Dianne Tomita

Effects of polyethylene glycol-conjugated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor on platelet counts after chemotherapy for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (MGDF, also known as PEG-rHuMGDF), a recombinant molecule related to thrombopoietin, specifically stimulates megakaryopoiesis and platelet production and reduces the severity of thrombocytopenia in animals receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study of MGDF in 53 patients with lung cancer who were treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The patients were randomly assigned in blocks of 4 in a 1:3 ratio to receive either placebo or MGDF (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 5.0 microg per kilogram of body weight per day), injected subcutaneously. No other marrow-active cytokines were given. RESULTS In the 38 patients who received MGDF after chemotherapy, the median nadir platelet count was 188,000 per cubic millimeter (range, 68,000 to 373,000), as compared with 111,000 per cubic millimeter (range, 21,000 to 307,000) in 12 patients receiving placebo (P = 0.013). The platelet count recovered to base-line levels in 14 days in the treated patients as compared with more than 21 days in those receiving placebo (P<0.001). Among all 40 patients treated with MGDF, 1 had deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and another had superficial thrombophlebitis. CONCLUSIONS MGDF has potent stimulatory effects on platelet production in patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.

Thrombopoietic effects of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND Pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) is a potent stimulator of megakaryocyte colony formation and platelet production. It is likely to be useful in the management of severe thrombocytopenia. To determine its clinical activity and safety, we gave it to patients with advanced cancer before chemotherapy. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive either PEG-rHuMGDF or placebo in a three to one ratio. PEG-rHuMGDF was given at a dose of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 microgram/kg body weight. The study drug or placebo were administered daily by subcutaneous injection for up to 10 days or until a target platelet count was reached. FINDINGS 17 patients, median age 59 years, received either PEG-rHuMGDF (13 patients) or placebo (four patients). PEG-rHuMGDF produced a dose-dependent increase in platelet counts. Patients given placebo. 0.03, and 0.1 microgram/kg of PEG-rHuMGDF had median increases in platelet counts of 16%, 12%, and 39%. Those receiving 0.3 and 1.0 microgram/kg of PEG-rHuMGDF had an increase in blood platelets of between 51% and 584%. Platelets rose from day 6 of PEG-rHuMGDF administration and continued to rise after stopping the drug. The platelet count peaked between days 12 and 18 and remained above 450 x 10(9)/L for up to 21 days. There were no alterations in white-blood-cell count or haematocrit, and low toxicity. Platelets taken from patients during PEG-rHuMGDF administration and at the time of peak platelet count were morphologically and functionally normal. INTERPRETATION The potency with which PEG-rHuMGDF stimulates platelet production and its low toxicity indicate that this is likely to be a useful agent for the management of thrombocytopenia.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in oncology: a study-level meta-analysis of survival and other safety outcomes

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often develop the potentially debilitating condition of anaemia. Numerous controlled studies indicate that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) can raise haemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. To evaluate recent safety concerns regarding ESAs, we carried out a meta-analysis of controlled ESA oncology trials to examine whether ESA use affects survival, disease progression and risk of venous-thromboembolic events.METHODS: This meta-analysis included studies from the 2006 Cochrane meta-analysis, studies published/updated since the 2006 Cochrane report, and unpublished trial data from Amgen and Centocor Ortho Biotech. The 60 studies analysed (15 323 patients) were conducted in the settings of chemotherapy/radiochemotherapy, radiotherapy only treatment or anaemia of cancer. Data were summarised using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).RESULTS: Results indicated that ESA use did not significantly affect mortality (60 studies: OR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.97–1.15) or disease progression (26 studies: OR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.90–1.14), but increased the risk for venous-thromoboembolic events (44 studies: OR=1.48; 95% CI: 1.28–1.72).CONCLUSION: Though this meta-analysis showed no significant effect of ESAs on survival or disease progression, prospectively designed, future randomised clinical trials will further examine the safety and efficacy of ESAs when used according to the revised labelling information.

