Dimitry A. Pushin
University of Waterloo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dimitry A. Pushin.
Physical Review D | 2016
Ke Li; Muhammad Arif; David G. Cory; Robert Haun; Benjamin Heacock; Michael G. Huber; J. Nsofini; Dimitry A. Pushin; Parminder Saggu; Dusan Sarenac; Chandra Shahi; Vladimir Skavysh; W. M. Snow; A. R. Young
The physical origin of the dark energy that causes the accelerated expansion rate of the universe is one of the major open questions of cosmology. One set of theories postulates the existence of a self-interacting scalar field for dark energy coupling to matter. In the chameleon dark energy theory, this coupling induces a screening mechanism such that the field amplitude is nonzero in empty space but is greatly suppressed in regions of terrestrial matter density. However measurements performed under appropriate vacuum conditions can enable the chameleon field to appear in the apparatus, where it can be subjected to laboratory experiments. Here we report the most stringent upper bound on the free neutron-chameleon coupling in the strongly-coupled limit of the chameleon theory using neutron interferometric techniques. Our experiment sought the chameleon field through the relative phase shift it would induce along one of the neutron paths inside a perfect crystal neutron interferometer. The amplitude of the chameleon field was actively modulated by varying the millibar pressures inside a dual-chamber aluminum cell. We report a 95% confidence level upper bound on
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2016
J. Ashenfelter; B. Balantekin; C. Baldenegro; H. R. Band; G. Barclay; C. D. Bass; D. Berish; N. S. Bowden; C. D. Bryan; J. J. Cherwinka; R. Chu; T. Classen; D. Davee; D. J. Dean; G. Deichert; M. J. Dolinski; Jeffrey Dolph; D. A. Dwyer; S. Fan; J. K. Gaison; A. Galindo-Uribarri; K. Gilje; A. Glenn; M. P. Green; K. Han; S. Hans; K. M. Heeger; B. Heffron; D. E. Jaffe; S. H. Kettell
Abstract Research reactors host a wide range of activities that make use of the intense neutron fluxes generated at these facilities. Recent interest in performing measurements with relatively low event rates, e.g. reactor antineutrino detection, at these facilities necessitates a detailed understanding of background radiation fields. Both reactor-correlated and naturally occurring background sources are potentially important, even at levels well below those of importance for typical activities. Here we describe a comprehensive series of background assessments at three high-power research reactors, including γ-ray, neutron, and muon measurements. For each facility we describe the characteristics and identify the sources of the background fields encountered. The general understanding gained of background production mechanisms and their relationship to facility features will prove valuable for the planning of any sensitive measurement conducted therein.
Optics Express | 2016
Dusan Sarenac; Michael G. Huber; Benjamin Heacock; Muhammad Arif; Charles W. Clark; David G. Cory; Chandra Shahi; Dimitry A. Pushin
We use a Mach-Zehnder interferometer to perform neutron holography of a spiral phase plate. The object beam passes through a spiral phase plate, acquiring the phase twist characteristic of orbital angular momentum states. The reference beam passes through a fused silica prism, acquiring a linear phase gradient. The resulting hologram is a fork dislocation image, which could be used to reconstruct neutron beams with various orbital angular momenta. This work paves the way for novel applications of neutron holography, diffraction and imaging.
Advances in High Energy Physics | 2015
Dimitry A. Pushin; Michael G. Huber; Muhammad Arif; Chandra Shahi; J. Nsofini; Christopher J. Wood; Dusan Sarenac; David G. Cory
Neutron interferometry has proved to be a very precise technique for measuring the quantum mechanical phase of a neutron caused by a potential energy difference between two spatially separated neutron paths inside interferometer. The path length inside the interferometer can be many centimeters (and many centimeters apart) making it very practical to study a variety of samples, fields, potentials, and other macroscopic medium and quantum effects. The precision of neutron interferometry comes at a cost; neutron interferometers are very susceptible to environmental noise that is typically mitigated with large, active isolated enclosures. With recent advances in quantum information processing especially quantum error correction (QEC) codes we were able to demonstrate a neutron interferometer that is insensitive to vibrational noise. A facility at NIST’s Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) has just been commissioned with higher neutron flux than the NCNR’s older interferometer setup. This new facility is based on QEC neutron interferometer, thus improving the accessibility of neutron interferometry to the greater scientific community and expanding its applications to quantum computing, gravity, and material research.
Physical Review C | 2014
Michael G. Huber; Muhammad Arif; Wangchun C. Chen; Thomas R. Gentile; Daniel S. Hussey; T. Black; Dimitry A. Pushin; Chandra Shahi; Fred E. Wietfeldt; L. Yang
We report a determination of the n-
Journal of Applied Physics | 2017
J. Nsofini; Dusan Sarenac; Kamyar Ghofrani; Michael G. Huber; Muhammad Arif; David G. Cory; Dimitry A. Pushin
^3
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2018
Benjamin Heacock; Muhammad Arif; David G. Cory; Thomas H. Gnaeupel-Herold; Robert Haun; Michael G. Huber; Michelle E. Jamer; J. Nsofini; Dimitry A. Pushin; Dusan Sarenac; Ivan Taminiau; A. R. Young
He scattering length difference
New Journal of Physics | 2018
Dusan Sarenac; J. Nsofini; Ian Hincks; Muhammad Arif; Charles W. Clark; David G. Cory; Michael G. Huber; Dimitry A. Pushin
Delta b^{prime} = b_{1}^{prime}-b_{0}^{prime} =
Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2015
W M Snow; Muhammad Arif; Benjamin Heacock; Michael G. Huber; K Li; Dimitry A. Pushin; V Skavysh; A. R. Young
(
arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors | 2013
J. Ashenfelter; A. B. Balantekin; H. R. Band; G. Barclay; C. D. Bass; N. S. Bowden; C. D. Bryan; J. J. Cherwinka; R. Chu; T. Classen; D. Davee; D. J. Dean; G. Deichert; M. V. Diwan; M. J. Dolinski; Jeffrey Dolph; D.A. Dwyer; Y. V. Efremenko; S. Fan; A. Galindo-Uribarri; K. Gilje; A. Glenn; M. P. Green; K. Han; S. Hans; Karsten M. Heeger; B. Heffron; L. Hu; Patrick Huber; D.E. Jaffe
-5.411