Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dimitrios Haidopoulos is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dimitrios Haidopoulos.


Cancer | 2010

Mucinous but not clear cell histology is associated with inferior survival in patients with advanced stage ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy†

Aristotle Bamias; Theodora Psaltopoulou; M. Sotiropoulou; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Evangelos Lianos; Evangelos Bournakis; Christos Papadimitriou; Alexandros Rodolakis; George Vlahos; Meletius A. Dimopoulos

Mucinous and clear cell histology have been associated with adverse prognosis in ovarian carcinomas. The authors compared the outcome of these subtypes with that of serous tumors in patients who were treated with combination paclitaxel/platinum at their center.


Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation | 2002

Conservative Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2–3) in Pregnant Women

George Vlahos; Alexandros Rodolakis; Emmanuel Diakomanolis; Konstantinos Stefanidis; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; K. Abela; V. Georgountzos; S. Michalas

The management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2–3) diagnosed during pregnancy was the subject of this study. Two hundred and eight pregnant women with an abnormal cytology were assessed in our unit over a 10-year period. The age of the patients ranged from 20 to 45 (mean 28) years. Seventy-eight of these women were histologically proven to have CIN2–3. All patients were followed up every 8–10 weeks by cytology and colposcopy during pregnancy and reassessed 8–12 weeks postpartum. The disease persisted in 30 cases (38.4%), whereas in the remaining 48 cases it regressed to CIN1. No case of invasive disease developed during the follow-up period in these pregnant patients. Conservative management of CIN2–3 during pregnancy is acceptable, but close follow-up and colposcopic expertise are necessary.


Annals of Oncology | 2013

The need for accredited training in gynaecological oncology: a report from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO)

Ranjit Manchanda; M Godfrey; La Wong-Taylor; Michael Halaska; Matthew Burnell; Jacek P. Grabowski; Murat Gultekin; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Ignacio Zapardiel; Boris Vranes; Kesic; P Zola; Nicoletta Colombo; R. H. M. Verheijen; M Bossart; J Piek

BACKGROUNDnPrimary data on training experiences of European gynaecological oncology trainees are lacking. This study aims to evaluate trainee profile, satisfaction and factors affecting the training experience in gynaecological oncology in Europe.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnA web-based anonymous survey sent to ENYGO members/trainees in July 2011. It included sociodemographic information and a 22-item (1-5 Likert scale) questionnaire evaluating training experience in gynaecological oncology. Chi-square tests were used for evaluating the independence of categorical variables and t-test (parametric)/Mann-Whitney (non-parametric) tests for differences between two independent groups on continuous data. Cluster analysis was used to identify groupings in multivariate data and Cronbachs-alpha for questionnaire reliability. A multivariable linear regression model was used to assess the effect of variables on training satisfaction.nnnRESULTSnOne hundred and nineteen gynaecological-oncology trainees from 31 countries responded. The mean age was 37.4 (S.D, 5.3) years and 55.5% were in accredited training posts. Two clusters identified in the cohort (Calinski-Harabasz, CH = 47.35) differed mainly by accredited training (P = 0.003). The training-satisfaction score (TSS) had high reliability (Cronbachs alpha, 0.951) and was significantly associated with accredited posts (P < 0.0005), years of training (P = 0.001) and salary (P = 0.002). The TSS was independent of age (P = 0.360), working hours (P = 0.620), overtime-pay (P = 0.318), annual leave (P = 0.933), gender (P = 0.545) and marital status (P = 0.731). Accredited programme trainees scored significantly higher than others in 17 of 22 aspects of training. The areas of greater need included advanced laparoscopic/urological/colorectal surgery, radiation oncology, palliative-care, cancer genetics and research opportunities.nnnCONCLUSIONSnOur data demonstrate the importance of accredited training and the need for harmonisation of gynaecological oncology training within Europe.