Phase 2, single-arm trial to evaluate the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for correcting anaemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) often develop anaemia resulting in frequent transfusions and fatigue. Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent (ESA) approved for treating chemotherapy‐induced anaemia. This single‐arm, phase 2 study examined the efficacy of darbepoetin alfa 500 μg every 3 weeks (Q3W) for treating anaemia in low‐risk MDS patients (after 6 weeks, poor responders received darbepoetin alfa 500 μg every 2 weeks). The primary end‐point was the incidence of erythroid responses (International Working Group criteria) after 13 weeks of therapy. Secondary end‐points included the incidence of erythroid responses at weeks 28 and 55, [or weeks 27 and 53 for dose escalations to every two weeks (Q2W)], and safety parameters. Analyses were stratified by the patient’s previous ESA therapy status [ESA‐naïve (n = 144) vs. prior ESA‐treated (n = 62)]. After 13 weeks of therapy, 49% of ESA‐naïve patients and 26% of prior ESA‐treated patients achieved a major erythroid response. After 53/55 weeks, 59% of ESA‐naïve patients and 34% of prior ESA‐treated patients achieved a major erythroid response; 82% of ESA‐naïve patients and 55% of prior ESA‐treated patients achieved target haemoglobin of 110 g/l. Thromboembolic or related adverse events occurred in 2% of patients; no pulmonary embolisms were reported. In conclusion, darbepoetin alfa, 500 μg Q3W appeared well tolerated and increased haemoglobin levels in low‐risk MDS patients.

A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of Practice Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of the Use of Darbepoetin Alfa and Epoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia

BACKGROUND Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported. OBJECTIVE This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States. METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents. RESULTS The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 microg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa, 44553 [8.0%]; epoetin alfa, 39414 [9.4%]). CONCLUSIONS Darbepoetin alfa 200 microg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.

The impact of Filgrastim schedule variation on hematopoietic recovery post-chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND A phase 2 trial was done to study effects of varying treatment schedule of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) on hematologic recovery following chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-six patients with extensive small-cell carcinoma of the lung were randomized to receive one of three Filgrastim schedules following cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CAE) chemotherapy for up to six cycles of treatment. Chemotherapy was delivered on days 1-3 of each 21-day cycle with Filgrastim initiated at 5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously (SC) beginning on day 4, day 6, or day 8 and continuing until post-nadir neutrophil recovery. RESULTS During the first cycle of chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia was similar for all three schedules; however, the pattern of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery differed. In subsequent cycles of treatment, an improvement in the severity of neutropenia occurred in patients on the day-4 and day-6 schedules compared with the first cycle of chemotherapy. By contrast, patients on the day-8 schedule continued to experience neutropenia similar to that seen in cycle one. Patients on the day-8 schedule also experienced a greater magnitude of grade IV thrombocytopenia in later cycles of treatment. CONCLUSION Timing of Filgrastim administration post-chemotherapy has profound effects on hematologic recovery. Delay of Filgrastim until day 8 was associated with suboptimal hematologic recovery compared with administration of Filgrastim on day 4 or day 6. Initiation of Filgrastim on day 4 or day 6 showed a similar pattern of hematologic recovery. Beginning Filgrastim on day 6 is associated with a decrease in the total dose of Filgrastim administered.

Trends in the prevalence of asthma hospitalization in the 5- to 14-year-old Michigan Medicaid population, 1980 to 1986

BACKGROUND Despite advances in therapy, morbidity and mortality rates as a result of pediatric asthma appear to have increased during the past decade. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that these increases disproportionately affected black children and the urban poor. METHODS With use of data from the Medicaid Management Information System, we estimated the prevalence of asthma hospitalization in the 5- to 14-year-old Michigan Medicaid population for the period 1980 to 1986. RESULTS Large increases were seen between 1980 and 1984, with leveling off or a slight decline thereafter. In 5- to 9-year-old children, the prevalence of asthma hospitalization increased from 2.3 per 1000 persons in 1980 to 4.5 per 1000 in 1984. Ten- to 14-year-old children demonstrated an increase of 2.2 per 1000 in 1980 to 3.2 per 1000 in 1984. Comparable trends occurred in all strata defined by age, race, residency, and gender. However, the largest increases were noted in urban black children, in which the rate more than doubled from 3.2 per 1000 in 1980 to 7.1 per 1000 in 1984. The adjusted relative risk for asthma hospitalization associated with being male was 1.6 (95% CI: 1.5, 1.7), with being black was 2.2 (95% CI: 2.1, 2.4), and with living in an urban county was 1.1 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.4). CONCLUSIONS Within this relatively homogeneous low socioeconomic population, black race remained a strong predictor for asthma hospitalization, whereas urban residence was only minimally associated with this outcome.

