Dina A. Kulikova

Cerd4, third member of the d4 gene family: expression and organization of genomic locus

Abstract. Two members of the d4 family of presumptive transcription modulators, neuro-d4 (Neud4) and ubi-d4/Requiem (Req), have been characterized previously. We cloned and characterized the third member of this gene family, cer-d4 (Cerd4), from chicken and mouse cDNA libraries. The expression patterns of Cerd4 gene in both species are similar and more restricted than expression patterns of other two d4 genes. The main sites of Cerd4 expression are retina and cerebellum, where multiple transcripts could be detected. Two major types of Cerd4 proteins are a full-length isoform possessing all domains characteristic to the d4 family and truncated XZ isoform without C-terminal tandem of PHD fingers. The developmental kinetics of expression of these isoforms is different. The intron/exon structure of human Cerd4 gene is similar to that of neuro-d4 and ubi-d4/Requiem genes, but most introns of Cerd4 gene are much larger than the corresponding introns of the other two genes.

Structure and expression of two members of the d4 gene family in mouse

The d4 family is a group of unique, evolutionarily conserved zinc finger proteins that are involved in the determination of cell fate. The first member of the d4 family, neuro-d4, was cloned as a neurospecific, developmentally regulated rat gene (Buchman et al. 1992). Multiple neuro-d4 mRNAs generated by alternative splicing give rise to a set of structurally unique proteins. The most characteristic feature of these proteins is a cysteine/histidine-rich C-terminal d4-domain, a double-paired finger motif that consists of two tandemly arranged PHD finger domains. PHD fingers (Cx2CxnCx2Cx4Hx2CxnCx2C) have some structural similarity to the LIM domain and RING fingers and are hallmarks of many transcription co-activators/repressors (Aasland et al. 1995; Saha et al. 1995). A single Kru¨ppel-type zinc finger was found in the N-terminal part of the neuro-d4 protein molecule, but some neurod4 proteins lack this finger along with a nuclear localization signal and a stretch of negatively charged amino acids. Studies of the gene structure and expression suggested that the neuro-d4 proteins are neurospecific nuclear factors, although some of these proteins could have cytoplasmic function(s) (Buchman et al. 1992).

Generation of mutant mice with targeted disruption of two members of the d4 gene family: neuro-d4 and cer-d4.

65 † To determine the function of genes of the d 4 family and their role in the ontogeny of mammals, we performed targeted inactivation of three genes of this family ( neuro d 4, ubi-d 4/ Requiem , and cer-d 4) in mice. Earlier, we characterized the structural organization of all three genes of the d 4 family in the mouse, studied their temporal and tissue-specific expression and cloned the DNA fragments overlapping the three loci studied [1, 2]. Information on the structure and expression of the genes made it possible to develop the optimal strategy of their inactivation. To date, we managed to obtain mutant mouse lines with disrupted loci of two genes of the family, neuro-d 4 and cer d 4. No pronounced phenotypic manifestations of this mutation have been observed. In further studies, we plan to investigate the phenotypes of these mutant mouse lines in greater detail.

Expression pattern of dd4, a sole member of the d4 family of transcription factors in Drosophila melanogaster.

In vertebrates, three members of the d4 gene family code for proteins, which are believed to function as transcription factors and involved in regulation of various intracellular processes. One member of the family, ubi-d4/requiem is ubiquitously expressed gene and two other, neuro-d4 and cer-d4, are expressed predominantly in the neural tissues (Nucleic Acids Res. 20 (1992) 5579; Biochim. Biophys. Acta 14 (1992) 172; Mamm. Genome 11 (2000) 72; Mamm. Genome 12 (2001) 862). Typically, d4 proteins show distinct domain organisation with domain 2/3 in the N-terminal, Krüppel-type zinc finger in the central and two adjacent PHD-fingers (d4-domain) in the C-terminal part of the molecule. However, alternative splicing, which is responsible for complex expression patterns of both neurospecific members of the family, generates multiple protein isoforms lacking certain domains (Nucleic Acids Res. 20 (1992) 5579; Genomics 36 (1996) 174; Mamm. Genome 11 (2000) 72; Mamm. Genome 12 (2001) 862). Exact function of d4 proteins is unclear but their involvement in regulation of differentiation and apoptotic cell death has been proposed (J. Biol. Chem. 269 (1994) 29515; Mamm. Genome 11 (2000) 72; Mamm. Genome 12 (2001) 862). Here we identified a single gene, dd4, in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster, the protein product of which could be assigned to the d4 family. Expression of dd4 is regulated during Drosophila development, and is most prominent in syncytial embryos and later in the embryonic nervous and reproductive systems. In flies dd4 mRNA is found in most tissues but the highest level of expression is detected in ovaries.

