a three-dimensional (3-D) slope stability analysis for assessing and quantifying both the locations of minimum edifice stability and the expected volumes of potential failure. Our approach can search the materials underlying a topographic surface, represented as a digital elevation model (DEM), and determine the relative stability of all parts of the edifice. Our 3-D extension of Bishops [1955] simplified limit-equilibrium analysis incorporates spherical failure surfaces, variable material properties, pore fluid pressures, and earthquake shaking. Although a variety of processes can trigger collapse, we focus here on gravitationally induced instability. Even homogeneous rock properties strongly influence the depth and volume of the least stable potential failure. For large failures in complex topography, patterns of potential instability do not mimic local ground surface slope alone. The May 18, 1980, catastrophic failure of the north flank of Mount St. Helens provides the best documented case history to test our method. Using the undeformed edifice topography of Mount St. Helens in an analysis of dry, static slope stability with homogeneous materials, as might be conducted in a precollapse hazard analysis, our method identified the northwest flank as the least stable region, although the north flank stability was within 5% of the minimum. Using estimates of the conditions that existed 2 days prior to collapse, including deformed topography with a north flank bulge and combined pore pressure and earthquake shaking effects, we obtained good estimates of the actual failure location and volume. Our method can provide estimates of initial failure volume and location to aid in assessing downslope or downstream hazards.
Archive | 2014
Rex L. Baum; William H. Schulz; Dianne L. Brien; William J. Burns; Mark E. Reid; Jonathan W. Godt
Landslide hazard assessment at local and regional scales contributes to mitigation of landslides in developing and densely populated areas by providing information for (1) land development and redevelopment plans and regulations, (2) emergency preparedness plans, and (3) economic analysis to (a) set priorities for engineered mitigation projects and (b) define areas of similar levels of hazard for insurance purposes. US Geological Survey (USGS) research on landslide hazard assessment has explored a range of methods that can be used to estimate temporal and spatial landslide potential and probability for various scales and purposes. Cases taken primarily from our work in the U.S. Pacific Northwest illustrate and compare a sampling of methods, approaches, and progress. For example, landform mapping using high-resolution topographic data resulted in identification of about four times more landslides in Seattle, Washington, than previous efforts using aerial photography. Susceptibility classes based on the landforms captured 93 % of all historical landslides (all types) throughout the city. A deterministic model for rainfall infiltration and shallow landslide initiation, TRIGRS, was able to identify locations of 92 % of historical shallow landslides in southwest Seattle. The potentially unstable areas identified by TRIGRS occupied only 26 % of the slope areas steeper than 20°. Addition of an unsaturated infiltration model to TRIGRS expands the applicability of the model to areas of highly permeable soils. Replacement of the single cell, 1D factor of safety with a simple 3D method of columns improves accuracy of factor of safety predictions for both saturated and unsaturated infiltration models. A 3D deterministic model for large, deep landslides, SCOOPS, combined with a three-dimensional model for groundwater flow, successfully predicted instability in steep areas of permeable outwash sand and topographic reentrants. These locations are consistent with locations of large, deep, historically active landslides. For an area in Seattle, a composite of the three maps illustrates how maps produced by different approaches might be combined to assess overall landslide potential. Examples from Oregon, USA, illustrate how landform mapping and deterministic analysis for shallow landslide potential have been adapted into standardized methods for efficiently producing detailed landslide inventory and shallow landslide susceptibility maps that have consistent content and format statewide.
Science | 2000
Richard M. Iverson; Mark E. Reid; Neal R. Iverson; Richard G. LaHusen; Michael J. Logan; Dianne L. Brien
Landslides | 2005
Rex L. Baum; Jeffery A. Coe; Jonathan W. Godt; Edwin L. Harp; Mark E. Reid; William Z. Savage; William H. Schulz; Dianne L. Brien; Alan F. Chleborad; Jonathan P. McKenna; John A. Michael
Bulletin of Volcanology | 2010
Mark E. Reid; Terry E.C. Keith; Robert E. Kayen; Neal R. Iverson; Richard M. Iverson; Dianne L. Brien
3rd International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment | 2003
Mark E. Reid; Dianne L. Brien; R.G. LaHusen; Joshua J. Roering; J. de la Fuente; Stephen D. Ellen
Reviews in Engineering Geology | 2008
Dianne L. Brien; Mark E. Reid
Techniques and Methods | 2015
Mark E. Reid; Sarah B. Christian; Dianne L. Brien; Scott T. Henderson
The First World Landslide Forum | 2008
Mark E. Reid; Richard M. Iverson; Neal R. Iverson; Richard G. LaHusen; Dianne L. Brien; Matthew Logan