European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2014

First versus second stage C/S maternal and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vasileios Pergialiotis; Dimitrios Vlachos; Alexandros Rodolakis; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Nikolaos Thomakos; Georgios Vlachos

The rates of cesarean section at full cervical dilatation (second stage cesarean sections) are currently increasing. The purpose of the present study is to compare maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality among cases offered cesarean section at full dilatation to those offered cesarean section prior to full dilatation. We searched Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.org, Popline, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar search engines, along with reference lists from all included studies. The RevMan 5.0 software was used for all analyses. Primary maternal outcomes were defined as death, ICU admission and need for transfusion, while primary neonatal outcomes were defined as death, neonatal unit admission and 5min Apgar score less than 7. Ten studies were finally retrieved involving 23,104 singleton childbearing women (18,160 operated in the first stage and 4944 in the second stage of labor). Second stage cesarean section seems to lead to higher maternal admissions to ICU (OR 7.41, 95% CI 2.47-22.5) and higher transfusion rates (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.49-2.54). Neonatal death rates were also increased (OR 5.20, 95% CI 2.49-10.85) along with admissions to neonatal unit (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.91-2.91) and rates of Apgar score less than 7 in 5min (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.02-7.50). Second stage cesarean section seems to result significantly increased morbidity for both mothers and neonates. It seems that a direct evaluation with forceps and vacuum extractors is imperative in order to establish its place in modern evidence-based practice.


International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2017

European Society of Gynecological Oncology Statement on Fibroid and Uterine Morcellation.

Michael Halaska; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; F Guyon; P Morice; Ignacio Zapardiel; Kesic; David Cibula; Denis Querleu; Murat Gultekin; C Creutzberg; E Avall-Lundqvist; F Goffin; N Concin; A Ferrero; D Kurdiani; J Ledermann; J Ponce; C Sessa; P Wimberger; C Marth; Rene Laky

Abstract Recently, there has been an intense discussion about the issue of fibroid and uterine morcellation in relation to the risk of unrecognized uterine sarcoma spread. Morcellation can negatively influence the prognosis of patients, and transecting the specimen into pieces prevents the pathologist from performing proper disease staging. Many societies have published their statements regarding this issue. The European Society for Gynecological Oncology has established a working group of clinicians involved in diagnostics and treatment of oncogynecological patients to provide a statement from the oncological point of view. Leiomyosarcomas and undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas have generally dismal prognosis, whereas low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and adenosarcomas have variable prognosis based on their stage. A focus on the detection of patients at risk of having a sarcoma should be mandatory before every surgery where morcellation is planned by evaluation of risk factors (African American descent, previous pelvic irradiation, use of tamoxifen, rapid lesion growth particularly in postmenopausal patients) and exclusion of patients with any suspicious ultrasonographic signs. Preoperative endometrial biopsy should be mandatory, although the sensitivity to detect sarcomas is low. An indication for myomectomy should be used only in patients with pregnancy plans; otherwise en bloc hysterectomy is preferred in both symptomatic and postmenopausal patients. Eliminating the technique of morcellation could lead to an increased morbidity in low-risk patients; therefore, after thorough preoperative evaluation and discussion with patients, morcellation still has its place in the armamentarium of gynecologic surgery.Recently, there has been an intense discussion about the issue of fibroid and uterine morcellation in relation to the risk of unrecognized uterine sarcoma spread. Morcellation can negatively influence the prognosis of patients, and transecting the specimen into pieces prevents the pathologist from performing proper disease staging. Many societies have published their statements regarding this issue. The European Society for Gynecological Oncology has established a working group of clinicians involved in diagnostics and treatment of oncogynecological patients to provide a statement from the oncological point of view. Leiomyosarcomas and undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas have generally dismal prognosis, whereas low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and adenosarcomas have variable prognosis based on their stage. A focus on the detection of patients at risk of having a sarcoma should be mandatory before every surgery where morcellation is planned by evaluation of risk factors (African American descent, previous pelvic irradiation, use of tamoxifen, rapid lesion growth particularly in postmenopausal patients) and exclusion of patients with any suspicious ultrasonographic signs. Preoperative endometrial biopsy should be mandatory, although the sensitivity to detect sarcomas is low. An indication for myomectomy should be used only in patients with pregnancy plans; otherwise en bloc hysterectomy is preferred in both symptomatic and postmenopausal patients. Eliminating the technique of morcellation could lead to an increased morbidity in low-risk patients; therefore, after thorough preoperative evaluation and discussion with patients, morcellation still has its place in the armamentarium of gynecologic surgery.


Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2014

Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing for vaginal hysterectomies

Vasileios Pergialiotis; Dimitrios Vlachos; Alexandros Rodolakis; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Dimitrios Christakis; Georgios Vlachos

AbstractBackgroundVascular clamping of the uterine vessels and the ovarian and broad ligaments during vaginal hysterectomies is more difficult than in traditional abdominal hysterectomies. We aimed to assess the efficacy of electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing systems (EBVS) as an adequate alternative to traditional suturing that could facilitate the accomplishment of securing the vascular pedicles.MethodsnWe searched MEDLINE (1966–2013), Scopus (2004–2013), POPLINE (1973–2013), Cochrane Central (1999–2013) and Google Scholar (2004–2013) search engines, along with reference lists from all included studies.ResultsEight randomized trials were selected, including 772 patients. We found that operative duration did not differ significantly among women treated with EBVS and those treated with traditional suture ligation (MD −16.86, 95xa0% CI −34.77, 1.05). Intraoperative blood loss on the other hand was significantly lower in the EBVS-treated group (MD −49.47, 95xa0% CI −67.60, −31.35). There were no significant differences in intraoperative complication rates (OR 0.96, 95xa0% CI 0.46, 2.01), major postoperative complication rates (OR 0.61, 95xa0% CI 0.29, 1.32) or minor complications (OR 1.63, 95xa0% CI 0.67, 3.92).ConclusionOur meta-analysis showed that EBVS seem to produce less intraoperative blood loss during vascular clamping, without significantly lowering intraoperative time or complication rate. However, the heterogeneity of included studies preclude firm conclusions. Future studies examine consistently their safety, and cost-effectiveness, and whether the application of such units will enhance the rates of vaginal hysterectomies.


International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2011

Gynecologic Oncology Training Systems in Europe A Report From the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists

Murat Gultekin; Polat Dursun; Boris Vranes; Rene Laky; M Bossart; Jacek P. Grabowski; J Piek; Ranjit Manchanda; Christoph Grimm; Kastriot Dallaku; Syuzanna Babloyan; Anna Moisei; Toon Van Gorp; Isabelle Cadron; Peter Markov; Ana Micevska; Michael Halaska; Karina Dahl Steffensen; Liidia Gristsenko; Ritva Nissi; Eric Lambaudie; Zaza Tsitsishvili; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Dimitrios Tsolakidis; Zoltán Novák; Michele Peiretti; Gauhar Dunenova; Ronalds Macuks; Thea E Hetland; Trond M. Michelsen

Objective: The objectives of the study were to highlight some of the differences in training systems and opportunities for training in gynecologic oncology across Europe and to draw attention to steps that can be taken to improve training prospects and experiences of European trainees in gynecologic oncology. Methods: The European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists national representatives from 34 countries were asked to review and summarize the training system in their countries of origin and fulfill a mini-questionnaire evaluating different aspects of training. We report analysis of outcomes of the mini-questionnaire and subsequent discussion at the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists national representatives Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention meeting in Istanbul (April 2010). Results: Training fellowships in gynecologic oncology are offered by 18 countries (53%). The median duration of training is 2.5 years (interquartile range, 2.0-3.0 years). Chemotherapy administration is part of training in 70.5% (24/34) countries. Most of the countries (26/34) do not have a dedicated national gynecologic-oncology journal. All trainees reported some or good access to training in advanced laparoscopic surgical techniques, whereas 41% indicated no access, and 59% some access to training opportunities in robotic surgery. European countries were grouped into 3 different categories on the basis of available training opportunities in gynecologic oncology: well-structured, moderately structured, and loosely structured training systems. Conclusions: There is a need for further harmonization and standardization of training programs and structures in gynecologic oncology across Europe. This is of particular relevance for loosely structured countries that lag behind the moderately structured and well-structured ones.