Analysis of the overexpression of a newly found gene toothrin in Drosophila

A newly found locus of the Drosophila melanogaster genome, named toothrin (tth) has been used to study the role of the conserved the 2/3 domain of genes from the d4 family. In contrast to all vertebrates studied (including humans), in which the 2/3 domain is always accompanied by the d4 domain, the tth gene contains the sequence encoding the 2/3 domain but lacks that encoding the d4 domain. The tth gene overexpression has been studied using the two-component system UAS-GAL4. It has been demonstrated that the tth overexpression at the third-instar larval (prepupal) stage decreases survival rate, simultaneously causing a substantial deceleration of development in Drosophila. It is known that the change of developmental stages in Drosophila is controlled by the rates of the expression of ecdysteroid and juvenile hormones (JHs). It is supposed that the overexpression of the tth gene causes either a shift in the ecdysterone-to-JH ratio (through a decreased JH decay rate or a delayed initiation of ecdysone synthesis) or a deceleration of the release of ecdysterones synthesized.

Spontaneous gain of susceptibility suggests a novel mechanism of resistance to hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila virilis

Syndromes of hybrid dysgenesis (HD) have been critical for our understanding of the transgenerational maintenance of genome stability by piRNA. HD in D. virilis represents a special case of HD since it includes simultaneous mobilization of a set of TEs that belong to different classes. The standard explanation for HD is that eggs of the responder strains lack an abundant pool of piRNAs corresponding to the asymmetric TE families transmitted solely by sperm. However, there are several strains of D. virilis that lack asymmetric TEs, but exhibit a “neutral” cytotype that confers resistance to HD. To characterize the mechanism of resistance to HD, we performed a comparative analysis of the landscape of ovarian small RNAs in strains that vary in their resistance to HD mediated sterility. We demonstrate that resistance to HD cannot be solely explained by a maternal piRNA pool that matches the assemblage of TEs that likely cause HD. In support of this, we have witnessed a cytotype shift from neutral (N) to susceptible (M) in a strain devoid of all major TEs implicated in HD. This shift occurred in the absence of significant change in TE copy number and expression of piRNAs homologous to asymmetric TEs. Instead, this shift is associated with a change in the chromatin profile of repeat sequences unlikely to be causative of paternal induction. Overall, our data suggest that resistance to TE-mediated sterility during HD may be achieved by mechanisms that are distinct from the canonical syndromes of HD.

Drosophila Model for the Analysis of Genesis of LIM-kinase 1-Dependent Williams-Beuren Syndrome Cognitive Phenotypes: INDELs, Transposable Elements of the Tc1/Mariner Superfamily and MicroRNAs

Genomic disorders, the syndromes with multiple manifestations, may occur sporadically due to unequal recombination in chromosomal regions with specific architecture. Therefore, each patient may carry an individual structural variant of DNA sequence (SV) with small insertions and deletions (INDELs) sometimes less than 10 bp. The transposable elements of the Tc1/mariner superfamily are often associated with hotspots for homologous recombination involved in human genetic disorders, such as Williams Beuren Syndromes (WBS) with LIM-kinase 1-dependent cognitive defects. The Drosophila melanogaster mutant agnts3 has unusual architecture of the agnostic locus harboring LIMK1: it is a hotspot of chromosome breaks, ectopic contacts, underreplication, and recombination. Here, we present the analysis of LIMK1-containing locus sequencing data in agnts3 and three D. melanogaster wild-type strains—Canton-S, Berlin, and Oregon-R. We found multiple strain-specific SVs, namely, single base changes and small INDEls. The specific feature of agnts3 is 28 bp A/T-rich insertion in intron 1 of LIMK1 and the insertion of mobile S-element from Tc1/mariner superfamily residing ~460 bp downstream LIMK1 3′UTR. Neither of SVs leads to amino acid substitutions in agnts3 LIMK1. However, they apparently affect the nucleosome distribution, non-canonical DNA structure formation and transcriptional factors binding. Interestingly, the overall expression of miRNAs including the biomarkers for human neurological diseases, is drastically reduced in agnts3 relative to the wild-type strains. Thus, LIMK1 DNA structure per se, as well as the pronounced changes in total miRNAs profile, probably lead to LIMK1 dysregulation and complex behavioral dysfunctions observed in agnts3 making this mutant a simple plausible Drosophila model for WBS.

d4 Family Genes: Genomic Organization and Expression

A family of closely related genes, named the d4 family, has been previously identified in mammals. It comprises three genes encoding structurally related proteins. The hallmark of the family is D4 domain—a double-paired finger motif that consists of two tandemly arranged PHD finger domains. These genes are expressed in various tissues and at various developmental stages. Two of those, neuro-d4 and cer-d4, are strictly neurospecific and their expression is developmentally regulated. Another gene, ubi-d4/Requiem is ubiquitously expressed in all embryonic and adult tissues at the same levels. d4 family genes are evolutionary conserved. Human, mouse, rat, and chicken d4 genes have been cloned. The only d4-like gene was found in the genome of nematode C. elegans and hydra H. magnipapillata. The sole member of d4 family was identified also in the genome of D. melanogaster. However, d4 genes are not believed to be present in the genomes of prokaryotes and yeast. This review describes genomic organization and expression of d4 family genes in vertebrates.