Dimitriy V. Masterov
University of Chicago
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dimitriy V. Masterov.
The Journal of Law and Economics | 2005
Pedro Carneiro; James J. Heckman; Dimitriy V. Masterov
This paper investigates the relative significance of differences in cognitive skills and discrimination in explaining racial/ethnic wage gaps. We show that cognitive test scores for exams taken prior to entering the labor market are influenced by schooling. Adjusting the scores for racial/ethnic differences in education at the time the test is taken reduces their role in accounting for the wage gaps. We also consider evidence on parental and child expectations about education and on stereotype threat effects. We find both factors to be implausible alternative explanations for the gaps we observe. We argue that policies need to address the sources of early skill gaps and to seek to influence the more malleable behavioral abilities in addition to their cognitive counterparts. Such policies are far more likely to be effective in promoting racial and ethnic equality for most groups than are additional civil rights and affirmative action policies targeted at the workplace.
Handbook of the Economics of Education | 2006
Flavio Cunha; James J. Heckman; Lance Lochner; Dimitriy V. Masterov
Abstract This paper presents economic models of child development that capture the essence of recent findings from the empirical literature on skill formation. The goal of this essay is to provide a theoretical framework for interpreting the evidence from a vast empirical literature, for guiding the next generation of empirical studies, and for formulating policy. Central to our analysis is the concept that childhood has more than one stage. We formalize the concepts of self-productivity and complementarity of human capital investments and use them to explain the evidence on skill formation. Together, they explain why skill begets skill through a multiplier process. Skill formation is a life cycle process. It starts in the womb and goes on throughout life. Families play a role in this process that is far more important than the role of schools. There are multiple skills and multiple abilities that are important for adult success. Abilities are both inherited and created, and the traditional debate about nature versus nurture is scientifically obsolete. Human capital investment exhibits both self-productivity and complementarity. Skill attainment at one stage of the life cycle raises skill attainment at later stages of the life cycle (self-productivity). Early investment facilitates the productivity of later investment (complementarity). Early investments are not productive if they are not followed up by later investments (another aspect of complementarity). This complementarity explains why there is no equity-efficiency trade-off for early investment. The returns to investing early in the life cycle are high. Remediation of inadequate early investments is difficult and very costly as a consequence of both self-productivity and complementarity.
In: Nelson, R and Nielsen, L, (eds.) Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities. (pp. 99-136). Springer: Amsterdam. (2005) | 2005
Pedro Carneiro; James J. Heckman; Dimitriy V. Masterov
Previous studies show that controlling for ability measured in the teenage years eliminates young adult wage gaps for all groups except Black males, for whom the gap is reduced by approximately three-fourths. This suggests that disparity in skills, rather than the differential treatment of such skills in the market, produces racial and ethnic wage differentials. However, minority children and their parents may have pessimistic expectations about receiving fair rewards for their skills in the labor market and so they may invest less in skill formation. Poor schools may also depress cognitive achievement, even in the absence of any discrimination.
economics and computation | 2015
Dimitriy V. Masterov; Uwe F. Mayer; Steven Tadelis
Reputation and feedback systems in online marketplaces are often biased, making it difficult to ascertain the quality of sellers. We use post-transaction, buyer-to-seller message traffic to detect signals of unsatisfactory transactions on eBay. We posit that a message sent after the item was paid for serves as a reliable indicator that the buyer may be unhappy with that purchase, particularly when the message included words associated with a negative experience. The fraction of a sellers message traffic that was negative predicts whether a buyer who transacts with this seller will stop purchasing on eBay, implying that platforms can use these messages as an additional signal of seller quality.
National Bureau of Economic Research | 2005
Flavio Cunha; James J. Heckman; Lance Lochner; Dimitriy V. Masterov
National Bureau of Economic Research | 2007
James J. Heckman; Dimitriy V. Masterov
The National Bureau of Economic Research | 2007
James J. Heckman; Dimitriy V. Masterov
National Bureau of Economic Research | 2005
James J. Heckman; Dimitriy V. Masterov
National Bureau of Economic Research | 2015
Matthew Backus; Tom Blake; Dimitriy V. Masterov; Steven Tadelis
National Bureau of Economic Research | 2017
Matthew Backus; Thomas Blake; Dimitriy V. Masterov; Steven Tadelis