Assessing symptom burden using the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: Results of a multicenter, open-label study (SURPASS) of patients treated with darbepoetin-α at a dose of 200 μg every 2 weeks

Patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy often experience chemotherapy‐induced anemia (CIA), which is associated with symptoms that reduce quality of life. The M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a brief, self‐rating assessment scale that measures the severity of core symptoms and symptom interference with function. The current study used the MDASI to prospectively assess the correlation between hemoglobin and self‐perceived cancer‐related symptoms in a large patient population with CIA who were receiving darbepoetin‐α at a dose of 200 μg every 2 weeks.

Benefits and risks of using erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in lung cancer patients: study-level and patient-level meta-analyses.

In anemic patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) raise hemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements, but ESA-related safety concerns exist. To evaluate ESA benefits and risks in lung cancer, we conducted meta-analyses of data from controlled ESA trials conducted in lung cancer patients. Study-level analyses included controlled ESA trials reporting lung cancer mortality, identified from the 2006 Cochrane ESA report and from a systematic search for studies published through December 2010. Patient-level analyses included data from lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in Amgen studies evaluating darbepoetin alfa (DA) vs placebo. Study-level and patient-level analyses examined deaths, progression, and transfusion incidence. Patient-level analyses also examined adverse events (AEs) and fatigue. In a study-level meta-analysis of nine ESA studies of 2342 patients receiving chemotherapy, the ESA odds ratio (OR) was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.09) for mortality; the overall random-effects risk difference (95% CI) for mortality was -0.02 (-0.06, 0.02). The ESA OR (95% CI) for disease progression in five chemotherapy studies reporting progression was 0.84 (0.65-1.09). The ESA odds ratio (95% CI) was 0.34 (0.28-0.41) for transfusion incidence. In a patient-level meta-analysis of four studies evaluating 1009 patients through follow-up, the median survival time was 41 weeks with DA and 38 weeks with placebo. During the combined study and follow-up periods, 80% of placebo-group patients and 74% of DA patients died (mortality hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% CI, 0.78-1.03] for DA); results were similar for small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Overall, 87% of placebo patients and 84% of DA patients progressed or died. Fewer DA patients had transfusions (week 5 through end-of-study, DA 19%, placebo 43%). AEs included thrombotic/embolic events (DA 10.5%, placebo 7.2%), cerebrovascular disorders (DA 3.7%, placebo 4.2%), pulmonary edema (DA 0.4%, placebo 1.0%) and pulmonary embolism (DA 1.8%, placebo 0.6%). These meta-analyses suggest that ESAs reduce transfusions without increasing mortality or disease progression in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of every-3-week darbepoetin alfa 300 micrograms for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia.

ABSTRACT Objective: Darbepoetin alfa is effective in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Administration of subcutaneous darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks (Q3W) could simplify treatment through synchronization with common Q3W chemotherapy regimens. We report results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose Q3W darbepoetin alfa in patients with a wide variety of tumor types who experienced CIA. Research design and methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL) being treated for nonmyeloid malignancy were randomized 1:1 to receive darbepoetin alfa 300 μg (n = 193) or placebo (n = 193) subcutaneously Q3W from weeks 1 to 13 in this 16-week study. Doses could be adjusted per prespecified rules. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received ≥1 red blood cell (RBC) transfusion between week 5 and the end of the treatment period (EOTP). The study also analyzed the proportions of patients achieving a hemoglobin concentration ≥11 g/dL and subsequently maintaining hemoglobin levels above 11 g/dL, and the change in hemoglobin concentration over time. Results: The proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions between week 5 and EOTP was significantly lower in the darbepoetin alfa-treated group than in the placebo-treated group (24 vs. 41% of patients, a 16.3% difference, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two treatment arms in quality-of-life measures. Cardiovascular/thromboembolic adverse events were uncommon and were not associated with increases in hemoglobin levels. Study limitations suggest caution in the interpretation of these results: transfusions, the primary endpoint, were recommended but not required if hemoglobin concentrations were ≤8.0 g/dL, and protocol deviations (primarily dosing errors) occurred in approximately one-half of the patients in both treatment groups. Conclusions: In this study, fixed-dose Q3W darbepoetin alfa appeared to be well-tolerated and effective for the treatment of CIA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00110955.