International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2015

The Work Place Educational Climate in Gynecological Oncology Fellowships Across Europe The Impact of Accreditation

J Piek; M Bossart; K Boor; Michael Halaska; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Ignacio Zapardiel; J Grabowski; Kesic; David Cibula; Nicoletta Colombo; René H.M. Verheijen; Ranjit Manchanda

Background A good educational climate/environment in the workplace is essential for developing high-quality medical (sub)specialists. These data are lacking for gynecological oncology training. Objective This study aims to evaluate the educational climate in gynecological oncology training throughout Europe and the factors affecting it. Methods A Web-based anonymous survey sent to ENYGO (European Network of Young Gynecological Oncologists) members/trainees to assess gynecological oncology training. This included sociodemographic information, details regarding training posts, and a 50-item validated Dutch Residency Educational Climate Test (D-RECT) questionnaire with 11 subscales (1–5 Likert scale) to assess the educational climate. The χ2 test was used for evaluating categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney U (nonparametric) test was used for continuous variables between 2 independent groups. Cronbach &agr; assessed the questionnaire reliability. Multivariable linear regression assessed the effect of variables on D-RECT outcome subscales. Results One hundred nineteen gynecological oncological fellows responded. The D-RECT questionnaire was extremely reliable for assessing the educational environment in gynecological oncology (subscales’ Cronbach &agr;, 0.82–0.96). Overall, trainees do not seem to receive adequate/effective constructive feedback during training. The overall educational climate (supervision, coaching/assessment, feedback, teamwork, interconsultant relationships, formal education, role of the tutor, patient handover, and overall consultant’s attitude) was significantly better (P = 0.001) in centers providing accredited training in comparison with centers without such accreditation. Multivariable regression indicated the main factors independently associated with a better educational climate were presence of an accredited training post and total years of training. Conclusions This study emphasizes the need for better feedback mechanisms and the importance of accreditation of centers for training in gynecological oncology to ensure training within higher quality clinical learning climates.


International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2013

The need for more workshops in laparoscopic surgery and surgical anatomy for European gynaecological oncology trainees: a survey by the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists.

Ranjit Manchanda; Michael Halaska; J Piek; Jacek P. Grabowski; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Ignacio Zapardiel; Murat Gultekin; Boris Vranes; Kastriot Dallaku; M Bossart

Objective The objective of this study was to highlight the relative preference of European gynecologic oncology trainees for workshops that could support and supplement their training needs. Methods A Web-based survey was sent to 900 trainees on the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists database in November 2011. Respondents were asked to rate a 13-item questionnaire (using a 1- to 5-point Likert scale) on workshop topics they felt would most benefit their training requirements. Free text space for additional topics was also provided. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the mean scores reported for different items. A complete linkage hierarchical cluster analysis with Dendron plot was used to assess any clustering of data, and Cronbach &agr; was used to assess the internal reliability of the questionnaire. Results One hundred ninety trainees from 37 countries responded to the survey, giving a 21% response rate. The 3 most important topics reported were laparoscopic surgery; surgical anatomy, and imaging techniques in gynecologic oncology. The Dendron plot indicated 4 different clusters of workshops (research related skills, supportive ancillary skills, related nonsurgical subspecialties, and core surgical skills) reflecting different competencies trainees need to meet. There was no significant association between individual country of training and workshop preference. The mean duration of the workshop preferred by 71% of respondents was 2 days. Cronbach &agr; of the 13-item questionnaire was 0.78, which suggests good internal consistency/reliability. Conclusions This report for the first time highlights the relative importance and significance European trainees attach to some of their training needs in gynecologic oncology. Laparoscopic surgery, surgical anatomy, and imaging appear to be the 3 areas of greatest need. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, other national specialist societies, and institutions should direct additional training efforts at these areas.


Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2005

Primary malignant mixed mullerian tumor of the vagina immunohistochemically confirmed

Maria Sotiropoulou; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; George Vlachos; Athanasios Pilalis; Alexandros Rodolakis; Emmanuel Diakomanolis

Case reportWe report the case of a 74-year old woman who presented with an ulcerated mass of the vagina. Histology of the tumor showed malignant mixed mullerian tumor (MMMT) with squamous and spindle cell stromal components, associated with high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN 3). Immunohistochemical study of the neoplasm revealed that the malignant stromal tumor was a high-grade leiomyosarcoma. Despite the multimodal therapeutic approach, the patient died within 11xa0months.ConclusionThe vagina is a rare site of presentation of primary MMMTs and the present case is the second one immunohistochemically confirmed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dimitrios Haidopoulos's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Halaska

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ignacio Zapardiel

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ranjit Manchanda

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M Bossart

University of Freiburg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J Piek

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge