Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Didier Dubois is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Didier Dubois.


Archive | 1999

Fuzzy Sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems

Didier Dubois; Henri Prade; James C. Bezdek

Series Foreword. Contributing Authors. Introduction. Part I: Reasoning. 1. Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory in Approximate and Plausible Reasoning B. Bouchon-Meunier, et al. 2. Weighted Inference Systems V. Novak. 3. Closure Operators in Fuzzy set Theory L. Biacino, G. Gerla. Part II: Learning and Fusion. 4. Learning Fuzzy Decision Rules B. Bouchon-Meunier, C. Marsala. 5. Neuro-Fuzzy Methods in Fuzzy Rule Generation D. Nauck, R. Kruse. 6. Merging Fuzzy Information D. Dubois, et al. Part III: Fuzzy Information Systems. 7. Fuzzy Databases P. Bosc, et al. 8. Fuzzy Set Techniques in Information Retrieval D.H. Kraft, et al. Summary. References


Stochastica: revista de matemática pura y aplicada | 1984

A theorem on implication functions defined from triangular norms.

Didier Dubois; Henri Prade

Several transformation which enable implication functions in multivalued logics to be generated from conjunctions have been proposed in the literature. It is proved that for a rather general class of conjunctions modeled by triangular norms, the generation process is closed, thus shedding some light on the relationships between seemingly independent classes of implication functions.


Archive | 1998

Belief Change Rules in Ordinal and Numerical Uncertainty Theories

Didier Dubois; Serafín Moral; Henri Prade

The situation of belief change in numerical uncertainty frameworks differs from the situation in classical logic in two respects: on the one hand, uncertainty theories are tailored to representing epistemic states involving shades of belief and are more expressive than classical logic in that respect. Indeed, considering a propositional belief set (a set of accepted beliefs) from the standpoint of uncertainty, a proposition is only surely true (it belongs to the belief set), surely false (its negation belongs to the belief set) or unknown (neither the proposition nor its negation belong to the belief set). Uncertainty theories express the extent to which an ultimately true or false proposition is believed. On the other hand, many logical-oriented belief revision theories are syntax-dependent (e.g., [Nebel, 1992], and in this book)—although they are semantically meaningful—while uncertainty theories adopt a semantic representation of epistemic states. In syntax-dependent theories of revision two logically equivalent, syntactically distinct, belief bases are generally not revised in the same way. The syntactic dimension of logical approaches introduces a level of increased complexity and expressiveness that cannot be grasped in the usual uncertainty theories. So, uncertainty theories are altogether more refined and less expressive than logical syntax-dependent approaches for the purpose of belief change.


Archive | 2008

Soft Methods for Handling Variability and Imprecision

Didier Dubois; M. Asunción Lubiano; Henri Prade; María Ángeles Gil; Przemysław Grzegorzewski; Olgierd Hryniewicz

Probability theory has been the only well-founded theory of uncertainty for a long time. It was viewed either as a powerful tool for modelling random phenomena, or as a rational approach to the notion of degree of belief. During the last thirty years, in areas centered around decision theory, artificial intelligence and information processing, numerous approaches extending or orthogonal to the existing theory of probability and mathematical statistics have come to the front. The common feature of those attempts is to allow for softer or wider frameworks for taking into account the incompleteness or imprecision of information. Many of these approaches come down to blending interval or fuzzy interval analysis with probabilistic methods. This book gathers contributions to the 4th International Conference on Soft methods in Probability and Statistics. Its aim is to present recent results illustrating such new trends that enlarge the statistical and uncertainty modeling traditions, towards the handling of incomplete or subjective information. It covers a broad scope ranging from philosophical and mathematical underpinnings of new uncertainty theories, with a stress on their impact in the area of statistics and data analysis, to numerical methods and applications to environmental risk analysis and mechanical engineering. A unique feature of this collection is to establish a dialogue between fuzzy random variables and imprecise probability theories.


The Many Valued and Nonmonotonic Turn in Logic | 2007

Fuzzy-Set Based Logics — an History-Oriented Presentation of their Main Developments

Didier Dubois; Francesc Esteva; Lluís Godo; Henri Prade

The historical development of fuzzy logic may look somewhat erratic. The concept of approximate reasoning developed by Zadeh in the seventies in considerable details did not receive great attention at the time, neither from the logical community nor from the engineering community let alone the artificial intelligence community, despite isolated related works in the eighties. Engineers exploited very successful, sometimes ad hoc, numerical techniques borrowing only a small part of fuzzy set concepts. They did not implement the combination projection principle, which is the backbone of approximate reasoning. Finally, there is a long tradition of mutual distrust between artificial intelligence and fuzzy logic, because of the numerical flavor of the latter. A new trend, the fundamental thesis of Zadeh—namely, the “fuzzy logic is a logic of approximate reasoning” is again left on the side of the road. Yet the contention is that, a good approach to ensuring a full revival of fuzzy logic is to demonstrate its capability to reasoning about knowledge and uncertainty.


International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems | 2002

A theoretical framework for possibilistic independence in a weakly ordered setting

N. Ben Amor; Khaled Mellouli; Salem Benferhat; Didier Dubois; Henri Prade

The notion of independence is central in many information processing areas, such as multiple criteria decision making, databases, or uncertain reasoning. This is especially true in the later case, where the success of Bayesian networks is basically due to the graphical representation of independence they provide. This paper first studies qualitative independence relations when uncertainty is encoded by a complete pre-order between states of the world. While a lot of work has focused on the formulation of suitable definitions of independence in uncertainty theories our interest in this paper is rather to formulate a general definition of independence based on purely ordinal considerations, and that applies to all weakly ordered settings. The second part of the paper investigates the impact of the embedding of qualitative independence relations into the scale-based possibility theory. The absolute scale used in this setting enforces the commensurateness between local pre-orders (since they share the same scale). This leads to an easy decomposability property of the joint distributions into more elementary relations on the basis of the independence relations. Lastly we provide a comparative study between already known definitions of possibilistic independence and the ones proposed here.


Archive | 1998

Introduction: The Real Contribution of Fuzzy Systems

Didier Dubois; Hung T. Nguyen; Henri Prade; Michio Sugeno

Fuzzy logic (FL) was invented in the sixties by a leading expert in control engineering who realized that control theory had become beautiful enough to carry on its development on its own, but that there was many real problems it could not solve. Most real complex system control problems involve man. Hence applying control theory to complex control problems may require a formal understanding of how a human operator understands his system, what his goals are, and how he proceeds when controlling it. It requires a dedicated tool for representing human-originated information in a flexible way. And this is where fuzzy logic enters the picture (Zadeh [28]). In a paper that can be considered as the origin of the fuzzy rule-based approach, Zadeh [31] claimed that systems analysis and control requires a trade-off between representations that are very precise and accurate, such as numerical ones stemming from numerical functions, differential equations and the like, and representations that are intelligible, meaningful to humans, hence summarized, possibly in linguistic terms. However these two kinds of representations are sort of antagonistic because the more precise and accurate a representation, the less understandable it is, and conversely. This is Zadeh’s principle of incompatibility, and it explains the particular position of fuzzy logic in control and systems engineering, and the misunderstandings and controversies it has created in the control engineering community. The contribution of fuzzy systems may not be at the level where traditional systems engineers expect contributions: where they expect improved performance, they might get improved intelligibility, flexibility and transparency in the representation of dynamic systems and the design of controllers.


RSCTC'06 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing | 2006

Bipolar representations in reasoning, knowledge extraction and decision processes

Didier Dubois; Henri Prade

This paper surveys various areas in information engineering where an explicit handling of positive and negative sides of information is appropriate. Three forms of bipolarity are laid bare. They can be instrumental in logical representations of incompleteness, rule representation and extraction, argumentation, and decision analysis.


Archive | 1993

A Glance at Non-Standard Models and Logics of Uncertainty and Vagueness

Didier Dubois; Henri Prade

Historically, it is well known that the notion of probability emerged in the 17th century as a dual concept: chance, related to gaming problems, and subjective uncertainty, related to the question of reliability of testimonies. In the works of pioneers of probability theory, such as J. Bernoulli, chance, very soon connected to frequency of occurrence, was an additive notion but subjective probability was not so. However with the development of physical sciences, the non-additive side of probability was forgotten (see Shafer, 1978). So much so as 20th century researchers in decision theory have devoted much effort in the non-frequentist justification of additive probability as a model for subjective uncertainty in rational decision strategies.


conference on decision and control | 1979

Various kinds of interactive addition of fuzzy numbers, application to decision analysis in presence of linguistic probabilities

Didier Dubois; Henri Prade

After a brief recall of possibility theory and of the concept of interactivity, new results concerning different kinds of addition of fuzzy numbers are given (to introduce these additions, no reference to the extension principle is needed). As an illustration, the application of one of these results to a problem (which was unsolved until now) of decision-making in presence of linguistic probabilities is presented.

Collaboration


Dive into the Didier Dubois's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lluís Godo

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandra A. Sandri

National Institute for Space Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Salem Benferhat

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jérôme Lang

Paris Dauphine University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Régis Sabbadin

Institut national de la recherche agronomique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francesc Esteva

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philippe Fortemps

Faculté polytechnique de Mons

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allel HadjAli

Paul Sabatier University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge